⏳ LAUNCH PRICING — 77% OFF · Professional £9/mo (was £39) Only 74 days left Lock in launch rate →
← Authority Intelligence

🕵️ Case Officer Intelligence

Go beyond authority-level data. Understand individual case officer behaviour — approval rates, decision speed, refusal patterns, and what they focus on. Intelligence your competitors don't have.

🔒 PlanningCore Exclusive — Deep Officer Behaviour Analytics

🧠 Gateshead Council — refusal-language fingerprint

Full pattern browser →
Refusal themes
design · 44×
highways · 35×
heritage · 23×
green belt · 16×
policy · 9×
ecology · 7×
Top policies cited
Policy CS13 · 18×
Policy CS19 · 16×
Policy CS15 · 13×
Policy CS14 · 12×
Policy MSGP24 · 11×
Policy MSGP15 · 8×
Top reused phrases
"character and appearance of" · 73×
"the character and appearance" · 66×
"national planning policy framework" · 36×
"the national planning policy" · 31×
"the national planning policy framework" · 30×
"appearance of the area" · 29×
📋 Gateshead Council uses a structured scoring template
3 formal recommendation options per Urban Design / Consultee response:
  • Refuse
  • Approve
Criteria checklist the officer scores against:
MSGP34 · CS19 · CS15 · MSGP25 · MSGP26 · MSGP24 · CS18 · MSGP37 · MSGP15 · CS16 · CS17 · MSGP29 · MSGP30 · H4 ·
→ Address each criterion explicitly in your Planning Statement / DAS to pre-empt refusal grounds.
← Back to Officer List
⚠️ Data limitations on this profile. Only 2 decisions on record for this officer at Gateshead Council — not enough to draw firm conclusions. Take any stats below as indicative only.

Known data gaps: our Idox scrape covers Gateshead, Sunderland, and Northumberland from late 2023 onwards. Newcastle Upon Tyne data is NOT in our corpus (the council's planning portal blocks IONOS shared-hosting IPs). If you're looking for a Newcastle case officer, their decisions won't appear here even if the officer name matches.

🕵️ David Morton · Gateshead Council

2
Total Decisions
100%
Approval Rate
64 days
Avg. Decision Time
0
Refusals
May 2026
Earliest Decision
May 2026
Latest Decision

📊 Application Type Breakdown

Application Type Total Approved Refused Other Approval Rate
Unknown 2 2 0 0
100%

⏱️ Decision Speed Distribution

0
Under 4 weeks
0
4–8 weeks
2
8–13 weeks
0
13–26 weeks
0
Over 26 weeks

📋 Decision History (2 most recent)

Reference Address Type Decision Date Days
24/00935/DOC9 Land Between Queen Victoria Street Allotments And Wynn Gardens Felling Approved 08 May 2026 64
24/00935/DOC10 Land Between Queen Victoria Street Allotments And Wynn Gardens Felling Approved 08 May 2026 62

🧠 Strategy Insight

This officer has a high approval rate (100%). They appear to be generally supportive of development. Focus on ensuring your application is policy-compliant and well-presented — straightforward applications should progress smoothly.

What Makes This Different

📊 Officer Approval Rates

See each officer's personal approval rate, not just the authority average. Know whether your officer approves 95% or 65% of applications.

PlanningCore Exclusive

⏱️ Decision Speed Profile

Average days to decision per officer. Know if your officer is fast (under 8 weeks) or chronically slow — and plan your timeline accordingly.

Officer-level granularity

🚫 Refusal Pattern Analysis

What does this officer refuse on most? Design? Highways? Amenity? Heritage? Know their focus areas and address them proactively.

Deep refusal analytics

⚖️ Appeal Overturn Rate

How often are this officer's refusals overturned on appeal? A high overturn rate suggests the officer is too strict — useful for your appeal strategy.

Appeal data linked to officers

🏛️ Committee vs Delegated Split

Does this officer usually decide under delegated powers, or do their cases end up at committee? Different preparation needed for each route.

Committee/delegated tracking

🧠 Strategic Advice

Based on the officer's patterns, get tailored advice: what to emphasise in your planning statement, what issues to pre-empt, and how to frame your scheme.

AI-powered strategy layer

📡 Data Pipeline

Officer intelligence is generated from planning application decision data. As more authorities are ingested into PlanningCore, officer profiles become richer and more accurate.

📊 Data sources & freshness
  • planning_applications.case_officer (updated Daily ingest)
    Live ingest from LPA portals (Idox + Civica + Northgate). Coverage varies by council — leading LPAs publish on every record, others publish only on committee reports.
  • Approval rate calculation
    approvals / (approvals + refusals) per officer. Withdrawn and pending applications are excluded.
  • Date window
    Stats reflect the entire decision history for the officer, not a rolling window. Recent volume changes can shift the averages.
Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me