💡 Officer Intelligence works best inside your planning journey — open or create your case there and your documents and site data fill this in for you.

🕵️ Case Officer Intelligence

Go beyond authority-level data. Understand individual case officer behaviour — approval rates, decision speed, refusal patterns, and what they focus on. Intelligence your competitors don't have.

🔒 PlanningCore Exclusive — Deep Officer Behaviour Analytics

← Back to Officer List

⚠️ Data limitations on this profile. Only 9 decisions on record for this officer at Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council — not enough to draw firm conclusions. Take any stats below as indicative only.

Known data gaps: our Idox scrape covers Gateshead, Sunderland, and Northumberland from late 2023 onwards. Newcastle Upon Tyne data is NOT in our corpus (the council's planning portal blocks IONOS shared-hosting IPs). If you're looking for a Newcastle case officer, their decisions won't appear here even if the officer name matches.

🕵️ Celyn Hanks · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council

Total Decisions

100%

Approval Rate

0 days

Avg. Decision Time

Refusals

—

Earliest Decision

—

Latest Decision

📊 Application Type Breakdown

Application Type	Total	Approved	Refused	Other	Approval Rate
Unknown	9	9	0	0	100%

⏱️ Decision Speed Distribution

Under 4 weeks

4–8 weeks

8–13 weeks

13–26 weeks

Over 26 weeks

📋 Decision History (9 most recent)

Reference	Address	Type	Decision	Date	Days
Application No. P/26/04199/HOU	Proposal/Description Increase in roof height and shape, changes to front facade, rear balcony at first floor and internal alterations	—	Approved	—	—
Application No. P/26/04209/PNHH	Location 300 Wimborne Road Poole BH15 3EG	—	Approved	—	—
Application No. P/26/04105/BNG	Location 57 Seliot Close Poole BH15 2HQ	—	Approved	—	—
Application No. P/26/04033/PNHH	Location 76 North Road Poole BH14 0LZ	—	Approved	—	—
Application No. P/26/03415/HOU	Proposal/Description Alterations at ground floor front entrance by the erection of new brick support pier and extend garage under existing covered area.	—	Approved	—	—
Application No. P/26/03276/CLP	Proposal/Description Lawful development certificate for proposed single-storey rear extension to replace an existing conservatory, and add on to an existing rear extension.	—	Approved	—	—
Application No. P/26/01192/HOU	Proposal/Description Ground floor rear extension, first floor rear extension with Juliet balcony, demolition of garage and installation of raised patio and flue	—	Approved	—	—
Application No. P/26/03139/HOU	Proposal/Description Single storey rear and side extension. Fenestration alterations, new open porch, and removal of chimney.	—	Approved	—	—
Application No. P/26/03180/PNHH	Location 5 Gardens Crescent Poole BH14 8JE	—	Approved	—	—

🧠 Strategy Insight

This officer has a high approval rate (100%). They appear to be generally supportive of development. Focus on ensuring your application is policy-compliant and well-presented — straightforward applications should progress smoothly.

What Makes This Different

📊 Officer Approval Rates

See each officer's personal approval rate, not just the authority average. Know whether your officer approves 95% or 65% of applications.

PlanningCore Exclusive

⏱️ Decision Speed Profile

Average days to decision per officer. Know if your officer is fast (under 8 weeks) or chronically slow — and plan your timeline accordingly.

Officer-level granularity

🚫 Refusal Pattern Analysis

What does this officer refuse on most? Design? Highways? Amenity? Heritage? Know their focus areas and address them proactively.

Deep refusal analytics

⚖️ Appeal Overturn Rate

How often are this officer's refusals overturned on appeal? A high overturn rate suggests the officer is too strict — useful for your appeal strategy.

Appeal data linked to officers

🏛️ Committee vs Delegated Split

Does this officer usually decide under delegated powers, or do their cases end up at committee? Different preparation needed for each route.

Committee/delegated tracking

🧠 Strategic Advice

Based on the officer's patterns, get tailored advice: what to emphasise in your planning statement, what issues to pre-empt, and how to frame your scheme.

AI-powered strategy layer

📡 Data Pipeline

Officer intelligence is generated from planning application decision data. As more authorities are ingested into PlanningCore, officer profiles become richer and more accurate.

📊 Data sources & freshness

planning_applications.case_officer (updated Daily ingest)
Live ingest from LPA portals (Idox + Civica + Northgate). Coverage varies by council — leading LPAs publish on every record, others publish only on committee reports.
Approval rate calculation
approvals / (approvals + refusals) per officer. Withdrawn and pending applications are excluded.
Date window
Stats reflect the entire decision history for the officer, not a rolling window. Recent volume changes can shift the averages.

About this tool: Case Officer Intelligence

Individual case officer profiling — approval rates, decision speed, refusal patterns, appeal overturn rates, and tailored submission strategy advice.

When to use it

Use when you know which officer is assigned to your case, or to research officer behaviour in an authority before submitting. Deep officer behaviour analytics exclusive to PlanningCore.

Policy and guidance it draws on

Data-driven analysis of individual officer decision patterns

Part of Authority Intelligence

Use these tools to understand how your Local Planning Authority behaves — what they approve, what they refuse, how often appeals succeed, and what strategy gives you the best chance. This is behavioural intelligence, not just policy research.

Guidance to help you prepare — not formal planning advice. Check the current policy text and your council's local plan before relying on it.