📍 Assess for:
Log in to link to a project
← ⚖️ Appeal Intelligence
← Back to Appeal Intelligence module
🔍 Objection Analysis Engine
Paste objection letters or neighbour comments. The engine extracts themes, classifies material vs non-material planning considerations, and shows the NPPF/case-law backed rebuttal for each — visible up-front, ready to drop into your response.
⚖️ The first rule:
Under s.70(2) TCPA 1990 + s.38(6) PCPA 2004, decisions are made on the development plan + material considerations only. Loss of view (Stovin v Wise), property value (Stringer v MHLG), competition (Tesco v SSE), and "precedent" (Carlisle CC v SoS) are NOT material — the LPA cannot refuse on them. Spot the non-material limbs and set them aside; spend your energy on the material ones.
🎯 Pre-empt these objections at National (all LPAs in our corpus)
Real objection themes + statutory consultees mined from PINS appeal text for this scope. Address these in your planning statement before objections land — most objections are predictable, the rebuttals are universal.
📊 Top objection themes — mentioned in real appeals
🏘️ Character of the area (59×)
🎯 69.5% win
🌊 Flooding / drainage (9×)
STATUTORY
🎯 44.4% win
🌳 Wildlife / trees (8×)
🎯 50% win
🚦 Highway safety / access (6×)
STATUTORY
🎯 50% win
🪟 Overlooking / privacy (5×)
🎯 60% win
🔊 Noise / disturbance (4×)
🎯 75% win
☀️ Loss of light / sunlight (2×)
🏠 Residential amenity (2×)
🏛️ Statutory consultees most-mentioned — engage these pre-app
Parish Council (46× mentions)
Highway Authority (42× mentions)
Public Rights of Way (29× mentions)
Natural England (27× mentions)
Environment Agency (21× mentions)
Historic England (12× mentions)
Typical objection volume at this scope:
100+: 2×
51-100: 1×
6-20: 2×
1-5: 1×
Tip: You can paste multiple objections — separate them with a blank line. The analyser will identify individual points within each.
Theme Breakdown
→ Next steps
📊 Data sources & freshness
Read the pre-emption section before submission. Paste actual objection text once consultation responses come in. Both surfaces show NPPF/case-law backed rebuttals up-front — no clicks.
- objection_patterns (mined nightly) ↗ (updated Mined daily via cron)
Third-party objection language mined from PINS appeal text via mine_objection_patterns.php. Themes + consultees + volume buckets for the chosen LPA. - Rebuttal content
NPPF + case-law backed counter-arguments per objection theme. Universal across LPAs — the law doesn't change, only the mix of objections does. - Material vs non-material classification
Follows s.70(2) TCPA 1990 + s.38(6) PCPA 2004 + Stovin v Wise (loss of view), Stringer v MHLG (property value), Tesco v SSE (competition), Carlisle CC v SoS (precedent).