← All authorities

Lake District National Park

National Parks · E26000011 · 141 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
722
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
11.2%
higher than 46% of authorities
Majors in time
71.4%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
76.4%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
88.3%
no formal threshold
Delegated
89.2%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
27.1%
38 allowed of 140 decided
Decisions overturned
0.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 19.5%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
837
in the window
Applications decided
722
in the window
Approval rate
88.8%
641 granted, 81 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 6 of 9 national park authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 9.0%
Decided within time
81.6%
rank 257 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 6 of 9 national park authorities · peer median 87.4%

Peer ranks compare only national park authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major1283.3%71.4%
Minor29785.2%76.4%
Other41391.5%—
of which householder27093.7%88.3%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01282552024 Q3: 252 received2024 Q3: 208 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 255 received2024 Q4: 197 decided2025 Q1: 242 received2025 Q1: 201 decided2025 Q2: 243 received2025 Q2: 194 decided2025 Q3: 198 received2025 Q3: 186 decided2025 Q4: 222 received2025 Q4: 214 decided2026 Q1: 216 received2026 Q1: 159 decided2026 Q2: 201 received2026 Q2: 163 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test

Not measured for this authority in the latest HDT release (county-matter, national park or recently merged authorities are not all listed).

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E26000011). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (141 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (141 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLGnot measured for this authority18 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 163 141 22 13.5% 75.0% 70.3% 201
2026 Q1 159 135 24 15.1% 100.0% 69.8% 216
2025 Q4 214 198 16 7.5% 0.0% 83.3% 222
2025 Q3 186 167 19 10.2% 100.0% 79.6% 198
2025 Q2 194 178 16 8.2% — 83.7% 243
2025 Q1 201 183 18 9.0% — 80.0% 242
2024 Q4 197 184 13 6.6% 50.0% 82.1% 255
2024 Q3 208 195 13 6.3% 0.0% 74.1% 252
2024 Q2 201 173 28 13.9% 100.0% 75.0% 229
2024 Q1 238 203 35 14.7% 100.0% 83.3% 273
2023 Q4 247 224 23 9.3% 100.0% 80.7% 303
2023 Q3 208 191 17 8.2% — 73.7% 246
2023 Q2 207 186 21 10.1% 100.0% 85.9% 264
2023 Q1 227 203 24 10.6% 100.0% 95.2% 290
2022 Q4 302 280 22 7.3% 66.7% 74.6% 270
2022 Q3 255 245 10 3.9% 100.0% 64.8% 277
2022 Q2 247 236 11 4.5% 100.0% 42.6% 302
2022 Q1 269 250 19 7.1% 66.7% 21.1% 299
2021 Q4 276 250 26 9.4% 100.0% 47.4% 379
2021 Q3 288 269 19 6.6% 100.0% 67.6% 381
2021 Q2 290 264 26 9.0% 75.0% 76.8% 367
2021 Q1 267 244 23 8.6% 100.0% 95.8% 387
2020 Q4 272 219 53 19.5% 75.0% 87.0% 332
2020 Q3 283 230 53 18.7% 66.7% 68.0% 272
2020 Q2 198 182 16 8.1% 100.0% 77.8% 255
2020 Q1 240 215 25 10.4% 100.0% 80.6% 302
2019 Q4 273 248 25 9.2% 100.0% 84.0% 271
2019 Q3 262 246 16 6.1% 100.0% 81.4% 331
2019 Q2 278 261 17 6.1% 100.0% 80.4% 275
2019 Q1 250 238 12 4.8% 66.7% 83.3% 324
2018 Q4 245 227 18 7.3% 100.0% 86.1% 326
2018 Q3 257 248 9 3.5% 80.0% 78.5% 287
2018 Q2 242 227 15 6.2% 100.0% 69.7% 293
2018 Q1 242 225 17 7.0% 100.0% 72.3% 296
2017 Q4 292 268 24 8.2% 66.7% 88.3% 326
2017 Q3 243 231 12 4.9% 0.0% 84.6% 322
2017 Q2 266 253 13 4.9% 85.7% 83.3% 254
2017 Q1 293 275 18 6.1% 80.0% 82.3% 315
2016 Q4 270 242 28 10.4% 100.0% 79.1% 328
2016 Q3 285 253 32 11.2% 100.0% 76.4% 301
2016 Q2 256 236 20 7.8% 60.0% 66.9% 291
2016 Q1 243 220 23 9.5% 100.0% 73.3% 274
2015 Q4 296 270 26 8.8% 100.0% 75.3% 280
2015 Q3 275 259 16 5.8% 75.0% 66.4% 292
2015 Q2 235 214 21 8.9% 80.0% 63.7% 286
2015 Q1 228 217 11 4.8% 72.7% 68.3% 267
2014 Q4 312 288 24 7.7% 60.0% 71.6% 265
2014 Q3 309 291 18 5.8% 66.7% 79.6% 318
2014 Q2 232 226 6 2.6% 100.0% 75.7% 317
2014 Q1 233 207 26 11.2% 80.0% 69.0% 249
2013 Q4 256 234 22 8.6% 66.7% 68.6% 250
2013 Q3 261 237 24 9.2% 50.0% 71.8% 277
2013 Q2 208 196 12 5.8% 50.0% 73.7% 266
2013 Q1 202 186 16 7.9% 75.0% 70.4% 232
2012 Q4 216 200 16 7.4% 80.0% 72.2% 225
2012 Q3 233 220 13 5.6% 100.0% 80.2% 227
2012 Q2 214 196 18 8.4% 37.5% 65.1% 238
2012 Q1 236 214 22 9.3% 50.0% 76.9% 245
2011 Q4 298 280 17 5.7% 71.4% 67.4% 265
2011 Q3 265 248 14 5.3% 50.0% 56.6% 323
2011 Q2 254 236 18 7.1% 37.5% 62.6% 310
2011 Q1 241 213 22 9.1% 66.7% 65.2% 273
2010 Q4 247 227 20 8.1% 66.7% 65.5% 276
2010 Q3 277 258 18 6.5% — 74.1% 268
2010 Q2 232 210 19 8.2% 33.3% 61.0% 260
2010 Q1 227 208 16 7.0% 85.7% 64.5% 292
2009 Q4 227 208 18 7.9% 100.0% 68.0% 248
2009 Q3 256 233 21 8.2% 66.7% 64.9% 276
2009 Q2 214 196 18 8.4% 100.0% 74.6% 264
2009 Q1 188 180 7 3.7% 50.0% 55.0% 227
2008 Q4 232 208 19 8.2% 100.0% 72.5% 223
2008 Q3 227 205 18 7.9% 66.7% 61.4% 257
2008 Q2 243 221 20 8.2% 33.3% 75.7% 264
1996 Q1 130 119 11 8.5% 100.0% 70.5% —
1995 Q4 126 116 10 7.9% 85.7% 76.0% —
1995 Q3 225 212 13 5.8% 94.1% 58.8% —
1995 Q2 166 158 8 4.8% 87.5% 61.1% —
1995 Q1 175 158 17 9.7% 61.9% 51.4% —
1994 Q4 155 143 12 7.7% 81.3% 56.9% —
1994 Q3 220 202 18 8.2% 81.8% 65.3% —
1994 Q2 185 171 14 7.6% 82.4% 54.2% —
1994 Q1 174 158 16 9.2% 75.0% 55.6% —
1993 Q4 228 212 16 7.0% 70.0% 57.7% —
1993 Q3 206 202 4 1.9% 47.1% 37.7% —
1993 Q2 184 168 16 8.7% 57.1% 31.1% —
1993 Q1 158 150 8 5.1% 75.0% 38.8% —
1992 Q4 236 221 15 6.4% 75.0% 62.5% —
1992 Q3 181 168 13 7.2% 77.8% 38.3% —
1992 Q2 163 155 8 4.9% 60.0% 33.9% —
1992 Q1 185 174 11 5.9% 75.0% 33.3% —
1991 Q4 174 161 13 7.5% 37.5% 48.4% —
1991 Q3 225 73 152 67.6% 76.9% 31.3% —
1991 Q2 232 224 8 3.4% 50.0% 51.8% —
1991 Q1 143 71 72 50.3% 33.3% 34.9% —
1990 Q4 196 179 17 8.7% 25.0% 30.2% —
1990 Q3 225 210 15 6.7% 66.7% 36.8% —
1990 Q2 248 218 30 12.1% 85.7% 46.8% —
1990 Q1 229 202 27 11.8% 69.2% 39.3% —
1989 Q4 210 185 25 11.9% 66.7% 36.7% —
1989 Q3 148 135 13 8.8% 100.0% 30.3% —
1989 Q2 171 155 16 9.4% 83.3% 60.8% —
1989 Q1 163 146 17 10.4% 100.0% 53.3% —
1988 Q4 153 129 24 15.7% 88.9% 28.2% —
1988 Q3 148 135 13 8.8% 100.0% 30.3% —
1988 Q2 172 159 13 7.6% 87.5% 44.4% —
1988 Q1 143 136 7 4.9% 50.0% 36.6% —
1987 Q4 138 130 8 5.8% 84.6% 30.3% —
1987 Q3 180 165 15 8.3% 85.7% 36.2% —
1987 Q2 156 144 12 7.7% 87.5% 46.3% —
1987 Q1 127 122 5 3.9% 50.0% 36.1% —
1986 Q4 136 128 8 5.9% 84.6% 30.3% —
1986 Q3 173 116 57 32.9% 90.0% 53.6% —
1986 Q2 171 81 90 52.6% 66.7% 25.0% —
1986 Q1 110 100 10 9.1% 44.4% 46.7% —
1985 Q4 153 144 9 5.9% 33.3% 20.5% —
1985 Q3 141 129 12 8.5% 60.0% 16.1% —
1985 Q2 151 141 10 6.6% 77.8% 36.0% —
1985 Q1 142 131 11 7.7% 83.3% 48.9% —
1984 Q4 172 159 13 7.6% 62.5% 18.2% —
1984 Q3 120 115 5 4.2% 55.6% 20.0% —
1984 Q2 198 182 16 8.1% 84.6% 70.4% —
1984 Q1 142 134 8 5.6% 81.3% 64.3% —
1983 Q4 151 142 9 6.0% 100.0% 32.0% —
1983 Q3 170 148 22 12.9% 72.7% 47.1% —
1983 Q2 148 133 15 10.1% 100.0% 64.1% —
1983 Q1 99 88 11 11.1% 100.0% 49.2% —
1982 Q4 141 128 13 9.2% — 79.5% —
1982 Q3 182 169 13 7.1% 75.0% 62.5% —
1982 Q2 135 126 9 6.7% 50.0% 66.7% —
1982 Q1 94 82 12 12.8% 50.0% 28.6% —
1981 Q4 77 71 6 7.8% 100.0% 25.9% —
1981 Q3 184 168 16 8.7% 100.0% 51.8% —
1981 Q2 193 177 16 8.3% — 61.4% —
1981 Q1 214 188 26 12.1% 42.9% 45.2% —
1980 Q4 173 151 22 12.7% 42.9% 48.8% —
1980 Q3 155 143 12 7.7% 66.7% 56.8% —
1980 Q2 361 317 44 12.2% 33.3% 55.2% —
1980 Q1 221 202 19 8.6% 50.0% 60.0% —
1979 Q4 210 190 20 9.5% 66.7% 67.4% —
1979 Q3 378 354 24 6.3% 40.0% 61.2% —
1979 Q2 280 258 22 7.9% 77.8% 82.4% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me