← All authorities

North York Moors National Park

National Parks · E26000005 · 141 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
418
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
3.8%
higher than 3% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
73.3%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
89.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
94.3%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
29.9%
20 allowed of 67 decided
Decisions overturned
0.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 10.6%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
436
in the window
Applications decided
418
in the window
Approval rate
96.2%
402 granted, 16 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 2 of 9 national park authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 9.0%
Decided within time
80.8%
rank 259 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 7 of 9 national park authorities · peer median 87.4%

Peer ranks compare only national park authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major785.7%100.0%
Minor11694.0%73.3%
Other29597.3%—
of which householder14797.3%89.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0721432024 Q3: 129 received2024 Q3: 141 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 111 received2024 Q4: 122 decided2025 Q1: 143 received2025 Q1: 120 decided2025 Q2: 125 received2025 Q2: 126 decided2025 Q3: 102 received2025 Q3: 95 decided2025 Q4: 98 received2025 Q4: 121 decided2026 Q1: 118 received2026 Q1: 85 decided2026 Q2: 118 received2026 Q2: 117 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test

Not measured for this authority in the latest HDT release (county-matter, national park or recently merged authorities are not all listed).

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E26000005). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (141 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (141 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLGnot measured for this authority18 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 117 116 1 0.9% 100.0% 75.0% 118
2026 Q1 85 83 2 2.4% — 72.2% 118
2025 Q4 121 116 5 4.1% 100.0% 85.7% 98
2025 Q3 95 87 8 8.4% — 63.0% 102
2025 Q2 126 122 4 3.2% 50.0% 78.1% 125
2025 Q1 120 111 9 7.5% — 82.6% 143
2024 Q4 122 115 7 5.7% 100.0% 75.7% 111
2024 Q3 141 136 5 3.5% — 83.9% 129
2024 Q2 120 109 11 9.2% 66.7% 57.1% 137
2024 Q1 142 127 15 10.6% — 82.9% 135
2023 Q4 115 104 11 9.6% 100.0% 89.3% 126
2023 Q3 138 129 9 6.5% — 68.0% 143
2023 Q2 100 94 6 6.0% — 90.9% 124
2023 Q1 115 112 3 2.6% 100.0% 84.2% 129
2022 Q4 112 106 6 5.4% 100.0% 87.5% 121
2022 Q3 129 122 7 5.4% 100.0% 79.2% 123
2022 Q2 140 132 8 5.7% 0.0% 89.7% 137
2022 Q1 128 119 9 7.0% 50.0% 76.9% 145
2021 Q4 155 145 10 6.5% 83.3% 71.1% 161
2021 Q3 148 141 7 4.7% — 68.6% 159
2021 Q2 150 139 11 7.3% — 74.4% 152
2021 Q1 127 120 7 5.5% 100.0% 77.4% 153
2020 Q4 165 155 10 6.1% 100.0% 86.3% 154
2020 Q3 142 135 7 4.9% 50.0% 76.0% 168
2020 Q2 135 129 6 4.4% — 63.0% 136
2020 Q1 113 107 6 5.3% — 92.0% 132
2019 Q4 120 110 10 8.3% 100.0% 85.7% 124
2019 Q3 151 142 9 6.0% 66.7% 68.3% 132
2019 Q2 132 125 7 5.3% 50.0% 75.6% 147
2019 Q1 104 98 6 5.8% 0.0% 85.7% 142
2018 Q4 158 146 12 7.6% — 71.1% 128
2018 Q3 128 124 4 3.1% 100.0% 78.1% 131
2018 Q2 123 117 6 4.9% 100.0% 75.0% 156
2018 Q1 106 102 4 3.8% — 74.2% 121
2017 Q4 133 129 4 3.0% 100.0% 66.7% 118
2017 Q3 124 112 12 9.7% 50.0% 73.8% 141
2017 Q2 134 131 3 2.2% 100.0% 74.4% 132
2017 Q1 114 104 10 8.8% 100.0% 73.3% 147
2016 Q4 139 132 7 5.0% 100.0% 79.5% 127
2016 Q3 150 142 8 5.3% 100.0% 80.0% 148
2016 Q2 137 127 10 7.3% — 66.7% 149
2016 Q1 118 112 6 5.1% 50.0% 80.5% 128
2015 Q4 133 124 9 6.8% 100.0% 77.6% 151
2015 Q3 140 125 15 10.7% 66.7% 77.8% 136
2015 Q2 127 120 7 5.5% — 83.3% 125
2015 Q1 131 121 10 7.6% — 77.4% 152
2014 Q4 126 115 11 8.7% 33.3% 73.6% 126
2014 Q3 145 134 11 7.6% 25.0% 68.8% 133
2014 Q2 148 139 9 6.1% 0.0% 84.1% 148
2014 Q1 118 102 11 9.3% 100.0% 78.9% 148
2013 Q4 152 143 7 4.6% 100.0% 81.5% 136
2013 Q3 179 169 10 5.6% 100.0% 86.4% 173
2013 Q2 133 125 2 1.5% 100.0% 79.2% 169
2013 Q1 115 112 3 2.6% 100.0% 83.7% 133
2012 Q4 134 129 3 2.2% 66.7% 76.6% 129
2012 Q3 155 143 9 5.8% 100.0% 82.8% 155
2012 Q2 141 127 10 7.1% 0.0% 77.6% 161
2012 Q1 160 146 14 8.8% 33.3% 78.4% 159
2011 Q4 168 156 12 7.1% 100.0% 85.3% 155
2011 Q3 144 126 13 9.0% — 62.2% 172
2011 Q2 167 144 22 13.2% 66.7% 71.2% 137
2011 Q1 127 115 7 5.5% — 70.5% 153
2010 Q4 177 163 11 6.2% 0.0% 69.8% 144
2010 Q3 162 151 10 6.2% 100.0% 78.0% 196
2010 Q2 158 139 18 11.4% 100.0% 79.6% 184
2010 Q1 124 105 19 15.3% 0.0% 76.5% 164
2009 Q4 167 155 9 5.4% 0.0% 82.1% 119
2009 Q3 156 135 19 12.2% 100.0% 72.0% 166
2009 Q2 160 139 17 10.6% 50.0% 66.0% 139
2009 Q1 143 123 19 13.3% 50.0% 75.9% 165
2008 Q4 165 134 25 15.2% 50.0% 81.7% 178
2008 Q3 216 174 33 15.3% 60.0% 74.7% 172
2008 Q2 197 170 23 11.7% — 57.7% 215
1996 Q1 474 424 50 10.5% 43.8% 67.9% —
1995 Q4 470 405 65 13.8% 57.1% 72.5% —
1995 Q3 505 472 33 6.5% 90.9% 70.2% —
1995 Q2 542 487 55 10.1% 80.0% 68.2% —
1995 Q1 482 440 42 8.7% 77.8% 65.2% —
1994 Q4 471 427 44 9.3% 43.8% 63.0% —
1994 Q3 519 474 45 8.7% 63.2% 61.7% —
1994 Q2 535 481 54 10.1% 94.4% 61.6% —
1994 Q1 481 439 42 8.7% 77.4% 60.6% —
1993 Q4 486 444 42 8.6% 87.5% 59.9% —
1993 Q3 488 443 45 9.2% 87.5% 64.8% —
1993 Q2 457 425 32 7.0% 50.0% 64.6% —
1993 Q1 465 429 36 7.7% 85.7% 65.7% —
1992 Q4 481 425 56 11.6% 75.8% 61.8% —
1992 Q3 427 379 48 11.2% 69.6% 66.7% —
1992 Q2 533 444 89 16.7% 65.2% 68.8% —
1992 Q1 431 378 53 12.3% 39.1% 63.5% —
1991 Q4 469 390 79 16.8% 64.5% 64.9% —
1991 Q3 609 531 78 12.8% 64.0% 58.3% —
1991 Q2 527 439 88 16.7% 65.2% 68.8% —
1991 Q1 516 437 79 15.3% 64.3% 48.4% —
1990 Q4 561 428 133 23.7% 77.8% 51.7% —
1990 Q3 587 484 103 17.5% 68.3% 52.7% —
1990 Q2 681 519 162 23.8% 70.0% 55.5% —
1990 Q1 586 498 88 15.0% 58.8% 46.4% —
1989 Q4 646 488 158 24.5% 61.3% 53.7% —
1989 Q3 723 575 148 20.5% 75.0% 47.8% —
1989 Q2 800 640 160 20.0% 56.7% 57.1% —
1989 Q1 702 560 142 20.2% 60.0% 52.4% —
1988 Q4 686 555 131 19.1% 86.5% 57.1% —
1988 Q3 769 627 142 18.5% 88.5% 55.5% —
1988 Q2 767 663 104 13.6% 53.3% 48.6% —
1988 Q1 617 527 90 14.6% 64.7% 41.6% —
1987 Q4 545 427 118 21.7% 89.5% 46.9% —
1987 Q3 681 588 93 13.7% 76.2% 60.6% —
1987 Q2 595 500 95 16.0% 68.4% 64.4% —
1987 Q1 500 428 72 14.4% 100.0% 67.6% —
1986 Q4 484 398 86 17.8% 63.2% 67.7% —
1986 Q3 583 483 100 17.2% 87.5% 57.8% —
1986 Q2 590 469 121 20.5% 84.6% 66.7% —
1986 Q1 357 298 59 16.5% 73.3% 77.8% —
1985 Q4 403 360 43 10.7% 77.8% 74.5% —
1985 Q3 503 437 66 13.1% 76.5% 77.1% —
1985 Q2 395 357 38 9.6% 88.9% 75.0% —
1985 Q1 369 340 29 7.9% 90.9% 84.8% —
1984 Q4 371 319 52 14.0% 90.9% 83.8% —
1984 Q3 410 360 50 12.2% 88.9% 86.5% —
1984 Q2 472 428 44 9.3% 88.9% 83.2% —
1984 Q1 400 355 45 11.3% 95.2% 84.4% —
1983 Q4 383 344 39 10.2% 72.0% 83.0% —
1983 Q3 410 361 49 12.0% 91.3% 75.8% —
1983 Q2 440 392 48 10.9% 87.5% 79.8% —
1983 Q1 330 287 43 13.0% 81.8% 84.4% —
1982 Q4 372 316 56 15.1% 90.0% 86.7% —
1982 Q3 406 344 62 15.3% 90.0% 76.1% —
1982 Q2 389 358 31 8.0% 77.8% 83.3% —
1982 Q1 326 277 49 15.0% 85.7% 79.5% —
1981 Q4 327 287 40 12.2% 100.0% 83.7% —
1981 Q3 348 312 36 10.3% 52.9% 56.6% —
1981 Q2 612 504 108 17.6% 92.3% 52.3% —
1981 Q1 469 395 74 15.8% 53.8% 56.9% —
1980 Q4 398 324 74 18.6% 50.0% 26.1% —
1980 Q3 444 380 64 14.4% 42.9% 19.2% —
1980 Q2 449 404 45 10.0% 25.0% 27.1% —
1980 Q1 451 377 74 16.4% 50.0% 22.5% —
1979 Q4 518 423 95 18.3% 72.2% 50.3% —
1979 Q3 542 448 94 17.3% 66.7% 47.8% —
1979 Q2 488 409 79 16.2% 78.6% 48.4% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me