← All authorities

Exmoor National Park

National Parks · E26000002 · 141 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
180
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
3.9%
higher than 4% of authorities
Majors in time
50.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
90.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
100.0%
no formal threshold
Delegated
89.4%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
54.8%
17 allowed of 31 decided
Decisions overturned
1.6%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.3%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
177
in the window
Applications decided
180
in the window
Approval rate
96.1%
173 granted, 7 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 3 of 9 national park authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 9.0%
Decided within time
96.4%
rank 64 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 1 of 9 national park authorities · peer median 87.4%

Peer ranks compare only national park authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2100.0%50.0%
Minor5996.6%90.0%
Other11995.8%—
of which householder5898.3%100.0%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
028552024 Q3: 52 received2024 Q3: 49 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 40 received2024 Q4: 55 decided2025 Q1: 41 received2025 Q1: 31 decided2025 Q2: 42 received2025 Q2: 42 decided2025 Q3: 54 received2025 Q3: 42 decided2025 Q4: 39 received2025 Q4: 46 decided2026 Q1: 52 received2026 Q1: 44 decided2026 Q2: 32 received2026 Q2: 48 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test

Not measured for this authority in the latest HDT release (county-matter, national park or recently merged authorities are not all listed).

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E26000002). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (141 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (141 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLGnot measured for this authority18 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 48 45 3 6.3% 100.0% 85.7% 32
2026 Q1 44 44 0 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 52
2025 Q4 46 46 0 0.0% — 100.0% 39
2025 Q3 42 38 4 9.5% — 100.0% 54
2025 Q2 42 39 3 7.1% — 100.0% 42
2025 Q1 31 26 5 16.1% — 75.0% 41
2024 Q4 55 51 4 7.3% — 100.0% 40
2024 Q3 49 41 8 16.3% — 83.3% 52
2024 Q2 38 32 6 15.8% — 33.3% 30
2024 Q1 33 29 4 12.1% — 33.3% 32
2023 Q4 42 39 3 7.1% 100.0% 75.0% 46
2023 Q3 40 37 3 7.5% — 75.0% 49
2023 Q2 48 43 5 10.4% — 83.3% 44
2023 Q1 50 48 2 4.0% — 66.7% 47
2022 Q4 79 73 6 7.6% — 33.3% 60
2022 Q3 69 63 6 8.7% — 50.0% 66
2022 Q2 49 45 4 8.2% — 55.6% 81
2022 Q1 52 45 7 13.5% — 75.0% 74
2021 Q4 75 70 5 6.7% — 46.2% 66
2021 Q3 70 63 7 10.0% — 58.8% 67
2021 Q2 69 63 6 8.7% 100.0% 44.4% 81
2021 Q1 43 39 4 9.3% — 75.0% 77
2020 Q4 57 52 5 8.8% — 68.4% 62
2020 Q3 52 46 6 11.5% — 57.9% 63
2020 Q2 51 43 8 15.7% — 33.3% 45
2020 Q1 50 47 3 6.0% — 50.0% 80
2019 Q4 56 53 3 5.4% — 0.0% 54
2019 Q3 76 68 8 10.5% — 37.0% 62
2019 Q2 53 49 4 7.5% — 78.6% 64
2019 Q1 50 47 3 6.0% 0.0% 87.5% 77
2018 Q4 63 57 6 9.5% — 95.5% 74
2018 Q3 57 53 4 7.0% — 87.5% 58
2018 Q2 51 47 4 7.8% — 78.6% 61
2018 Q1 48 45 3 6.3% 100.0% 92.3% 50
2017 Q4 76 71 5 6.6% 75.0% 96.2% 71
2017 Q3 53 52 1 1.9% — 100.0% 75
2017 Q2 65 62 3 4.6% — 95.5% 62
2017 Q1 52 48 4 7.7% — 100.0% 73
2016 Q4 80 77 3 3.8% — 90.9% 55
2016 Q3 91 89 2 2.2% 100.0% 100.0% 85
2016 Q2 71 69 2 2.8% 100.0% 100.0% 107
2016 Q1 44 42 2 4.5% 100.0% 93.3% 52
2015 Q4 60 59 1 1.7% — 100.0% 58
2015 Q3 64 58 6 9.4% 100.0% 88.9% 67
2015 Q2 54 52 2 3.7% — 100.0% 67
2015 Q1 55 52 3 5.5% — 93.1% 51
2014 Q4 58 56 2 3.4% — 82.8% 67
2014 Q3 71 68 3 4.2% — 71.4% 66
2014 Q2 59 56 3 5.1% 100.0% 65.2% 75
2014 Q1 64 58 3 4.7% 100.0% 84.0% 81
2013 Q4 63 58 3 4.8% — 76.7% 67
2013 Q3 92 84 3 3.3% — 76.2% 70
2013 Q2 74 68 4 5.4% — 46.2% 78
2013 Q1 67 62 4 6.0% — 51.9% 82
2012 Q4 80 70 6 7.5% — 62.8% 77
2012 Q3 58 54 3 5.2% — 61.5% 75
2012 Q2 79 75 3 3.8% — 68.6% 72
2012 Q1 67 65 2 3.0% 0.0% 54.3% 76
2011 Q4 82 77 1 1.2% — 85.7% 99
2011 Q3 74 69 3 4.1% 100.0% 67.6% 86
2011 Q2 56 53 2 3.6% — 84.6% 68
2011 Q1 77 67 5 6.5% — 63.9% 69
2010 Q4 78 76 1 1.3% 0.0% 77.8% 84
2010 Q3 74 69 1 1.4% — 61.3% 79
2010 Q2 66 59 5 7.6% 33.3% 67.9% 85
2010 Q1 55 49 4 7.3% — 65.4% 67
2009 Q4 73 68 4 5.5% 0.0% 59.4% 80
2009 Q3 68 64 2 2.9% — 78.6% 74
2009 Q2 58 56 2 3.4% 0.0% 64.0% 61
2009 Q1 47 42 4 8.5% — 35.3% 58
2008 Q4 59 54 5 8.5% 100.0% 64.7% 46
2008 Q3 60 51 8 13.3% — 45.8% 63
2008 Q2 74 65 6 8.1% 100.0% 59.1% 85
1996 Q1 171 158 13 7.6% 20.0% 71.9% —
1995 Q4 186 155 31 16.7% 0.0% 69.4% —
1995 Q3 184 167 17 9.2% 44.4% 71.7% —
1995 Q2 204 185 19 9.3% 0.0% 80.6% —
1995 Q1 177 150 27 15.3% 66.7% 75.8% —
1994 Q4 221 203 18 8.1% 25.0% 64.2% —
1994 Q3 186 166 20 10.8% 16.7% 58.3% —
1994 Q2 196 178 18 9.2% 30.0% 54.0% —
1994 Q1 176 152 24 13.6% 55.6% 67.2% —
1993 Q4 166 141 25 15.1% 62.5% 67.3% —
1993 Q3 236 198 38 16.1% 56.3% 69.7% —
1993 Q2 175 165 10 5.7% 60.0% 71.9% —
1993 Q1 175 153 22 12.6% 33.3% 64.4% —
1992 Q4 194 162 32 16.5% 42.9% 55.7% —
1992 Q3 208 173 35 16.8% 50.0% 52.3% —
1992 Q2 204 167 37 18.1% 0.0% 60.3% —
1992 Q1 223 175 48 21.5% 20.0% 51.8% —
1991 Q4 220 167 53 24.1% 50.0% 56.5% —
1991 Q3 191 160 31 16.2% 0.0% 36.1% —
1991 Q2 220 158 62 28.2% 70.0% 40.8% —
1991 Q1 201 164 37 18.4% 25.0% 42.1% —
1990 Q4 219 161 58 26.5% 46.2% 55.6% —
1990 Q3 226 166 60 26.5% 55.6% 41.3% —
1990 Q2 216 161 55 25.5% 22.2% 46.8% —
1990 Q1 239 166 73 30.5% 38.9% 61.3% —
1989 Q4 243 191 52 21.4% 36.8% 49.4% —
1989 Q3 331 228 103 31.1% 44.4% 46.2% —
1989 Q2 292 231 61 20.9% 50.0% 44.3% —
1989 Q1 258 190 68 26.4% 56.3% 35.7% —
1988 Q4 299 235 64 21.4% 72.7% 37.5% —
1988 Q3 290 235 55 19.0% 50.0% 49.0% —
1988 Q2 281 225 56 19.9% 63.6% 60.3% —
1988 Q1 201 168 33 16.4% 37.5% 62.2% —
1987 Q4 244 194 50 20.5% 22.2% 55.4% —
1987 Q3 103 94 9 8.7% 0.0% 74.0% —
1987 Q2 73 62 11 15.1% 100.0% 75.9% —
1987 Q1 63 58 5 7.9% — 70.6% —
1986 Q4 93 81 12 12.9% — 82.9% —
1986 Q3 73 65 8 11.0% — 72.2% —
1986 Q2 73 62 11 15.1% 100.0% 75.9% —
1986 Q1 69 61 8 11.6% 100.0% 66.7% —
1985 Q4 72 63 9 12.5% — 87.8% —
1985 Q3 58 53 5 8.6% — 86.2% —
1985 Q2 72 65 7 9.7% 100.0% 54.1% —
1985 Q1 47 39 8 17.0% — 72.0% —
1984 Q4 70 60 10 14.3% — 64.9% —
1984 Q3 54 50 4 7.4% — 65.6% —
1984 Q2 65 59 6 9.2% — 48.4% —
1984 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1983 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1983 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1983 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1983 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1982 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1982 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1982 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1982 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1981 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1981 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1981 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1981 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1980 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1980 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1980 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1980 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1979 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1979 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1979 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me