← All authorities

Wandsworth

London · E09000032 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
2,123
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
11.2%
higher than 46% of authorities
Majors in time
85.7%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
83.5%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
90.9%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.1%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
26.7%
119 allowed of 446 decided
Decisions overturned
1.0%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 13.5%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
2,205
in the window
Applications decided
2,123
in the window
Approval rate
88.8%
1,885 granted, 238 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 8 of 33 London boroughs (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 17.0%
Decided within time
86.5%
rank 222 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 26 of 33 London boroughs · peer median 91.0%

Peer ranks compare only London boroughs with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2487.5%85.7%
Minor90286.7%83.5%
Other1,19790.4%—
of which householder97791.9%90.9%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
03597182024 Q3: 600 received2024 Q3: 502 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 718 received2024 Q4: 470 decided2025 Q1: 676 received2025 Q1: 572 decided2025 Q2: 660 received2025 Q2: 503 decided2025 Q3: 519 received2025 Q3: 546 decided2025 Q4: 515 received2025 Q4: 520 decided2026 Q1: 615 received2026 Q1: 493 decided2026 Q2: 556 received2026 Q2: 564 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
123%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E09000032). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 564 490 74 13.1% 100.0% 81.5% 556
2026 Q1 493 445 48 9.7% 100.0% 84.0% 615
2025 Q4 520 456 64 12.3% 50.0% 86.0% 515
2025 Q3 546 494 52 9.5% 100.0% 82.7% 519
2025 Q2 503 461 42 8.3% — 80.4% 660
2025 Q1 572 508 64 11.2% 100.0% 86.5% 676
2024 Q4 470 422 48 10.2% — 84.7% 718
2024 Q3 502 443 59 11.8% 33.3% 86.3% 600
2024 Q2 507 452 55 10.8% 100.0% 81.9% 642
2024 Q1 533 482 51 9.6% — 94.6% 685
2023 Q4 523 465 58 11.1% 75.0% 78.3% 679
2023 Q3 547 476 71 13.0% 33.3% 52.8% 653
2023 Q2 590 538 52 8.8% — 68.3% 725
2023 Q1 610 549 61 10.0% 100.0% 69.8% 773
2022 Q4 567 507 60 10.6% 0.0% 78.9% 744
2022 Q3 617 534 83 13.5% 100.0% 69.5% 716
2022 Q2 599 550 49 8.2% 100.0% 89.8% 907
2022 Q1 589 532 57 9.7% 0.0% 76.4% 958
2021 Q4 636 589 47 7.4% 75.0% 78.3% 980
2021 Q3 714 664 50 7.0% 100.0% 73.6% 859
2021 Q2 666 619 47 7.1% 100.0% 85.4% 1,037
2021 Q1 685 632 53 7.7% 80.0% 81.2% 951
2020 Q4 612 573 39 6.4% 100.0% 79.5% 691
2020 Q3 510 468 42 8.2% 100.0% 87.6% 537
2020 Q2 572 536 36 6.3% 100.0% 84.3% 648
2020 Q1 608 553 55 9.0% 0.0% 79.5% 718
2019 Q4 615 558 57 9.3% 50.0% 78.0% 592
2019 Q3 714 654 60 8.4% 100.0% 57.9% 602
2019 Q2 650 593 57 8.8% 100.0% 75.3% 773
2019 Q1 636 569 67 10.5% 100.0% 70.0% 785
2018 Q4 628 562 66 10.5% — 77.5% 856
2018 Q3 723 658 65 9.0% 100.0% 75.3% 872
2018 Q2 812 729 83 10.2% 100.0% 75.4% 939
2018 Q1 705 628 77 10.9% — 76.2% 1,028
2017 Q4 779 712 67 8.6% 100.0% 73.5% 973
2017 Q3 805 725 80 9.9% — 77.4% 894
2017 Q2 793 713 80 10.1% 100.0% 79.9% 1,049
2017 Q1 746 667 79 10.6% 16.7% 74.8% 1,048
2016 Q4 836 740 96 11.5% 100.0% 79.4% 1,017
2016 Q3 974 891 83 8.5% 33.3% 79.7% 1,034
2016 Q2 957 865 92 9.6% 100.0% 75.7% 1,323
2016 Q1 810 734 76 9.4% 85.7% 74.4% 1,063
2015 Q4 911 836 75 8.2% 83.3% 66.4% 1,043
2015 Q3 962 868 94 9.8% 71.4% 69.4% 1,188
2015 Q2 787 728 59 7.5% 87.5% 66.9% 1,180
2015 Q1 835 761 74 8.9% 62.5% 69.3% 1,084
2014 Q4 880 813 67 7.6% 12.5% 70.8% 1,059
2014 Q3 978 911 67 6.9% 100.0% 65.4% 1,113
2014 Q2 928 864 64 6.9% 27.3% 66.0% 1,243
2014 Q1 935 773 42 4.5% 100.0% 66.8% 1,180
2013 Q4 978 811 39 4.0% 64.7% 67.9% 1,071
2013 Q3 1,033 894 38 3.7% 76.5% 67.2% 1,054
2013 Q2 981 773 86 8.8% 72.2% 63.0% 1,119
2013 Q1 827 689 49 5.9% 25.0% 74.0% 970
2012 Q4 871 704 74 8.5% 61.5% 62.8% 880
2012 Q3 941 756 72 7.7% 69.6% 46.8% 845
2012 Q2 756 608 56 7.4% 86.7% 56.6% 966
2012 Q1 860 692 84 9.8% 48.0% 72.1% 931
2011 Q4 850 686 59 6.9% 50.0% 62.4% 1,047
2011 Q3 943 786 46 4.9% 66.7% 61.2% 1,024
2011 Q2 799 639 66 8.3% 62.5% 73.1% 1,139
2011 Q1 722 581 57 7.9% 56.3% 78.3% 1,115
2010 Q4 761 620 56 7.4% 56.3% 82.7% 858
2010 Q3 825 641 70 8.5% 50.0% 77.6% 878
2010 Q2 831 658 83 10.0% 62.5% 76.6% 899
2010 Q1 726 570 69 9.5% 44.4% 71.7% 896
2009 Q4 595 474 48 8.1% 55.6% 84.7% 784
2009 Q3 694 536 79 11.4% 81.8% 79.6% 725
2009 Q2 612 486 68 11.1% 90.0% 75.4% 737
2009 Q1 517 429 44 8.5% 84.6% 82.2% 636
2008 Q4 690 551 79 11.4% 77.8% 69.2% 671
2008 Q3 883 679 101 11.4% 71.4% 73.5% 828
2008 Q2 1,037 831 110 10.6% 87.5% 64.8% 1,089
2008 Q1 959 754 99 10.3% 70.6% 72.0% 1,111
2007 Q4 1,050 820 128 12.2% 75.0% 74.5% 1,111
2007 Q3 1,121 872 123 11.0% 73.3% 75.2% 1,196
2007 Q2 1,030 836 100 9.7% 85.7% 69.9% 1,239
2007 Q1 847 679 98 11.6% 92.9% 73.2% 1,079
2006 Q4 848 644 110 13.0% 76.5% 77.9% 963
2006 Q3 920 739 91 9.9% 47.1% 83.3% 1,001
2006 Q2 915 745 88 9.6% 94.4% 79.8% 1,057
2006 Q1 782 607 96 12.3% 66.7% 69.0% 1,010
2005 Q4 754 587 91 12.1% 66.7% 78.6% 903
2005 Q3 880 665 124 14.1% 84.2% 83.0% 963
2005 Q2 840 622 115 13.7% 87.0% 75.9% 912
2005 Q1 755 608 82 10.9% 52.0% 78.8% 815
2004 Q4 816 629 103 12.6% 41.2% 82.8% 823
2004 Q3 948 725 129 13.6% 68.4% 74.7% 823
2004 Q2 831 665 92 11.1% 41.2% 73.4% 836
2004 Q1 676 537 83 12.3% 22.2% 68.0% 732
2003 Q4 748 594 89 11.9% 25.0% 65.9% 740
2003 Q3 870 665 113 13.0% 33.3% 74.1% 755
2003 Q2 775 636 77 9.9% 41.2% 59.6% 813
2003 Q1 693 570 68 9.8% 45.8% 55.3% 789
2002 Q4 820 663 94 11.5% 40.9% 70.8% 816
2002 Q3 857 697 83 9.7% 30.4% 60.9% 901
2002 Q2 771 636 78 10.1% 55.0% 60.3% 983
2002 Q1 700 576 71 10.1% 60.0% 55.2% 855
2001 Q4 759 618 67 8.8% 28.6% 56.3% 784
2001 Q3 754 615 53 7.0% 57.1% 51.6% 853
2001 Q2 705 571 52 7.4% 47.1% 47.7% 957
2001 Q1 643 521 63 9.8% 40.0% 53.3% 846
2000 Q4 741 608 55 7.4% 20.0% 50.0% 768
2000 Q3 843 684 70 8.3% 20.0% 41.7% 740
2000 Q2 629 506 46 7.3% 20.0% 40.3% 896
2000 Q1 592 552 37 6.3% 50.0% 71.8% 730
1999 Q4 692 519 55 7.9% 34.8% 52.5% 708
1999 Q3 602 424 27 4.5% 60.0% 54.0% 766
1999 Q2 619 462 49 7.9% 50.0% 38.6% 687
1999 Q1 436 345 43 9.9% 27.3% 40.6% 494
1998 Q4 552 419 48 8.7% 35.7% 38.4% 507
1998 Q3 606 481 42 6.9% 45.5% 56.7% 658
1998 Q2 600 466 42 7.0% 60.0% 50.0% 783
1998 Q1 596 424 60 10.1% 70.4% 58.8% 768
1997 Q4 654 459 43 6.6% 76.9% 51.9% 652
1997 Q3 786 621 66 8.4% 65.5% 55.3% 788
1997 Q2 532 445 35 6.6% 75.0% 58.7% 790
1997 Q1 587 434 44 7.5% 78.3% 66.3% 736
1996 Q4 632 487 46 7.3% 78.6% 50.5% 662
1996 Q3 563 460 43 7.6% 62.5% 40.8% 631
1996 Q2 441 349 27 6.1% 76.2% 66.9% 679
1996 Q1 146 124 22 15.1% 33.3% 65.5% —
1995 Q4 193 161 32 16.6% 50.0% 67.2% —
1995 Q3 207 171 36 17.4% 13.3% 50.0% —
1995 Q2 193 160 33 17.1% 0.0% 57.1% —
1995 Q1 193 162 31 16.1% 20.0% 48.6% —
1994 Q4 150 126 24 16.0% 20.0% 56.8% —
1994 Q3 212 173 39 18.4% 0.0% 58.0% —
1994 Q2 177 131 46 26.0% 0.0% 61.5% —
1994 Q1 212 183 29 13.7% 40.0% 49.4% —
1993 Q4 188 145 43 22.9% 33.3% 35.0% —
1993 Q3 156 125 31 19.9% 50.0% 48.4% —
1993 Q2 219 177 42 19.2% 14.3% 49.0% —
1993 Q1 206 155 51 24.8% 60.0% 36.1% —
1992 Q4 225 158 67 29.8% 0.0% 20.3% —
1992 Q3 184 150 34 18.5% 14.3% 16.9% —
1992 Q2 193 145 48 24.9% 100.0% 22.8% —
1992 Q1 206 155 51 24.8% 60.0% 33.3% —
1991 Q4 209 151 58 27.8% 14.3% 30.2% —
1991 Q3 254 184 70 27.6% 16.7% 42.0% —
1991 Q2 232 179 53 22.8% 25.0% 37.6% —
1991 Q1 245 182 63 25.7% 0.0% 34.7% —
1990 Q4 236 160 76 32.2% 66.7% 48.5% —
1990 Q3 303 214 89 29.4% 33.3% 26.8% —
1990 Q2 351 259 92 26.2% 20.0% 27.3% —
1990 Q1 265 180 85 32.1% 100.0% 20.4% —
1989 Q4 414 272 142 34.3% 50.0% 25.3% —
1989 Q3 282 200 82 29.1% 25.0% 13.1% —
1989 Q2 354 231 123 34.7% 20.0% 21.1% —
1989 Q1 378 230 148 39.2% 42.9% 13.0% —
1988 Q4 508 353 155 30.5% 60.0% 63.5% —
1988 Q3 423 332 91 21.5% 75.0% 13.7% —
1988 Q2 486 351 135 27.8% 16.7% 34.1% —
1988 Q1 416 299 117 28.1% 75.0% 41.6% —
1987 Q4 464 322 142 30.6% 60.0% 63.2% —
1987 Q3 391 308 83 21.2% 71.4% 13.3% —
1987 Q2 406 294 112 27.6% 18.2% 34.0% —
1987 Q1 332 238 94 28.3% 66.7% 41.8% —
1986 Q4 437 302 135 30.9% 60.0% 62.6% —
1986 Q3 349 277 72 20.6% 66.7% 12.1% —
1986 Q2 263 198 65 24.7% 100.0% 23.4% —
1986 Q1 349 265 84 24.1% — 56.1% —
1985 Q4 374 319 55 14.7% 50.0% 53.5% —
1985 Q3 418 367 51 12.2% 100.0% 35.2% —
1985 Q2 294 227 67 22.8% 60.0% 34.7% —
1985 Q1 326 247 79 24.2% — 56.9% —
1984 Q4 349 296 53 15.2% 50.0% 53.5% —
1984 Q3 397 347 50 12.6% 100.0% 34.4% —
1984 Q2 326 290 36 11.0% 50.0% 29.4% —
1984 Q1 331 297 34 10.3% 0.0% 33.9% —
1983 Q4 260 220 40 15.4% 60.0% 52.0% —
1983 Q3 449 387 62 13.8% 50.0% 62.4% —
1983 Q2 360 320 40 11.1% 12.5% 65.4% —
1983 Q1 300 264 36 12.0% 85.7% 63.4% —
1982 Q4 286 234 52 18.2% 71.4% 66.2% —
1982 Q3 269 236 33 12.3% 50.0% 67.4% —
1982 Q2 267 232 35 13.1% 100.0% 72.7% —
1982 Q1 300 257 43 14.3% 66.7% 63.9% —
1981 Q4 288 248 40 13.9% 100.0% 43.3% —
1981 Q3 259 219 40 15.4% 57.1% 39.8% —
1981 Q2 360 307 53 14.7% 100.0% 54.4% —
1981 Q1 375 322 53 14.1% 50.0% 52.2% —
1980 Q4 265 242 23 8.7% 0.0% 78.5% —
1980 Q3 353 314 39 11.0% 100.0% 73.9% —
1980 Q2 423 374 49 11.6% 40.0% 58.4% —
1980 Q1 367 315 52 14.2% 33.3% 58.0% —
1979 Q4 338 284 54 16.0% 60.0% 42.2% —
1979 Q3 409 357 52 12.7% 50.0% 34.6% —
1979 Q2 329 302 27 8.2% 44.4% 36.5% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me