← All authorities

Haringey

London · E09000014 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,464
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
15.3%
higher than 70% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
82.2%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
90.4%
no formal threshold
Delegated
99.1%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
31.1%
140 allowed of 450 decided
Decisions overturned
1.7%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 24.5%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,439
in the window
Applications decided
1,464
in the window
Approval rate
84.7%
1,240 granted, 224 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 13 of 33 London boroughs (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 17.0%
Decided within time
85.2%
rank 234 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 28 of 33 London boroughs · peer median 91.0%

Peer ranks compare only London boroughs with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major18100.0%100.0%
Minor61782.2%82.2%
Other82986.2%—
of which householder68990.3%90.4%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
02024032024 Q3: 381 received2024 Q3: 403 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 381 received2024 Q4: 375 decided2025 Q1: 366 received2025 Q1: 311 decided2025 Q2: 387 received2025 Q2: 374 decided2025 Q3: 342 received2025 Q3: 362 decided2025 Q4: 348 received2025 Q4: 367 decided2026 Q1: 376 received2026 Q1: 366 decided2026 Q2: 373 received2026 Q2: 369 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
71%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E09000014). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 369 324 45 12.2% — 80.6% 373
2026 Q1 366 312 54 14.8% 100.0% 81.5% 376
2025 Q4 367 299 68 18.5% — 81.0% 348
2025 Q3 362 305 57 15.7% — 86.3% 342
2025 Q2 374 336 38 10.2% — 86.7% 387
2025 Q1 311 266 45 14.5% — 86.8% 366
2024 Q4 375 328 47 12.5% — 88.5% 381
2024 Q3 403 354 49 12.2% — 83.3% 381
2024 Q2 331 298 33 10.0% — 80.6% 423
2024 Q1 404 343 61 15.1% — 69.2% 356
2023 Q4 366 310 56 15.3% — 87.3% 315
2023 Q3 426 352 74 17.4% — 81.3% 392
2023 Q2 345 299 46 13.3% — 54.7% 356
2023 Q1 382 341 41 10.7% 100.0% 59.5% 372
2022 Q4 354 306 48 13.6% 100.0% 61.5% 328
2022 Q3 444 367 77 17.3% — 73.6% 477
2022 Q2 398 344 54 13.6% — 83.3% 398
2022 Q1 303 259 44 14.5% 100.0% 76.2% 480
2021 Q4 399 322 77 19.3% — 84.2% 452
2021 Q3 488 387 101 20.7% 100.0% 90.0% 452
2021 Q2 400 339 61 15.3% 100.0% 90.5% 507
2021 Q1 433 373 60 13.9% — 96.7% 496
2020 Q4 444 335 109 24.5% 100.0% 94.1% 496
2020 Q3 399 312 87 21.8% 100.0% 87.8% 421
2020 Q2 354 296 58 16.4% 100.0% 91.3% 354
2020 Q1 370 327 43 11.6% — 90.7% 435
2019 Q4 344 296 48 14.0% 100.0% 93.8% 362
2019 Q3 389 344 45 11.6% 100.0% 91.0% 407
2019 Q2 441 392 49 11.1% 100.0% 92.8% 476
2019 Q1 420 354 66 15.7% 100.0% 93.9% 484
2018 Q4 450 383 67 14.9% — 98.9% 467
2018 Q3 427 381 46 10.8% — 91.4% 471
2018 Q2 451 397 54 12.0% 100.0% 100.0% 447
2018 Q1 443 384 59 13.3% 100.0% 97.0% 503
2017 Q4 439 359 80 18.2% — 97.6% 448
2017 Q3 478 407 71 14.9% 100.0% 95.0% 506
2017 Q2 475 395 80 16.8% 100.0% 94.8% 506
2017 Q1 476 412 64 13.4% 100.0% 91.3% 485
2016 Q4 558 469 89 15.9% 100.0% 89.0% 518
2016 Q3 661 531 130 19.7% 100.0% 74.3% 617
2016 Q2 555 445 110 19.8% 100.0% 77.9% 611
2016 Q1 513 397 116 22.6% 100.0% 79.2% 512
2015 Q4 605 464 141 23.3% 100.0% 73.0% 605
2015 Q3 558 446 112 20.1% 100.0% 75.6% 618
2015 Q2 488 378 110 22.5% 100.0% 80.5% 592
2015 Q1 447 360 87 19.5% 100.0% 79.4% 518
2014 Q4 539 472 67 12.4% 100.0% 55.8% 496
2014 Q3 478 410 68 14.2% — 68.5% 585
2014 Q2 401 341 60 15.0% 100.0% 83.6% 482
2014 Q1 492 316 68 13.8% 83.3% 60.6% 540
2013 Q4 453 309 66 14.6% 100.0% 66.7% 552
2013 Q3 547 390 60 11.0% 33.3% 69.5% 560
2013 Q2 473 332 68 14.4% 50.0% 77.8% 601
2013 Q1 537 307 114 21.2% 76.9% 52.1% 459
2012 Q4 429 277 99 23.1% 0.0% 54.4% 456
2012 Q3 489 297 91 18.6% 33.3% 52.6% 511
2012 Q2 443 273 93 21.0% 100.0% 68.6% 542
2012 Q1 407 282 55 13.5% 0.0% 47.7% 566
2011 Q4 507 347 86 17.0% 0.0% 77.8% 569
2011 Q3 439 266 96 21.9% 0.0% 69.7% 478
2011 Q2 422 259 94 22.3% 0.0% 70.4% 521
2011 Q1 366 251 59 16.1% 0.0% 73.6% 474
2010 Q4 515 358 81 15.7% 50.0% 87.9% 471
2010 Q3 482 312 92 19.1% 33.3% 72.1% 586
2010 Q2 447 301 74 16.6% 33.3% 82.1% 496
2010 Q1 387 249 79 20.4% 40.0% 75.9% 515
2009 Q4 435 269 93 21.4% 80.0% 75.0% 480
2009 Q3 455 309 84 18.5% 85.7% 74.1% 451
2009 Q2 387 204 119 30.7% 0.0% 81.8% 482
2009 Q1 401 248 86 21.4% 50.0% 85.5% 446
2008 Q4 402 230 108 26.9% 75.0% 72.6% 472
2008 Q3 543 285 158 29.1% 100.0% 80.4% 513
2008 Q2 533 322 109 20.5% 85.7% 82.5% 613
2008 Q1 529 290 144 27.2% 90.9% 80.0% 618
2007 Q4 569 334 146 25.7% 88.9% 74.5% 590
2007 Q3 528 284 138 26.1% 100.0% 78.4% 647
2007 Q2 537 292 149 27.7% 20.0% 77.6% 595
2007 Q1 492 244 160 32.5% 100.0% 87.9% 609
2006 Q4 483 243 139 28.8% 83.3% 89.8% 580
2006 Q3 551 292 151 27.4% 66.7% 83.3% 520
2006 Q2 502 230 156 31.1% 50.0% 91.8% 568
2006 Q1 415 217 127 30.6% 66.7% 82.2% 584
2005 Q4 482 239 159 33.0% 81.3% 82.4% 492
2005 Q3 548 276 172 31.4% 90.0% 80.6% 525
2005 Q2 485 262 125 25.8% 100.0% 81.1% 652
2005 Q1 468 249 144 30.8% 66.7% 86.3% 553
2004 Q4 457 250 126 27.6% 90.0% 73.9% 525
2004 Q3 529 292 157 29.7% 77.8% 78.2% 544
2004 Q2 538 308 135 25.1% 77.8% 77.2% 576
2004 Q1 442 244 105 23.8% 83.3% 80.6% 645
2003 Q4 461 242 145 31.5% 35.7% 71.3% 553
2003 Q3 516 267 137 26.6% 50.0% 74.1% 605
2003 Q2 447 263 119 26.6% 33.3% 74.8% 520
2003 Q1 382 211 100 26.2% 60.0% 74.8% 466
2002 Q4 417 212 104 24.9% 50.0% 71.3% 430
2002 Q3 430 220 117 27.2% 54.5% 78.5% 512
2002 Q2 372 203 105 28.2% 12.5% 79.4% 463
2002 Q1 334 196 83 24.9% 0.0% 70.6% 421
2001 Q4 407 226 113 27.8% 100.0% 61.0% 393
2001 Q3 401 230 114 28.4% 33.3% 55.6% 443
2001 Q2 367 229 67 18.3% 0.0% 56.5% 421
2001 Q1 297 180 70 23.6% 50.0% 63.7% 443
2000 Q4 427 250 93 21.8% 0.0% 49.5% 380
2000 Q3 334 202 60 18.0% 0.0% 41.5% 378
2000 Q2 368 215 75 20.4% 100.0% 47.4% 389
2000 Q1 373 224 80 21.4% 0.0% 57.9% 425
1999 Q4 339 209 63 18.6% 50.0% 52.7% 363
1999 Q3 392 249 60 15.3% 50.0% 67.7% 435
1999 Q2 287 164 62 21.6% 100.0% 78.3% 373
1999 Q1 300 201 48 16.0% 66.7% 62.8% 354
1998 Q4 383 250 78 20.4% 33.3% 76.3% 351
1998 Q3 421 283 82 19.5% 100.0% 80.2% 477
1998 Q2 329 222 58 17.6% 0.0% 67.0% 409
1998 Q1 275 176 70 25.5% 50.0% 52.2% 293
1997 Q4 393 270 80 20.4% 0.0% 60.3% 392
1997 Q3 454 324 78 17.2% 0.0% 64.5% 474
1997 Q2 242 150 52 21.5% 66.7% 59.5% 398
1997 Q1 240 150 34 14.2% 75.0% 73.6% 373
1996 Q4 379 231 93 24.5% 50.0% 49.2% 305
1996 Q3 330 181 89 27.0% 50.0% 57.9% 376
1996 Q2 295 174 83 28.1% 33.3% 54.7% 394
1996 Q1 269 247 22 8.2% 50.0% 52.3% —
1995 Q4 240 226 14 5.8% 25.0% 34.1% —
1995 Q3 290 260 30 10.3% 50.0% 58.5% —
1995 Q2 324 294 30 9.3% 44.4% 42.1% —
1995 Q1 263 240 23 8.7% 66.7% 34.0% —
1994 Q4 271 248 23 8.5% 71.4% 43.9% —
1994 Q3 259 242 17 6.6% 55.6% 37.1% —
1994 Q2 266 250 16 6.0% 80.0% 51.7% —
1994 Q1 262 246 16 6.1% 71.4% 57.0% —
1993 Q4 284 265 19 6.7% 66.7% 55.7% —
1993 Q3 294 275 19 6.5% 83.3% 63.6% —
1993 Q2 272 245 27 9.9% 50.0% 64.1% —
1993 Q1 264 242 22 8.3% 66.7% 49.5% —
1992 Q4 286 260 26 9.1% 80.0% 57.7% —
1992 Q3 317 289 28 8.8% 70.0% 54.8% —
1992 Q2 302 258 44 14.6% 50.0% 51.9% —
1992 Q1 260 221 39 15.0% 62.5% 58.6% —
1991 Q4 314 272 42 13.4% 70.0% 42.5% —
1991 Q3 325 273 52 16.0% 58.3% 48.8% —
1991 Q2 344 290 54 15.7% 61.5% 39.8% —
1991 Q1 285 247 38 13.3% 71.4% 34.7% —
1990 Q4 347 269 78 22.5% 69.2% 42.8% —
1990 Q3 368 319 49 13.3% 73.3% 43.1% —
1990 Q2 294 246 48 16.3% 50.0% 30.7% —
1990 Q1 383 302 81 21.1% 66.7% 44.6% —
1989 Q4 328 279 49 14.9% 68.4% 36.9% —
1989 Q3 446 366 80 17.9% 41.2% 19.4% —
1989 Q2 416 364 52 12.5% 50.0% 36.7% —
1989 Q1 407 319 88 21.6% 33.3% 47.2% —
1988 Q4 410 338 72 17.6% 57.1% 28.9% —
1988 Q3 449 397 52 11.6% 63.2% 39.3% —
1988 Q2 409 365 44 10.8% 84.6% 52.5% —
1988 Q1 305 256 49 16.1% 100.0% 46.4% —
1987 Q4 332 280 52 15.7% 81.8% 60.6% —
1987 Q3 461 394 67 14.5% 66.7% 46.0% —
1987 Q2 422 348 74 17.5% 64.3% 44.9% —
1987 Q1 450 372 78 17.3% 50.0% 30.0% —
1986 Q4 392 318 74 18.9% 80.0% 47.3% —
1986 Q3 432 367 65 15.0% 66.7% 45.6% —
1986 Q2 400 331 69 17.3% 64.3% 44.4% —
1986 Q1 444 369 75 16.9% 50.0% 30.0% —
1985 Q4 317 258 59 18.6% 77.8% 47.3% —
1985 Q3 374 319 55 14.7% 62.5% 45.3% —
1985 Q2 346 287 59 17.1% 61.5% 43.5% —
1985 Q1 361 315 46 12.7% 47.1% 43.8% —
1984 Q4 297 234 63 21.2% 42.9% 43.1% —
1984 Q3 441 379 62 14.1% 69.2% 50.0% —
1984 Q2 455 396 59 13.0% 12.5% 45.9% —
1984 Q1 468 400 68 14.5% 42.9% 38.5% —
1983 Q4 355 292 63 17.7% 60.0% 29.7% —
1983 Q3 376 324 52 13.8% 85.7% 51.3% —
1983 Q2 460 381 79 17.2% 57.1% 40.4% —
1983 Q1 334 294 40 12.0% 66.7% 37.9% —
1982 Q4 364 293 71 19.5% 81.8% 50.7% —
1982 Q3 385 318 67 17.4% 57.1% 50.0% —
1982 Q2 374 312 62 16.6% 84.6% 59.1% —
1982 Q1 306 248 58 19.0% 72.7% 49.7% —
1981 Q4 314 256 58 18.5% 75.0% 45.9% —
1981 Q3 416 347 69 16.6% 64.3% 56.4% —
1981 Q2 364 295 69 19.0% 62.5% 37.6% —
1981 Q1 385 312 73 19.0% 57.1% 37.1% —
1980 Q4 291 234 57 19.6% 66.7% 46.2% —
1980 Q3 376 305 71 18.9% 55.6% 52.3% —
1980 Q2 325 271 54 16.6% 88.9% 50.8% —
1980 Q1 343 280 63 18.4% 66.7% 45.2% —
1979 Q4 277 231 46 16.6% 54.5% 60.5% —
1979 Q3 303 258 45 14.9% 85.7% 56.5% —
1979 Q2 291 242 49 16.8% 50.0% 47.1% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me