← All authorities

Sheffield

Yorkshire and the Humber · E08000039 · 147 quarters held (1988 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,716
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
13.2%
higher than 60% of authorities
Majors in time
81.5%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
86.6%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
92.3%
no formal threshold
Delegated
99.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
30.8%
127 allowed of 413 decided
Decisions overturned
1.1%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 15.5%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,800
in the window
Applications decided
1,716
in the window
Approval rate
86.8%
1,489 granted, 227 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 19 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
90.7%
rank 165 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 21 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major7693.4%81.5%
Minor34582.0%86.6%
Other1,29587.6%—
of which householder94988.6%92.3%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
02545082024 Q3: 459 received2024 Q3: 483 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 430 received2024 Q4: 441 decided2025 Q1: 508 received2025 Q1: 392 decided2025 Q2: 420 received2025 Q2: 469 decided2025 Q3: 447 received2025 Q3: 504 decided2025 Q4: 406 received2025 Q4: 400 decided2026 Q1: 459 received2026 Q1: 383 decided2026 Q2: 488 received2026 Q2: 429 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
58%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000039). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1988 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1988 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 429 374 55 12.8% 100.0% 88.4% 488
2026 Q1 383 326 57 14.9% 71.4% 89.5% 459
2025 Q4 400 344 56 14.0% 81.8% 87.8% 406
2025 Q3 504 445 59 11.7% 85.7% 81.1% 447
2025 Q2 469 404 65 13.9% 80.0% 93.8% 420
2025 Q1 392 346 46 11.7% 83.3% 66.7% 508
2024 Q4 441 378 63 14.3% 100.0% 71.4% 430
2024 Q3 483 437 46 9.5% 66.7% 79.7% 459
2024 Q2 547 471 76 13.9% 75.0% 68.7% 512
2024 Q1 445 391 54 12.1% 50.0% 72.7% 487
2023 Q4 490 433 57 11.6% 100.0% 85.1% 499
2023 Q3 538 472 66 12.3% 75.0% 72.7% 507
2023 Q2 560 503 57 10.2% 100.0% 81.9% 528
2023 Q1 519 465 54 10.4% 100.0% 74.6% 616
2022 Q4 576 487 89 15.5% 85.7% 66.7% 520
2022 Q3 589 520 69 11.7% 80.0% 72.1% 607
2022 Q2 596 545 51 8.6% 88.9% 73.8% 653
2022 Q1 552 489 63 11.4% 87.5% 68.4% 655
2021 Q4 675 592 83 12.3% 80.0% 58.8% 582
2021 Q3 765 687 78 10.2% 66.7% 79.8% 672
2021 Q2 709 649 60 8.5% 100.0% 79.7% 852
2021 Q1 577 537 40 6.9% 85.7% 84.0% 756
2020 Q4 625 556 69 11.0% 90.0% 80.5% 620
2020 Q3 631 561 70 11.1% 100.0% 61.4% 637
2020 Q2 511 463 48 9.4% 88.9% 62.2% 474
2020 Q1 491 443 48 9.8% 100.0% 82.0% 646
2019 Q4 649 594 55 8.5% 80.0% 69.0% 537
2019 Q3 709 659 50 7.1% 100.0% 71.3% 653
2019 Q2 631 584 47 7.4% 100.0% 73.0% 742
2019 Q1 492 465 27 5.5% 85.7% 73.1% 628
2018 Q4 670 633 37 5.5% 100.0% 84.7% 630
2018 Q3 640 617 23 3.6% 70.0% 74.7% 673
2018 Q2 677 639 38 5.6% 91.7% 73.1% 646
2018 Q1 577 541 36 6.2% 86.7% 77.6% 747
2017 Q4 661 622 39 5.9% 70.0% 84.0% 626
2017 Q3 653 604 49 7.5% 75.0% 79.5% 650
2017 Q2 635 600 35 5.5% 90.0% 83.8% 710
2017 Q1 601 568 33 5.5% 84.2% 81.8% 761
2016 Q4 583 544 39 6.7% 95.5% 90.7% 612
2016 Q3 687 653 34 4.9% 75.0% 91.0% 650
2016 Q2 657 630 27 4.1% 89.5% 88.1% 722
2016 Q1 554 528 26 4.7% 93.3% 87.8% 698
2015 Q4 565 527 38 6.7% 94.1% 79.0% 578
2015 Q3 644 618 26 4.0% 83.3% 80.0% 645
2015 Q2 631 595 36 5.7% 70.6% 65.4% 697
2015 Q1 551 512 39 7.1% 66.7% 65.4% 608
2014 Q4 619 587 32 5.2% 92.9% 70.4% 605
2014 Q3 647 617 30 4.6% 63.2% 71.6% 708
2014 Q2 607 576 31 5.1% 82.4% 81.5% 676
2014 Q1 523 497 20 3.8% 87.0% 68.5% 658
2013 Q4 596 557 30 5.0% 77.3% 64.8% 552
2013 Q3 648 602 38 5.9% 83.3% 73.8% 652
2013 Q2 630 580 35 5.6% 73.5% 70.3% 632
2013 Q1 543 503 31 5.7% 44.1% 53.0% 649
2012 Q4 623 579 38 6.1% 79.1% 72.0% 603
2012 Q3 649 604 41 6.3% 70.0% 72.7% 649
2012 Q2 638 587 44 6.9% 57.9% 75.1% 654
2012 Q1 582 538 35 6.0% 58.8% 43.2% 660
2011 Q4 622 577 42 6.8% 46.7% 63.5% 593
2011 Q3 658 598 56 8.5% 73.7% 79.3% 675
2011 Q2 690 636 50 7.2% 86.2% 76.5% 735
2011 Q1 604 564 36 6.0% 76.7% 76.3% 712
2010 Q4 666 611 52 7.8% 80.0% 71.1% 583
2010 Q3 683 634 45 6.6% 75.0% 78.5% 734
2010 Q2 641 587 49 7.6% 100.0% 72.6% 679
2010 Q1 517 477 40 7.7% 75.0% 80.4% 659
2009 Q4 649 582 61 9.4% 76.7% 79.9% 635
2009 Q3 688 619 69 10.0% 72.0% 79.8% 708
2009 Q2 674 604 70 10.4% 78.6% 81.0% 738
2009 Q1 591 526 62 10.5% 64.7% 80.2% 696
2008 Q4 776 668 108 13.9% 67.3% 75.0% 676
2008 Q3 807 701 99 12.3% 62.2% 73.9% 838
2008 Q2 932 798 131 14.1% 72.0% 86.6% 919
2008 Q1 819 677 139 17.0% 85.7% 78.2% 1,018
2007 Q4 917 743 165 18.0% 77.8% 82.2% 869
2007 Q3 1,065 852 200 18.8% 60.7% 75.2% 990
2007 Q2 961 785 133 13.8% 51.7% 75.2% 943
2007 Q1 948 770 135 14.2% 67.4% 69.4% 1,085
2006 Q4 882 724 114 12.9% 66.2% 73.6% 946
2006 Q3 1,019 841 140 13.7% 58.9% 72.3% 1,003
2006 Q2 943 806 119 12.6% 79.1% 63.3% 1,061
2006 Q1 911 766 123 13.5% 75.0% 72.8% 1,060
2005 Q4 854 710 109 12.8% 55.6% 64.6% 939
2005 Q3 1,003 890 97 9.7% 47.8% 70.1% 1,021
2005 Q2 1,105 990 110 10.0% 43.4% 58.8% 1,045
2005 Q1 918 798 111 12.1% 45.5% 73.2% 1,184
2004 Q4 969 835 129 13.3% 54.8% 68.5% 1,033
2004 Q3 1,145 978 159 13.9% 75.6% 63.8% 1,086
2004 Q2 1,093 961 118 10.8% 40.8% 64.2% 1,158
2004 Q1 916 795 108 11.8% 50.0% 68.8% 1,096
2003 Q4 937 823 106 11.3% 51.2% 64.6% 966
2003 Q3 1,104 985 111 10.1% 44.7% 55.1% 1,045
2003 Q2 1,060 944 90 8.5% 47.2% 50.4% 1,149
2003 Q1 767 676 76 9.9% 53.2% 47.9% 978
2002 Q4 988 874 98 9.9% 51.2% 54.2% 902
2002 Q3 904 797 87 9.6% 16.7% 54.7% 1,010
2002 Q2 945 845 78 8.3% 15.4% 40.6% 864
2002 Q1 676 606 47 7.0% 33.3% 22.3% 908
2001 Q4 670 548 71 10.6% 56.0% 35.8% 851
2001 Q3 830 671 56 6.7% 25.9% 42.2% 790
2001 Q2 800 620 60 7.5% 38.9% 33.3% 854
2001 Q1 636 519 45 7.1% 27.3% 37.5% 825
2000 Q4 828 591 99 12.0% 43.5% 42.4% 749
2000 Q3 816 670 54 6.6% 37.9% 48.9% 772
2000 Q2 760 602 64 8.4% 47.4% 38.9% 846
2000 Q1 675 531 46 6.8% 32.1% 30.5% 750
1999 Q4 703 534 39 5.5% 57.9% 29.3% 604
1999 Q3 785 616 51 6.5% 47.1% 39.3% 727
1999 Q2 691 577 38 5.5% 42.1% 37.0% 764
1999 Q1 571 434 40 7.0% 40.0% 35.3% 683
1998 Q4 723 549 64 8.9% 30.6% 36.6% 588
1998 Q3 775 628 46 5.9% 50.0% 43.4% 706
1998 Q2 747 622 48 6.4% 52.6% 50.5% 730
1998 Q1 568 449 38 6.7% 43.8% 40.3% 760
1997 Q4 992 783 78 7.9% 26.9% 69.2% 571
1997 Q3 709 581 53 7.5% 31.3% 31.8% 1,085
1997 Q2 732 595 64 8.7% 34.6% 35.3% 775
1996 Q1 461 390 71 15.4% 77.8% 62.2% —
1995 Q4 454 387 67 14.8% 75.0% 61.4% —
1995 Q3 553 448 105 19.0% 46.2% 36.7% —
1995 Q2 508 446 62 12.2% 68.4% 38.4% —
1995 Q1 413 357 56 13.6% 64.7% 34.8% —
1994 Q4 472 409 63 13.3% 54.5% 40.7% —
1994 Q3 543 458 85 15.7% 92.9% 39.8% —
1994 Q2 456 366 90 19.7% 91.7% 59.2% —
1994 Q1 338 298 40 11.8% 25.0% 38.3% —
1993 Q4 400 333 67 16.8% 70.0% 31.1% —
1993 Q3 393 323 70 17.8% 60.0% 43.9% —
1993 Q2 367 299 68 18.5% 44.4% 43.0% —
1993 Q1 349 256 93 26.6% 57.4% 54.3% —
1992 Q4 291 234 57 19.6% 57.1% 42.3% —
1992 Q3 370 285 85 23.0% 100.0% 58.0% —
1992 Q2 430 339 91 21.2% 54.5% 57.6% —
1992 Q1 405 306 99 24.4% 54.5% 60.0% —
1991 Q4 455 355 100 22.0% 50.0% 55.6% —
1991 Q3 447 323 124 27.7% 25.0% 56.2% —
1991 Q2 465 361 104 22.4% 66.7% 47.4% —
1991 Q1 442 334 108 24.4% 53.3% 36.8% —
1990 Q4 461 341 120 26.0% 0.0% 28.3% —
1990 Q3 447 324 123 27.5% 14.3% 31.8% —
1990 Q2 566 426 140 24.7% 35.7% 33.3% —
1990 Q1 499 367 132 26.5% 33.3% 27.0% —
1989 Q4 619 432 187 30.2% 9.1% 15.4% —
1989 Q3 536 406 130 24.3% 12.5% 5.0% —
1989 Q2 585 423 162 27.7% 22.2% 7.8% —
1989 Q1 471 339 132 28.0% 25.0% 18.3% —
1988 Q4 546 445 101 18.5% 26.7% 17.8% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me