← All authorities

Gateshead

North East · E08000037 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
510
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
12.9%
higher than 57% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
80.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
67.1%
no formal threshold
Delegated
95.3%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
22.1%
19 allowed of 86 decided
Decisions overturned
0.6%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 15.6%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
517
in the window
Applications decided
510
in the window
Approval rate
87.1%
444 granted, 66 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 17 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
73.6%
rank 282 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 34 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major1392.3%100.0%
Minor13079.2%80.0%
Other36789.6%—
of which householder25993.1%67.1%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0801592024 Q3: 129 received2024 Q3: 132 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 111 received2024 Q4: 120 decided2025 Q1: 125 received2025 Q1: 95 decided2025 Q2: 142 received2025 Q2: 112 decided2025 Q3: 139 received2025 Q3: 133 decided2025 Q4: 119 received2025 Q4: 128 decided2026 Q1: 100 received2026 Q1: 109 decided2026 Q2: 159 received2026 Q2: 140 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
105%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000037). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 140 122 18 12.9% — 69.2% 159
2026 Q1 109 92 17 15.6% — 66.7% 100
2025 Q4 128 111 17 13.3% — 88.9% 119
2025 Q3 133 119 14 10.5% 100.0% 86.7% 139
2025 Q2 112 106 6 5.4% — 88.9% 142
2025 Q1 95 87 8 8.4% 100.0% 66.7% 125
2024 Q4 120 106 14 11.7% 100.0% 80.0% 111
2024 Q3 132 123 9 6.8% 0.0% 88.9% 129
2024 Q2 110 102 8 7.3% — 90.9% 142
2024 Q1 122 110 12 9.8% — 100.0% 120
2023 Q4 153 138 15 9.8% — 100.0% 112
2023 Q3 112 105 7 6.3% 100.0% 75.0% 164
2023 Q2 123 112 11 8.9% 100.0% 81.8% 124
2023 Q1 127 122 5 3.9% — 85.7% 140
2022 Q4 125 118 7 5.6% 100.0% 100.0% 134
2022 Q3 165 161 4 2.4% 100.0% 75.0% 142
2022 Q2 160 152 8 5.0% 100.0% 88.9% 196
2022 Q1 146 140 6 4.1% 100.0% 100.0% 148
2021 Q4 193 182 11 5.7% 100.0% 33.3% 170
2021 Q3 201 195 6 3.0% 100.0% 50.0% 194
2021 Q2 217 208 9 4.1% — 64.7% 254
2021 Q1 172 164 8 4.7% — 78.6% 230
2020 Q4 172 160 12 7.0% 100.0% 71.4% 173
2020 Q3 186 177 9 4.8% 100.0% 53.3% 208
2020 Q2 112 107 5 4.5% 100.0% 50.0% 149
2020 Q1 151 141 10 6.6% 100.0% 72.0% 177
2019 Q4 174 170 4 2.3% 100.0% 89.5% 150
2019 Q3 242 224 18 7.4% 100.0% 80.6% 229
2019 Q2 262 247 15 5.7% 100.0% 87.8% 268
2019 Q1 168 156 12 7.1% — 87.5% 202
2018 Q4 193 183 10 5.2% 100.0% 96.0% 217
2018 Q3 230 212 18 7.8% 100.0% 93.0% 224
2018 Q2 245 229 16 6.5% 100.0% 96.6% 231
2018 Q1 227 212 15 6.6% 100.0% 90.5% 250
2017 Q4 232 220 12 5.2% 80.0% 88.2% 229
2017 Q3 212 205 7 3.3% 100.0% 90.0% 210
2017 Q2 236 228 8 3.4% 100.0% 96.6% 258
2017 Q1 165 157 8 4.8% — 92.3% 236
2016 Q4 219 205 14 6.4% 100.0% 98.0% 210
2016 Q3 206 197 9 4.4% 100.0% 93.3% 221
2016 Q2 242 221 21 8.7% — 90.5% 240
2016 Q1 216 201 15 6.9% 100.0% 83.3% 235
2015 Q4 170 157 13 7.6% 100.0% 71.7% 171
2015 Q3 210 198 12 5.7% 100.0% 79.1% 233
2015 Q2 218 204 14 6.4% 100.0% 85.7% 237
2015 Q1 195 183 12 6.2% 100.0% 90.9% 231
2014 Q4 209 202 7 3.3% 100.0% 80.4% 208
2014 Q3 240 226 14 5.8% 100.0% 73.3% 219
2014 Q2 267 250 17 6.4% 100.0% 69.0% 274
2014 Q1 211 187 17 8.1% 71.4% 77.0% 267
2013 Q4 247 221 20 8.1% 100.0% 80.3% 246
2013 Q3 245 216 23 9.4% 80.0% 82.7% 249
2013 Q2 267 245 14 5.2% 90.0% 82.4% 260
2013 Q1 221 213 7 3.2% 82.4% 80.3% 286
2012 Q4 235 213 17 7.2% 36.4% 71.8% 243
2012 Q3 217 199 15 6.9% 71.4% 82.8% 219
2012 Q2 285 262 19 6.7% 50.0% 76.9% 269
2012 Q1 250 230 15 6.0% 53.8% 72.8% 276
2011 Q4 251 230 18 7.2% 70.0% 71.2% 276
2011 Q3 282 252 26 9.2% 80.0% 76.5% 272
2011 Q2 227 217 10 4.4% 69.2% 88.4% 271
2011 Q1 206 190 13 6.3% 83.3% 82.8% 256
2010 Q4 258 240 13 5.0% 77.8% 73.2% 227
2010 Q3 265 248 15 5.7% 71.4% 87.4% 271
2010 Q2 266 240 20 7.5% 100.0% 91.5% 274
2010 Q1 209 200 9 4.3% 81.3% 87.5% 245
2009 Q4 243 222 18 7.4% 100.0% 93.0% 249
2009 Q3 264 237 18 6.8% 78.6% 89.2% 251
2009 Q2 220 202 16 7.3% 72.7% 74.1% 274
2009 Q1 270 230 34 12.6% 66.7% 80.0% 236
2008 Q4 276 246 25 9.1% 68.4% 81.5% 281
2008 Q3 349 310 28 8.0% 90.0% 83.3% 303
2008 Q2 338 295 33 9.8% 91.7% 64.3% 349
2008 Q1 285 247 34 11.9% 75.0% 77.9% 393
2007 Q4 386 336 44 11.4% 57.1% 73.1% 340
2007 Q3 441 388 50 11.3% 63.6% 86.9% 473
2007 Q2 440 394 42 9.5% 66.7% 86.4% 532
2007 Q1 402 346 54 13.4% 91.7% 79.8% 470
2006 Q4 428 360 62 14.5% 91.7% 85.6% 460
2006 Q3 483 416 64 13.3% 60.0% 89.9% 460
2006 Q2 428 351 72 16.8% 90.0% 75.8% 480
2006 Q1 382 332 49 12.8% 85.7% 92.4% 463
2005 Q4 408 339 68 16.7% 75.0% 86.4% 431
2005 Q3 404 351 52 12.9% 76.5% 78.7% 464
2005 Q2 569 501 68 12.0% 85.7% 66.3% 496
2005 Q1 413 366 44 10.7% 62.5% 79.1% 504
2004 Q4 405 366 30 7.4% 45.5% 65.2% 426
2004 Q3 503 456 45 8.9% 30.8% 78.0% 497
2004 Q2 409 385 19 4.6% 55.6% 69.8% 495
2004 Q1 428 377 48 11.2% 53.8% 56.3% 508
2003 Q4 410 374 33 8.0% 65.0% 67.8% 404
2003 Q3 428 401 26 6.1% 66.7% 70.7% 471
2003 Q2 434 411 19 4.4% 69.2% 59.8% 473
2003 Q1 318 281 35 11.0% 88.9% 64.0% 460
2002 Q4 346 329 16 4.6% 88.9% 75.5% 344
2002 Q3 345 325 20 5.8% 66.7% 76.7% 405
2002 Q2 370 344 25 6.8% 66.7% 81.7% 363
2002 Q1 305 280 21 6.9% 78.6% 86.2% 369
2001 Q4 300 280 18 6.0% 88.9% 79.2% 285
2001 Q3 376 346 30 8.0% 70.0% 79.8% 368
2001 Q2 338 312 26 7.7% 83.3% 78.4% 364
2001 Q1 258 229 28 10.9% 88.2% 88.9% 334
2000 Q4 277 256 19 6.9% 78.3% 94.4% 273
2000 Q3 283 256 26 9.2% 70.0% 91.4% 288
2000 Q2 325 295 29 8.9% 82.4% 88.5% 344
2000 Q1 272 236 34 12.5% 67.7% 70.0% 289
1999 Q4 240 206 32 13.3% 83.3% 83.8% 268
1999 Q3 304 265 38 12.5% 81.3% 87.8% 295
1999 Q2 315 278 37 11.7% 64.7% 75.7% 322
1999 Q1 247 210 35 14.2% 100.0% 83.2% 316
1998 Q4 317 268 49 15.5% 78.6% 84.0% 299
1998 Q3 307 278 28 9.1% 76.2% 85.6% 316
1998 Q2 286 248 37 12.9% 100.0% 87.5% 325
1998 Q1 251 216 34 13.5% 75.0% 87.6% 311
1997 Q4 280 245 32 11.4% 77.8% 77.6% 232
1997 Q3 270 236 34 12.6% 100.0% 78.9% 280
1997 Q2 261 240 19 7.3% 80.0% 82.2% 300
1997 Q1 261 222 39 14.9% 85.7% 85.4% 287
1996 Q4 272 244 28 10.3% 100.0% 88.5% 276
1996 Q3 309 274 34 11.0% 84.0% 80.5% 324
1996 Q2 270 236 31 11.5% 75.0% 87.2% 326
1996 Q1 191 159 32 16.8% 62.5% 61.1% —
1995 Q4 165 145 20 12.1% 100.0% 57.3% —
1995 Q3 191 171 20 10.5% 36.4% 75.3% —
1995 Q2 220 198 22 10.0% 63.6% 70.8% —
1995 Q1 217 192 25 11.5% 83.3% 63.7% —
1994 Q4 204 182 22 10.8% 29.4% 64.9% —
1994 Q3 204 171 33 16.2% 57.1% 54.0% —
1994 Q2 216 194 22 10.2% 66.7% 69.0% —
1994 Q1 223 200 23 10.3% 87.5% 65.2% —
1993 Q4 203 167 36 17.7% 61.1% 54.8% —
1993 Q3 185 161 24 13.0% 71.4% 45.5% —
1993 Q2 199 179 20 10.1% 33.3% 47.0% —
1993 Q1 220 190 30 13.6% 54.5% 45.9% —
1992 Q4 214 184 30 14.0% 50.0% 54.5% —
1992 Q3 233 205 28 12.0% 85.7% 55.1% —
1992 Q2 208 179 29 13.9% 75.0% 43.2% —
1992 Q1 204 163 41 20.1% 66.7% 53.6% —
1991 Q4 221 189 32 14.5% 42.9% 59.3% —
1991 Q3 230 198 32 13.9% 66.7% 53.1% —
1991 Q2 193 164 29 15.0% 42.9% 43.6% —
1991 Q1 214 176 38 17.8% 40.0% 50.0% —
1990 Q4 176 149 27 15.3% 50.0% 35.7% —
1990 Q3 253 214 39 15.4% 50.0% 23.0% —
1990 Q2 235 188 47 20.0% 76.5% 50.0% —
1990 Q1 321 261 60 18.7% 64.3% 35.9% —
1989 Q4 245 209 36 14.7% 53.3% 40.4% —
1989 Q3 253 214 39 15.4% 50.0% 23.0% —
1989 Q2 255 195 60 23.5% 81.8% 46.4% —
1989 Q1 221 170 51 23.1% 52.4% 24.0% —
1988 Q4 294 236 58 19.7% 64.5% 47.2% —
1988 Q3 257 218 39 15.2% 50.0% 22.6% —
1988 Q2 228 176 52 22.8% 81.8% 44.2% —
1988 Q1 244 187 57 23.4% 48.0% 29.6% —
1987 Q4 189 155 34 18.0% 85.7% 55.4% —
1987 Q3 337 288 49 14.5% 66.7% 42.2% —
1987 Q2 333 297 36 10.8% 50.0% 21.7% —
1987 Q1 230 192 38 16.5% 71.4% 27.5% —
1986 Q4 272 242 30 11.0% 33.3% 41.9% —
1986 Q3 286 264 22 7.7% 100.0% 26.0% —
1986 Q2 320 294 26 8.1% 37.5% 30.1% —
1986 Q1 269 233 36 13.4% 28.6% 36.0% —
1985 Q4 292 265 27 9.2% 83.3% 44.3% —
1985 Q3 399 366 33 8.3% 81.8% 46.5% —
1985 Q2 391 358 33 8.4% 80.0% 49.1% —
1985 Q1 246 223 23 9.3% 88.9% 54.7% —
1984 Q4 325 289 36 11.1% 87.5% 60.8% —
1984 Q3 353 320 33 9.3% 75.0% 55.4% —
1984 Q2 378 349 29 7.7% 85.7% 48.8% —
1984 Q1 308 282 26 8.4% 100.0% 59.1% —
1983 Q4 370 340 30 8.1% 62.5% 63.2% —
1983 Q3 454 419 35 7.7% 60.0% 72.0% —
1983 Q2 467 422 45 9.6% 61.5% 49.1% —
1983 Q1 299 277 22 7.4% 75.0% 62.3% —
1982 Q4 380 344 36 9.5% 75.0% 75.3% —
1982 Q3 450 415 35 7.8% 100.0% 68.7% —
1982 Q2 373 351 22 5.9% 80.0% 79.1% —
1982 Q1 246 218 28 11.4% 85.7% 80.0% —
1981 Q4 343 314 29 8.5% 100.0% 72.9% —
1981 Q3 390 347 43 11.0% 100.0% 63.1% —
1981 Q2 434 381 53 12.2% 85.7% 57.1% —
1981 Q1 431 370 61 14.2% 75.0% 69.0% —
1980 Q4 390 337 53 13.6% 71.4% 81.7% —
1980 Q3 444 418 26 5.9% 0.0% 74.5% —
1980 Q2 602 550 52 8.6% 75.0% 79.6% —
1980 Q1 378 353 25 6.6% 66.7% 55.7% —
1979 Q4 486 438 48 9.9% 50.0% 55.6% —
1979 Q3 439 406 33 7.5% 16.7% 33.8% —
1979 Q2 529 473 56 10.6% 90.0% 51.6% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me