← All authorities

Wolverhampton

West Midlands · E08000031 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
745
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
10.1%
higher than 40% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
100.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
99.7%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.4%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
40.4%
65 allowed of 161 decided
Decisions overturned
1.5%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 14.4%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
770
in the window
Applications decided
745
in the window
Approval rate
89.9%
670 granted, 75 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 13 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
99.6%
rank 15 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 4 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3797.3%100.0%
Minor17382.1%100.0%
Other53592.0%—
of which householder42095.5%99.7%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01262512024 Q3: 206 received2024 Q3: 210 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 217 received2024 Q4: 180 decided2025 Q1: 238 received2025 Q1: 163 decided2025 Q2: 204 received2025 Q2: 251 decided2025 Q3: 204 received2025 Q3: 178 decided2025 Q4: 197 received2025 Q4: 219 decided2026 Q1: 197 received2026 Q1: 169 decided2026 Q2: 172 received2026 Q2: 179 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
59%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000031). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 179 167 12 6.7% 100.0% 100.0% 172
2026 Q1 169 154 15 8.9% 100.0% 100.0% 197
2025 Q4 219 190 29 13.2% 100.0% 100.0% 197
2025 Q3 178 159 19 10.7% 100.0% 100.0% 204
2025 Q2 251 225 26 10.4% 100.0% 100.0% 204
2025 Q1 163 145 18 11.0% 100.0% 100.0% 238
2024 Q4 180 154 26 14.4% 100.0% 100.0% 217
2024 Q3 210 194 16 7.6% 100.0% 96.0% 206
2024 Q2 217 190 27 12.4% 100.0% 92.3% 201
2024 Q1 186 167 19 10.2% 100.0% 80.0% 237
2023 Q4 228 213 15 6.6% 100.0% 94.7% 215
2023 Q3 220 209 11 5.0% 100.0% 79.4% 231
2023 Q2 192 178 14 7.3% 100.0% 90.5% 211
2023 Q1 196 173 23 11.7% 100.0% 92.3% 191
2022 Q4 194 181 13 6.7% 71.4% 65.4% 217
2022 Q3 186 177 9 4.8% 100.0% 65.2% 204
2022 Q2 227 205 22 9.7% 100.0% 72.2% 205
2022 Q1 231 217 14 6.1% 71.4% 78.0% 223
2021 Q4 225 207 18 8.0% 33.3% 66.7% 226
2021 Q3 253 236 17 6.7% 100.0% 67.7% 247
2021 Q2 290 272 18 6.2% 100.0% 77.8% 326
2021 Q1 254 241 13 5.1% 87.5% 80.9% 294
2020 Q4 245 228 17 6.9% 100.0% 80.4% 251
2020 Q3 214 196 18 8.4% 100.0% 56.9% 253
2020 Q2 182 174 8 4.4% 66.7% 63.5% 188
2020 Q1 178 157 21 11.8% 50.0% 69.2% 213
2019 Q4 230 216 14 6.1% 40.0% 70.9% 210
2019 Q3 260 234 26 10.0% 62.5% 75.4% 255
2019 Q2 227 215 12 5.3% 60.0% 81.6% 240
2019 Q1 213 198 15 7.0% 92.3% 56.8% 255
2018 Q4 213 199 14 6.6% 80.0% 72.1% 223
2018 Q3 254 242 12 4.7% 87.5% 83.8% 253
2018 Q2 199 186 13 6.5% 50.0% 80.0% 261
2018 Q1 237 216 21 8.9% 88.9% 84.5% 219
2017 Q4 255 230 25 9.8% 66.7% 78.0% 236
2017 Q3 226 203 23 10.2% 33.3% 79.7% 269
2017 Q2 227 214 13 5.7% 100.0% 86.4% 236
2017 Q1 218 205 13 6.0% 60.0% 76.0% 232
2016 Q4 180 169 11 6.1% — 82.6% 210
2016 Q3 250 237 13 5.2% 75.0% 78.9% 232
2016 Q2 243 235 8 3.3% 90.9% 64.6% 252
2016 Q1 188 181 7 3.7% 50.0% 86.3% 215
2015 Q4 212 204 8 3.8% 100.0% 83.3% 203
2015 Q3 275 266 9 3.3% 75.0% 86.2% 255
2015 Q2 232 225 7 3.0% 80.0% 86.2% 241
2015 Q1 173 165 8 4.6% 80.0% 76.5% 229
2014 Q4 223 217 6 2.7% 88.9% 71.7% 225
2014 Q3 192 178 14 7.3% 71.4% 70.5% 213
2014 Q2 218 211 7 3.2% 60.0% 78.5% 207
2014 Q1 209 196 9 4.3% 50.0% 64.1% 231
2013 Q4 220 205 13 5.9% 54.5% 70.1% 202
2013 Q3 212 201 9 4.2% 33.3% 71.4% 235
2013 Q2 223 212 5 2.2% 36.4% 71.2% 219
2013 Q1 196 183 6 3.1% 42.9% 70.0% 226
2012 Q4 257 241 13 5.1% 50.0% 56.3% 244
2012 Q3 246 237 7 2.8% 50.0% 74.4% 272
2012 Q2 256 237 12 4.7% 53.8% 75.4% 264
2012 Q1 280 259 15 5.4% 54.5% 56.7% 270
2011 Q4 216 203 9 4.2% 36.4% 60.0% 243
2011 Q3 290 264 23 7.9% 52.9% 43.8% 248
2011 Q2 279 250 26 9.3% 66.7% 41.0% 282
2011 Q1 245 204 39 15.9% 43.3% 35.1% 287
2010 Q4 288 239 46 16.0% 32.0% 58.1% 273
2010 Q3 323 249 71 22.0% 53.8% 66.2% 351
2010 Q2 288 221 62 21.5% 61.1% 66.3% 339
2010 Q1 239 178 60 25.1% 53.8% 63.8% 298
2009 Q4 271 219 50 18.5% 41.7% 80.5% 273
2009 Q3 293 228 64 21.8% 60.0% 77.6% 324
2009 Q2 253 187 65 25.7% 81.0% 86.8% 298
2009 Q1 248 194 54 21.8% 63.2% 68.8% 264
2008 Q4 338 246 90 26.6% 64.0% 70.3% 290
2008 Q3 397 314 78 19.6% 60.0% 51.4% 358
2008 Q2 341 263 75 22.0% 84.2% 61.1% 394
2008 Q1 360 263 96 26.7% 73.5% 71.8% 422
2007 Q4 362 254 106 29.3% 80.8% 80.8% 390
2007 Q3 403 305 95 23.6% 78.6% 78.3% 435
2007 Q2 403 304 99 24.6% 68.2% 85.0% 436
2007 Q1 396 300 95 24.0% 83.3% 83.9% 456
2006 Q4 374 287 86 23.0% 71.4% 84.6% 407
2006 Q3 401 296 104 25.9% 87.5% 77.3% 409
2006 Q2 353 257 94 26.6% 84.2% 82.6% 425
2006 Q1 347 261 82 23.6% 77.4% 75.8% 391
2005 Q4 421 310 110 26.1% 88.0% 88.8% 382
2005 Q3 421 337 83 19.7% 73.1% 82.9% 462
2005 Q2 464 357 106 22.8% 79.2% 76.1% 455
2005 Q1 437 308 129 29.5% 83.3% 83.9% 460
2004 Q4 491 323 164 33.4% 70.0% 68.1% 498
2004 Q3 486 360 126 25.9% 87.5% 82.6% 549
2004 Q2 414 315 97 23.4% 77.8% 53.4% 492
2004 Q1 353 261 87 24.6% 83.3% 65.3% 460
2003 Q4 320 228 78 24.4% 55.6% 58.8% 398
2003 Q3 414 313 93 22.5% 65.0% 65.1% 383
2003 Q2 408 317 91 22.3% 70.0% 64.6% 434
2003 Q1 353 283 70 19.8% 66.7% 45.8% 385
2002 Q4 323 265 58 18.0% 25.0% 64.8% 386
2002 Q3 318 264 54 17.0% 50.0% 59.6% 379
2002 Q2 305 244 61 20.0% 50.0% 58.1% 339
2002 Q1 296 250 42 14.2% 27.3% 50.8% 335
2001 Q4 346 294 50 14.5% 50.0% 62.5% 301
2001 Q3 364 304 58 15.9% 33.3% 63.2% 375
2001 Q2 348 282 62 17.8% 58.3% 56.5% 384
2001 Q1 268 233 34 12.7% 33.3% 35.5% 319
2000 Q4 295 258 35 11.9% 66.7% 55.7% 297
2000 Q3 328 278 50 15.2% 50.0% 69.9% 388
2000 Q2 329 267 62 18.8% 70.0% 63.8% 316
2000 Q1 291 233 58 19.9% 25.0% 64.0% 389
1999 Q4 307 254 52 16.9% 14.3% 57.8% 283
1999 Q3 318 263 52 16.4% 33.3% 55.9% 334
1999 Q2 265 222 40 15.1% 33.3% 60.0% 334
1999 Q1 255 195 59 23.1% 80.0% 61.5% 293
1998 Q4 336 278 55 16.4% 50.0% 47.7% 268
1998 Q3 348 295 53 15.2% 20.0% 33.1% 316
1998 Q2 278 243 34 12.2% 57.1% 36.9% 331
1996 Q1 280 219 61 21.8% 53.8% 72.5% —
1995 Q4 296 232 64 21.6% 33.3% 72.2% —
1995 Q3 285 207 78 27.4% 63.6% 76.7% —
1995 Q2 303 234 69 22.8% 66.7% 85.6% —
1995 Q1 287 223 64 22.3% 72.2% 81.1% —
1994 Q4 368 293 75 20.4% 77.8% 86.4% —
1994 Q3 341 281 60 17.6% 83.3% 64.0% —
1994 Q2 303 261 42 13.9% 37.5% 53.9% —
1994 Q1 274 228 46 16.8% 40.0% 62.1% —
1993 Q4 402 314 88 21.9% 38.5% 58.0% —
1993 Q3 410 359 51 12.4% 57.1% 47.2% —
1993 Q2 339 300 39 11.5% 35.3% 40.0% —
1993 Q1 342 277 65 19.0% 83.3% 54.1% —
1992 Q4 335 278 57 17.0% 100.0% 45.7% —
1992 Q3 389 341 48 12.3% 33.3% 43.9% —
1992 Q2 348 291 57 16.4% 38.5% 41.2% —
1992 Q1 298 250 48 16.1% 62.5% 42.7% —
1991 Q4 320 248 72 22.5% 100.0% 46.7% —
1991 Q3 391 326 65 16.6% 75.0% 56.0% —
1991 Q2 371 312 59 15.9% 76.9% 36.3% —
1991 Q1 324 257 67 20.7% 83.3% 43.6% —
1990 Q4 398 307 91 22.9% 60.0% 40.7% —
1990 Q3 422 341 81 19.2% 50.0% 39.3% —
1990 Q2 421 334 87 20.7% 52.9% 21.1% —
1990 Q1 448 332 116 25.9% 44.4% 28.3% —
1989 Q4 542 414 128 23.6% 32.1% 14.8% —
1989 Q3 299 251 48 16.1% 35.3% 11.0% —
1989 Q2 456 355 101 22.1% 44.4% 34.9% —
1989 Q1 352 304 48 13.6% 44.4% 52.4% —
1988 Q4 406 318 88 21.7% 25.0% 43.0% —
1988 Q3 477 389 88 18.4% 100.0% 50.0% —
1988 Q2 378 305 73 19.3% 75.0% 54.1% —
1988 Q1 346 300 46 13.3% 60.0% 54.1% —
1987 Q4 353 313 40 11.3% 78.6% 56.8% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me