← All authorities

Walsall

West Midlands · E08000030 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
753
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
16.3%
higher than 76% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
76.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
91.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.7%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
34.6%
56 allowed of 162 decided
Decisions overturned
1.2%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 26.9%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
826
in the window
Applications decided
753
in the window
Approval rate
83.7%
630 granted, 123 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 29 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
86.7%
rank 220 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 29 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2395.7%100.0%
Minor19977.4%76.0%
Other53185.5%—
of which householder45588.1%91.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01252502024 Q3: 239 received2024 Q3: 215 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 200 received2024 Q4: 227 decided2025 Q1: 224 received2025 Q1: 196 decided2025 Q2: 210 received2025 Q2: 195 decided2025 Q3: 192 received2025 Q3: 250 decided2025 Q4: 203 received2025 Q4: 211 decided2026 Q1: 237 received2026 Q1: 144 decided2026 Q2: 194 received2026 Q2: 148 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
56%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000030). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 148 118 30 20.3% 100.0% 0.0% 194
2026 Q1 144 119 25 17.4% 100.0% 63.6% 237
2025 Q4 211 179 32 15.2% — 81.3% 203
2025 Q3 250 214 36 14.4% — 85.7% 192
2025 Q2 195 160 35 17.9% 100.0% 90.0% 210
2025 Q1 196 180 16 8.2% 100.0% 93.8% 224
2024 Q4 227 200 27 11.9% 100.0% 92.9% 200
2024 Q3 215 191 24 11.2% 0.0% 96.3% 239
2024 Q2 228 192 36 15.8% 100.0% 56.3% 250
2024 Q1 235 187 48 20.4% 100.0% 73.3% 186
2023 Q4 227 197 30 13.2% 33.3% 27.8% 218
2023 Q3 202 175 27 13.4% 0.0% 28.6% 187
2023 Q2 197 144 53 26.9% 25.0% 6.9% 222
2023 Q1 251 199 52 20.7% 20.0% 20.0% 194
2022 Q4 210 183 27 12.9% 0.0% 21.4% 206
2022 Q3 258 231 27 10.5% — 41.2% 227
2022 Q2 248 224 24 9.7% 25.0% 45.5% 256
2022 Q1 303 278 25 8.3% — 37.5% 270
2021 Q4 275 258 17 6.2% — 33.3% 222
2021 Q3 203 187 16 7.9% 0.0% 25.0% 270
2021 Q2 269 243 26 9.7% — 50.0% 317
2021 Q1 287 259 28 9.8% 0.0% 54.5% 307
2020 Q4 216 193 23 10.6% 0.0% 45.5% 286
2020 Q3 220 200 20 9.1% — 42.9% 249
2020 Q2 181 159 22 12.2% — 75.0% 168
2020 Q1 258 227 31 12.0% 100.0% 81.0% 218
2019 Q4 189 172 17 9.0% 100.0% 90.0% 257
2019 Q3 198 183 15 7.6% — 80.0% 275
2019 Q2 259 229 30 11.6% 100.0% 92.6% 302
2019 Q1 234 207 27 11.5% 100.0% 83.3% 276
2018 Q4 285 253 32 11.2% 100.0% 91.2% 338
2018 Q3 312 275 37 11.9% 100.0% 90.2% 287
2018 Q2 310 272 38 12.3% 100.0% 85.3% 434
2018 Q1 271 231 40 14.8% 100.0% 88.9% 303
2017 Q4 311 274 37 11.9% 50.0% 78.9% 373
2017 Q3 256 235 21 8.2% 50.0% 44.1% 256
2017 Q2 269 240 29 10.8% 100.0% 60.0% 297
2017 Q1 228 208 20 8.8% 100.0% 66.7% 292
2016 Q4 281 250 31 11.0% 50.0% 48.9% 251
2016 Q3 307 282 25 8.1% — 34.4% 277
2016 Q2 200 179 21 10.5% 50.0% 38.5% 303
2016 Q1 254 231 23 9.1% 100.0% 88.2% 318
2015 Q4 287 263 24 8.4% 100.0% 75.6% 305
2015 Q3 246 229 17 6.9% 100.0% 82.6% 261
2015 Q2 252 231 21 8.3% 70.0% 78.8% 321
2015 Q1 248 218 30 12.1% 100.0% 67.3% 274
2014 Q4 319 287 32 10.0% 87.5% 90.9% 297
2014 Q3 270 220 50 18.5% 100.0% 72.9% 330
2014 Q2 302 240 62 20.5% 85.7% 86.3% 327
2014 Q1 228 184 43 18.9% 85.7% 75.0% 304
2013 Q4 275 226 42 15.3% 63.6% 68.9% 250
2013 Q3 269 229 34 12.6% 81.3% 62.1% 301
2013 Q2 272 225 40 14.7% 46.7% 59.3% 277
2013 Q1 271 238 30 11.1% 38.5% 73.7% 308
2012 Q4 312 290 20 6.4% 60.0% 60.3% 299
2012 Q3 272 232 35 12.9% 43.8% 60.3% 289
2012 Q2 285 228 40 14.0% 42.9% 81.1% 307
2012 Q1 239 199 38 15.9% 81.8% 93.0% 271
2011 Q4 283 245 32 11.3% 41.2% 81.8% 266
2011 Q3 304 254 47 15.5% 66.7% 68.6% 306
2011 Q2 270 228 39 14.4% 45.5% 66.2% 284
2011 Q1 202 163 35 17.3% 57.1% 86.0% 287
2010 Q4 290 236 51 17.6% 66.7% 82.1% 265
2010 Q3 334 265 65 19.5% 76.5% 78.2% 296
2010 Q2 261 187 65 24.9% 76.9% 85.2% 325
2010 Q1 230 174 53 23.0% 56.3% 85.2% 264
2009 Q4 298 237 61 20.5% 63.6% 73.5% 268
2009 Q3 319 255 60 18.8% 76.5% 73.4% 309
2009 Q2 272 216 54 19.9% 62.5% 78.3% 330
2009 Q1 275 208 66 24.0% 75.0% 85.0% 299
2008 Q4 331 255 73 22.1% 50.0% 75.3% 299
2008 Q3 433 348 82 18.9% 68.4% 78.5% 380
2008 Q2 438 331 100 22.8% 64.3% 82.4% 422
2008 Q1 429 338 87 20.3% 81.0% 86.1% 486
2007 Q4 535 408 127 23.7% 72.4% 88.5% 474
2007 Q3 582 444 134 23.0% 72.2% 83.8% 508
2007 Q2 567 400 161 28.4% 64.0% 93.4% 550
2007 Q1 352 266 79 22.4% 87.5% 92.8% 494
2006 Q4 469 359 103 22.0% 52.0% 89.1% 457
2006 Q3 599 454 134 22.4% 84.0% 76.8% 474
2006 Q2 439 319 114 26.0% 68.8% 67.9% 516
2006 Q1 386 273 110 28.5% 62.5% 81.8% 435
2005 Q4 499 362 134 26.9% 66.7% 84.0% 458
2005 Q3 519 393 122 23.5% 66.7% 80.0% 542
2005 Q2 613 485 127 20.7% 71.4% 82.3% 547
2005 Q1 448 342 102 22.8% 73.3% 78.8% 587
2004 Q4 611 433 171 28.0% 42.9% 78.3% 563
2004 Q3 631 493 133 21.1% 71.4% 66.7% 603
2004 Q2 685 576 100 14.6% 14.3% 42.1% 659
2004 Q1 472 384 82 17.4% 30.0% 41.6% 612
2003 Q4 507 430 68 13.4% 35.3% 32.4% 545
2003 Q3 598 547 44 7.4% 18.8% 33.7% 556
2003 Q2 469 434 31 6.6% 23.1% 25.6% 551
2003 Q1 400 336 56 14.0% 25.0% 41.7% 527
2002 Q4 495 417 75 15.2% 28.6% 46.0% 502
2002 Q3 444 387 55 12.4% 52.9% 48.8% 568
2002 Q2 486 410 61 12.6% 34.8% 54.3% 477
2002 Q1 423 364 49 11.6% 38.1% 45.2% 520
2001 Q4 462 390 57 12.3% 35.7% 53.6% 395
2001 Q3 498 433 54 10.8% 15.4% 50.0% 481
2001 Q2 403 347 49 12.2% 50.0% 50.0% 488
2001 Q1 381 312 62 16.3% 58.3% 58.0% 446
2000 Q4 380 333 35 9.2% 27.3% 51.6% 375
2000 Q3 453 384 49 10.8% 20.0% 44.0% 419
2000 Q2 385 338 33 8.6% 53.8% 35.9% 404
2000 Q1 374 320 37 9.9% 66.7% 50.0% 462
1999 Q4 411 339 54 13.1% 54.5% 35.1% 346
1999 Q3 434 362 60 13.8% 43.8% 35.7% 422
1999 Q2 361 317 32 8.9% 44.4% 40.0% 405
1999 Q1 256 210 30 11.7% 46.7% 47.4% 342
1998 Q4 458 355 73 15.9% 50.0% 51.1% 478
1998 Q3 386 312 53 13.7% 40.0% 48.2% 364
1998 Q2 378 315 50 13.2% 57.1% 33.9% 359
1996 Q1 480 446 34 7.1% 50.0% 50.0% —
1995 Q4 494 451 43 8.7% 30.0% 48.2% —
1995 Q3 539 511 28 5.2% 33.3% 43.5% —
1995 Q2 553 516 37 6.7% 57.9% 38.8% —
1995 Q1 519 491 28 5.4% 31.8% 36.6% —
1994 Q4 474 440 34 7.2% 40.0% 41.9% —
1994 Q3 575 538 37 6.4% 51.7% 41.3% —
1994 Q2 535 510 25 4.7% 67.9% 42.1% —
1994 Q1 539 494 45 8.3% 51.7% 37.9% —
1993 Q4 557 518 39 7.0% 52.6% 41.6% —
1993 Q3 682 635 47 6.9% 48.0% 38.1% —
1993 Q2 544 508 36 6.6% 38.9% 34.0% —
1993 Q1 471 437 34 7.2% 50.0% 37.2% —
1992 Q4 520 465 55 10.6% 33.3% 42.4% —
1992 Q3 523 480 43 8.2% 31.6% 29.2% —
1992 Q2 639 595 44 6.9% 39.1% 49.8% —
1992 Q1 445 406 39 8.8% 61.3% 49.7% —
1991 Q4 607 556 51 8.4% 50.0% 45.5% —
1991 Q3 647 586 61 9.4% 46.9% 39.1% —
1991 Q2 645 590 55 8.5% 50.0% 38.8% —
1991 Q1 475 396 79 16.6% 61.0% 32.6% —
1990 Q4 542 467 75 13.8% 39.6% 38.5% —
1990 Q3 709 630 79 11.1% 61.0% 31.8% —
1990 Q2 768 679 89 11.6% 50.9% 25.1% —
1990 Q1 573 501 72 12.6% 51.9% 25.0% —
1989 Q4 686 606 80 11.7% 45.1% 29.8% —
1989 Q3 651 572 79 12.1% 29.2% 30.0% —
1989 Q2 706 647 59 8.4% 51.1% 43.0% —
1989 Q1 642 573 69 10.7% 63.4% 41.3% —
1988 Q4 608 547 61 10.0% 51.7% 46.6% —
1988 Q3 687 634 53 7.7% 55.6% 51.7% —
1988 Q2 634 588 46 7.3% 69.0% 52.9% —
1988 Q1 562 504 58 10.3% 59.5% 49.8% —
1987 Q4 529 483 46 8.7% 54.3% 54.3% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me