← All authorities

Birmingham

West Midlands · E08000025 · 128 quarters held (1992 Q3 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
3,333
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
17.9%
higher than 84% of authorities
Majors in time
47.6%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
28.5%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
83.1%
no formal threshold
Delegated
98.4%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
32.9%
258 allowed of 784 decided
Decisions overturned
1.2%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 22.9%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
3,729
in the window
Applications decided
3,333
in the window
Approval rate
82.1%
2,735 granted, 598 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 33 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
66.5%
rank 293 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 36 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major8988.8%47.6%
Minor67176.5%28.5%
Other2,57383.3%—
of which householder1,97186.6%83.1%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
05101,0192024 Q3: 992 received2024 Q3: 693 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 946 received2024 Q4: 841 decided2025 Q1: 937 received2025 Q1: 799 decided2025 Q2: 865 received2025 Q2: 864 decided2025 Q3: 1,019 received2025 Q3: 921 decided2025 Q4: 873 received2025 Q4: 949 decided2026 Q1: 921 received2026 Q1: 738 decided2026 Q2: 916 received2026 Q2: 725 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
57%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000025). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1992 Q3 to 2026 Q2 (128 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1992 Q3 to 2026 Q2 (128 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 725 597 128 17.7% 66.7% 17.7% 916
2026 Q1 738 614 124 16.8% 16.7% 29.4% 921
2025 Q4 949 758 191 20.1% 66.7% 29.4% 873
2025 Q3 921 766 155 16.8% 33.3% 34.8% 1,019
2025 Q2 864 715 149 17.2% 33.3% 20.0% 865
2025 Q1 799 681 118 14.8% 60.0% 20.0% 937
2024 Q4 841 690 151 18.0% 50.0% 31.6% 946
2024 Q3 693 579 114 16.5% 100.0% 34.1% 992
2024 Q2 861 700 161 18.7% 100.0% 89.7% 1,088
2024 Q1 957 749 208 21.7% 80.0% 88.5% 1,036
2023 Q4 1,042 803 239 22.9% 100.0% 84.8% 1,068
2023 Q3 969 788 181 18.7% 100.0% 74.5% 1,113
2023 Q2 1,038 838 200 19.3% 66.7% 84.5% 1,151
2023 Q1 1,275 1,103 172 13.5% 100.0% 86.0% 1,087
2022 Q4 1,022 841 181 17.7% 71.4% 94.6% 1,264
2022 Q3 1,111 953 158 14.2% 85.7% 88.4% 1,105
2022 Q2 1,240 1,042 198 16.0% 92.3% 88.8% 1,216
2022 Q1 1,123 960 163 14.5% 88.9% 92.0% 1,462
2021 Q4 1,252 1,047 205 16.4% 100.0% 90.4% 1,335
2021 Q3 1,293 1,129 164 12.7% 100.0% 82.9% 1,258
2021 Q2 1,192 1,029 163 13.7% 93.3% 95.9% 1,409
2021 Q1 1,122 953 169 15.1% 90.0% 87.1% 1,436
2020 Q4 1,209 1,050 159 13.2% 100.0% 91.0% 1,341
2020 Q3 971 825 146 15.0% 100.0% 81.1% 1,324
2020 Q2 1,055 892 163 15.5% 72.7% 78.1% 1,077
2020 Q1 1,176 1,000 176 15.0% 75.0% 76.2% 1,250
2019 Q4 1,290 1,121 169 13.1% 84.2% 59.0% 1,351
2019 Q3 1,281 1,116 165 12.9% 57.7% 67.5% 1,367
2019 Q2 1,263 1,098 165 13.1% 76.9% 73.6% 1,511
2019 Q1 1,170 1,011 159 13.6% 78.6% 58.7% 1,425
2018 Q4 1,202 1,026 176 14.6% 70.6% 57.5% 1,362
2018 Q3 1,291 1,151 140 10.8% 60.9% 52.3% 1,324
2018 Q2 1,172 1,023 149 12.7% 82.6% 58.0% 1,425
2018 Q1 1,159 1,001 158 13.6% 66.7% 64.3% 1,399
2017 Q4 1,160 1,023 137 11.8% 58.6% 61.0% 1,406
2017 Q3 1,239 1,104 135 10.9% 93.5% 67.9% 1,386
2017 Q2 1,215 1,076 139 11.4% 94.7% 77.8% 1,492
2017 Q1 1,158 1,050 108 9.3% 100.0% 86.9% 1,456
2016 Q4 1,215 1,098 117 9.6% 92.9% 87.9% 1,346
2016 Q3 1,277 1,164 113 8.8% 90.3% 81.2% 1,404
2016 Q2 1,309 1,168 141 10.8% 92.9% 83.8% 1,513
2016 Q1 1,123 1,016 107 9.5% 91.9% 80.7% 1,423
2015 Q4 1,374 1,247 127 9.2% 97.4% 78.0% 1,481
2015 Q3 1,278 1,140 138 10.8% 91.8% 85.3% 1,391
2015 Q2 1,281 1,101 180 14.1% 81.0% 81.2% 1,451
2015 Q1 1,029 889 140 13.6% 94.7% 80.8% 1,329
2014 Q4 1,097 970 127 11.6% 87.8% 79.2% 1,235
2014 Q3 1,178 1,046 132 11.2% 84.6% 77.8% 1,268
2014 Q2 1,068 980 88 8.2% 82.7% 82.4% 1,377
2014 Q1 1,007 904 83 8.2% 93.2% 84.7% 1,251
2013 Q4 1,132 1,003 107 9.5% 91.1% 84.4% 1,253
2013 Q3 1,270 1,131 118 9.3% 88.2% 88.5% 1,359
2013 Q2 1,143 1,046 90 7.9% 95.5% 84.4% 1,430
2013 Q1 911 807 94 10.3% 93.0% 88.6% 1,257
2012 Q4 1,149 1,010 123 10.7% 78.7% 85.0% 1,151
2012 Q3 1,236 1,106 114 9.2% 81.4% 85.4% 1,463
2012 Q2 1,211 1,061 139 11.5% 82.7% 83.9% 1,439
2012 Q1 1,125 966 142 12.6% 78.0% 83.6% 1,397
2011 Q4 1,198 1,031 153 12.8% 78.4% 77.6% 1,334
2011 Q3 1,338 1,161 162 12.1% 66.7% 81.1% 1,428
2011 Q2 1,156 1,010 132 11.4% 80.8% 71.5% 1,391
2011 Q1 986 885 86 8.7% 68.5% 71.4% 1,310
2010 Q4 1,332 1,161 158 11.9% 66.0% 70.9% 1,245
2010 Q3 1,331 1,163 156 11.7% 72.9% 69.3% 1,482
2010 Q2 1,262 1,122 127 10.1% 67.5% 80.4% 1,590
2010 Q1 1,090 936 147 13.5% 56.3% 71.2% 1,370
2009 Q4 1,191 1,003 176 14.8% 53.1% 64.7% 1,331
2009 Q3 1,284 1,071 197 15.3% 85.7% 77.5% 1,465
2009 Q2 1,192 1,004 175 14.7% 89.1% 75.8% 1,571
2009 Q1 1,013 832 163 16.1% 87.8% 80.4% 1,321
2008 Q4 1,228 984 236 19.2% 80.5% 79.1% 1,321
2008 Q3 1,439 1,148 279 19.4% 61.5% 71.8% 1,615
2008 Q2 1,415 1,126 280 19.8% 63.0% 75.2% 1,655
2008 Q1 1,525 1,197 321 21.0% 70.9% 70.0% 1,801
2007 Q4 1,681 1,354 312 18.6% 70.8% 68.0% 1,770
2007 Q3 1,691 1,384 299 17.7% 81.7% 72.8% 1,946
2007 Q2 1,609 1,295 308 19.1% 71.9% 73.4% 2,044
2007 Q1 1,498 1,186 306 20.4% 67.1% 75.3% 1,880
2006 Q4 1,654 1,300 333 20.1% 70.1% 72.1% 1,728
2006 Q3 1,768 1,369 382 21.6% 80.0% 75.8% 1,907
2006 Q2 1,555 1,222 318 20.5% 85.9% 78.4% 2,032
2006 Q1 1,494 1,154 326 21.8% 65.6% 73.9% 1,895
2005 Q4 1,578 1,270 300 19.0% 45.1% 65.6% 1,643
2005 Q3 1,715 1,391 316 18.4% 53.3% 60.7% 1,837
2005 Q2 1,814 1,428 373 20.6% 42.1% 70.0% 1,967
2005 Q1 1,501 1,135 301 20.1% 54.2% 66.7% 2,216
2004 Q4 1,879 1,443 344 18.3% 53.8% 62.7% 1,867
2004 Q3 1,837 1,386 364 19.8% 42.6% 62.0% 1,303
2004 Q2 1,770 1,342 355 20.1% 50.0% 66.1% 2,184
2004 Q1 1,650 1,263 325 19.7% 47.2% 63.8% 2,066
2003 Q4 1,658 1,275 332 20.0% 40.3% 63.9% 1,833
2003 Q3 1,723 1,334 307 17.8% 38.1% 68.7% 2,035
2003 Q2 1,571 1,231 270 17.2% 29.8% 62.7% 1,977
2003 Q1 1,539 1,271 251 16.3% 23.1% 49.9% 1,804
2002 Q4 1,506 1,209 203 13.5% 23.9% 45.4% 1,578
2002 Q3 1,441 1,142 220 15.3% 34.9% 40.7% 1,672
2002 Q2 1,371 1,056 242 17.7% 25.7% 41.4% 1,728
2002 Q1 1,423 1,052 278 19.5% 20.0% 44.6% 1,591
2001 Q4 1,399 1,056 229 16.4% 33.3% 38.5% 1,438
2001 Q3 1,636 1,170 261 16.0% 34.6% 35.8% 1,609
2001 Q2 1,325 915 219 16.5% 23.3% 38.6% 1,604
2001 Q1 1,319 920 236 17.9% 38.6% 44.2% 1,634
2000 Q4 1,212 853 207 17.1% 45.0% 47.3% 1,289
2000 Q3 1,298 946 192 14.8% 50.0% 47.3% 1,469
2000 Q2 1,446 1,078 194 13.4% 43.6% 49.2% 1,529
2000 Q1 1,187 857 209 17.6% 37.8% 64.2% 1,573
1999 Q4 1,213 906 172 14.2% 53.7% 61.6% 1,307
1999 Q3 1,268 944 192 15.1% 65.7% 62.2% 1,465
1999 Q2 1,298 969 203 15.6% 54.3% 60.4% 1,479
1999 Q1 1,126 812 190 16.9% 55.0% 57.7% 1,355
1998 Q4 1,425 1,020 268 18.8% 51.1% 51.3% 1,283
1998 Q3 1,262 921 219 17.4% 46.5% 53.7% 1,423
1998 Q2 1,105 814 187 16.9% 47.9% 49.0% 1,388
1996 Q1 985 835 150 15.2% 52.0% 49.0% —
1995 Q4 841 690 151 18.0% 72.7% 58.0% —
1995 Q3 1,045 898 147 14.1% 43.8% 59.1% —
1995 Q2 918 796 122 13.3% 72.0% 55.4% —
1995 Q1 843 728 115 13.6% 62.1% 60.8% —
1994 Q4 985 842 143 14.5% 72.0% 63.2% —
1994 Q3 966 853 113 11.7% 57.1% 64.5% —
1994 Q2 952 818 134 14.1% 63.3% 52.0% —
1994 Q1 930 776 154 16.6% 59.6% 61.2% —
1993 Q4 931 803 128 13.7% 68.0% 63.7% —
1993 Q3 1,088 951 137 12.6% 51.2% 63.5% —
1993 Q2 990 865 125 12.6% 54.8% 50.7% —
1993 Q1 810 683 127 15.7% 60.5% 53.6% —
1992 Q4 1,009 854 155 15.4% 54.9% 49.8% —
1992 Q3 909 752 157 17.3% 62.5% 54.7% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me