← All authorities

Sunderland

North East · E08000024 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
607
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
9.4%
higher than 35% of authorities
Majors in time
90.9%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
96.2%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
98.6%
no formal threshold
Delegated
89.3%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
30.1%
34 allowed of 113 decided
Decisions overturned
0.9%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 12.2%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
607
in the window
Applications decided
607
in the window
Approval rate
90.6%
550 granted, 57 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 10 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
97.7%
rank 47 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 9 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3989.7%90.9%
Minor14492.4%96.2%
Other42490.1%—
of which householder27893.9%98.6%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0851692024 Q3: 169 received2024 Q3: 162 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 145 received2024 Q4: 141 decided2025 Q1: 154 received2025 Q1: 148 decided2025 Q2: 154 received2025 Q2: 127 decided2025 Q3: 160 received2025 Q3: 156 decided2025 Q4: 147 received2025 Q4: 147 decided2026 Q1: 162 received2026 Q1: 151 decided2026 Q2: 138 received2026 Q2: 153 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
167%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000024). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 153 144 9 5.9% 100.0% 100.0% 138
2026 Q1 151 135 16 10.6% 100.0% 94.7% 162
2025 Q4 147 129 18 12.2% 100.0% 95.0% 147
2025 Q3 156 142 14 9.0% 66.7% 95.5% 160
2025 Q2 127 121 6 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 154
2025 Q1 148 134 14 9.5% 50.0% 95.2% 154
2024 Q4 141 133 8 5.7% 100.0% 100.0% 145
2024 Q3 162 146 16 9.9% 100.0% 100.0% 169
2024 Q2 138 123 15 10.9% 100.0% 94.4% 161
2024 Q1 153 144 9 5.9% 100.0% 95.5% 150
2023 Q4 143 130 13 9.1% 81.8% 100.0% 153
2023 Q3 204 185 19 9.3% 100.0% 90.2% 171
2023 Q2 167 155 12 7.2% 100.0% 93.5% 194
2023 Q1 186 176 10 5.4% 100.0% 96.0% 196
2022 Q4 199 180 19 9.5% 100.0% 100.0% 182
2022 Q3 218 201 17 7.8% 100.0% 94.4% 220
2022 Q2 255 240 15 5.9% 100.0% 86.8% 230
2022 Q1 176 162 14 8.0% 100.0% 66.7% 232
2021 Q4 258 240 18 7.0% 100.0% 91.8% 221
2021 Q3 260 235 25 9.6% 100.0% 78.1% 263
2021 Q2 265 239 26 9.8% 100.0% 85.7% 280
2021 Q1 204 187 17 8.3% 100.0% 68.4% 254
2020 Q4 230 216 14 6.1% 100.0% 76.0% 213
2020 Q3 189 178 11 5.8% 100.0% 91.7% 256
2020 Q2 191 175 16 8.4% 100.0% 93.3% 159
2020 Q1 158 143 15 9.5% 100.0% 87.0% 228
2019 Q4 214 196 18 8.4% 100.0% 80.0% 197
2019 Q3 183 164 19 10.4% 100.0% 84.4% 190
2019 Q2 253 237 16 6.3% 66.7% 88.9% 215
2019 Q1 177 163 14 7.9% 100.0% 84.0% 227
2018 Q4 197 182 15 7.6% 100.0% 80.0% 205
2018 Q3 232 219 13 5.6% 83.3% 95.2% 215
2018 Q2 214 199 15 7.0% 100.0% 78.6% 224
2018 Q1 195 178 17 8.7% 100.0% 90.6% 241
2017 Q4 223 210 13 5.8% 100.0% 84.4% 225
2017 Q3 244 221 23 9.4% 88.9% 88.2% 253
2017 Q2 275 243 32 11.6% 100.0% 91.7% 266
2017 Q1 199 185 14 7.0% 100.0% 89.6% 284
2016 Q4 211 195 16 7.6% 100.0% 76.2% 205
2016 Q3 275 255 20 7.3% 100.0% 90.7% 262
2016 Q2 240 226 14 5.8% 100.0% 95.2% 281
2016 Q1 187 176 11 5.9% 100.0% 78.8% 226
2015 Q4 229 211 18 7.9% 100.0% 83.7% 215
2015 Q3 283 259 24 8.5% 100.0% 64.4% 222
2015 Q2 294 278 16 5.4% 87.5% 34.0% 288
2015 Q1 156 139 17 10.9% 100.0% 51.4% 273
2014 Q4 208 196 12 5.8% 100.0% 63.6% 186
2014 Q3 232 219 13 5.6% 100.0% 62.3% 228
2014 Q2 254 238 16 6.3% 77.8% 56.7% 249
2014 Q1 212 195 13 6.1% 60.0% 63.3% 263
2013 Q4 237 216 14 5.9% 73.7% 56.5% 234
2013 Q3 273 258 8 2.9% 60.0% 71.1% 269
2013 Q2 277 239 13 4.7% 61.5% 52.9% 272
2013 Q1 201 188 10 5.0% 46.2% 56.4% 270
2012 Q4 253 229 13 5.1% 61.1% 56.6% 224
2012 Q3 248 224 13 5.2% 33.3% 57.1% 265
2012 Q2 264 232 9 3.4% 81.3% 57.9% 278
2012 Q1 227 205 9 4.0% 71.4% 85.5% 282
2011 Q4 229 212 11 4.8% 85.7% 89.3% 261
2011 Q3 295 279 7 2.4% 100.0% 89.7% 280
2011 Q2 245 224 10 4.1% 81.3% 93.6% 309
2011 Q1 192 171 9 4.7% 78.6% 91.7% 258
2010 Q4 255 236 12 4.7% 72.7% 94.1% 200
2010 Q3 305 278 19 6.2% 77.8% 96.9% 310
2010 Q2 304 269 20 6.6% 92.3% 97.2% 332
2010 Q1 239 201 23 9.6% 100.0% 97.3% 294
2009 Q4 269 235 23 8.6% 80.0% 97.2% 262
2009 Q3 296 270 22 7.4% 90.0% 96.3% 294
2009 Q2 333 302 19 5.7% 100.0% 95.9% 350
2009 Q1 235 212 15 6.4% 93.3% 98.5% 301
2008 Q4 276 230 40 14.5% 100.0% 97.0% 293
2008 Q3 391 360 25 6.4% 100.0% 97.8% 351
2008 Q2 465 414 39 8.4% 88.2% 96.5% 372
2008 Q1 387 355 25 6.5% 100.0% 90.4% 539
2007 Q4 489 436 45 9.2% 100.0% 96.6% 458
2007 Q3 542 477 51 9.4% 87.5% 93.4% 522
2007 Q2 587 511 65 11.1% 95.2% 90.1% 624
2007 Q1 431 364 51 11.8% 100.0% 93.1% 580
2006 Q4 482 424 44 9.1% 80.0% 83.5% 499
2006 Q3 587 504 71 12.1% 76.2% 87.2% 575
2006 Q2 640 537 68 10.6% 68.8% 78.6% 638
2006 Q1 512 398 48 9.4% 61.5% 85.2% 628
2005 Q4 580 441 79 13.6% 54.5% 84.2% 607
2005 Q3 713 577 98 13.7% 38.5% 70.8% 620
2005 Q2 654 559 85 13.0% 28.6% 83.9% 740
2005 Q1 568 483 82 14.4% 34.8% 56.3% 659
2004 Q4 720 625 84 11.7% 20.0% 38.5% 557
2004 Q3 706 658 45 6.4% 47.4% 34.6% 658
2004 Q2 629 592 34 5.4% 60.0% 39.5% 715
2004 Q1 549 491 36 6.6% 44.4% 38.7% 721
2003 Q4 615 537 40 6.5% 44.4% 36.4% 604
2003 Q3 720 659 19 2.6% 58.3% 31.4% 733
2003 Q2 607 562 16 2.6% 40.0% 45.5% 789
2003 Q1 472 450 13 2.8% 50.0% 47.5% 628
2002 Q4 509 456 31 6.1% 70.0% 62.1% 529
2002 Q3 627 571 22 3.5% 33.3% 52.7% 578
2002 Q2 542 492 29 5.4% 44.4% 52.8% 612
2002 Q1 438 368 28 6.4% 33.3% 73.2% 586
2001 Q4 437 378 31 7.1% 63.6% 60.8% 454
2001 Q3 638 546 30 4.7% 65.2% 52.6% 583
2001 Q2 561 475 35 6.2% 61.5% 66.4% 614
2001 Q1 425 356 34 8.0% 73.7% 73.9% 511
2000 Q4 439 358 35 8.0% 62.5% 54.5% 422
2000 Q3 452 385 25 5.5% 52.6% 47.9% 487
2000 Q2 476 405 25 5.3% 66.7% 60.5% 509
2000 Q1 318 280 23 7.2% 83.3% 64.4% 454
1999 Q4 375 313 32 8.5% 69.2% 76.7% 365
1999 Q3 429 362 21 4.9% 37.5% 63.7% 408
1999 Q2 410 370 9 2.2% 66.7% 62.8% 407
1999 Q1 310 287 11 3.5% 40.0% 58.6% 436
1998 Q4 379 355 19 5.0% 72.7% 63.6% 391
1998 Q3 372 350 11 3.0% 85.7% 58.8% 405
1998 Q2 408 393 15 3.7% 72.7% 46.0% 401
1996 Q1 342 304 38 11.1% 61.5% 21.3% —
1995 Q4 305 280 25 8.2% 75.0% 54.3% —
1995 Q3 416 381 35 8.4% 55.0% 67.9% —
1995 Q2 426 399 27 6.3% 30.0% 66.7% —
1995 Q1 413 385 28 6.8% 46.2% 69.6% —
1994 Q4 355 325 30 8.5% 37.5% 64.3% —
1994 Q3 397 360 37 9.3% 72.7% 76.0% —
1994 Q2 421 380 41 9.7% 50.0% 65.3% —
1994 Q1 330 299 31 9.4% 42.9% 65.5% —
1993 Q4 389 352 37 9.5% 30.8% 64.6% —
1993 Q3 383 355 28 7.3% 75.0% 66.7% —
1993 Q2 381 355 26 6.8% 87.5% 71.6% —
1993 Q1 302 262 40 13.2% 38.5% 74.7% —
1992 Q4 345 313 32 9.3% 44.4% 61.0% —
1992 Q3 404 369 35 8.7% 68.8% 52.0% —
1992 Q2 401 356 45 11.2% 53.8% 62.2% —
1992 Q1 360 329 31 8.6% 36.4% 59.5% —
1991 Q4 382 318 64 16.8% 66.7% 57.1% —
1991 Q3 423 346 77 18.2% 66.7% 63.4% —
1991 Q2 421 347 74 17.6% 35.7% 57.7% —
1991 Q1 378 303 75 19.8% 47.1% 56.7% —
1990 Q4 465 364 101 21.7% 52.2% 59.5% —
1990 Q3 538 437 101 18.8% 35.0% 39.6% —
1990 Q2 447 384 63 14.1% 20.0% 42.3% —
1990 Q1 507 424 83 16.4% 37.9% 35.1% —
1989 Q4 498 406 92 18.5% 27.3% 31.6% —
1989 Q3 584 487 97 16.6% 18.2% 16.7% —
1989 Q2 532 446 86 16.2% 40.9% 9.6% —
1989 Q1 465 396 69 14.8% 18.8% 18.8% —
1988 Q4 567 459 108 19.0% 23.5% 21.8% —
1988 Q3 552 457 95 17.2% 27.3% 23.7% —
1988 Q2 589 502 87 14.8% 18.2% 28.8% —
1988 Q1 491 425 66 13.4% 44.0% 47.4% —
1987 Q4 436 355 81 18.6% 65.0% 42.6% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me