← All authorities

South Tyneside

North East · E08000023 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
387
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
9.6%
higher than 36% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
90.9%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
97.1%
no formal threshold
Delegated
92.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
37.0%
27 allowed of 73 decided
Decisions overturned
1.0%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 20.4%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
460
in the window
Applications decided
387
in the window
Approval rate
90.4%
350 granted, 37 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 11 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
94.3%
rank 103 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 14 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major887.5%100.0%
Minor7494.6%90.9%
Other30589.5%—
of which householder21498.6%97.1%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0661322024 Q3: 108 received2024 Q3: 103 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 73 received2024 Q4: 94 decided2025 Q1: 121 received2025 Q1: 88 decided2025 Q2: 89 received2025 Q2: 101 decided2025 Q3: 108 received2025 Q3: 94 decided2025 Q4: 113 received2025 Q4: 93 decided2026 Q1: 107 received2026 Q1: 108 decided2026 Q2: 132 received2026 Q2: 92 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
53%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000023). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 92 84 8 8.7% — 66.7% 132
2026 Q1 108 86 22 20.4% 100.0% 90.9% 107
2025 Q4 93 91 2 2.2% — 100.0% 113
2025 Q3 94 89 5 5.3% — 100.0% 108
2025 Q2 101 98 3 3.0% — 75.0% 89
2025 Q1 88 82 6 6.8% — 100.0% 121
2024 Q4 94 91 3 3.2% 100.0% 75.0% 73
2024 Q3 103 97 6 5.8% — 91.7% 108
2024 Q2 136 132 4 2.9% — 87.5% 121
2024 Q1 112 108 4 3.6% — 60.0% 119
2023 Q4 105 101 4 3.8% 100.0% 0.0% 102
2023 Q3 147 142 5 3.4% — 55.6% 104
2023 Q2 112 102 10 8.9% — 57.1% 138
2023 Q1 110 108 2 1.8% 100.0% 100.0% 129
2022 Q4 120 115 5 4.2% — 87.5% 133
2022 Q3 143 134 9 6.3% — 71.4% 112
2022 Q2 151 145 6 4.0% 100.0% 66.7% 135
2022 Q1 129 118 11 8.5% — 50.0% 151
2021 Q4 158 152 6 3.8% 100.0% 0.0% 133
2021 Q3 183 177 6 3.3% — 71.4% 171
2021 Q2 167 162 5 3.0% 100.0% 10.0% 192
2021 Q1 152 140 12 7.9% — 50.0% 185
2020 Q4 192 186 6 3.1% — 83.3% 155
2020 Q3 117 115 2 1.7% — 100.0% 199
2020 Q2 117 114 3 2.6% 100.0% 80.0% 113
2020 Q1 112 109 3 2.7% — 100.0% 140
2019 Q4 142 135 7 4.9% 100.0% 100.0% 98
2019 Q3 152 146 6 3.9% — 100.0% 151
2019 Q2 122 112 10 8.2% — 100.0% 170
2019 Q1 97 88 9 9.3% — 100.0% 115
2018 Q4 110 104 6 5.5% — 100.0% 114
2018 Q3 131 123 8 6.1% 100.0% 100.0% 130
2018 Q2 154 138 16 10.4% 100.0% 93.8% 147
2018 Q1 114 104 10 8.8% 100.0% 100.0% 140
2017 Q4 157 148 9 5.7% — 100.0% 124
2017 Q3 160 152 8 5.0% — 100.0% 169
2017 Q2 123 122 1 0.8% — 100.0% 164
2017 Q1 159 147 12 7.5% — 93.3% 135
2016 Q4 172 162 10 5.8% 100.0% 22.7% 144
2016 Q3 148 136 12 8.1% 100.0% 46.4% 173
2016 Q2 155 148 7 4.5% 100.0% 50.0% 186
2016 Q1 106 100 6 5.7% 100.0% 38.1% 141
2015 Q4 142 135 7 4.9% 100.0% 87.5% 126
2015 Q3 132 126 6 4.5% — 69.6% 149
2015 Q2 153 146 7 4.6% 100.0% 66.7% 159
2015 Q1 106 105 1 0.9% 66.7% 61.9% 144
2014 Q4 162 155 7 4.3% 33.3% 56.1% 131
2014 Q3 142 134 8 5.6% 100.0% 50.0% 147
2014 Q2 151 148 3 2.0% 0.0% 67.9% 156
2014 Q1 144 140 4 2.8% 75.0% 97.8% 182
2013 Q4 130 122 4 3.1% 100.0% 87.5% 132
2013 Q3 136 126 5 3.7% 100.0% 71.0% 144
2013 Q2 164 155 6 3.7% 100.0% 65.2% 162
2013 Q1 129 114 9 7.0% 50.0% 75.0% 158
2012 Q4 182 172 6 3.3% 66.7% 78.6% 147
2012 Q3 156 145 9 5.8% 0.0% 90.5% 187
2012 Q2 182 176 4 2.2% 100.0% 92.3% 163
2012 Q1 169 161 7 4.1% 60.0% 73.9% 204
2011 Q4 171 165 4 2.3% 50.0% 79.5% 165
2011 Q3 182 168 13 7.1% 100.0% 57.1% 178
2011 Q2 202 194 8 4.0% 71.4% 60.0% 188
2011 Q1 150 144 4 2.7% 50.0% 63.6% 198
2010 Q4 202 185 16 7.9% 100.0% 84.2% 167
2010 Q3 220 205 13 5.9% 100.0% 93.5% 225
2010 Q2 176 159 16 9.1% 80.0% 78.8% 212
2010 Q1 158 134 24 15.2% 100.0% 88.2% 172
2009 Q4 161 150 11 6.8% 83.3% 75.0% 167
2009 Q3 217 201 15 6.9% 100.0% 86.1% 210
2009 Q2 215 201 14 6.5% 75.0% 80.6% 196
2009 Q1 118 97 21 17.8% 100.0% 87.5% 193
2008 Q4 186 161 25 13.4% 100.0% 87.2% 145
2008 Q3 239 213 25 10.5% 83.3% 93.0% 228
2008 Q2 274 240 34 12.4% 100.0% 86.0% 264
2008 Q1 227 208 18 7.9% 100.0% 86.3% 271
2007 Q4 343 308 35 10.2% 85.7% 90.8% 318
2007 Q3 310 277 32 10.3% 100.0% 89.2% 330
2007 Q2 343 310 29 8.5% 100.0% 84.3% 320
2007 Q1 303 283 19 6.3% 100.0% 86.8% 400
2006 Q4 315 291 23 7.3% 100.0% 80.4% 311
2006 Q3 367 343 23 6.3% 100.0% 79.6% 353
2006 Q2 398 368 26 6.5% 85.7% 68.6% 408
2006 Q1 249 228 21 8.4% 100.0% 77.8% 331
2005 Q4 324 301 21 6.5% 91.7% 87.3% 293
2005 Q3 348 330 16 4.6% 55.6% 83.3% 358
2005 Q2 352 330 21 6.0% 57.1% 74.0% 403
2005 Q1 279 259 20 7.2% 83.3% 84.4% 290
2004 Q4 379 344 35 9.2% 25.0% 81.0% 342
2004 Q3 418 387 31 7.4% 50.0% 80.0% 443
2004 Q2 452 402 50 11.1% 100.0% 68.3% 415
2004 Q1 330 290 40 12.1% 66.7% 79.6% 436
2003 Q4 417 371 45 10.8% 66.7% 55.1% 373
2003 Q3 406 378 27 6.7% 50.0% 46.8% 407
2003 Q2 353 320 33 9.3% 33.3% 46.7% 456
2003 Q1 341 306 34 10.0% 71.4% 50.9% 361
2002 Q4 278 251 25 9.0% 0.0% 59.6% 324
2002 Q3 305 260 42 13.8% 40.0% 28.6% 309
2002 Q2 335 303 26 7.8% — 60.9% 344
2002 Q1 229 194 27 11.8% 66.7% 52.8% 318
2001 Q4 287 242 42 14.6% 75.0% 49.0% 242
2001 Q3 301 257 44 14.6% 50.0% 57.5% 295
2001 Q2 274 235 39 14.2% — 55.8% 306
2001 Q1 175 149 25 14.3% 0.0% 65.2% 265
2000 Q4 253 217 28 11.1% 50.0% 64.3% 209
2000 Q3 257 217 35 13.6% 66.7% 70.6% 260
2000 Q2 254 228 22 8.7% 75.0% 75.0% 285
2000 Q1 201 172 9 4.5% 60.0% 78.8% 234
1999 Q4 254 236 14 5.5% 50.0% 70.6% 221
1999 Q3 290 274 14 4.8% 100.0% 66.7% 0
1999 Q2 248 210 36 14.5% 66.7% 62.1% 309
1999 Q1 236 195 39 16.5% 100.0% 62.9% 231
1998 Q4 241 206 32 13.3% 50.0% 71.1% 249
1998 Q3 268 234 33 12.3% 100.0% 66.7% 267
1998 Q2 277 239 37 13.4% 100.0% 65.0% 253
1996 Q1 256 222 34 13.3% 55.6% 60.8% —
1995 Q4 156 141 15 9.6% 60.0% 68.7% —
1995 Q3 242 223 19 7.9% 37.5% 60.6% —
1995 Q2 312 287 25 8.0% 69.2% 68.0% —
1995 Q1 200 177 23 11.5% 75.0% 58.9% —
1994 Q4 243 220 23 9.5% 57.1% 75.0% —
1994 Q3 294 262 32 10.9% 88.9% 68.8% —
1994 Q2 286 260 26 9.1% 66.7% 62.9% —
1994 Q1 251 210 41 16.3% 57.1% 69.8% —
1993 Q4 233 213 20 8.6% 70.6% 77.8% —
1993 Q3 274 254 20 7.3% 72.7% 61.1% —
1993 Q2 286 263 23 8.0% 100.0% 65.2% —
1993 Q1 251 219 32 12.7% 91.7% 79.8% —
1992 Q4 267 220 47 17.6% 60.0% 53.0% —
1992 Q3 325 279 46 14.2% 70.6% 52.3% —
1992 Q2 380 341 39 10.3% 76.0% 63.7% —
1992 Q1 303 275 28 9.2% 70.0% 64.2% —
1991 Q4 275 235 40 14.5% 66.7% 50.6% —
1991 Q3 354 317 37 10.5% 77.8% 54.5% —
1991 Q2 316 276 40 12.7% 63.6% 56.3% —
1991 Q1 306 278 28 9.2% 70.0% 64.5% —
1990 Q4 299 256 43 14.4% 66.7% 50.0% —
1990 Q3 355 318 37 10.4% 66.7% 49.4% —
1990 Q2 316 273 43 13.6% 83.3% 60.5% —
1990 Q1 419 342 77 18.4% 66.7% 37.8% —
1989 Q4 353 287 66 18.7% 76.0% 33.6% —
1989 Q3 264 230 34 12.9% 57.1% 14.5% —
1989 Q2 470 400 70 14.9% 70.0% 23.7% —
1989 Q1 329 281 48 14.6% 33.3% 18.0% —
1988 Q4 403 358 45 11.2% 40.0% 34.1% —
1988 Q3 327 286 41 12.5% 60.0% 41.3% —
1988 Q2 432 394 38 8.8% 100.0% 36.0% —
1988 Q1 268 238 30 11.2% 90.9% 41.3% —
1987 Q4 296 254 42 14.2% 57.1% 47.6% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me