← All authorities

North Tyneside

North East · E08000022 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
612
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
3.4%
higher than 3% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
100.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
99.1%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.5%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
29.7%
27 allowed of 91 decided
Decisions overturned
0.7%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 10.1%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
634
in the window
Applications decided
612
in the window
Approval rate
96.6%
591 granted, 21 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 1 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
99.4%
rank 16 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 5 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major1994.7%100.0%
Minor95100.0%100.0%
Other49896.0%—
of which householder38596.9%99.1%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0981952024 Q3: 159 received2024 Q3: 182 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 188 received2024 Q4: 168 decided2025 Q1: 195 received2025 Q1: 170 decided2025 Q2: 163 received2025 Q2: 180 decided2025 Q3: 139 received2025 Q3: 169 decided2025 Q4: 136 received2025 Q4: 129 decided2026 Q1: 186 received2026 Q1: 138 decided2026 Q2: 173 received2026 Q2: 176 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
65%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000022). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 176 169 7 4.0% 100.0% 100.0% 173
2026 Q1 138 135 3 2.2% 100.0% 100.0% 186
2025 Q4 129 125 4 3.1% — 100.0% 136
2025 Q3 169 162 7 4.1% — 100.0% 139
2025 Q2 180 174 6 3.3% 100.0% 100.0% 163
2025 Q1 170 161 9 5.3% 100.0% 100.0% 195
2024 Q4 168 160 8 4.8% 100.0% 100.0% 188
2024 Q3 182 170 12 6.6% — 100.0% 159
2024 Q2 180 173 7 3.9% 100.0% 100.0% 164
2024 Q1 140 135 5 3.6% 100.0% 100.0% 162
2023 Q4 163 148 15 9.2% 100.0% 100.0% 169
2023 Q3 210 203 7 3.3% 100.0% 100.0% 183
2023 Q2 190 179 11 5.8% 100.0% 100.0% 200
2023 Q1 149 138 11 7.4% 100.0% 100.0% 175
2022 Q4 226 217 9 4.0% 100.0% 100.0% 190
2022 Q3 230 219 11 4.8% 100.0% 96.4% 215
2022 Q2 256 250 6 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 237
2022 Q1 214 206 8 3.7% 100.0% 100.0% 281
2021 Q4 210 203 7 3.3% 100.0% 100.0% 190
2021 Q3 293 281 12 4.1% 100.0% 100.0% 248
2021 Q2 291 277 14 4.8% 100.0% 100.0% 321
2021 Q1 248 243 5 2.0% 100.0% 100.0% 275
2020 Q4 247 230 17 6.9% — 100.0% 265
2020 Q3 170 159 11 6.5% 100.0% 100.0% 232
2020 Q2 192 178 14 7.3% 100.0% 100.0% 180
2020 Q1 188 178 10 5.3% — 100.0% 209
2019 Q4 181 175 6 3.3% 100.0% 100.0% 205
2019 Q3 224 216 8 3.6% 100.0% 100.0% 208
2019 Q2 213 203 10 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 218
2019 Q1 193 187 6 3.1% 100.0% 100.0% 199
2018 Q4 237 213 24 10.1% 100.0% 100.0% 241
2018 Q3 238 219 19 8.0% 100.0% 100.0% 218
2018 Q2 226 217 9 4.0% 100.0% 100.0% 228
2018 Q1 227 209 18 7.9% 100.0% 100.0% 224
2017 Q4 242 226 16 6.6% 100.0% 96.9% 264
2017 Q3 240 225 15 6.3% 100.0% 100.0% 207
2017 Q2 221 209 12 5.4% 100.0% 100.0% 233
2017 Q1 188 183 5 2.7% 100.0% 100.0% 209
2016 Q4 220 206 14 6.4% 100.0% 100.0% 215
2016 Q3 236 219 17 7.2% 100.0% 95.5% 204
2016 Q2 248 231 17 6.9% 100.0% 100.0% 268
2016 Q1 237 221 16 6.8% 80.0% 100.0% 239
2015 Q4 174 164 10 5.7% 100.0% 97.1% 223
2015 Q3 246 231 15 6.1% 100.0% 98.1% 207
2015 Q2 226 200 26 11.5% 66.7% 100.0% 241
2015 Q1 175 163 12 6.9% 61.5% 91.7% 230
2014 Q4 207 193 14 6.8% 25.0% 88.2% 208
2014 Q3 203 190 13 6.4% 70.0% 91.3% 201
2014 Q2 224 206 18 8.0% 87.5% 97.8% 246
2014 Q1 182 160 9 4.9% 75.0% 85.4% 247
2013 Q4 211 187 14 6.6% 76.9% 95.2% 197
2013 Q3 249 220 9 3.6% 83.3% 91.2% 203
2013 Q2 251 224 18 7.2% 57.1% 91.5% 278
2013 Q1 218 193 11 5.0% 50.0% 66.0% 233
2012 Q4 209 174 23 11.0% 57.1% 83.7% 249
2012 Q3 245 207 23 9.4% 45.5% 80.0% 201
2012 Q2 264 222 27 10.2% 66.7% 78.4% 264
2012 Q1 211 179 20 9.5% 70.0% 86.7% 279
2011 Q4 221 195 17 7.7% 72.7% 83.0% 206
2011 Q3 259 228 18 6.9% 60.0% 86.5% 252
2011 Q2 260 211 35 13.5% 28.6% 82.0% 288
2011 Q1 210 180 27 12.9% 69.2% 87.0% 251
2010 Q4 255 217 31 12.2% 85.7% 86.0% 235
2010 Q3 267 229 34 12.7% 71.4% 88.1% 280
2010 Q2 236 212 19 8.1% 100.0% 86.0% 250
2010 Q1 184 163 18 9.8% 62.5% 88.6% 247
2009 Q4 283 244 33 11.7% 40.0% 88.9% 231
2009 Q3 311 273 33 10.6% 83.3% 84.0% 341
2009 Q2 260 237 19 7.3% 37.5% 80.4% 314
2009 Q1 238 210 27 11.3% 50.0% 75.4% 243
2008 Q4 290 266 22 7.6% 100.0% 80.0% 290
2008 Q3 307 275 30 9.8% 86.7% 82.7% 323
2008 Q2 319 290 24 7.5% 100.0% 81.8% 294
2008 Q1 352 318 32 9.1% 75.0% 72.0% 406
2007 Q4 422 369 51 12.1% 82.6% 78.7% 377
2007 Q3 442 379 59 13.3% 72.7% 80.2% 416
2007 Q2 511 434 72 14.1% 61.1% 89.2% 507
2007 Q1 389 324 62 15.9% 66.7% 67.9% 463
2006 Q4 352 293 54 15.3% 81.3% 71.2% 402
2006 Q3 441 386 53 12.0% 89.5% 69.5% 381
2006 Q2 457 387 67 14.7% 70.0% 83.1% 484
2006 Q1 367 305 55 15.0% 71.4% 84.2% 421
2005 Q4 376 315 49 13.0% 57.9% 67.8% 369
2005 Q3 484 403 76 15.7% 68.8% 78.5% 433
2005 Q2 479 394 79 16.5% 53.8% 79.4% 526
2005 Q1 408 327 71 17.4% 46.7% 78.1% 612
2004 Q4 540 440 94 17.4% 64.3% 88.2% 461
2004 Q3 559 464 90 16.1% 60.0% 84.5% 602
2004 Q2 519 445 70 13.5% 66.7% 64.5% 580
2004 Q1 441 377 63 14.3% 33.3% 58.1% 493
2003 Q4 521 446 71 13.6% 57.1% 57.3% 422
2003 Q3 566 505 56 9.9% 37.5% 30.6% 484
2003 Q2 457 404 47 10.3% 46.2% 12.5% 511
2003 Q1 356 311 44 12.4% 33.3% 31.5% 467
2002 Q4 411 361 43 10.5% 27.3% 22.1% 326
2002 Q3 372 310 54 14.5% 63.6% 53.8% 493
2002 Q2 366 309 50 13.7% 50.0% 49.2% 440
2002 Q1 321 272 42 13.1% 50.0% 57.7% 359
2001 Q4 344 287 50 14.5% 25.0% 39.7% 311
2001 Q3 363 315 42 11.6% 52.6% 57.7% 387
2001 Q2 337 300 25 7.4% 28.6% 55.7% 381
2001 Q1 276 238 31 11.2% 53.8% 55.0% 307
2000 Q4 301 257 38 12.6% 77.8% 53.4% 305
2000 Q3 252 225 16 6.3% 25.0% 53.7% 274
2000 Q2 289 242 39 13.5% 60.0% 75.8% 323
2000 Q1 274 223 38 13.9% 75.0% 77.2% 319
1999 Q4 291 239 45 15.5% 83.3% 72.9% 274
1999 Q3 389 332 48 12.3% 81.3% 67.9% 330
1999 Q2 248 230 17 6.9% 50.0% 70.6% 301
1999 Q1 278 232 44 15.8% 47.6% 55.8% 279
1998 Q4 248 227 20 8.1% 52.9% 27.0% 239
1998 Q3 299 272 27 9.0% 33.3% 22.1% 303
1998 Q2 319 301 17 5.3% 83.3% 18.7% 265
1996 Q1 170 141 29 17.1% 66.7% 57.7% —
1995 Q4 184 164 20 10.9% 40.0% 59.3% —
1995 Q3 221 209 12 5.4% 62.5% 69.3% —
1995 Q2 229 207 22 9.6% 66.7% 56.5% —
1995 Q1 177 161 16 9.0% 100.0% 68.1% —
1994 Q4 207 180 27 13.0% 100.0% 79.6% —
1994 Q3 228 187 41 18.0% 55.6% 76.0% —
1994 Q2 218 191 27 12.4% 71.4% 78.7% —
1994 Q1 186 159 27 14.5% 75.0% 67.8% —
1993 Q4 210 176 34 16.2% 71.4% 69.1% —
1993 Q3 189 176 13 6.9% 80.0% 68.4% —
1993 Q2 234 211 23 9.8% 60.0% 76.1% —
1993 Q1 161 131 30 18.6% 100.0% 73.3% —
1992 Q4 200 175 25 12.5% 66.7% 63.9% —
1992 Q3 178 159 19 10.7% 66.7% 68.7% —
1992 Q2 271 220 51 18.8% 75.0% 73.6% —
1992 Q1 228 191 37 16.2% 83.3% 68.8% —
1991 Q4 168 143 25 14.9% 66.7% 73.5% —
1991 Q3 262 215 47 17.9% 100.0% 71.9% —
1991 Q2 285 208 77 27.0% 60.0% 65.1% —
1991 Q1 201 161 40 19.9% 40.0% 57.8% —
1990 Q4 219 182 37 16.9% 40.0% 68.5% —
1990 Q3 307 251 56 18.2% 66.7% 59.2% —
1990 Q2 352 268 84 23.9% 80.0% 60.3% —
1990 Q1 270 213 57 21.1% 0.0% 55.4% —
1989 Q4 253 203 50 19.8% 42.9% 52.0% —
1989 Q3 242 178 64 26.4% 87.5% 65.6% —
1989 Q2 382 303 79 20.7% 37.5% 55.7% —
1989 Q1 266 209 57 21.4% 71.4% 72.1% —
1988 Q4 320 261 59 18.4% 75.0% 72.9% —
1988 Q3 299 255 44 14.7% 81.8% 67.5% —
1988 Q2 295 260 35 11.9% 0.0% 65.5% —
1988 Q1 284 242 42 14.8% 33.3% 44.4% —
1987 Q4 228 208 20 8.8% 28.6% 43.4% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me