← All authorities

Newcastle upon Tyne

North East · E08000021 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,018
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
11.2%
higher than 46% of authorities
Majors in time
60.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
92.3%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
86.6%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.5%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
23.6%
38 allowed of 161 decided
Decisions overturned
0.7%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 17.0%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,096
in the window
Applications decided
1,018
in the window
Approval rate
88.8%
904 granted, 114 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 15 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
84.2%
rank 241 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 33 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3897.4%60.0%
Minor25479.9%92.3%
Other72691.5%—
of which householder39194.1%86.6%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01472932024 Q3: 268 received2024 Q3: 221 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 229 received2024 Q4: 277 decided2025 Q1: 259 received2025 Q1: 175 decided2025 Q2: 225 received2025 Q2: 241 decided2025 Q3: 277 received2025 Q3: 233 decided2025 Q4: 275 received2025 Q4: 261 decided2026 Q1: 293 received2026 Q1: 270 decided2026 Q2: 251 received2026 Q2: 254 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
87%
Action plan

Delivery 85–94%: the authority must publish an action plan. No presumption or buffer consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000021). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 254 226 28 11.0% 0.0% 87.9% 251
2026 Q1 270 224 46 17.0% 100.0% 98.2% 293
2025 Q4 261 233 28 10.7% 50.0% 90.9% 275
2025 Q3 233 221 12 5.2% 100.0% 86.4% 277
2025 Q2 241 224 17 7.1% 100.0% 85.7% 225
2025 Q1 175 162 13 7.4% — 87.1% 259
2024 Q4 277 250 27 9.7% 100.0% 77.1% 229
2024 Q3 221 209 12 5.4% 100.0% 75.0% 268
2024 Q2 259 246 13 5.0% 100.0% 82.1% 274
2024 Q1 261 242 19 7.3% 100.0% 81.3% 268
2023 Q4 240 219 21 8.8% 66.7% 77.8% 254
2023 Q3 213 197 16 7.5% 66.7% 78.1% 252
2023 Q2 253 232 21 8.3% 100.0% 72.0% 229
2023 Q1 216 201 15 6.9% — 51.9% 312
2022 Q4 218 195 23 10.6% 25.0% 50.0% 239
2022 Q3 251 231 20 8.0% 50.0% 66.7% 271
2022 Q2 358 340 18 5.0% — 70.5% 291
2022 Q1 288 273 15 5.2% 50.0% 50.0% 348
2021 Q4 346 321 25 7.2% 0.0% 70.0% 286
2021 Q3 290 263 27 9.3% 0.0% 50.0% 313
2021 Q2 327 310 17 5.2% — 75.0% 350
2021 Q1 262 239 23 8.8% 100.0% 68.8% 390
2020 Q4 269 255 14 5.2% 100.0% 84.0% 293
2020 Q3 241 223 18 7.5% 33.3% 68.2% 266
2020 Q2 234 216 18 7.7% 66.7% 34.6% 224
2020 Q1 275 248 27 9.8% 0.0% 70.0% 282
2019 Q4 301 271 30 10.0% 33.3% 75.0% 307
2019 Q3 320 303 17 5.3% 100.0% 88.0% 323
2019 Q2 363 321 42 11.6% 100.0% 84.8% 377
2019 Q1 291 277 14 4.8% 80.0% 92.3% 365
2018 Q4 290 272 18 6.2% 75.0% 91.8% 319
2018 Q3 308 283 25 8.1% 100.0% 88.4% 300
2018 Q2 380 322 58 15.3% 100.0% 92.3% 363
2018 Q1 286 263 23 8.0% 91.7% 92.3% 361
2017 Q4 324 287 37 11.4% 100.0% 88.9% 402
2017 Q3 362 329 33 9.1% 100.0% 92.5% 370
2017 Q2 385 359 26 6.8% 100.0% 84.7% 395
2017 Q1 352 337 15 4.3% 100.0% 96.6% 387
2016 Q4 414 379 35 8.5% 85.7% 90.8% 384
2016 Q3 402 346 56 13.9% 83.3% 87.1% 437
2016 Q2 368 340 28 7.6% 100.0% 85.3% 416
2016 Q1 315 294 21 6.7% 100.0% 77.8% 369
2015 Q4 383 354 29 7.6% 88.9% 80.2% 330
2015 Q3 349 318 31 8.9% 87.5% 79.4% 396
2015 Q2 373 349 24 6.4% 92.3% 85.3% 379
2015 Q1 273 249 24 8.8% 85.7% 88.6% 384
2014 Q4 325 291 34 10.5% 89.5% 76.2% 342
2014 Q3 358 319 39 10.9% 100.0% 86.5% 347
2014 Q2 409 378 31 7.6% 76.9% 85.1% 431
2014 Q1 323 281 28 8.7% 71.4% 84.8% 435
2013 Q4 361 312 32 8.9% 75.0% 89.3% 378
2013 Q3 363 324 29 8.0% 73.3% 79.8% 379
2013 Q2 353 315 26 7.4% 82.4% 89.2% 391
2013 Q1 308 264 31 10.1% 78.9% 83.1% 381
2012 Q4 318 285 23 7.2% 72.2% 80.8% 328
2012 Q3 400 346 35 8.8% 50.0% 60.0% 342
2012 Q2 334 309 15 4.5% 60.0% 53.2% 374
2012 Q1 286 260 17 5.9% 78.9% 70.8% 366
2011 Q4 370 334 26 7.0% 66.7% 60.9% 343
2011 Q3 363 331 30 8.3% 76.9% 66.0% 384
2011 Q2 365 334 20 5.5% 84.2% 83.5% 400
2011 Q1 310 280 23 7.4% 81.8% 67.0% 404
2010 Q4 361 328 28 7.8% 71.4% 77.1% 373
2010 Q3 387 345 37 9.6% 64.7% 80.5% 392
2010 Q2 352 332 15 4.3% 77.8% 83.0% 415
2010 Q1 328 298 30 9.1% 85.7% 80.6% 400
2009 Q4 362 327 31 8.6% 90.5% 88.4% 356
2009 Q3 397 360 34 8.6% 87.5% 92.3% 444
2009 Q2 354 312 40 11.3% 93.3% 85.3% 422
2009 Q1 323 281 39 12.1% 69.0% 71.1% 376
2008 Q4 423 370 49 11.6% 84.6% 60.6% 396
2008 Q3 430 379 50 11.6% 88.9% 77.4% 512
2008 Q2 405 338 66 16.3% 77.8% 86.4% 453
2008 Q1 468 390 72 15.4% 83.3% 90.9% 559
2007 Q4 503 420 74 14.7% 54.5% 86.8% 513
2007 Q3 548 474 65 11.9% 93.8% 91.0% 594
2007 Q2 601 532 62 10.3% 90.0% 93.5% 658
2007 Q1 518 453 47 9.1% 85.0% 92.8% 631
2006 Q4 616 556 48 7.8% 90.9% 91.9% 620
2006 Q3 579 508 56 9.7% 94.4% 91.8% 614
2006 Q2 628 549 61 9.7% 85.7% 85.5% 726
2006 Q1 515 434 63 12.2% 93.8% 89.8% 609
2005 Q4 459 397 50 10.9% 100.0% 86.4% 523
2005 Q3 572 473 87 15.2% 73.3% 88.9% 544
2005 Q2 658 546 92 14.0% 56.3% 75.8% 657
2005 Q1 581 483 91 15.7% 57.1% 65.7% 609
2004 Q4 637 540 81 12.7% 44.4% 65.7% 626
2004 Q3 656 562 76 11.6% 52.9% 57.0% 676
2004 Q2 620 531 81 13.1% 60.0% 51.0% 701
2004 Q1 465 405 51 11.0% 47.1% 57.4% 691
2003 Q4 565 496 59 10.4% 68.8% 61.8% 563
2003 Q3 677 559 110 16.2% 50.0% 58.7% 628
2003 Q2 663 587 74 11.2% 57.1% 53.8% 774
2003 Q1 651 536 103 15.8% 28.6% 42.1% 675
2002 Q4 530 447 77 14.5% 14.3% 50.6% 561
2002 Q3 524 452 67 12.8% 50.0% 39.0% 654
2002 Q2 544 476 58 10.7% 60.0% 43.8% 577
2002 Q1 373 319 49 13.1% 41.2% 58.4% 335
2001 Q4 463 398 65 14.0% 21.4% 54.7% 491
2001 Q3 473 439 31 6.6% 61.1% 64.6% 404
2001 Q2 383 354 26 6.8% 41.7% 65.7% 499
2001 Q1 473 423 47 9.9% 15.4% 48.4% 442
2000 Q4 383 348 27 7.0% 33.3% 61.5% 425
2000 Q3 414 377 31 7.5% 63.6% 48.0% 505
2000 Q2 325 304 20 6.2% 57.1% 57.4% 444
2000 Q1 385 325 53 13.8% 55.6% 54.1% 444
1999 Q4 302 267 29 9.6% 40.0% 57.4% 386
1999 Q3 313 273 39 12.5% 11.1% 39.7% 418
1999 Q2 236 212 23 9.7% 50.0% 56.2% 442
1999 Q1 260 237 23 8.8% 54.5% 58.8% 591
1998 Q4 282 251 29 10.3% 33.3% 67.3% 415
1998 Q3 342 309 33 9.6% 50.0% 54.3% 448
1998 Q2 335 314 21 6.3% 57.1% 48.3% 439
1996 Q1 429 371 58 13.5% 31.3% 37.4% —
1995 Q4 406 356 50 12.3% 40.0% 44.8% —
1995 Q3 452 396 56 12.4% 42.9% 53.0% —
1995 Q2 461 401 60 13.0% 53.3% 46.3% —
1995 Q1 461 414 47 10.2% 57.9% 52.6% —
1994 Q4 384 345 39 10.2% 46.7% 54.1% —
1994 Q3 465 423 42 9.0% 47.1% 46.2% —
1994 Q2 420 378 42 10.0% 60.0% 47.2% —
1994 Q1 364 326 38 10.4% 43.5% 59.7% —
1993 Q4 365 306 59 16.2% 50.0% 61.5% —
1993 Q3 442 401 41 9.3% 34.8% 61.0% —
1993 Q2 405 367 38 9.4% 75.0% 64.9% —
1993 Q1 383 329 54 14.1% 47.6% 45.8% —
1992 Q4 308 277 31 10.1% 46.2% 57.3% —
1992 Q3 343 296 47 13.7% 50.0% 58.2% —
1992 Q2 440 381 59 13.4% 46.7% 63.7% —
1992 Q1 390 322 68 17.4% 69.2% 60.4% —
1991 Q4 385 310 75 19.5% 16.7% 61.9% —
1991 Q3 455 379 76 16.7% 54.5% 59.8% —
1991 Q2 526 439 87 16.5% 53.6% 61.6% —
1991 Q1 394 322 72 18.3% 71.4% 55.1% —
1990 Q4 432 335 97 22.5% 53.8% 51.7% —
1990 Q3 561 440 121 21.6% 64.0% 59.0% —
1990 Q2 525 413 112 21.3% 61.1% 48.1% —
1990 Q1 553 421 132 23.9% 56.3% 47.2% —
1989 Q4 472 357 115 24.4% 61.1% 51.3% —
1989 Q3 608 484 124 20.4% 64.7% 49.1% —
1989 Q2 630 511 119 18.9% 32.1% 44.3% —
1989 Q1 726 534 192 26.4% 54.1% 32.9% —
1988 Q4 624 458 166 26.6% 52.9% 36.6% —
1988 Q3 724 599 125 17.3% 51.3% 34.6% —
1988 Q2 562 464 98 17.4% 64.0% 54.8% —
1988 Q1 582 453 129 22.2% 59.1% 54.4% —
1987 Q4 615 505 110 17.9% 85.0% 65.8% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me