← All authorities

Rotherham

Yorkshire and the Humber · E08000018 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
731
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
22.4%
higher than 93% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
100.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
100.0%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
25.9%
52 allowed of 201 decided
Decisions overturned
1.1%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 66.7%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
806
in the window
Applications decided
731
in the window
Approval rate
77.6%
567 granted, 164 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 36 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
100.0%
rank 1 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 1 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major34100.0%100.0%
Minor18584.3%100.0%
Other51273.6%—
of which householder39769.8%100.0%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01322632024 Q3: 230 received2024 Q3: 208 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 220 received2024 Q4: 235 decided2025 Q1: 263 received2025 Q1: 204 decided2025 Q2: 188 received2025 Q2: 222 decided2025 Q3: 176 received2025 Q3: 191 decided2025 Q4: 190 received2025 Q4: 160 decided2026 Q1: 235 received2026 Q1: 177 decided2026 Q2: 205 received2026 Q2: 203 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
139%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000018). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 203 181 22 10.8% 100.0% 100.0% 205
2026 Q1 177 157 20 11.3% 100.0% 100.0% 235
2025 Q4 160 135 25 15.6% 100.0% 100.0% 190
2025 Q3 191 94 97 50.8% 100.0% 100.0% 176
2025 Q2 222 208 14 6.3% 100.0% 100.0% 188
2025 Q1 204 184 20 9.8% 100.0% 100.0% 263
2024 Q4 235 198 37 15.7% 100.0% 100.0% 220
2024 Q3 208 189 19 9.1% 100.0% 96.3% 230
2024 Q2 241 218 23 9.5% 100.0% 100.0% 223
2024 Q1 254 221 33 13.0% 100.0% 100.0% 231
2023 Q4 175 158 17 9.7% 100.0% 100.0% 251
2023 Q3 210 187 23 11.0% — 100.0% 210
2023 Q2 227 198 29 12.8% 100.0% 100.0% 221
2023 Q1 181 160 21 11.6% 100.0% 100.0% 244
2022 Q4 213 190 23 10.8% 100.0% 100.0% 195
2022 Q3 270 247 23 8.5% 100.0% 100.0% 251
2022 Q2 284 262 22 7.7% 100.0% 100.0% 266
2022 Q1 240 80 160 66.7% 100.0% 100.0% 312
2021 Q4 246 225 21 8.5% 100.0% 100.0% 250
2021 Q3 358 326 32 8.9% 100.0% 100.0% 294
2021 Q2 350 322 28 8.0% 100.0% 100.0% 406
2021 Q1 240 213 27 11.3% 100.0% 100.0% 365
2020 Q4 304 278 26 8.6% 100.0% 100.0% 287
2020 Q3 293 267 26 8.9% 100.0% 100.0% 369
2020 Q2 222 198 24 10.8% 100.0% 100.0% 253
2020 Q1 284 260 24 8.5% 100.0% 100.0% 328
2019 Q4 244 216 28 11.5% 100.0% 100.0% 296
2019 Q3 289 262 27 9.3% 100.0% 100.0% 277
2019 Q2 256 233 23 9.0% 100.0% 100.0% 314
2019 Q1 267 248 19 7.1% 100.0% 100.0% 303
2018 Q4 296 266 30 10.1% 100.0% 100.0% 323
2018 Q3 271 249 22 8.1% 100.0% 100.0% 307
2018 Q2 313 282 31 9.9% 100.0% 100.0% 344
2018 Q1 266 240 26 9.8% 100.0% 100.0% 325
2017 Q4 241 227 14 5.8% 100.0% 100.0% 292
2017 Q3 256 239 17 6.6% 100.0% 100.0% 280
2017 Q2 258 238 20 7.8% 100.0% 100.0% 299
2017 Q1 239 212 27 11.3% 100.0% 100.0% 325
2016 Q4 273 255 18 6.6% 100.0% 100.0% 267
2016 Q3 271 240 31 11.4% 100.0% 97.9% 312
2016 Q2 302 274 28 9.3% 100.0% 100.0% 325
2016 Q1 210 192 18 8.6% 100.0% 100.0% 290
2015 Q4 276 260 16 5.8% 100.0% 98.2% 245
2015 Q3 307 290 17 5.5% 100.0% 97.9% 331
2015 Q2 262 251 11 4.2% 100.0% 100.0% 346
2015 Q1 233 209 24 10.3% 100.0% 97.3% 275
2014 Q4 259 237 22 8.5% 100.0% 96.2% 272
2014 Q3 289 250 39 13.5% 92.3% 77.4% 294
2014 Q2 290 271 19 6.6% 100.0% 89.6% 341
2014 Q1 214 192 20 9.3% 100.0% 83.1% 286
2013 Q4 293 271 22 7.5% 100.0% 81.7% 263
2013 Q3 308 275 27 8.8% 90.9% 83.0% 300
2013 Q2 301 266 33 11.0% 62.5% 91.5% 347
2013 Q1 248 211 36 14.5% 85.7% 95.1% 301
2012 Q4 329 284 43 13.1% 66.7% 92.6% 282
2012 Q3 373 318 50 13.4% 77.3% 88.0% 347
2012 Q2 329 267 61 18.5% 55.6% 88.0% 400
2012 Q1 250 215 32 12.8% 93.3% 90.8% 333
2011 Q4 309 262 45 14.6% 90.0% 96.6% 282
2011 Q3 379 326 51 13.5% 84.6% 79.8% 367
2011 Q2 344 303 37 10.8% 60.0% 84.0% 365
2011 Q1 299 266 31 10.4% 76.2% 82.5% 366
2010 Q4 354 297 54 15.3% 62.5% 80.2% 329
2010 Q3 374 319 49 13.1% 91.3% 90.5% 366
2010 Q2 379 331 46 12.1% 100.0% 93.5% 418
2010 Q1 297 255 40 13.5% 64.3% 81.6% 357
2009 Q4 300 253 47 15.7% 100.0% 91.5% 314
2009 Q3 348 303 40 11.5% 94.1% 90.5% 358
2009 Q2 371 329 37 10.0% 69.2% 94.7% 370
2009 Q1 260 227 32 12.3% 82.4% 76.8% 374
2008 Q4 419 355 63 15.0% 68.8% 84.5% 320
2008 Q3 495 438 57 11.5% 75.0% 86.1% 486
2008 Q2 501 411 90 18.0% 64.3% 79.8% 500
2008 Q1 430 381 49 11.4% 85.7% 78.8% 515
2007 Q4 532 477 54 10.2% 87.1% 82.7% 474
2007 Q3 571 511 57 10.0% 54.5% 75.2% 742
2007 Q2 623 549 71 11.4% 50.0% 64.1% 533
2007 Q1 469 417 51 10.9% 60.6% 65.4% 596
2006 Q4 504 448 53 10.5% 73.9% 80.0% 457
2006 Q3 526 472 50 9.5% 72.7% 75.5% 558
2006 Q2 532 472 59 11.1% 75.0% 79.4% 610
2006 Q1 493 451 41 8.3% 89.5% 90.0% 616
2005 Q4 590 538 50 8.5% 56.7% 69.6% 511
2005 Q3 642 597 44 6.9% 44.4% 41.3% 581
2005 Q2 563 534 28 5.0% 66.7% 68.6% 620
2005 Q1 445 431 12 2.7% 77.3% 64.9% 601
2004 Q4 542 509 30 5.5% 35.3% 62.2% 507
2004 Q3 629 595 31 4.9% 63.6% 71.8% 620
2004 Q2 597 567 27 4.5% 56.3% 70.5% 701
2004 Q1 470 452 18 3.8% 71.4% 63.1% 674
2003 Q4 543 496 46 8.5% 47.1% 65.3% 477
2003 Q3 616 558 58 9.4% 47.6% 44.2% 559
2003 Q2 538 511 25 4.6% 58.3% 45.7% 568
2003 Q1 379 356 19 5.0% 62.5% 50.0% 538
2002 Q4 387 368 19 4.9% 43.8% 45.8% 431
2002 Q3 496 470 25 5.0% 30.8% 47.0% 469
2002 Q2 477 458 19 4.0% 63.6% 50.0% 464
2002 Q1 362 337 22 6.1% 61.5% 57.4% 482
2001 Q4 410 384 24 5.9% 36.8% 62.6% 348
2001 Q3 441 407 29 6.6% 18.8% 46.4% 397
2001 Q2 409 392 16 3.9% 57.1% 40.6% 461
2001 Q1 332 299 30 9.0% 57.1% 29.4% 378
2000 Q4 368 327 32 8.7% 66.7% 39.2% 342
2000 Q3 388 358 28 7.2% 42.9% 42.4% 374
2000 Q2 358 333 24 6.7% 50.0% 14.9% 379
2000 Q1 280 259 21 7.5% 88.9% 36.0% 390
1999 Q4 321 294 26 8.1% 45.5% 50.9% 367
1999 Q3 390 363 26 6.7% 71.4% 54.6% 342
1999 Q2 352 341 10 2.8% 58.8% 37.3% 414
1999 Q1 322 299 22 6.8% 55.6% 47.4% 372
1998 Q4 272 257 14 5.1% 53.8% 63.9% 289
1998 Q3 335 307 25 7.5% 63.2% 60.9% 322
1998 Q2 404 387 14 3.5% 64.7% 56.4% 415
1998 Q1 307 292 15 4.9% 81.3% 58.8% 348
1997 Q4 333 315 16 4.8% 69.2% 65.4% 321
1997 Q3 384 366 17 4.4% 66.7% 65.9% 429
1997 Q2 360 335 25 6.9% 83.3% 57.1% 426
1997 Q1 270 251 19 7.0% 43.8% 50.0% 328
1996 Q4 316 300 14 4.4% 90.0% 69.9% 353
1996 Q3 405 379 25 6.2% 77.8% 69.8% 422
1996 Q2 360 335 23 6.4% 80.0% 66.4% 416
1996 Q1 303 269 34 11.2% 71.4% 55.2% —
1995 Q4 324 273 51 15.7% 83.3% 63.2% —
1995 Q3 321 283 38 11.8% 50.0% 66.0% —
1995 Q2 372 319 53 14.2% 66.7% 58.9% —
1995 Q1 296 244 52 17.6% 50.0% 42.2% —
1994 Q4 342 287 55 16.1% 33.3% 54.5% —
1994 Q3 356 299 57 16.0% 33.3% 61.5% —
1994 Q2 339 276 63 18.6% 66.7% 46.6% —
1994 Q1 319 274 45 14.1% 50.0% 33.0% —
1993 Q4 305 261 44 14.4% 44.4% 51.3% —
1993 Q3 315 259 56 17.8% 62.5% 51.9% —
1993 Q2 320 267 53 16.6% 62.5% 53.7% —
1993 Q1 327 279 48 14.7% 50.0% 37.1% —
1992 Q4 315 252 63 20.0% 66.7% 43.5% —
1992 Q3 317 248 69 21.8% 30.0% 49.5% —
1992 Q2 341 252 89 26.1% 80.0% 57.7% —
1992 Q1 374 270 104 27.8% 44.4% 39.4% —
1991 Q4 298 238 60 20.1% 25.0% 48.8% —
1991 Q3 372 286 86 23.1% 40.0% 60.6% —
1991 Q2 384 298 86 22.4% 71.4% 59.1% —
1991 Q1 364 285 79 21.7% 87.5% 42.4% —
1990 Q4 358 284 74 20.7% 58.8% 48.5% —
1990 Q3 423 326 97 22.9% 46.7% 46.9% —
1990 Q2 455 350 105 23.1% 66.7% 34.8% —
1990 Q1 394 255 139 35.3% 40.0% 11.5% —
1989 Q4 476 334 142 29.8% 57.1% 24.9% —
1989 Q3 503 350 153 30.4% 7.7% 6.9% —
1989 Q2 580 431 149 25.7% 33.3% 14.0% —
1989 Q1 437 350 87 19.9% 0.0% 24.4% —
1988 Q4 504 403 101 20.0% 80.0% 30.9% —
1988 Q3 527 394 133 25.2% 50.0% 20.2% —
1988 Q2 493 343 150 30.4% 50.0% 11.0% —
1988 Q1 427 345 82 19.2% 20.0% 24.5% —
1987 Q4 435 328 107 24.6% 80.0% 23.9% —
1987 Q3 529 419 110 20.8% 71.4% 24.1% —
1987 Q2 452 328 124 27.4% 60.0% 28.6% —
1987 Q1 320 259 61 19.1% 60.0% 33.1% —
1986 Q4 356 279 77 21.6% 0.0% 34.2% —
1986 Q3 373 308 65 17.4% 25.0% 22.0% —
1986 Q2 397 318 79 19.9% — 42.4% —
1986 Q1 406 336 70 17.2% 66.7% 36.4% —
1985 Q4 346 292 54 15.6% 40.0% 66.4% —
1985 Q3 395 329 66 16.7% 66.7% 63.5% —
1985 Q2 456 358 98 21.5% 50.0% 57.8% —
1985 Q1 334 281 53 15.9% 57.1% 55.1% —
1984 Q4 317 254 63 19.9% 40.0% 52.3% —
1984 Q3 352 281 71 20.2% 25.0% 58.6% —
1984 Q2 392 339 53 13.5% 100.0% 61.2% —
1984 Q1 358 313 45 12.6% 85.7% 69.9% —
1983 Q4 274 234 40 14.6% 100.0% 86.8% —
1983 Q3 391 344 47 12.0% 50.0% 71.8% —
1983 Q2 353 298 55 15.6% 16.7% 83.1% —
1983 Q1 379 323 56 14.8% 57.1% 81.3% —
1982 Q4 352 268 84 23.9% 100.0% 81.4% —
1982 Q3 314 272 42 13.4% 66.7% 71.1% —
1982 Q2 356 314 42 11.8% 80.0% 84.4% —
1982 Q1 264 233 31 11.7% 80.0% 81.9% —
1981 Q4 269 234 35 13.0% 80.0% 89.3% —
1981 Q3 338 292 46 13.6% 40.0% 82.7% —
1981 Q2 500 391 109 21.8% 100.0% 87.4% —
1981 Q1 387 321 66 17.1% 75.0% 92.5% —
1980 Q4 322 251 71 22.0% 83.3% 88.7% —
1980 Q3 361 292 69 19.1% 80.0% 66.4% —
1980 Q2 415 336 79 19.0% 100.0% 74.6% —
1980 Q1 344 274 70 20.3% 80.0% 90.1% —
1979 Q4 432 362 70 16.2% 77.8% 82.3% —
1979 Q3 402 320 82 20.4% 100.0% 78.5% —
1979 Q2 394 308 86 21.8% 100.0% 81.6% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me