← All authorities

Wirral

North West · E08000015 · 169 quarters held (1982 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
877
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
12.2%
higher than 54% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
90.3%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
96.5%
no formal threshold
Delegated
99.1%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
27.1%
71 allowed of 262 decided
Decisions overturned
1.2%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 18.3%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
967
in the window
Applications decided
877
in the window
Approval rate
87.8%
770 granted, 107 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 16 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
94.6%
rank 98 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 13 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major23100.0%100.0%
Minor16283.3%90.3%
Other69288.4%—
of which householder55789.6%96.5%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01492972024 Q3: 288 received2024 Q3: 289 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 261 received2024 Q4: 270 decided2025 Q1: 297 received2025 Q1: 254 decided2025 Q2: 217 received2025 Q2: 257 decided2025 Q3: 227 received2025 Q3: 227 decided2025 Q4: 228 received2025 Q4: 194 decided2026 Q1: 256 received2026 Q1: 231 decided2026 Q2: 256 received2026 Q2: 225 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
123%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000015). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1982 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (169 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1982 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (169 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 225 201 24 10.7% — 85.7% 256
2026 Q1 231 206 25 10.8% — 85.0% 256
2025 Q4 194 171 23 11.9% 100.0% 100.0% 228
2025 Q3 227 192 35 15.4% 100.0% 88.2% 227
2025 Q2 257 228 29 11.3% 100.0% 81.8% 217
2025 Q1 254 219 35 13.8% 100.0% 80.8% 297
2024 Q4 270 225 45 16.7% — 94.1% 261
2024 Q3 289 250 39 13.5% — 95.0% 288
2024 Q2 243 208 35 14.4% — 88.9% 284
2024 Q1 234 201 33 14.1% 100.0% 100.0% 245
2023 Q4 252 218 34 13.5% 100.0% 68.4% 262
2023 Q3 239 215 24 10.0% — 77.8% 273
2023 Q2 284 232 52 18.3% 100.0% 59.1% 301
2023 Q1 278 250 28 10.1% 0.0% 86.7% 282
2022 Q4 260 235 25 9.6% 66.7% 50.0% 341
2022 Q3 248 227 21 8.5% 40.0% 60.0% 329
2022 Q2 273 233 40 14.7% 100.0% 64.7% 318
2022 Q1 385 341 44 11.4% 100.0% 62.5% 362
2021 Q4 377 322 55 14.6% 100.0% 44.4% 345
2021 Q3 395 361 34 8.6% — 29.4% 377
2021 Q2 322 294 28 8.7% — 81.0% 501
2021 Q1 308 288 20 6.5% 100.0% 81.0% 419
2020 Q4 342 311 31 9.1% 0.0% 82.9% 391
2020 Q3 287 268 19 6.6% 75.0% 77.8% 347
2020 Q2 277 253 24 8.7% 100.0% 74.1% 282
2020 Q1 252 229 23 9.1% 100.0% 76.9% 291
2019 Q4 308 288 20 6.5% 100.0% 84.3% 332
2019 Q3 326 297 29 8.9% 100.0% 88.4% 345
2019 Q2 394 360 34 8.6% 66.7% 84.0% 351
2019 Q1 289 267 22 7.6% 66.7% 52.1% 357
2018 Q4 366 332 34 9.3% 50.0% 46.3% 329
2018 Q3 314 297 17 5.4% 33.3% 38.8% 326
2018 Q2 302 279 23 7.6% 0.0% 41.8% 354
2018 Q1 303 277 26 8.6% 11.1% 51.4% 355
2017 Q4 301 269 32 10.6% 42.9% 65.2% 304
2017 Q3 341 304 37 10.9% 0.0% 69.8% 336
2017 Q2 310 285 25 8.1% 80.0% 76.6% 382
2017 Q1 253 231 22 8.7% 66.7% 62.1% 293
2016 Q4 314 283 31 9.9% 25.0% 76.4% 284
2016 Q3 364 334 30 8.2% 57.1% 64.3% 351
2016 Q2 338 313 25 7.4% 57.1% 63.0% 388
2016 Q1 278 256 22 7.9% 66.7% 75.8% 342
2015 Q4 317 292 25 7.9% 100.0% 64.3% 269
2015 Q3 367 342 25 6.8% 60.0% 70.1% 359
2015 Q2 352 329 23 6.5% 60.0% 60.6% 388
2015 Q1 307 270 37 12.1% 72.7% 57.5% 369
2014 Q4 271 246 25 9.2% 80.0% 71.6% 322
2014 Q3 320 296 24 7.5% 100.0% 83.3% 292
2014 Q2 367 338 29 7.9% 62.5% 77.5% 355
2014 Q1 274 244 29 10.6% 40.0% 51.9% 377
2013 Q4 341 304 35 10.3% 46.2% 63.9% 299
2013 Q3 296 279 17 5.7% 50.0% 72.0% 370
2013 Q2 396 365 29 7.3% 50.0% 74.1% 349
2013 Q1 311 277 31 10.0% 66.7% 66.7% 410
2012 Q4 299 279 16 5.4% 50.0% 79.3% 334
2012 Q3 328 300 28 8.5% 57.1% 81.4% 317
2012 Q2 408 379 22 5.4% 28.6% 64.3% 389
2012 Q1 284 264 17 6.0% 56.3% 68.3% 386
2011 Q4 296 271 23 7.8% 45.5% 75.7% 306
2011 Q3 363 330 26 7.2% 62.5% 90.9% 353
2011 Q2 341 295 32 9.4% 75.0% 77.6% 376
2011 Q1 280 240 30 10.7% 77.8% 87.5% 370
2010 Q4 303 273 29 9.6% 50.0% 81.8% 310
2010 Q3 361 311 45 12.5% 57.1% 81.4% 358
2010 Q2 349 312 37 10.6% 80.0% 82.4% 373
2010 Q1 312 276 33 10.6% 100.0% 75.9% 373
2009 Q4 353 316 36 10.2% 42.9% 90.6% 332
2009 Q3 375 323 52 13.9% 66.7% 86.0% 413
2009 Q2 347 292 53 15.3% 57.1% 84.0% 379
2009 Q1 267 238 29 10.9% 45.0% 81.6% 343
2008 Q4 399 356 43 10.8% 80.0% 88.7% 327
2008 Q3 524 460 62 11.8% 76.9% 76.1% 486
2008 Q2 571 506 63 11.0% 62.5% 73.1% 521
2008 Q1 437 387 48 11.0% 60.9% 81.5% 560
2007 Q4 603 532 71 11.8% 42.1% 72.9% 521
2007 Q3 570 510 56 9.8% 62.5% 73.4% 624
2007 Q2 596 507 89 14.9% 58.3% 77.1% 657
2007 Q1 582 479 102 17.5% 66.7% 72.7% 596
2006 Q4 548 487 60 10.9% 57.1% 73.4% 618
2006 Q3 526 463 62 11.8% 66.7% 65.0% 573
2006 Q2 670 584 85 12.7% 52.4% 77.3% 621
2006 Q1 565 489 74 13.1% 66.7% 70.6% 636
2005 Q4 620 517 103 16.6% 70.6% 72.9% 637
2005 Q3 683 597 85 12.4% 85.0% 71.9% 697
2005 Q2 699 600 98 14.0% 64.0% 67.2% 747
2005 Q1 551 471 78 14.2% 71.4% 71.3% 713
2004 Q4 704 598 105 14.9% 79.3% 69.8% 636
2004 Q3 688 571 117 17.0% 65.0% 70.4% 744
2004 Q2 753 622 125 16.6% 66.7% 83.6% 765
2004 Q1 557 432 124 22.3% 75.0% 66.4% 745
2003 Q4 773 613 158 20.4% 72.4% 58.3% 646
2003 Q3 612 538 73 11.9% 38.5% 41.7% 652
2003 Q2 585 567 16 2.7% 50.0% 46.2% 681
2003 Q1 476 423 50 10.5% 68.8% 58.9% 682
2002 Q4 589 510 78 13.2% 50.0% 69.4% 557
2002 Q3 642 586 55 8.6% 62.5% 68.5% 671
2002 Q2 628 582 45 7.2% 77.8% 79.4% 658
2002 Q1 452 406 44 9.7% 80.0% 73.9% 634
2001 Q4 538 481 55 10.2% 91.7% 67.1% 500
2001 Q3 603 552 47 7.8% 65.0% 62.3% 578
2001 Q2 534 465 66 12.4% 77.8% 78.5% 625
2001 Q1 404 350 51 12.6% 73.1% 74.8% 525
2000 Q4 436 403 31 7.1% 83.3% 89.8% 428
2000 Q3 556 507 49 8.8% 86.7% 81.2% 538
2000 Q2 451 426 24 5.3% 90.5% 74.0% 544
2000 Q1 439 383 55 12.5% 81.8% 84.8% 547
1999 Q4 517 469 47 9.1% 81.8% 85.4% 426
1999 Q3 544 507 37 6.8% 84.2% 76.6% 547
1999 Q2 469 431 38 8.1% 80.0% 85.8% 598
1999 Q1 390 351 39 10.0% 76.2% 73.9% 470
1998 Q4 411 360 51 12.4% 73.9% 78.5% 396
1998 Q3 499 454 45 9.0% 88.9% 80.6% 488
1998 Q2 445 399 46 10.3% 69.2% 79.9% 527
1996 Q1 310 289 21 6.8% 68.8% 75.0% —
1995 Q4 323 307 16 5.0% 85.7% 60.2% —
1995 Q3 706 661 45 6.4% 81.6% 72.6% —
1995 Q2 365 349 16 4.4% 76.9% 84.2% —
1995 Q1 367 338 29 7.9% 70.0% 71.9% —
1994 Q4 396 369 27 6.8% 80.0% 80.5% —
1994 Q3 419 381 38 9.1% 94.1% 73.8% —
1994 Q2 423 401 22 5.2% 82.4% 79.3% —
1994 Q1 368 328 40 10.9% 85.7% 78.0% —
1993 Q4 438 399 39 8.9% 71.4% 62.9% —
1993 Q3 362 339 23 6.4% 83.3% 71.4% —
1993 Q2 438 413 25 5.7% 88.2% 78.4% —
1993 Q1 373 345 28 7.5% 84.6% 82.3% —
1992 Q4 494 457 37 7.5% 100.0% 75.4% —
1992 Q3 457 411 46 10.1% 81.3% 59.6% —
1992 Q2 455 431 24 5.3% 65.2% 73.2% —
1992 Q1 459 409 50 10.9% 78.9% 61.7% —
1991 Q4 553 490 63 11.4% 69.2% 66.5% —
1991 Q3 542 488 54 10.0% 90.9% 56.3% —
1991 Q2 498 448 50 10.0% 60.0% 61.6% —
1991 Q1 452 401 51 11.3% 52.9% 70.7% —
1990 Q4 570 498 72 12.6% 78.9% 65.3% —
1990 Q3 624 558 66 10.6% 78.3% 51.1% —
1990 Q2 672 597 75 11.2% 86.2% 53.9% —
1990 Q1 476 419 57 12.0% 79.2% 66.3% —
1989 Q4 601 531 70 11.6% 75.0% 61.9% —
1989 Q3 565 500 65 11.5% 72.7% 48.9% —
1989 Q2 642 570 72 11.2% 68.4% 64.9% —
1989 Q1 448 369 79 17.6% 77.8% 73.1% —
1988 Q4 530 467 63 11.9% 95.0% 78.2% —
1988 Q3 558 482 76 13.6% 55.2% 79.8% —
1988 Q2 623 570 53 8.5% 88.9% 71.4% —
1988 Q1 457 403 54 11.8% 80.0% 74.6% —
1987 Q4 441 395 46 10.4% 75.0% 68.4% —
1987 Q3 523 474 49 9.4% 75.0% 55.3% —
1987 Q2 480 443 37 7.7% 45.5% 49.7% —
1987 Q1 437 376 61 14.0% 77.8% 58.2% —
1986 Q4 441 391 50 11.3% 53.3% 72.7% —
1986 Q3 488 433 55 11.3% 81.3% 74.4% —
1986 Q2 458 421 37 8.1% 63.6% 56.5% —
1986 Q1 418 361 57 13.6% 78.6% 61.4% —
1985 Q4 469 415 54 11.5% 56.3% 73.6% —
1985 Q3 547 484 63 11.5% 83.3% 74.6% —
1985 Q2 520 477 43 8.3% 61.5% 56.7% —
1985 Q1 449 390 59 13.1% 80.0% 61.0% —
1984 Q4 480 425 55 11.5% 56.3% 74.3% —
1984 Q3 546 483 63 11.5% 83.3% 74.6% —
1984 Q2 563 518 45 8.0% 64.3% 56.8% —
1984 Q1 497 436 61 12.3% 70.8% 52.9% —
1983 Q4 485 435 50 10.3% 86.4% 84.4% —
1983 Q3 624 548 76 12.2% 74.3% 64.1% —
1983 Q2 579 510 69 11.9% 93.1% 63.1% —
1983 Q1 441 382 59 13.4% 79.2% 60.9% —
1982 Q4 530 440 90 17.0% 79.2% 62.9% —
1982 Q3 622 542 80 12.9% 85.7% 70.1% —
1982 Q2 533 462 71 13.3% 96.0% 57.5% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me