← All authorities

Trafford

North West · E08000009 · 143 quarters held (1988 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,352
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
14.0%
higher than 65% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
94.6%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
92.6%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.5%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
26.9%
89 allowed of 331 decided
Decisions overturned
1.0%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 23.3%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,480
in the window
Applications decided
1,352
in the window
Approval rate
86.0%
1,163 granted, 189 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 23 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
91.4%
rank 154 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 19 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3387.9%100.0%
Minor23987.0%94.6%
Other1,08085.7%—
of which householder93287.9%92.6%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
02204392024 Q3: 352 received2024 Q3: 342 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 377 received2024 Q4: 347 decided2025 Q1: 439 received2025 Q1: 345 decided2025 Q2: 389 received2025 Q2: 400 decided2025 Q3: 352 received2025 Q3: 375 decided2025 Q4: 347 received2025 Q4: 331 decided2026 Q1: 347 received2026 Q1: 324 decided2026 Q2: 434 received2026 Q2: 322 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
83%
Buffer

Delivery 75–84%: a 20% buffer is added to the authority's housing land supply requirement.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000009). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1988 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (143 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1988 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (143 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 322 269 53 16.5% 100.0% 92.6% 434
2026 Q1 324 279 45 13.9% 100.0% 88.2% 347
2025 Q4 331 287 44 13.3% 100.0% 100.0% 347
2025 Q3 375 328 47 12.5% 100.0% 96.2% 352
2025 Q2 400 354 46 11.5% — 100.0% 389
2025 Q1 345 279 66 19.1% 66.7% 83.8% 439
2024 Q4 347 296 51 14.7% 100.0% 92.5% 377
2024 Q3 342 276 66 19.3% 100.0% 80.0% 352
2024 Q2 416 319 97 23.3% 100.0% 81.6% 378
2024 Q1 399 316 83 20.8% — 80.0% 383
2023 Q4 332 281 51 15.4% 100.0% 47.6% 356
2023 Q3 413 353 60 14.5% 100.0% 63.6% 326
2023 Q2 460 402 58 12.6% 100.0% 41.2% 390
2023 Q1 358 312 46 12.8% 100.0% 61.9% 395
2022 Q4 397 361 36 9.1% 100.0% 60.0% 428
2022 Q3 319 297 22 6.9% — 50.0% 456
2022 Q2 443 405 38 8.6% — 70.4% 479
2022 Q1 432 394 38 8.8% 100.0% 71.4% 523
2021 Q4 453 429 24 5.3% 100.0% 83.3% 510
2021 Q3 538 508 30 5.6% 100.0% 73.7% 532
2021 Q2 529 501 28 5.3% 100.0% 72.0% 626
2021 Q1 577 538 39 6.8% — 86.2% 659
2020 Q4 501 467 34 6.8% — 92.0% 611
2020 Q3 403 387 16 4.0% 100.0% 72.2% 546
2020 Q2 373 357 16 4.3% — 81.3% 397
2020 Q1 375 341 34 9.1% 100.0% 84.6% 437
2019 Q4 419 380 39 9.3% 100.0% 86.5% 463
2019 Q3 502 473 29 5.8% 100.0% 89.5% 443
2019 Q2 473 436 37 7.8% 80.0% 87.5% 566
2019 Q1 399 373 26 6.5% — 77.8% 525
2018 Q4 431 398 33 7.7% 100.0% 62.5% 474
2018 Q3 441 418 23 5.2% 66.7% 76.0% 461
2018 Q2 524 495 29 5.5% 100.0% 81.6% 546
2018 Q1 440 416 24 5.5% 100.0% 85.2% 563
2017 Q4 441 413 28 6.3% 100.0% 100.0% 471
2017 Q3 498 471 27 5.4% 83.3% 89.4% 495
2017 Q2 468 443 25 5.3% 100.0% 71.7% 537
2017 Q1 377 357 20 5.3% 100.0% 78.9% 538
2016 Q4 424 403 21 5.0% 100.0% 84.0% 426
2016 Q3 409 386 23 5.6% 90.0% 97.6% 464
2016 Q2 452 429 23 5.1% 100.0% 83.9% 486
2016 Q1 411 390 21 5.1% 100.0% 97.6% 472
2015 Q4 384 359 25 6.5% 92.9% 97.9% 411
2015 Q3 459 431 28 6.1% 87.5% 86.2% 538
2015 Q2 435 415 20 4.6% 75.0% 81.8% 556
2015 Q1 367 343 24 6.5% 90.0% 73.8% 551
2014 Q4 424 389 35 8.3% 71.4% 49.4% 460
2014 Q3 412 367 45 10.9% 54.5% 55.8% 428
2014 Q2 360 325 35 9.7% 78.6% 54.5% 471
2014 Q1 304 250 38 12.5% 80.0% 58.5% 403
2013 Q4 388 334 35 9.0% 66.7% 59.7% 414
2013 Q3 415 338 57 13.7% 53.3% 70.1% 448
2013 Q2 466 392 50 10.7% 70.0% 74.5% 503
2013 Q1 376 310 54 14.4% 45.0% 62.4% 482
2012 Q4 366 294 54 14.8% 57.1% 61.6% 361
2012 Q3 375 322 37 9.9% 36.4% 36.1% 354
2012 Q2 373 327 36 9.7% 38.9% 55.4% 435
2012 Q1 273 230 26 9.5% 12.5% 44.0% 434
2011 Q4 323 293 23 7.1% 33.3% 48.5% 389
2011 Q3 367 312 49 13.4% 64.3% 63.9% 391
2011 Q2 401 349 45 11.2% 38.5% 55.3% 449
2011 Q1 279 233 37 13.3% 38.5% 69.8% 420
2010 Q4 363 301 49 13.5% 38.9% 60.6% 347
2010 Q3 447 378 56 12.5% 55.2% 65.9% 422
2010 Q2 400 347 43 10.8% 46.2% 69.0% 463
2010 Q1 282 238 34 12.1% 71.4% 52.0% 421
2009 Q4 323 282 34 10.5% 53.3% 65.5% 389
2009 Q3 335 283 45 13.4% 100.0% 78.5% 398
2009 Q2 397 348 41 10.3% 54.5% 70.8% 450
2009 Q1 376 324 41 10.9% 50.0% 61.5% 420
2008 Q4 435 355 73 16.8% 27.8% 70.9% 409
2008 Q3 542 437 99 18.3% 31.6% 71.4% 515
2008 Q2 519 407 106 20.4% 56.0% 73.3% 581
2008 Q1 501 378 103 20.6% 67.9% 73.7% 578
2007 Q4 585 458 114 19.5% 80.0% 78.0% 587
2007 Q3 574 453 112 19.5% 58.8% 75.2% 668
2007 Q2 627 487 128 20.4% 44.4% 73.6% 649
2007 Q1 456 358 82 18.0% 82.4% 78.7% 593
2006 Q4 549 444 91 16.6% 64.3% 73.9% 561
2006 Q3 575 467 97 16.9% 72.7% 80.0% 544
2006 Q2 594 462 117 19.7% 78.6% 84.2% 666
2006 Q1 538 415 99 18.4% 63.6% 87.2% 613
2005 Q4 564 444 101 17.9% 66.7% 80.8% 633
2005 Q3 626 476 133 21.2% 76.5% 82.8% 601
2005 Q2 698 513 150 21.5% 53.8% 65.6% 595
2005 Q1 617 449 153 24.8% 57.1% 67.1% 694
2004 Q4 592 434 150 25.3% 53.3% 39.5% 610
2004 Q3 762 555 197 25.9% 60.0% 37.8% 689
2004 Q2 701 541 146 20.8% 40.0% 54.7% 785
2004 Q1 643 531 99 15.4% 41.2% 44.7% 724
2003 Q4 607 485 109 18.0% 33.3% 34.7% 651
2003 Q3 694 555 118 17.0% 27.3% 35.6% 662
2003 Q2 675 576 92 13.6% 30.0% 35.2% 696
2003 Q1 578 487 78 13.5% 29.4% 45.4% 671
2002 Q4 487 414 50 10.3% 50.0% 46.8% 642
2002 Q3 643 534 80 12.4% 45.0% 55.3% 607
2002 Q2 559 467 64 11.4% 50.0% 58.0% 609
2002 Q1 517 443 65 12.6% 55.6% 52.9% 637
2001 Q4 511 428 60 11.7% 47.1% 61.0% 557
2001 Q3 552 472 60 10.9% 38.1% 57.4% 549
2001 Q2 536 459 61 11.4% 43.8% 61.3% 635
2001 Q1 537 463 58 10.8% 59.1% 42.2% 568
2000 Q4 539 470 56 10.4% 44.4% 43.0% 523
2000 Q3 502 449 44 8.8% 50.0% 33.9% 534
2000 Q2 495 445 45 9.1% 33.3% 35.3% 567
2000 Q1 419 363 43 10.3% 41.7% 47.4% 511
1999 Q4 427 361 53 12.4% 100.0% 35.7% 427
1999 Q3 444 410 34 7.7% 25.0% 48.3% 496
1999 Q2 376 328 45 12.0% 55.6% 36.9% 474
1999 Q1 386 343 43 11.1% 40.0% 39.7% 406
1998 Q4 383 346 37 9.7% 33.3% 41.6% 405
1998 Q3 481 419 57 11.9% 58.3% 33.1% 410
1998 Q2 367 335 32 8.7% 57.9% 17.1% 472
1996 Q1 157 145 12 7.6% 30.0% 67.5% —
1995 Q4 200 188 12 6.0% 44.4% 54.2% —
1995 Q3 143 134 9 6.3% 54.5% 61.3% —
1995 Q2 155 145 10 6.5% 28.6% 61.5% —
1995 Q1 198 190 8 4.0% 88.9% 50.6% —
1994 Q4 115 110 5 4.3% 64.7% 50.0% —
1994 Q3 166 153 13 7.8% 45.5% 35.5% —
1994 Q2 132 121 11 8.3% 54.5% 56.7% —
1994 Q1 168 151 17 10.1% 50.0% 44.7% —
1993 Q4 163 155 8 4.9% 63.2% 52.5% —
1993 Q3 145 133 12 8.3% 71.4% 66.1% —
1993 Q2 149 131 18 12.1% 33.3% 57.1% —
1993 Q1 179 170 9 5.0% 40.0% 40.3% —
1992 Q4 168 145 23 13.7% 80.0% 36.8% —
1992 Q3 160 141 19 11.9% 0.0% 36.4% —
1992 Q2 148 137 11 7.4% 40.0% 36.3% —
1992 Q1 170 147 23 13.5% 22.2% 32.7% —
1991 Q4 167 120 47 28.1% 35.7% 23.8% —
1991 Q3 175 139 36 20.6% 50.0% 19.1% —
1991 Q2 187 158 29 15.5% 33.3% 31.3% —
1991 Q1 157 125 32 20.4% 38.5% 22.4% —
1990 Q4 202 145 57 28.2% 40.0% 23.7% —
1990 Q3 197 165 32 16.2% 41.7% 26.7% —
1990 Q2 193 170 23 11.9% 40.0% 37.7% —
1990 Q1 246 171 75 30.5% 25.0% 37.0% —
1989 Q4 151 130 21 13.9% 23.1% 29.5% —
1989 Q3 232 208 24 10.3% 6.7% 14.3% —
1989 Q2 161 142 19 11.8% 0.0% 6.6% —
1989 Q1 306 266 40 13.1% 51.2% 16.5% —
1988 Q4 158 137 21 13.3% 22.2% 10.6% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me