← All authorities

Salford

North West · E08000006 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
708
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
12.9%
higher than 57% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
71.3%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
98.9%
no formal threshold
Delegated
95.1%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
28.8%
36 allowed of 125 decided
Decisions overturned
0.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 18.0%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
931
in the window
Applications decided
708
in the window
Approval rate
87.1%
617 granted, 91 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 17 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
90.3%
rank 175 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 25 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2788.9%100.0%
Minor20583.9%71.3%
Other47688.4%—
of which householder34892.0%98.9%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01533062024 Q3: 236 received2024 Q3: 220 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 259 received2024 Q4: 186 decided2025 Q1: 306 received2025 Q1: 196 decided2025 Q2: 252 received2025 Q2: 223 decided2025 Q3: 228 received2025 Q3: 192 decided2025 Q4: 216 received2025 Q4: 172 decided2026 Q1: 241 received2026 Q1: 150 decided2026 Q2: 246 received2026 Q2: 194 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
178%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000006). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 194 159 35 18.0% 100.0% 40.9% 246
2026 Q1 150 134 16 10.7% — 75.0% 241
2025 Q4 172 149 23 13.4% — 89.3% 216
2025 Q3 192 175 17 8.9% 100.0% 77.8% 228
2025 Q2 223 203 20 9.0% — 90.9% 252
2025 Q1 196 174 22 11.2% 100.0% 80.0% 306
2024 Q4 186 169 17 9.1% 100.0% 100.0% 259
2024 Q3 220 195 25 11.4% — 96.9% 236
2024 Q2 212 180 32 15.1% 100.0% 100.0% 279
2024 Q1 163 147 16 9.8% — 77.8% 264
2023 Q4 178 157 21 11.8% 100.0% 88.2% 174
2023 Q3 193 183 10 5.2% 100.0% 90.9% 215
2023 Q2 223 199 24 10.8% 0.0% 78.3% 220
2023 Q1 207 186 21 10.1% 33.3% 64.0% 218
2022 Q4 260 234 26 10.0% 50.0% 68.2% 224
2022 Q3 257 224 33 12.8% 50.0% 66.7% 257
2022 Q2 255 231 24 9.4% 100.0% 80.0% 304
2022 Q1 271 252 19 7.0% 60.0% 88.9% 278
2021 Q4 281 254 27 9.6% 54.5% 82.9% 257
2021 Q3 349 322 27 7.7% 42.9% 69.8% 307
2021 Q2 286 271 15 5.2% 66.7% 82.1% 359
2021 Q1 263 250 13 4.9% 100.0% 66.7% 335
2020 Q4 267 254 13 4.9% 25.0% 71.9% 319
2020 Q3 217 206 11 5.1% 85.7% 78.1% 274
2020 Q2 236 229 7 3.0% 100.0% 56.5% 219
2020 Q1 210 201 9 4.3% 50.0% 78.6% 273
2019 Q4 223 204 19 8.5% 100.0% 90.0% 233
2019 Q3 224 214 10 4.5% 60.0% 77.5% 254
2019 Q2 304 295 9 3.0% 71.4% 78.4% 251
2019 Q1 216 208 8 3.7% 0.0% 56.8% 275
2018 Q4 238 217 21 8.8% 85.7% 57.5% 242
2018 Q3 242 228 14 5.8% 66.7% 73.3% 238
2018 Q2 245 237 8 3.3% 100.0% 67.5% 273
2018 Q1 233 213 20 8.6% 66.7% 86.8% 264
2017 Q4 230 207 23 10.0% 80.0% 87.8% 242
2017 Q3 272 250 22 8.1% 83.3% 75.9% 246
2017 Q2 242 230 12 5.0% 50.0% 76.9% 277
2017 Q1 212 195 17 8.0% 60.0% 77.8% 277
2016 Q4 218 206 12 5.5% 53.8% 74.4% 204
2016 Q3 267 242 25 9.4% 100.0% 84.6% 258
2016 Q2 276 262 14 5.1% 80.0% 84.3% 279
2016 Q1 236 215 21 8.9% 100.0% 77.1% 270
2015 Q4 233 213 20 8.6% 91.7% 86.7% 281
2015 Q3 230 209 21 9.1% 66.7% 90.0% 258
2015 Q2 215 202 13 6.0% 66.7% 86.4% 242
2015 Q1 218 204 14 6.4% 88.9% 89.7% 222
2014 Q4 240 228 12 5.0% 100.0% 71.2% 224
2014 Q3 260 247 13 5.0% 66.7% 64.4% 249
2014 Q2 168 164 4 2.4% 100.0% 95.6% 253
2014 Q1 191 178 12 6.3% 90.0% 64.5% 213
2013 Q4 232 221 9 3.9% 88.9% 74.7% 193
2013 Q3 240 223 11 4.6% 88.9% 71.4% 265
2013 Q2 258 238 18 7.0% 63.6% 75.8% 244
2013 Q1 215 193 13 6.0% 80.0% 48.1% 243
2012 Q4 213 199 14 6.6% 54.5% 63.0% 205
2012 Q3 275 255 17 6.2% 42.9% 74.7% 272
2012 Q2 205 189 13 6.3% 91.7% 76.1% 265
2012 Q1 193 182 11 5.7% 77.8% 79.7% 240
2011 Q4 259 236 21 8.1% 38.5% 78.2% 200
2011 Q3 280 248 26 9.3% 60.0% 72.3% 256
2011 Q2 255 211 28 11.0% 52.4% 83.8% 287
2011 Q1 243 213 28 11.5% 68.8% 69.2% 288
2010 Q4 240 202 31 12.9% 61.5% 80.3% 280
2010 Q3 250 208 34 13.6% 72.7% 84.4% 282
2010 Q2 210 180 29 13.8% 91.7% 85.3% 231
2010 Q1 214 187 24 11.2% 65.4% 68.4% 242
2009 Q4 229 196 26 11.4% 85.7% 85.2% 257
2009 Q3 233 194 36 15.5% 68.8% 75.4% 238
2009 Q2 246 210 33 13.4% 93.8% 83.3% 239
2009 Q1 193 170 21 10.9% 90.9% 82.8% 294
2008 Q4 232 202 28 12.1% 85.7% 78.8% 217
2008 Q3 297 260 36 12.1% 62.5% 80.7% 272
2008 Q2 369 316 52 14.1% 66.7% 75.7% 357
2008 Q1 284 249 33 11.6% 63.2% 76.0% 405
2007 Q4 357 312 44 12.3% 78.9% 74.5% 324
2007 Q3 423 363 55 13.0% 66.7% 66.4% 389
2007 Q2 394 320 72 18.3% 66.7% 69.2% 471
2007 Q1 323 267 55 17.0% 60.0% 70.8% 434
2006 Q4 384 325 58 15.1% 68.8% 68.5% 369
2006 Q3 419 362 56 13.4% 66.7% 73.9% 442
2006 Q2 424 378 45 10.6% 66.7% 81.8% 504
2006 Q1 421 370 50 11.9% 81.5% 62.5% 477
2005 Q4 411 378 29 7.1% 72.2% 71.1% 416
2005 Q3 391 346 45 11.5% 51.7% 79.0% 436
2005 Q2 467 400 53 11.3% 75.7% 81.0% 458
2005 Q1 518 465 51 9.8% 76.3% 79.0% 565
2004 Q4 407 373 32 7.9% 35.5% 66.4% 440
2004 Q3 475 423 47 9.9% 56.0% 81.3% 504
2004 Q2 483 434 48 9.9% 72.7% 79.7% 521
2004 Q1 399 351 47 11.8% 63.6% 83.2% 547
2003 Q4 457 402 55 12.0% 56.8% 82.9% 440
2003 Q3 438 378 58 13.2% 60.0% 82.9% 485
2003 Q2 480 415 65 13.5% 94.3% 86.0% 501
2003 Q1 388 324 60 15.5% 88.9% 85.3% 515
2002 Q4 419 352 63 15.0% 45.0% 70.7% 391
2002 Q3 342 303 37 10.8% 40.0% 62.5% 383
2002 Q2 391 357 34 8.7% 50.0% 51.5% 395
2002 Q1 323 292 30 9.3% 20.0% 51.7% 371
2001 Q4 317 286 31 9.8% 26.7% 50.5% 320
2001 Q3 315 295 19 6.0% 58.3% 70.5% 350
2001 Q2 323 290 33 10.2% 30.0% 72.7% 375
2001 Q1 349 323 23 6.6% 66.7% 71.9% 424
2000 Q4 311 289 21 6.8% 68.4% 69.4% 294
2000 Q3 331 302 26 7.9% 62.5% 65.6% 368
2000 Q2 295 267 28 9.5% 50.0% 80.8% 316
2000 Q1 329 287 42 12.8% 35.3% 59.2% 293
1999 Q4 279 266 13 4.7% 30.8% 56.3% 291
1999 Q3 311 282 29 9.3% 57.1% 41.2% 287
1999 Q2 282 268 14 5.0% 68.8% 59.8% 305
1999 Q1 277 259 18 6.5% 50.0% 53.0% 310
1998 Q4 238 222 16 6.7% 57.1% 34.1% 250
1998 Q3 303 282 21 6.9% 57.1% 50.4% 282
1998 Q2 282 263 19 6.7% 62.5% 41.7% 338
1998 Q1 221 204 17 7.7% 50.0% 59.5% 287
1997 Q4 288 264 24 8.3% 75.0% 57.3% 269
1997 Q3 276 259 17 6.2% 23.1% 29.4% 276
1997 Q2 242 224 18 7.4% 37.5% 17.7% 313
1997 Q1 257 224 33 12.8% 46.2% 24.6% 268
1996 Q4 229 204 25 10.9% 50.0% 38.0% 252
1996 Q3 195 182 12 6.2% 0.0% 28.1% 283
1996 Q2 224 212 12 5.4% 81.8% 29.5% 315
1996 Q1 273 249 24 8.8% 28.6% 47.9% —
1995 Q4 303 274 29 9.6% 28.6% 53.2% —
1995 Q3 346 306 40 11.6% 40.0% 50.3% —
1995 Q2 327 300 27 8.3% 50.0% 52.2% —
1995 Q1 291 266 25 8.6% 28.6% 48.4% —
1994 Q4 338 305 33 9.8% 60.0% 57.6% —
1994 Q3 353 325 28 7.9% 33.3% 57.5% —
1994 Q2 310 288 22 7.1% 50.0% 53.0% —
1994 Q1 343 310 33 9.6% 27.3% 49.7% —
1993 Q4 337 296 41 12.2% 40.0% 49.3% —
1993 Q3 394 357 37 9.4% 44.4% 59.7% —
1993 Q2 323 295 28 8.7% 14.3% 44.4% —
1993 Q1 265 228 37 14.0% 75.0% 44.2% —
1992 Q4 330 292 38 11.5% 50.0% 45.3% —
1992 Q3 363 310 53 14.6% 50.0% 53.6% —
1992 Q2 355 308 47 13.2% 33.3% 56.9% —
1992 Q1 295 262 33 11.2% 40.0% 51.0% —
1991 Q4 317 269 48 15.1% 71.4% 51.3% —
1991 Q3 323 282 41 12.7% 44.4% 49.2% —
1991 Q2 338 291 47 13.9% 33.3% 48.0% —
1991 Q1 274 235 39 14.2% 45.5% 48.5% —
1990 Q4 340 282 58 17.1% 60.0% 42.8% —
1990 Q3 310 247 63 20.3% 22.2% 35.3% —
1990 Q2 327 270 57 17.4% 30.0% 45.9% —
1990 Q1 274 230 44 16.1% 12.5% 25.0% —
1989 Q4 370 304 66 17.8% 46.7% 25.1% —
1989 Q3 322 250 72 22.4% 23.5% 27.3% —
1989 Q2 378 305 73 19.3% 36.4% 40.8% —
1989 Q1 263 221 42 16.0% 66.7% 42.3% —
1988 Q4 323 248 75 23.2% 57.1% 37.9% —
1988 Q3 315 262 53 16.8% 70.0% 39.4% —
1988 Q2 290 233 57 19.7% 82.4% 69.2% —
1988 Q1 360 300 60 16.7% 75.0% 64.6% —
1987 Q4 265 225 40 15.1% 60.0% 63.0% —
1987 Q3 303 258 45 14.9% 50.0% 60.2% —
1987 Q2 309 263 46 14.9% 60.0% 61.2% —
1987 Q1 211 176 35 16.6% 77.8% 69.2% —
1986 Q4 252 218 34 13.5% 83.3% 67.8% —
1986 Q3 266 225 41 15.4% 63.6% 65.9% —
1986 Q2 283 255 28 9.9% 42.9% 56.1% —
1986 Q1 210 192 18 8.6% 50.0% 66.4% —
1985 Q4 215 188 27 12.6% 80.0% 64.7% —
1985 Q3 146 120 26 17.8% 33.3% 65.6% —
1985 Q2 254 219 35 13.8% 80.0% 66.4% —
1985 Q1 215 194 21 9.8% 62.5% 72.3% —
1984 Q4 249 226 23 9.2% 80.0% 77.8% —
1984 Q3 224 196 28 12.5% 50.0% 71.6% —
1984 Q2 273 240 33 12.1% 100.0% 79.2% —
1984 Q1 258 224 34 13.2% 83.3% 74.1% —
1983 Q4 304 261 43 14.1% 50.0% 76.0% —
1983 Q3 319 278 41 12.9% 33.3% 68.8% —
1983 Q2 344 305 39 11.3% 57.1% 68.8% —
1983 Q1 249 227 22 8.8% 100.0% 63.2% —
1982 Q4 165 138 27 16.4% 100.0% 65.9% —
1982 Q3 268 231 37 13.8% 50.0% 69.9% —
1982 Q2 313 272 41 13.1% 57.1% 77.6% —
1982 Q1 225 200 25 11.1% 66.7% 75.5% —
1981 Q4 226 199 27 11.9% 66.7% 76.4% —
1981 Q3 318 289 29 9.1% 0.0% 62.5% —
1981 Q2 483 408 75 15.5% 84.6% 64.8% —
1981 Q1 321 278 43 13.4% 70.0% 72.3% —
1980 Q4 347 301 46 13.3% 75.0% 74.6% —
1980 Q3 346 281 65 18.8% 83.3% 69.1% —
1980 Q2 337 283 54 16.0% 100.0% 71.6% —
1980 Q1 493 398 95 19.3% 87.5% 73.4% —
1979 Q4 374 309 65 17.4% 100.0% 68.4% —
1979 Q3 279 233 46 16.5% 100.0% 64.9% —
1979 Q2 353 281 72 20.4% 60.0% 62.3% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me