← All authorities

Manchester

North West · E08000003 · 151 quarters held (1988 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,807
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
11.1%
higher than 45% of authorities
Majors in time
96.9%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
92.9%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
96.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.2%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
35.0%
143 allowed of 409 decided
Decisions overturned
1.4%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.0%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
2,034
in the window
Applications decided
1,807
in the window
Approval rate
88.9%
1,606 granted, 201 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 14 of 36 metropolitan districts (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 13.2%
Decided within time
94.7%
rank 96 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 12 of 36 metropolitan districts · peer median 92.1%

Peer ranks compare only metropolitan districts with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major9997.0%96.9%
Minor57782.8%92.9%
Other1,13191.2%—
of which householder68894.6%96.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
02645272024 Q3: 470 received2024 Q3: 432 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 491 received2024 Q4: 451 decided2025 Q1: 499 received2025 Q1: 346 decided2025 Q2: 518 received2025 Q2: 520 decided2025 Q3: 527 received2025 Q3: 432 decided2025 Q4: 467 received2025 Q4: 515 decided2026 Q1: 513 received2026 Q1: 457 decided2026 Q2: 527 received2026 Q2: 403 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
75%
Buffer

Delivery 75–84%: a 20% buffer is added to the authority's housing land supply requirement.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E08000003). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1988 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (151 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1988 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (151 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 403 374 29 7.2% 100.0% 92.2% 527
2026 Q1 457 406 51 11.2% 100.0% 93.8% 513
2025 Q4 515 446 69 13.4% 85.7% 92.0% 467
2025 Q3 432 380 52 12.0% 100.0% 93.7% 527
2025 Q2 520 450 70 13.5% 100.0% 98.3% 518
2025 Q1 346 305 41 11.8% 100.0% 92.4% 499
2024 Q4 451 391 60 13.3% 85.7% 97.0% 491
2024 Q3 432 376 56 13.0% 100.0% 95.7% 470
2024 Q2 494 415 79 16.0% 100.0% 96.4% 470
2024 Q1 500 437 63 12.6% 100.0% 96.8% 480
2023 Q4 536 488 48 9.0% 91.7% 75.0% 499
2023 Q3 502 463 39 7.8% 83.3% 82.8% 549
2023 Q2 403 366 37 9.2% 100.0% 76.9% 533
2023 Q1 490 426 64 13.1% 100.0% 74.1% 459
2022 Q4 481 444 37 7.7% 77.8% 83.1% 558
2022 Q3 564 514 50 8.9% 77.8% 80.0% 584
2022 Q2 546 491 55 10.1% 100.0% 82.4% 560
2022 Q1 477 444 33 6.9% 71.4% 78.6% 515
2021 Q4 525 482 43 8.2% 85.7% 68.8% 531
2021 Q3 594 558 36 6.1% 85.7% 78.0% 630
2021 Q2 589 547 42 7.1% 77.8% 77.8% 650
2021 Q1 504 457 47 9.3% 100.0% 81.0% 592
2020 Q4 525 471 54 10.3% 78.6% 69.8% 578
2020 Q3 481 442 39 8.1% 87.5% 79.3% 600
2020 Q2 425 395 30 7.1% 91.7% 77.2% 421
2020 Q1 519 471 48 9.2% 76.9% 78.8% 576
2019 Q4 597 544 53 8.9% 93.8% 87.6% 621
2019 Q3 567 512 55 9.7% 86.7% 88.3% 637
2019 Q2 613 563 50 8.2% 100.0% 90.0% 651
2019 Q1 564 492 72 12.8% 84.6% 81.0% 659
2018 Q4 584 531 53 9.1% 100.0% 88.5% 640
2018 Q3 655 601 54 8.2% 71.4% 85.9% 646
2018 Q2 635 594 41 6.5% 88.5% 81.8% 713
2018 Q1 598 544 54 9.0% 89.5% 89.2% 662
2017 Q4 595 516 79 13.3% 82.6% 81.5% 637
2017 Q3 641 594 47 7.3% 80.6% 86.5% 666
2017 Q2 581 536 45 7.7% 92.0% 81.5% 675
2017 Q1 507 466 41 8.1% 90.9% 88.5% 640
2016 Q4 605 538 67 11.1% 86.7% 78.9% 585
2016 Q3 599 550 49 8.2% 67.6% 72.7% 630
2016 Q2 526 469 57 10.8% 88.2% 73.2% 645
2016 Q1 433 385 48 11.1% 73.1% 74.0% 591
2015 Q4 580 523 57 9.8% 87.8% 82.1% 504
2015 Q3 558 503 55 9.9% 88.2% 80.5% 625
2015 Q2 483 443 40 8.3% 68.8% 82.6% 558
2015 Q1 440 407 33 7.5% 95.7% 82.0% 533
2014 Q4 543 501 42 7.7% 66.7% 80.5% 543
2014 Q3 560 519 41 7.3% 69.6% 80.0% 577
2014 Q2 486 456 30 6.2% 60.0% 81.5% 585
2014 Q1 451 420 25 5.5% 72.7% 80.4% 525
2013 Q4 570 508 51 8.9% 61.9% 76.5% 547
2013 Q3 603 542 46 7.6% 75.0% 77.4% 647
2013 Q2 555 500 37 6.7% 66.7% 81.9% 593
2013 Q1 485 432 35 7.2% 76.9% 79.3% 642
2012 Q4 552 492 47 8.5% 70.0% 77.7% 530
2012 Q3 577 515 51 8.8% 83.3% 79.2% 636
2012 Q2 533 479 48 9.0% 94.7% 85.2% 641
2012 Q1 502 441 54 10.8% 68.4% 78.9% 616
2011 Q4 509 437 68 13.4% 72.0% 80.9% 530
2011 Q3 580 497 74 12.8% 72.0% 71.0% 562
2011 Q2 526 466 50 9.5% 60.0% 85.4% 626
2011 Q1 535 472 54 10.1% 78.3% 82.7% 636
2010 Q4 586 525 49 8.4% 76.5% 77.0% 605
2010 Q3 600 530 64 10.7% 70.8% 83.3% 656
2010 Q2 522 469 47 9.0% 66.7% 81.6% 610
2010 Q1 512 472 38 7.4% 73.1% 80.2% 614
2009 Q4 556 488 58 10.4% 83.3% 77.2% 584
2009 Q3 609 544 61 10.0% 65.0% 78.4% 658
2009 Q2 579 498 72 12.4% 70.8% 78.6% 627
2009 Q1 471 412 56 11.9% 84.2% 75.5% 565
2008 Q4 587 505 77 13.1% 83.3% 79.8% 645
2008 Q3 585 499 85 14.5% 56.7% 84.2% 572
2008 Q2 582 523 54 9.3% 63.2% 80.8% 679
2008 Q1 568 466 63 11.1% 51.3% 83.2% 653
2007 Q4 639 524 78 12.2% 71.0% 85.7% 684
2007 Q3 723 576 91 12.6% 65.9% 78.4% 775
2007 Q2 689 547 97 14.1% 60.0% 79.4% 853
2007 Q1 609 484 71 11.7% 58.3% 75.6% 731
2006 Q4 647 496 87 13.4% 59.1% 77.5% 689
2006 Q3 729 517 109 15.0% 70.3% 84.2% 764
2006 Q2 660 494 82 12.4% 55.9% 78.2% 761
2006 Q1 642 459 80 12.5% 68.3% 75.0% 741
2005 Q4 717 501 83 11.6% 71.1% 87.0% 798
2005 Q3 697 465 84 12.1% 52.9% 77.5% 776
2005 Q2 698 443 72 10.3% 75.0% 77.1% 860
2005 Q1 654 368 78 11.9% 48.6% 68.9% 782
2004 Q4 809 499 92 11.4% 62.1% 67.9% 853
2004 Q3 684 431 41 6.0% 68.8% 67.7% 873
2004 Q2 695 505 59 8.5% 73.7% 80.6% 768
2004 Q1 648 455 58 9.0% 59.7% 59.5% 739
2003 Q4 615 423 53 8.6% 63.6% 65.7% 729
2003 Q3 637 462 83 13.0% 61.8% 72.2% 752
2003 Q2 621 506 77 12.4% 38.8% 67.5% 674
2003 Q1 550 461 84 15.3% 47.8% 68.9% 613
2002 Q4 582 496 79 13.6% 58.3% 77.8% 662
2002 Q3 640 542 88 13.8% 57.1% 73.5% 685
2002 Q2 671 573 93 13.9% 46.8% 78.8% 714
2002 Q1 531 465 65 12.2% 40.8% 81.7% 1,124
2001 Q4 653 561 87 13.3% 40.0% 60.6% 528
2001 Q3 621 540 79 12.7% 45.9% 45.6% 732
2001 Q2 474 417 56 11.8% 39.0% 43.9% 659
2001 Q1 478 417 60 12.6% 29.9% 58.9% 665
2000 Q4 553 484 67 12.1% 30.2% 63.5% 546
2000 Q3 636 568 67 10.5% 37.9% 51.3% 744
2000 Q2 514 454 59 11.5% 33.3% 57.1% 672
2000 Q1 545 487 58 10.6% 30.4% 35.0% 599
1999 Q4 507 465 37 7.3% 38.6% 53.6% 538
1999 Q3 452 413 38 8.4% 50.0% 43.8% 673
1999 Q2 453 401 49 10.8% 46.7% 41.8% 540
1999 Q1 462 420 41 8.9% 39.0% 48.6% 508
1998 Q4 451 414 35 7.8% 45.7% 49.7% 471
1998 Q3 665 603 61 9.2% 53.1% 51.6% 750
1998 Q2 437 385 51 11.7% 56.8% 52.1% 576
1998 Q1 433 400 31 7.2% 39.5% 40.3% 535
1997 Q4 448 382 65 14.5% 55.6% 42.7% 448
1997 Q3 571 466 104 18.2% 40.4% 49.3% 644
1997 Q2 429 385 40 9.3% 51.7% 37.8% 511
1997 Q1 447 383 57 12.8% 45.5% 39.8% 496
1996 Q4 454 409 41 9.0% 40.5% 53.4% 490
1996 Q3 483 424 57 11.8% 54.5% 57.9% 497
1996 Q2 460 412 45 9.8% 44.4% 49.0% 521
1996 Q1 334 286 48 14.4% 71.4% 58.1% —
1995 Q4 364 330 34 9.3% 58.3% 63.4% —
1995 Q3 408 360 48 11.8% 50.0% 44.5% —
1995 Q2 330 298 32 9.7% 40.0% 37.0% —
1995 Q1 349 305 44 12.6% 57.1% 51.1% —
1994 Q4 371 318 53 14.3% 37.5% 41.9% —
1994 Q3 452 376 76 16.8% 50.0% 57.4% —
1994 Q2 392 344 48 12.2% 80.0% 47.1% —
1994 Q1 308 269 39 12.7% 75.0% 49.5% —
1993 Q4 346 302 44 12.7% 88.9% 53.5% —
1993 Q3 388 345 43 11.1% 50.0% 65.5% —
1993 Q2 336 305 31 9.2% 60.0% 63.8% —
1993 Q1 353 297 56 15.9% 61.5% 46.9% —
1992 Q4 332 272 60 18.1% 28.6% 43.5% —
1992 Q3 323 284 39 12.1% 40.0% 50.0% —
1992 Q2 405 333 72 17.8% 75.0% 60.1% —
1992 Q1 373 331 42 11.3% 38.5% 42.8% —
1991 Q4 408 361 47 11.5% 63.6% 50.0% —
1991 Q3 415 345 70 16.9% 53.8% 39.1% —
1991 Q2 420 341 79 18.8% 31.3% 37.7% —
1991 Q1 377 281 96 25.5% 27.3% 43.8% —
1990 Q4 396 296 100 25.3% 28.6% 34.9% —
1990 Q3 483 427 56 11.6% 61.5% 71.0% —
1990 Q2 263 223 40 15.2% 0.0% 58.2% —
1990 Q1 701 582 119 17.0% 80.0% 63.1% —
1989 Q4 411 313 98 23.8% 100.0% 58.9% —
1989 Q3 503 446 57 11.3% 61.5% 71.6% —
1989 Q2 308 259 49 15.9% 20.0% 59.1% —
1989 Q1 779 648 131 16.8% 80.0% 63.0% —
1988 Q4 406 310 96 23.6% 100.0% 59.0% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me