← All authorities

Mid Sussex

South East · E07000228 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,089
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
8.9%
higher than 32% of authorities
Majors in time
92.3%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
97.9%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
98.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.1%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
26.9%
71 allowed of 264 decided
Decisions overturned
1.0%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 14.4%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,162
in the window
Applications decided
1,089
in the window
Approval rate
91.1%
992 granted, 97 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 61 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
97.6%
rank 49 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 21 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major5294.2%92.3%
Minor22788.1%97.9%
Other81091.7%—
of which householder67992.6%98.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01903802024 Q3: 264 received2024 Q3: 282 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 296 received2024 Q4: 214 decided2025 Q1: 380 received2025 Q1: 242 decided2025 Q2: 284 received2025 Q2: 317 decided2025 Q3: 259 received2025 Q3: 258 decided2025 Q4: 305 received2025 Q4: 287 decided2026 Q1: 312 received2026 Q1: 253 decided2026 Q2: 286 received2026 Q2: 291 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
104%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000228). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 291 264 27 9.3% 100.0% 100.0% 286
2026 Q1 253 235 18 7.1% 100.0% 92.0% 312
2025 Q4 287 265 22 7.7% 100.0% 100.0% 305
2025 Q3 258 228 30 11.6% 66.7% 100.0% 259
2025 Q2 317 294 23 7.3% 100.0% 100.0% 284
2025 Q1 242 220 22 9.1% — 94.1% 380
2024 Q4 214 197 17 7.9% 100.0% 100.0% 296
2024 Q3 282 256 26 9.2% 100.0% 100.0% 264
2024 Q2 291 279 12 4.1% 100.0% 100.0% 310
2024 Q1 254 233 21 8.3% 100.0% 96.0% 302
2023 Q4 274 251 23 8.4% 100.0% 91.4% 303
2023 Q3 294 269 25 8.5% 100.0% 100.0% 303
2023 Q2 326 305 21 6.4% 100.0% 100.0% 336
2023 Q1 313 268 45 14.4% 100.0% 95.2% 380
2022 Q4 322 287 35 10.9% 100.0% 97.2% 364
2022 Q3 390 371 19 4.9% 100.0% 100.0% 358
2022 Q2 423 393 30 7.1% 100.0% 100.0% 458
2022 Q1 386 360 26 6.7% 100.0% 95.1% 475
2021 Q4 384 358 26 6.8% 100.0% 100.0% 433
2021 Q3 426 404 22 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 395
2021 Q2 510 488 22 4.3% 100.0% 97.8% 526
2021 Q1 414 386 28 6.8% 100.0% 97.9% 507
2020 Q4 340 314 26 7.6% 75.0% 100.0% 410
2020 Q3 328 306 22 6.7% 100.0% 100.0% 418
2020 Q2 347 326 21 6.1% 100.0% 97.8% 322
2020 Q1 346 316 30 8.7% 100.0% 100.0% 416
2019 Q4 315 285 30 9.5% 100.0% 100.0% 362
2019 Q3 407 373 34 8.4% 100.0% 100.0% 422
2019 Q2 400 365 35 8.8% 100.0% 96.0% 391
2019 Q1 374 336 38 10.2% 100.0% 96.1% 426
2018 Q4 362 331 31 8.6% 100.0% 100.0% 418
2018 Q3 440 393 47 10.7% 83.3% 98.3% 440
2018 Q2 469 427 42 9.0% 100.0% 100.0% 480
2018 Q1 416 376 40 9.6% 100.0% 94.3% 505
2017 Q4 430 384 46 10.7% 88.9% 98.4% 488
2017 Q3 439 402 37 8.4% 100.0% 97.5% 458
2017 Q2 447 416 31 6.9% 100.0% 96.7% 474
2017 Q1 437 409 28 6.4% 100.0% 98.5% 529
2016 Q4 398 372 26 6.5% 100.0% 94.6% 470
2016 Q3 459 421 38 8.3% 55.6% 89.2% 481
2016 Q2 415 384 31 7.5% 100.0% 98.4% 477
2016 Q1 349 322 27 7.7% 100.0% 96.4% 475
2015 Q4 391 355 36 9.2% 85.7% 91.9% 416
2015 Q3 402 354 48 11.9% 75.0% 91.9% 395
2015 Q2 395 368 27 6.8% 66.7% 82.2% 418
2015 Q1 361 338 23 6.4% 66.7% 91.8% 452
2014 Q4 361 336 25 6.9% 100.0% 96.3% 436
2014 Q3 411 384 27 6.6% 100.0% 87.0% 421
2014 Q2 433 402 31 7.2% 87.5% 87.2% 474
2014 Q1 333 298 24 7.2% 80.0% 85.6% 433
2013 Q4 389 344 29 7.5% 91.7% 82.8% 395
2013 Q3 406 363 28 6.9% 100.0% 89.3% 450
2013 Q2 399 347 42 10.5% 70.6% 74.1% 424
2013 Q1 350 302 36 10.3% 91.7% 85.2% 420
2012 Q4 344 301 31 9.0% 71.4% 87.3% 391
2012 Q3 427 379 29 6.8% 78.6% 92.5% 423
2012 Q2 419 372 23 5.5% 75.0% 90.9% 449
2012 Q1 354 311 32 9.0% 83.3% 87.2% 470
2011 Q4 355 306 35 9.9% 85.7% 86.7% 430
2011 Q3 361 313 36 10.0% 77.8% 90.1% 417
2011 Q2 382 326 42 11.0% 75.0% 80.2% 397
2011 Q1 351 307 32 9.1% 77.8% 82.6% 421
2010 Q4 343 293 32 9.3% 86.7% 86.7% 384
2010 Q3 411 343 48 11.7% 87.5% 90.1% 418
2010 Q2 405 345 34 8.4% 50.0% 78.2% 451
2010 Q1 353 286 45 12.7% 90.0% 80.6% 415
2009 Q4 363 304 38 10.5% 66.7% 92.1% 397
2009 Q3 408 330 57 14.0% 42.9% 88.3% 432
2009 Q2 398 333 49 12.3% 77.8% 83.5% 500
2009 Q1 313 252 47 15.0% 76.2% 86.8% 433
2008 Q4 368 301 57 15.5% 81.8% 84.2% 355
2008 Q3 411 344 56 13.6% 77.8% 87.8% 434
2008 Q2 530 425 91 17.2% 85.7% 84.4% 528
2008 Q1 485 377 83 17.1% 73.3% 81.8% 626
2007 Q4 498 410 72 14.5% 81.8% 86.5% 513
2007 Q3 543 434 96 17.7% 94.4% 77.7% 602
2007 Q2 537 433 87 16.2% 80.0% 72.6% 600
2007 Q1 523 411 80 15.3% 91.3% 80.8% 592
2006 Q4 476 379 79 16.6% 63.6% 78.0% 544
2006 Q3 530 433 78 14.7% 50.0% 59.8% 563
2006 Q2 521 414 82 15.7% 81.8% 58.7% 542
2006 Q1 504 415 73 14.5% 50.0% 70.2% 615
2005 Q4 479 393 76 15.9% 46.7% 70.0% 525
2005 Q3 553 446 91 16.5% 66.7% 64.5% 578
2005 Q2 521 435 71 13.6% 75.0% 67.9% 551
2005 Q1 470 388 63 13.4% 81.8% 58.7% 545
2004 Q4 557 458 81 14.5% 81.8% 70.6% 591
2004 Q3 573 464 87 15.2% 75.0% 65.7% 560
2004 Q2 629 512 93 14.8% 70.0% 71.4% 617
2004 Q1 508 424 57 11.2% 30.8% 59.3% 618
2003 Q4 510 404 82 16.1% 56.3% 73.9% 547
2003 Q3 631 496 111 17.6% 41.7% 67.5% 642
2003 Q2 577 480 81 14.0% 11.1% 57.6% 662
2003 Q1 521 445 62 11.9% 50.0% 58.3% 600
2002 Q4 508 426 65 12.8% 50.0% 45.5% 509
2002 Q3 524 465 41 7.8% 44.4% 37.9% 517
2002 Q2 504 442 45 8.9% 14.3% 47.7% 597
2002 Q1 418 357 47 11.2% 45.5% 38.4% 538
2001 Q4 452 383 45 10.0% 42.9% 46.6% 452
2001 Q3 465 408 30 6.5% 25.0% 58.1% 512
2001 Q2 530 472 25 4.7% 0.0% 50.6% 561
2001 Q1 416 343 43 10.3% 66.7% 52.5% 493
2000 Q4 425 337 42 9.9% 0.0% 44.2% 452
2000 Q3 482 422 32 6.6% 83.3% 50.0% 508
2000 Q2 487 436 36 7.4% 57.1% 61.9% 585
2000 Q1 260 240 20 7.7% 50.0% 51.4% 308
1999 Q4 306 273 33 10.8% 50.0% 61.4% 320
1999 Q3 651 587 63 9.7% 93.3% 68.3% 682
1999 Q2 216 189 27 12.5% 66.7% 67.4% 215
1999 Q1 442 383 58 13.1% 69.2% 60.0% 523
1998 Q4 423 373 49 11.6% 68.4% 63.7% 420
1998 Q3 422 364 58 13.7% 46.2% 62.1% 494
1998 Q2 350 326 23 6.6% 71.4% 67.4% 334
1998 Q1 280 245 33 11.8% 66.7% 45.5% 312
1997 Q4 465 412 46 9.9% 64.3% 59.3% 456
1997 Q3 364 329 35 9.6% 42.9% 62.8% 421
1997 Q2 427 383 44 10.3% 62.5% 69.4% 526
1997 Q1 328 287 41 12.5% 60.0% 62.5% 305
1996 Q4 291 259 32 11.0% 91.7% 62.1% 338
1996 Q3 367 333 34 9.3% 61.5% 74.5% 430
1996 Q2 389 343 45 11.6% 50.0% 70.9% 353
1996 Q1 289 270 19 6.6% 42.9% 71.8% —
1995 Q4 304 281 23 7.6% 62.5% 64.2% —
1995 Q3 347 314 33 9.5% 45.5% 57.5% —
1995 Q2 404 371 33 8.2% 57.1% 60.4% —
1995 Q1 301 265 36 12.0% 50.0% 59.0% —
1994 Q4 375 339 36 9.6% 62.5% 62.7% —
1994 Q3 430 394 36 8.4% 64.3% 56.0% —
1994 Q2 362 328 34 9.4% 60.0% 48.1% —
1994 Q1 334 296 38 11.4% 70.0% 55.1% —
1993 Q4 354 326 28 7.9% 76.5% 52.8% —
1993 Q3 373 333 40 10.7% 40.0% 56.3% —
1993 Q2 332 301 31 9.3% 55.6% 68.1% —
1993 Q1 293 277 16 5.5% 57.1% 64.0% —
1992 Q4 306 274 32 10.5% 54.5% 58.6% —
1992 Q3 379 345 34 9.0% 57.1% 56.8% —
1992 Q2 363 328 35 9.6% 66.7% 59.2% —
1992 Q1 371 324 47 12.7% 60.0% 41.3% —
1991 Q4 376 313 63 16.8% 70.0% 34.7% —
1991 Q3 383 330 53 13.8% 40.0% 36.8% —
1991 Q2 363 309 54 14.9% 28.6% 39.3% —
1991 Q1 390 336 54 13.8% 53.3% 32.4% —
1990 Q4 404 321 83 20.5% 61.9% 18.7% —
1990 Q3 402 322 80 19.9% 40.0% 26.3% —
1990 Q2 457 358 99 21.7% 77.8% 19.9% —
1990 Q1 409 321 88 21.5% 33.3% 15.4% —
1989 Q4 412 312 100 24.3% 42.9% 35.0% —
1989 Q3 518 386 132 25.5% 63.6% 28.8% —
1989 Q2 606 471 135 22.3% 54.1% 20.7% —
1989 Q1 512 335 177 34.6% 29.2% 12.4% —
1988 Q4 526 397 129 24.5% 21.4% 4.6% —
1988 Q3 460 362 98 21.3% 40.0% 3.1% —
1988 Q2 363 318 45 12.4% 0.0% 10.0% —
1988 Q1 475 390 85 17.9% 50.0% 23.0% —
1987 Q4 367 308 59 16.1% 76.2% 40.5% —
1987 Q3 467 407 60 12.8% 60.7% 45.2% —
1987 Q2 394 328 66 16.8% 64.7% 55.3% —
1987 Q1 283 245 38 13.4% 76.9% 41.5% —
1986 Q4 357 319 38 10.6% 45.8% 42.1% —
1986 Q3 392 348 44 11.2% 60.0% 36.4% —
1986 Q2 336 315 21 6.3% 47.6% 35.0% —
1986 Q1 336 298 38 11.3% 75.0% 45.5% —
1985 Q4 308 284 24 7.8% 60.0% 53.0% —
1985 Q3 304 276 28 9.2% 40.0% 55.7% —
1985 Q2 362 337 25 6.9% 57.1% 56.1% —
1985 Q1 273 253 20 7.3% 60.0% 47.9% —
1984 Q4 286 265 21 7.3% 57.1% 55.7% —
1984 Q3 303 278 25 8.3% 50.0% 60.3% —
1984 Q2 335 306 29 8.7% 75.0% 54.1% —
1984 Q1 326 298 28 8.6% 66.7% 55.6% —
1983 Q4 247 226 21 8.5% 25.0% 53.8% —
1983 Q3 330 302 28 8.5% 80.0% 50.8% —
1983 Q2 322 296 26 8.1% 100.0% 67.5% —
1983 Q1 305 277 28 9.2% 100.0% 56.0% —
1982 Q4 293 274 19 6.5% 33.3% 61.3% —
1982 Q3 307 275 32 10.4% 0.0% 51.7% —
1982 Q2 290 260 30 10.3% 0.0% 56.4% —
1982 Q1 260 231 29 11.2% 0.0% 59.3% —
1981 Q4 224 205 19 8.5% 25.0% 73.5% —
1981 Q3 263 237 26 9.9% 0.0% 69.1% —
1981 Q2 370 317 53 14.3% 76.9% 66.0% —
1981 Q1 313 273 40 12.8% 62.5% 66.9% —
1980 Q4 315 272 43 13.7% 71.4% 65.9% —
1980 Q3 410 330 80 19.5% 54.5% 58.6% —
1980 Q2 483 397 86 17.8% 60.0% 52.1% —
1980 Q1 416 355 61 14.7% 42.9% 43.7% —
1979 Q4 306 265 41 13.4% 0.0% 44.7% —
1979 Q3 407 342 65 16.0% 40.0% 29.4% —
1979 Q2 382 311 71 18.6% 45.5% 26.9% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me