← All authorities

Nuneaton and Bedworth

West Midlands · E07000219 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
284
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
6.3%
higher than 15% of authorities
Majors in time
—
threshold 60%
Minors in time
95.2%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
99.0%
no formal threshold
Delegated
94.7%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
35.1%
27 allowed of 77 decided
Decisions overturned
1.4%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.7%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
324
in the window
Applications decided
284
in the window
Approval rate
93.7%
266 granted, 18 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 28 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
98.6%
rank 26 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 10 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major11100.0%—
Minor6883.8%95.2%
Other20596.6%—
of which householder15598.1%99.0%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
049982024 Q3: 98 received2024 Q3: 80 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 83 received2024 Q4: 63 decided2025 Q1: 86 received2025 Q1: 75 decided2025 Q2: 98 received2025 Q2: 87 decided2025 Q3: 76 received2025 Q3: 68 decided2025 Q4: 77 received2025 Q4: 71 decided2026 Q1: 89 received2026 Q1: 80 decided2026 Q2: 82 received2026 Q2: 65 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
221%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000219). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 65 59 6 9.2% — 100.0% 82
2026 Q1 80 76 4 5.0% — 87.5% 89
2025 Q4 71 68 3 4.2% — 100.0% 77
2025 Q3 68 63 5 7.4% — 100.0% 76
2025 Q2 87 83 4 4.6% — 100.0% 98
2025 Q1 75 72 3 4.0% — 100.0% 86
2024 Q4 63 56 7 11.1% — 100.0% 83
2024 Q3 80 76 4 5.0% — 100.0% 98
2024 Q2 72 67 5 6.9% — 80.0% 82
2024 Q1 56 51 5 8.9% — 100.0% 86
2023 Q4 72 60 12 16.7% — 100.0% 91
2023 Q3 93 84 9 9.7% — 100.0% 77
2023 Q2 96 88 8 8.3% — 100.0% 108
2023 Q1 82 70 12 14.6% — 66.7% 105
2022 Q4 103 94 9 8.7% — 85.7% 99
2022 Q3 105 96 9 8.6% 0.0% 83.3% 111
2022 Q2 129 120 9 7.0% — 100.0% 126
2022 Q1 110 100 10 9.1% — 100.0% 121
2021 Q4 114 99 15 13.2% 77.8% 100.0% 109
2021 Q3 111 107 4 3.6% 0.0% 40.0% 121
2021 Q2 162 147 15 9.3% 0.0% 37.5% 213
2021 Q1 133 122 11 8.3% — 100.0% 190
2020 Q4 137 123 14 10.2% 50.0% 87.5% 145
2020 Q3 118 108 10 8.5% 50.0% 50.0% 171
2020 Q2 78 75 3 3.8% 0.0% 80.0% 139
2020 Q1 108 96 12 11.1% 50.0% 58.8% 192
2019 Q4 115 105 10 8.7% 66.7% 88.2% 171
2019 Q3 132 124 8 6.1% 100.0% 92.3% 167
2019 Q2 136 130 6 4.4% 50.0% 87.5% 224
2019 Q1 113 103 10 8.8% — 93.8% 166
2018 Q4 114 107 7 6.1% 75.0% 88.9% 214
2018 Q3 120 115 5 4.2% 66.7% 100.0% 164
2018 Q2 146 130 16 11.0% 100.0% 96.3% 215
2018 Q1 98 88 10 10.2% 100.0% 100.0% 191
2017 Q4 119 112 7 5.9% 66.7% 100.0% 160
2017 Q3 130 121 9 6.9% — 88.9% 188
2017 Q2 126 114 12 9.5% 100.0% 95.7% 189
2017 Q1 133 115 18 13.5% 100.0% 91.9% 178
2016 Q4 99 90 9 9.1% 100.0% 95.2% 168
2016 Q3 88 77 11 12.5% 100.0% 95.2% 177
2016 Q2 136 126 10 7.4% 66.7% 72.0% 186
2016 Q1 110 100 10 9.1% 100.0% 70.0% 163
2015 Q4 107 99 8 7.5% 100.0% 81.6% 159
2015 Q3 132 123 9 6.8% 75.0% 63.2% 164
2015 Q2 120 115 5 4.2% 33.3% 74.5% 65
2015 Q1 105 95 10 9.5% 100.0% 51.9% 122
2014 Q4 124 115 9 7.3% 100.0% 47.9% 129
2014 Q3 119 111 8 6.7% 100.0% 62.9% 160
2014 Q2 130 120 10 7.7% 33.3% 55.2% 164
2014 Q1 128 118 8 6.3% 40.0% 27.3% 146
2013 Q4 126 116 5 4.0% 42.9% 68.6% 132
2013 Q3 121 108 13 10.7% 33.3% 52.0% 140
2013 Q2 140 125 10 7.1% 33.3% 69.7% 136
2013 Q1 98 89 7 7.1% 71.4% 64.1% 126
2012 Q4 127 112 13 10.2% 37.5% 74.3% 117
2012 Q3 125 109 9 7.2% 80.0% 72.4% 166
2012 Q2 131 116 10 7.6% 20.0% 60.7% 141
2012 Q1 141 121 16 11.3% 12.5% 33.3% 130
2011 Q4 103 80 15 14.6% 50.0% 35.0% 129
2011 Q3 134 126 8 6.0% 37.5% 29.0% 127
2011 Q2 121 105 12 9.9% 33.3% 55.6% 149
2011 Q1 108 92 14 13.0% 66.7% 62.9% 158
2010 Q4 162 137 21 13.0% 20.0% 69.0% 150
2010 Q3 134 104 28 20.9% 80.0% 90.3% 190
2010 Q2 144 121 21 14.6% 75.0% 61.0% 167
2010 Q1 113 94 17 15.0% 83.3% 86.4% 135
2009 Q4 141 113 28 19.9% 57.1% 70.0% 158
2009 Q3 154 130 23 14.9% 80.0% 73.0% 168
2009 Q2 159 126 27 17.0% 44.4% 70.0% 172
2009 Q1 121 108 12 9.9% 25.0% 92.3% 155
2008 Q4 142 125 17 12.0% 71.4% 73.8% 129
2008 Q3 160 136 24 15.0% 66.7% 62.2% 192
2008 Q2 189 167 22 11.6% 75.0% 69.6% 166
2008 Q1 172 138 29 16.9% 66.7% 55.6% 186
2007 Q4 206 169 37 18.0% 60.0% 53.5% 183
2007 Q3 187 158 28 15.0% 33.3% 55.8% 233
2007 Q2 197 166 30 15.2% 72.7% 76.3% 224
2007 Q1 182 151 31 17.0% 83.3% 83.3% 198
2006 Q4 169 130 38 22.5% 37.5% 78.6% 192
2006 Q3 184 146 38 20.7% 75.0% 79.1% 188
2006 Q2 218 177 38 17.4% 78.6% 83.7% 219
2006 Q1 171 147 23 13.5% 50.0% 62.3% 212
2005 Q4 167 133 31 18.6% 77.8% 78.4% 204
2005 Q3 191 156 34 17.8% 80.0% 72.7% 198
2005 Q2 232 195 22 9.5% 80.0% 78.2% 212
2005 Q1 229 183 35 15.3% 78.9% 66.7% 259
2004 Q4 212 165 29 13.7% 50.0% 47.2% 233
2004 Q3 299 239 46 15.4% 63.6% 40.0% 285
2004 Q2 231 205 17 7.4% 60.0% 46.5% 271
2004 Q1 244 170 59 24.2% 35.7% 27.8% 225
2003 Q4 228 180 39 17.1% 27.3% 50.0% 219
2003 Q3 230 191 33 14.3% 26.7% 41.9% 230
2003 Q2 247 220 18 7.3% 25.0% 30.8% 261
2003 Q1 219 172 32 14.6% 18.2% 57.4% 244
2002 Q4 201 171 18 9.0% 9.1% 51.6% 242
2002 Q3 235 183 28 11.9% 25.0% 46.5% 220
2002 Q2 186 151 28 15.1% 30.0% 17.9% 228
2002 Q1 190 148 24 12.6% 27.3% 38.9% 203
2001 Q4 176 152 11 6.3% 60.0% 39.5% 165
2001 Q3 229 176 42 18.3% 62.5% 44.4% 193
2001 Q2 130 108 8 6.2% 0.0% 43.3% 214
2001 Q1 220 178 13 5.9% 33.3% 54.7% 192
2000 Q4 156 132 10 6.4% 41.7% 55.2% 175
2000 Q3 189 164 12 6.3% 26.7% 23.9% 166
2000 Q2 189 164 12 6.3% 26.7% 23.9% 181
2000 Q1 186 153 11 5.9% 33.3% 46.3% 188
1999 Q4 162 133 14 8.6% 0.0% 33.3% 223
1999 Q3 176 148 9 5.1% 16.7% 53.1% 171
1999 Q2 124 111 8 6.5% 90.9% 43.8% 177
1999 Q1 161 133 18 11.2% 85.7% 47.9% 248
1998 Q4 201 181 10 5.0% 37.5% 42.5% 250
1998 Q3 182 149 19 10.4% 50.0% 45.8% 181
1998 Q2 132 115 5 3.8% 66.7% 64.3% 185
1998 Q1 156 132 12 7.7% 71.4% 54.2% 167
1997 Q4 159 134 14 8.8% 100.0% 57.5% 140
1997 Q3 177 159 10 5.6% 50.0% 69.8% 192
1997 Q2 193 169 8 4.1% 28.6% 70.2% 199
1997 Q1 129 109 3 2.3% 75.0% 48.5% 153
1996 Q4 146 132 6 4.1% 40.0% 84.4% 136
1996 Q3 187 158 13 7.0% 100.0% 63.0% 189
1996 Q2 175 156 14 8.0% 100.0% 63.1% 169
1996 Q1 400 359 41 10.3% 79.5% 71.8% —
1995 Q4 407 369 38 9.3% 62.2% 66.9% —
1995 Q3 444 399 45 10.1% 73.2% 64.5% —
1995 Q2 366 337 29 7.9% 61.5% 57.4% —
1995 Q1 403 358 45 11.2% 83.3% 63.0% —
1994 Q4 389 349 40 10.3% 59.5% 63.9% —
1994 Q3 481 452 29 6.0% 61.1% 55.8% —
1994 Q2 423 395 28 6.6% 60.6% 61.2% —
1994 Q1 422 389 33 7.8% 75.0% 66.7% —
1993 Q4 446 414 32 7.2% 79.4% 69.6% —
1993 Q3 473 427 46 9.7% 77.8% 67.3% —
1993 Q2 393 353 40 10.2% 82.1% 58.2% —
1993 Q1 369 339 30 8.1% 79.5% 61.7% —
1992 Q4 428 389 39 9.1% 59.2% 56.2% —
1992 Q3 441 399 42 9.5% 66.7% 51.7% —
1992 Q2 382 349 33 8.6% 69.6% 52.9% —
1992 Q1 426 381 45 10.6% 66.7% 40.9% —
1991 Q4 422 367 55 13.0% 90.0% 27.8% —
1991 Q3 354 294 60 16.9% 75.0% 38.2% —
1991 Q2 428 373 55 12.9% 60.0% 38.1% —
1991 Q1 386 336 50 13.0% 58.3% 27.1% —
1990 Q4 450 380 70 15.6% 60.9% 33.3% —
1990 Q3 467 407 60 12.8% 37.5% 30.0% —
1990 Q2 466 393 73 15.7% 78.9% 46.8% —
1990 Q1 505 449 56 11.1% 35.4% 32.8% —
1989 Q4 510 441 69 13.5% 59.1% 25.6% —
1989 Q3 452 399 53 11.7% 57.1% 15.9% —
1989 Q2 466 404 62 13.3% 81.8% 36.0% —
1989 Q1 479 397 82 17.1% 40.0% 52.7% —
1988 Q4 532 469 63 11.8% 77.8% 61.0% —
1988 Q3 502 448 54 10.8% 68.8% 59.1% —
1988 Q2 440 400 40 9.1% 70.0% 70.4% —
1988 Q1 470 416 54 11.5% 90.0% 65.6% —
1987 Q4 431 400 31 7.2% 42.9% 66.7% —
1987 Q3 467 421 46 9.9% 100.0% 60.0% —
1987 Q2 444 402 42 9.5% 76.9% 69.5% —
1987 Q1 403 366 37 9.2% 92.0% 69.9% —
1986 Q4 456 432 24 5.3% 81.0% 65.9% —
1986 Q3 411 370 41 10.0% 83.3% 70.3% —
1986 Q2 471 434 37 7.9% 86.7% 71.4% —
1986 Q1 369 328 41 11.1% 60.0% 82.1% —
1985 Q4 370 342 28 7.6% 83.3% 71.6% —
1985 Q3 420 382 38 9.0% 80.0% 70.8% —
1985 Q2 394 362 32 8.1% 71.4% 77.7% —
1985 Q1 410 375 35 8.5% 81.3% 71.6% —
1984 Q4 348 314 34 9.8% 85.7% 71.4% —
1984 Q3 436 398 38 8.7% 85.0% 68.3% —
1984 Q2 445 403 42 9.4% 100.0% 67.2% —
1984 Q1 423 381 42 9.9% 90.9% 65.1% —
1983 Q4 423 383 40 9.5% 93.8% 66.8% —
1983 Q3 462 411 51 11.0% 60.0% 56.3% —
1983 Q2 364 333 31 8.5% 83.3% 60.0% —
1983 Q1 410 374 36 8.8% 76.5% 60.6% —
1982 Q4 419 363 56 13.4% 66.7% 66.2% —
1982 Q3 468 414 54 11.5% 66.7% 56.8% —
1982 Q2 335 303 32 9.6% 85.7% 59.5% —
1982 Q1 415 372 43 10.4% 90.0% 59.2% —
1981 Q4 343 307 36 10.5% 75.0% 50.0% —
1981 Q3 302 280 22 7.3% 100.0% 65.9% —
1981 Q2 395 363 32 8.1% 85.0% 46.2% —
1981 Q1 365 323 42 11.5% 88.5% 72.6% —
1980 Q4 471 418 53 11.3% 89.8% 71.6% —
1980 Q3 474 424 50 10.5% 90.9% 69.4% —
1980 Q2 509 462 47 9.2% 90.0% 74.3% —
1980 Q1 441 385 56 12.7% 78.6% 60.6% —
1979 Q4 445 390 55 12.4% 76.9% 59.6% —
1979 Q3 513 480 33 6.4% 84.8% 35.3% —
1979 Q2 405 372 33 8.1% 95.7% 42.9% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me