← All authorities

Babergh

East of England · E07000200 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
803
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
12.5%
higher than 56% of authorities
Majors in time
50.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
94.6%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
98.8%
no formal threshold
Delegated
98.8%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
25.8%
64 allowed of 248 decided
Decisions overturned
1.2%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 19.5%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
886
in the window
Applications decided
803
in the window
Approval rate
87.5%
703 granted, 100 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 98 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
96.3%
rank 67 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 34 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2176.2%50.0%
Minor18174.0%94.6%
Other60192.0%—
of which householder35491.2%98.8%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01202402024 Q3: 240 received2024 Q3: 209 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 201 received2024 Q4: 202 decided2025 Q1: 236 received2025 Q1: 197 decided2025 Q2: 231 received2025 Q2: 220 decided2025 Q3: 238 received2025 Q3: 209 decided2025 Q4: 207 received2025 Q4: 209 decided2026 Q1: 206 received2026 Q1: 162 decided2026 Q2: 235 received2026 Q2: 223 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
147%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000200). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 223 204 19 8.5% — 95.8% 235
2026 Q1 162 144 18 11.1% 66.7% 85.0% 206
2025 Q4 209 174 35 16.7% 0.0% 100.0% 207
2025 Q3 209 181 28 13.4% — 95.8% 238
2025 Q2 220 191 29 13.2% 100.0% 88.9% 231
2025 Q1 197 176 21 10.7% 100.0% 91.7% 236
2024 Q4 202 183 19 9.4% 100.0% 100.0% 201
2024 Q3 209 181 28 13.4% — 95.8% 240
2024 Q2 219 190 29 13.2% 100.0% 88.9% 231
2024 Q1 236 190 46 19.5% 100.0% 83.9% 237
2023 Q4 217 188 29 13.4% 100.0% 91.2% 268
2023 Q3 249 218 31 12.4% 100.0% 90.0% 260
2023 Q2 267 229 38 14.2% 100.0% 71.8% 270
2023 Q1 236 218 18 7.6% 100.0% 88.2% 309
2022 Q4 215 193 22 10.2% 100.0% 100.0% 290
2022 Q3 258 223 35 13.6% 100.0% 97.1% 235
2022 Q2 309 271 38 12.3% 75.0% 95.7% 301
2022 Q1 258 238 20 7.8% 100.0% 100.0% 336
2021 Q4 303 271 32 10.6% 100.0% 98.0% 305
2021 Q3 343 314 29 8.5% 100.0% 98.0% 364
2021 Q2 398 366 32 8.0% 83.3% 96.6% 414
2021 Q1 314 293 21 6.7% 66.7% 98.4% 429
2020 Q4 315 289 26 8.3% — 97.8% 395
2020 Q3 288 263 25 8.7% 100.0% 96.2% 328
2020 Q2 228 207 21 9.2% 100.0% 97.1% 266
2020 Q1 252 213 39 15.5% 100.0% 96.0% 286
2019 Q4 308 265 43 14.0% 100.0% 94.5% 309
2019 Q3 300 275 25 8.3% 66.7% 98.5% 344
2019 Q2 360 320 40 11.1% 100.0% 95.4% 342
2019 Q1 282 257 25 8.9% 100.0% 86.8% 334
2018 Q4 282 242 40 14.2% 66.7% 62.5% 279
2018 Q3 301 267 34 11.3% 50.0% 66.7% 262
2018 Q2 294 275 19 6.5% 66.7% 71.7% 372
2018 Q1 294 274 20 6.8% 100.0% 75.9% 335
2017 Q4 325 289 36 11.1% 75.0% 67.6% 310
2017 Q3 305 287 18 5.9% 100.0% 58.5% 316
2017 Q2 333 318 15 4.5% 100.0% 79.6% 370
2017 Q1 271 246 25 9.2% 100.0% 86.7% 321
2016 Q4 268 249 19 7.1% 94.7% 76.6% 302
2016 Q3 355 336 19 5.4% 100.0% 71.7% 315
2016 Q2 313 301 12 3.8% 91.7% 76.5% 376
2016 Q1 265 252 13 4.9% 75.0% 66.7% 295
2015 Q4 324 308 16 4.9% 87.5% 69.6% 266
2015 Q3 306 281 25 8.2% 66.7% 72.0% 383
2015 Q2 270 241 29 10.7% 78.9% 67.7% 320
2015 Q1 261 237 24 9.2% 88.9% 65.7% 263
2014 Q4 259 238 21 8.1% 50.0% 55.6% 314
2014 Q3 304 281 23 7.6% 100.0% 36.9% 327
2014 Q2 305 275 30 9.8% 92.9% 52.5% 370
2014 Q1 253 213 19 7.5% 60.0% 53.1% 324
2013 Q4 266 224 29 10.9% 81.8% 70.0% 289
2013 Q3 261 220 32 12.3% 66.7% 66.7% 264
2013 Q2 331 287 41 12.4% 69.2% 60.9% 314
2013 Q1 268 236 21 7.8% 66.7% 59.3% 302
2012 Q4 312 258 50 16.0% 37.5% 46.8% 242
2012 Q3 232 203 24 10.3% 33.3% 50.0% 304
2012 Q2 304 259 39 12.8% 44.4% 60.0% 299
2012 Q1 248 209 31 12.5% 75.0% 58.0% 320
2011 Q4 282 231 44 15.6% 80.0% 60.0% 297
2011 Q3 307 264 36 11.7% 33.3% 57.6% 285
2011 Q2 303 266 32 10.6% 63.6% 63.9% 291
2011 Q1 276 246 27 9.8% 85.7% 69.4% 343
2010 Q4 270 240 26 9.6% 55.6% 57.5% 311
2010 Q3 342 308 29 8.5% 71.4% 59.7% 316
2010 Q2 327 280 46 14.1% 25.0% 58.0% 360
2010 Q1 296 255 38 12.8% 62.5% 65.6% 333
2009 Q4 234 196 33 14.1% 0.0% 55.7% 328
2009 Q3 273 240 27 9.9% 66.7% 64.2% 321
2009 Q2 284 255 26 9.2% 100.0% 81.4% 309
2009 Q1 307 263 44 14.3% 85.7% 84.9% 324
2008 Q4 323 265 56 17.3% 63.6% 64.1% 311
2008 Q3 340 276 63 18.5% 69.2% 60.2% 374
2008 Q2 406 324 82 20.2% 80.8% 60.8% 354
2008 Q1 406 343 60 14.8% 72.0% 49.5% 442
2007 Q4 385 322 57 14.8% 53.8% 61.5% 433
2007 Q3 403 333 68 16.9% 86.7% 59.6% 439
2007 Q2 411 357 49 11.9% 60.0% 58.1% 411
2007 Q1 339 283 52 15.3% 66.7% 48.8% 453
2006 Q4 379 319 54 14.2% 54.5% 49.4% 337
2006 Q3 432 354 62 14.4% 50.0% 67.0% 429
2006 Q2 447 369 72 16.1% 72.7% 70.1% 466
2006 Q1 358 300 56 15.6% 87.5% 78.8% 513
2005 Q4 380 331 49 12.9% 42.9% 69.9% 402
2005 Q3 477 393 78 16.4% 92.3% 64.5% 480
2005 Q2 498 442 50 10.0% 33.3% 68.3% 478
2005 Q1 393 339 53 13.5% 50.0% 56.0% 486
2004 Q4 416 344 72 17.3% 66.7% 57.8% 417
2004 Q3 492 431 61 12.4% 60.0% 60.0% 467
2004 Q2 487 426 60 12.3% 55.6% 56.8% 500
2004 Q1 417 359 57 13.7% 83.3% 55.7% 541
2003 Q4 376 328 47 12.5% 62.5% 59.8% 385
2003 Q3 428 366 62 14.5% 50.0% 70.4% 436
2003 Q2 501 414 84 16.8% 62.5% 81.3% 525
2003 Q1 418 363 51 12.2% 57.1% 51.4% 492
2002 Q4 411 356 52 12.7% 40.0% 60.2% 470
2002 Q3 475 423 50 10.5% 91.7% 49.5% 464
2002 Q2 323 297 26 8.0% 57.1% 45.8% 375
2002 Q1 380 343 36 9.5% 62.5% 38.4% 434
2001 Q4 383 345 37 9.7% 0.0% 48.2% 396
2001 Q3 389 351 33 8.5% 33.3% 57.8% 417
2001 Q2 448 415 25 5.6% 33.3% 50.0% 454
2001 Q1 378 339 24 6.3% 28.6% 53.8% 460
2000 Q4 342 292 29 8.5% 14.3% 36.6% 300
2000 Q3 343 303 13 3.8% 22.2% 58.8% 390
2000 Q2 427 371 23 5.4% 0.0% 39.7% 421
2000 Q1 354 294 36 10.2% 66.7% 52.2% 416
1999 Q4 327 292 12 3.7% 40.0% 50.9% 332
1999 Q3 360 319 23 6.4% 37.5% 50.7% 375
1999 Q2 365 321 26 7.1% 50.0% 66.7% 376
1999 Q1 304 276 13 4.3% 100.0% 47.2% 374
1998 Q4 351 300 22 6.3% 42.9% 54.7% 288
1998 Q3 323 275 31 9.6% 50.0% 62.4% 382
1998 Q2 378 328 24 6.3% 50.0% 52.7% 363
1998 Q1 278 222 10 3.6% 0.0% 52.9% 346
1997 Q4 264 207 24 9.1% 100.0% 66.7% 291
1997 Q3 374 296 30 8.0% 33.3% 59.7% 328
1997 Q2 312 248 15 4.8% 50.0% 75.4% 377
1997 Q1 249 182 19 7.6% 50.0% 57.7% 279
1996 Q4 297 247 13 4.4% 62.5% 68.5% 280
1996 Q3 338 269 15 4.4% 33.3% 63.1% 328
1996 Q2 330 261 16 4.8% 66.7% 71.4% 379
1996 Q1 253 232 21 8.3% 55.6% 59.3% —
1995 Q4 249 225 24 9.6% 50.0% 68.3% —
1995 Q3 311 285 26 8.4% 50.0% 63.8% —
1995 Q2 304 284 20 6.6% 50.0% 72.6% —
1995 Q1 258 237 21 8.1% 25.0% 62.9% —
1994 Q4 221 208 13 5.9% 40.0% 70.6% —
1994 Q3 270 256 14 5.2% 75.0% 71.2% —
1994 Q2 291 272 19 6.5% 63.6% 69.1% —
1994 Q1 264 244 20 7.6% 25.0% 63.9% —
1993 Q4 281 256 25 8.9% 50.0% 59.5% —
1993 Q3 299 272 27 9.0% 66.7% 74.2% —
1993 Q2 306 280 26 8.5% 40.0% 77.4% —
1993 Q1 231 206 25 10.8% 75.0% 63.8% —
1992 Q4 276 253 23 8.3% 55.6% 68.8% —
1992 Q3 298 267 31 10.4% 71.4% 58.2% —
1992 Q2 297 268 29 9.8% 20.0% 66.7% —
1992 Q1 318 293 25 7.9% 16.7% 57.1% —
1991 Q4 281 242 39 13.9% 25.0% 59.8% —
1991 Q3 343 297 46 13.4% 75.0% 69.2% —
1991 Q2 346 321 25 7.2% 60.0% 60.9% —
1991 Q1 311 269 42 13.5% 0.0% 68.3% —
1990 Q4 267 230 37 13.9% 40.0% 60.5% —
1990 Q3 377 322 55 14.6% 44.4% 70.9% —
1990 Q2 400 321 79 19.8% 25.0% 69.8% —
1990 Q1 340 263 77 22.6% 80.0% 51.7% —
1989 Q4 338 285 53 15.7% 50.0% 64.0% —
1989 Q3 440 345 95 21.6% 37.5% 63.6% —
1989 Q2 480 374 106 22.1% 50.0% 63.2% —
1989 Q1 505 399 106 21.0% 57.1% 61.4% —
1988 Q4 454 330 124 27.3% 75.0% 54.0% —
1988 Q3 541 396 145 26.8% 66.7% 53.9% —
1988 Q2 513 401 112 21.8% 71.4% 58.2% —
1988 Q1 384 308 76 19.8% 50.0% 52.9% —
1987 Q4 369 295 74 20.1% 75.0% 52.0% —
1987 Q3 481 409 72 15.0% 100.0% 72.2% —
1987 Q2 461 316 145 31.5% 80.0% 59.2% —
1987 Q1 300 247 53 17.7% 50.0% 67.5% —
1986 Q4 316 280 36 11.4% 100.0% 72.8% —
1986 Q3 394 343 51 12.9% 50.0% 64.3% —
1986 Q2 351 294 57 16.2% 60.0% 71.8% —
1986 Q1 262 214 48 18.3% 50.0% 61.3% —
1985 Q4 274 223 51 18.6% 40.0% 65.2% —
1985 Q3 301 254 47 15.6% 33.3% 72.2% —
1985 Q2 335 297 38 11.3% 66.7% 67.9% —
1985 Q1 399 340 59 14.8% 28.6% 64.3% —
1984 Q4 224 188 36 16.1% 66.7% 68.9% —
1984 Q3 297 267 30 10.1% 87.5% 63.0% —
1984 Q2 328 289 39 11.9% 44.4% 81.1% —
1984 Q1 224 191 33 14.7% 66.7% 78.6% —
1983 Q4 265 229 36 13.6% 42.9% 64.9% —
1983 Q3 314 272 42 13.4% 33.3% 70.8% —
1983 Q2 290 250 40 13.8% 100.0% 75.2% —
1983 Q1 247 221 26 10.5% 66.7% 77.1% —
1982 Q4 238 203 35 14.7% 72.7% 68.9% —
1982 Q3 255 219 36 14.1% 66.7% 53.3% —
1982 Q2 198 168 30 15.2% 25.0% 41.7% —
1982 Q1 185 154 31 16.8% 100.0% 76.7% —
1981 Q4 259 229 30 11.6% 66.7% 76.5% —
1981 Q3 241 213 28 11.6% 66.7% 68.6% —
1981 Q2 374 304 70 18.7% 100.0% 60.7% —
1981 Q1 289 250 39 13.5% 100.0% 68.8% —
1980 Q4 245 196 49 20.0% 50.0% 78.4% —
1980 Q3 309 253 56 18.1% 50.0% 68.8% —
1980 Q2 336 278 58 17.3% 50.0% 63.6% —
1980 Q1 312 255 57 18.3% 75.0% 78.5% —
1979 Q4 328 261 67 20.4% 72.7% 61.1% —
1979 Q3 370 312 58 15.7% 57.1% 63.8% —
1979 Q2 340 281 59 17.4% 66.7% 64.8% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me