← All authorities

East Staffordshire

West Midlands · E07000193 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
707
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
11.6%
higher than 49% of authorities
Majors in time
50.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
41.8%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
56.9%
no formal threshold
Delegated
98.3%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
33.7%
29 allowed of 86 decided
Decisions overturned
0.7%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 18.7%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
758
in the window
Applications decided
707
in the window
Approval rate
88.4%
625 granted, 82 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 87 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
51.1%
rank 305 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 162 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2491.7%50.0%
Minor19784.3%41.8%
Other48689.9%—
of which householder34090.0%56.9%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01232462024 Q3: 181 received2024 Q3: 148 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 183 received2024 Q4: 150 decided2025 Q1: 205 received2025 Q1: 128 decided2025 Q2: 180 received2025 Q2: 140 decided2025 Q3: 171 received2025 Q3: 138 decided2025 Q4: 198 received2025 Q4: 152 decided2026 Q1: 206 received2026 Q1: 171 decided2026 Q2: 183 received2026 Q2: 246 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
181%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000193). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 246 200 46 18.7% 33.3% 34.4% 183
2026 Q1 171 161 10 5.8% — 44.4% 206
2025 Q4 152 137 15 9.9% 0.0% 42.9% 198
2025 Q3 138 127 11 8.0% 100.0% 71.4% 171
2025 Q2 140 131 9 6.4% — 71.4% 180
2025 Q1 128 121 7 5.5% 100.0% 100.0% 205
2024 Q4 150 130 20 13.3% 83.3% 90.9% 183
2024 Q3 148 129 19 12.8% 100.0% 76.9% 181
2024 Q2 162 135 27 16.7% 75.0% 82.6% 166
2024 Q1 186 161 25 13.4% 100.0% 81.3% 169
2023 Q4 191 164 27 14.1% 0.0% 88.2% 182
2023 Q3 187 174 13 7.0% 100.0% 90.5% 230
2023 Q2 202 184 18 8.9% 100.0% 92.0% 223
2023 Q1 175 154 21 12.0% 100.0% 83.3% 222
2022 Q4 213 198 15 7.0% 100.0% 86.2% 197
2022 Q3 222 216 6 2.7% 100.0% 95.0% 239
2022 Q2 204 191 13 6.4% 100.0% 90.0% 238
2022 Q1 202 183 19 9.4% 100.0% 94.3% 247
2021 Q4 217 208 9 4.1% 100.0% 87.0% 225
2021 Q3 255 244 11 4.3% 100.0% 87.9% 214
2021 Q2 224 216 8 3.6% 100.0% 80.8% 286
2021 Q1 236 230 6 2.5% 100.0% 90.7% 280
2020 Q4 233 225 8 3.4% 100.0% 88.6% 277
2020 Q3 198 188 10 5.1% 100.0% 86.2% 241
2020 Q2 198 190 8 4.0% 100.0% 91.2% 177
2020 Q1 208 195 13 6.3% 100.0% 80.8% 230
2019 Q4 219 208 11 5.0% 75.0% 81.8% 227
2019 Q3 214 203 11 5.1% 66.7% 82.5% 239
2019 Q2 220 208 12 5.5% 100.0% 97.8% 238
2019 Q1 215 200 15 7.0% 83.3% 88.6% 241
2018 Q4 234 217 17 7.3% 100.0% 91.2% 215
2018 Q3 236 224 12 5.1% 100.0% 98.2% 243
2018 Q2 231 211 20 8.7% 100.0% 97.8% 241
2018 Q1 226 216 10 4.4% 100.0% 83.7% 247
2017 Q4 240 215 25 10.4% 100.0% 89.7% 230
2017 Q3 217 208 9 4.1% 50.0% 92.5% 245
2017 Q2 181 168 13 7.2% 100.0% 93.5% 248
2017 Q1 221 211 10 4.5% 83.3% 98.0% 203
2016 Q4 221 202 19 8.6% 50.0% 97.9% 223
2016 Q3 268 247 21 7.8% 100.0% 93.2% 265
2016 Q2 213 195 18 8.5% 80.0% 84.8% 252
2016 Q1 205 190 15 7.3% 100.0% 73.1% 259
2015 Q4 260 238 22 8.5% 75.0% 71.8% 213
2015 Q3 270 242 28 10.4% 66.7% 74.1% 263
2015 Q2 221 206 15 6.8% 80.0% 73.1% 302
2015 Q1 228 210 18 7.9% 100.0% 96.9% 286
2014 Q4 240 232 8 3.3% 100.0% 94.7% 230
2014 Q3 265 245 20 7.5% 100.0% 95.7% 274
2014 Q2 226 207 19 8.4% 55.6% 100.0% 275
2014 Q1 273 258 10 3.7% 80.0% 94.9% 282
2013 Q4 199 179 17 8.5% 77.8% 94.4% 202
2013 Q3 275 251 21 7.6% 58.3% 94.0% 243
2013 Q2 245 219 21 8.6% 66.7% 92.5% 293
2013 Q1 211 183 20 9.5% 53.8% 87.3% 246
2012 Q4 290 256 25 8.6% 81.8% 95.1% 264
2012 Q3 281 253 19 6.8% 100.0% 96.4% 283
2012 Q2 259 234 17 6.6% 55.6% 95.1% 309
2012 Q1 217 197 11 5.1% 85.7% 95.4% 255
2011 Q4 247 229 15 6.1% 50.0% 90.9% 224
2011 Q3 286 249 29 10.1% 75.0% 94.4% 282
2011 Q2 236 204 21 8.9% 83.3% 87.5% 253
2011 Q1 182 158 18 9.9% 57.1% 87.3% 230
2010 Q4 232 205 21 9.1% 88.9% 81.0% 204
2010 Q3 273 243 27 9.9% 66.7% 95.1% 261
2010 Q2 257 233 21 8.2% 100.0% 92.9% 260
2010 Q1 239 217 19 7.9% 83.3% 95.3% 276
2009 Q4 239 206 32 13.4% 77.8% 94.7% 247
2009 Q3 267 234 29 10.9% 100.0% 98.8% 256
2009 Q2 209 172 37 17.7% 90.0% 95.5% 259
2009 Q1 154 136 17 11.0% 80.0% 98.0% 208
2008 Q4 250 204 40 16.0% 84.6% 81.8% 203
2008 Q3 309 272 33 10.7% 75.0% 67.0% 252
2008 Q2 282 247 30 10.6% 87.5% 71.1% 244
2008 Q1 265 232 31 11.7% 100.0% 95.2% 331
2007 Q4 380 314 63 16.6% 80.0% 98.6% 328
2007 Q3 342 271 71 20.8% 81.3% 92.5% 368
2007 Q2 359 284 72 20.1% 93.3% 90.8% 377
2007 Q1 333 262 63 18.9% 93.3% 88.4% 378
2006 Q4 348 265 79 22.7% 84.6% 94.7% 330
2006 Q3 334 280 54 16.2% 66.7% 93.0% 369
2006 Q2 426 338 86 20.2% 100.0% 94.7% 386
2006 Q1 320 237 78 24.4% 47.4% 90.3% 437
2005 Q4 338 267 62 18.3% 63.0% 80.8% 264
2005 Q3 440 353 78 17.7% 41.9% 58.4% 357
2005 Q2 418 370 46 11.0% 50.0% 50.4% 416
2005 Q1 312 267 41 13.1% 11.8% 30.7% 382
2004 Q4 361 332 29 8.0% 31.3% 47.8% 356
2004 Q3 364 326 36 9.9% 40.0% 53.5% 452
2004 Q2 389 353 36 9.3% 35.7% 52.3% 446
2004 Q1 374 339 32 8.6% 33.3% 57.1% 421
2003 Q4 362 308 53 14.6% 43.8% 62.4% 355
2003 Q3 411 384 23 5.6% 22.2% 53.4% 422
2003 Q2 384 346 38 9.9% 46.7% 54.8% 422
2003 Q1 349 322 27 7.7% 22.2% 59.8% 410
2002 Q4 478 439 33 6.9% 64.3% 64.9% 476
2002 Q3 376 341 35 9.3% 50.0% 65.7% 388
2002 Q2 400 369 29 7.3% 46.2% 49.4% 398
2002 Q1 276 236 38 13.8% 30.0% 48.1% 378
2001 Q4 293 255 33 11.3% 23.1% 58.6% 294
2001 Q3 328 288 39 11.9% 35.3% 58.5% 354
2001 Q2 331 294 36 10.9% 23.1% 54.1% 340
2001 Q1 275 235 37 13.5% 53.8% 43.2% 353
2000 Q4 265 240 16 6.0% 50.0% 58.8% 243
2000 Q3 299 262 34 11.4% 20.0% 49.4% 296
2000 Q2 326 292 24 7.4% 56.3% 47.2% 320
2000 Q1 270 231 31 11.5% 33.3% 50.7% 330
1999 Q4 279 238 34 12.2% 75.0% 58.4% 267
1999 Q3 352 304 44 12.5% 35.3% 50.5% 357
1999 Q2 283 243 35 12.4% 47.1% 47.4% 341
1999 Q1 305 256 40 13.1% 27.3% 46.5% 324
1998 Q4 270 231 32 11.9% 14.3% 67.5% 291
1998 Q3 285 253 27 9.5% 25.0% 49.5% 310
1998 Q2 325 296 24 7.4% 33.3% 51.0% 322
1998 Q1 259 233 15 5.8% 25.0% 68.8% 290
1997 Q4 262 234 21 8.0% 50.0% 64.1% 306
1997 Q3 284 266 17 6.0% 57.1% 63.0% 306
1997 Q2 326 296 30 9.2% 52.4% 61.0% 282
1997 Q1 230 213 13 5.7% 30.0% 70.0% 327
1996 Q4 273 251 21 7.7% 50.0% 69.6% 265
1996 Q3 299 267 30 10.0% 50.0% 68.0% 296
1996 Q2 286 251 33 11.5% 77.8% 70.0% 341
1996 Q1 190 166 24 12.6% 62.5% 65.8% —
1995 Q4 156 141 15 9.6% 50.0% 62.3% —
1995 Q3 220 193 27 12.3% 69.2% 51.6% —
1995 Q2 195 177 18 9.2% 100.0% 53.1% —
1995 Q1 205 194 11 5.4% 68.8% 74.3% —
1994 Q4 157 148 9 5.7% 50.0% 64.2% —
1994 Q3 240 224 16 6.7% 61.1% 63.2% —
1994 Q2 195 170 25 12.8% 61.1% 60.0% —
1994 Q1 190 168 22 11.6% 77.3% 52.1% —
1993 Q4 190 171 19 10.0% 77.8% 58.7% —
1993 Q3 203 177 26 12.8% 63.6% 55.4% —
1993 Q2 190 172 18 9.5% 66.7% 55.4% —
1993 Q1 159 136 23 14.5% 71.4% 60.7% —
1992 Q4 192 173 19 9.9% 50.0% 75.0% —
1992 Q3 185 171 14 7.6% 75.0% 73.3% —
1992 Q2 230 204 26 11.3% 80.0% 73.3% —
1992 Q1 208 178 30 14.4% 81.8% 85.4% —
1991 Q4 219 176 43 19.6% 66.7% 77.6% —
1991 Q3 196 175 21 10.7% 66.7% 83.2% —
1991 Q2 224 199 25 11.2% 46.2% 91.9% —
1991 Q1 237 202 35 14.8% 85.7% 86.4% —
1990 Q4 208 191 17 8.2% 66.7% 88.6% —
1990 Q3 219 183 36 16.4% 85.7% 89.9% —
1990 Q2 364 298 66 18.1% 91.7% 84.0% —
1990 Q1 234 195 39 16.7% 66.7% 80.8% —
1989 Q4 301 224 77 25.6% 57.9% 88.9% —
1989 Q3 335 271 64 19.1% 100.0% 78.7% —
1989 Q2 368 301 67 18.2% 81.3% 76.9% —
1989 Q1 371 315 56 15.1% 85.0% 85.1% —
1988 Q4 284 243 41 14.4% 100.0% 92.1% —
1988 Q3 507 418 89 17.6% 100.0% 92.5% —
1988 Q2 458 410 48 10.5% 100.0% 88.7% —
1988 Q1 246 232 14 5.7% 100.0% 93.1% —
1987 Q4 324 273 51 15.7% 100.0% 93.5% —
1987 Q3 343 304 39 11.4% 100.0% 83.1% —
1987 Q2 389 320 69 17.7% 75.0% 89.4% —
1987 Q1 219 173 46 21.0% 100.0% 87.2% —
1986 Q4 300 270 30 10.0% 75.0% 84.5% —
1986 Q3 363 297 66 18.2% 83.3% 86.1% —
1986 Q2 308 269 39 12.7% 75.0% 85.3% —
1986 Q1 170 146 24 14.1% 100.0% 81.1% —
1985 Q4 233 195 38 16.3% 100.0% 88.9% —
1985 Q3 303 270 33 10.9% 80.0% 70.9% —
1985 Q2 241 217 24 10.0% 100.0% 80.2% —
1985 Q1 256 218 38 14.8% 100.0% 67.0% —
1984 Q4 278 235 43 15.5% 33.3% 76.4% —
1984 Q3 308 261 47 15.3% 100.0% 76.5% —
1984 Q2 358 318 40 11.2% 100.0% 75.0% —
1984 Q1 309 268 41 13.3% 91.7% 77.5% —
1983 Q4 274 238 36 13.1% 100.0% 84.5% —
1983 Q3 359 314 45 12.5% 100.0% 86.2% —
1983 Q2 280 246 34 12.1% — 75.5% —
1983 Q1 313 275 38 12.1% 100.0% 63.8% —
1982 Q4 255 221 34 13.3% 50.0% 74.7% —
1982 Q3 311 264 47 15.1% 100.0% 79.3% —
1982 Q2 313 270 43 13.7% 100.0% 76.1% —
1982 Q1 269 241 28 10.4% 100.0% 82.7% —
1981 Q4 265 227 38 14.3% 100.0% 72.5% —
1981 Q3 316 270 46 14.6% — 77.8% —
1981 Q2 350 297 53 15.1% 100.0% 66.7% —
1981 Q1 282 237 45 16.0% 100.0% 72.8% —
1980 Q4 277 233 44 15.9% 100.0% 74.5% —
1980 Q3 309 259 50 16.2% 80.0% 61.3% —
1980 Q2 378 324 54 14.3% 92.3% 59.1% —
1980 Q1 211 194 17 8.1% 0.0% 14.9% —
1979 Q4 355 310 45 12.7% 60.0% 62.3% —
1979 Q3 375 339 36 9.6% 57.1% 44.6% —
1979 Q2 381 337 44 11.5% 75.0% 19.0% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me