← All authorities

West Oxfordshire

South East · E07000181 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,117
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
5.0%
higher than 7% of authorities
Majors in time
88.9%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
96.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
97.8%
no formal threshold
Delegated
95.4%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
26.4%
60 allowed of 227 decided
Decisions overturned
0.9%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 17.0%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,191
in the window
Applications decided
1,117
in the window
Approval rate
95.0%
1,061 granted, 56 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 12 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
97.1%
rank 57 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 28 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major4182.9%88.9%
Minor26590.6%96.0%
Other81197.0%—
of which householder56997.2%97.8%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01793572024 Q3: 322 received2024 Q3: 337 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 304 received2024 Q4: 300 decided2025 Q1: 357 received2025 Q1: 294 decided2025 Q2: 249 received2025 Q2: 323 decided2025 Q3: 294 received2025 Q3: 254 decided2025 Q4: 267 received2025 Q4: 276 decided2026 Q1: 295 received2026 Q1: 272 decided2026 Q2: 335 received2026 Q2: 315 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
104%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000181). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 315 304 11 3.5% 100.0% 97.0% 335
2026 Q1 272 259 13 4.8% 100.0% 90.5% 295
2025 Q4 276 259 17 6.2% 100.0% 96.4% 267
2025 Q3 254 239 15 5.9% 50.0% 100.0% 294
2025 Q2 323 309 14 4.3% 100.0% 95.8% 249
2025 Q1 294 280 14 4.8% 100.0% 91.7% 357
2024 Q4 300 287 13 4.3% 0.0% 92.9% 304
2024 Q3 337 310 27 8.0% 75.0% 91.2% 322
2024 Q2 258 238 20 7.8% — 96.6% 347
2024 Q1 328 292 36 11.0% 100.0% 92.3% 281
2023 Q4 306 254 52 17.0% 75.0% 84.2% 327
2023 Q3 323 296 27 8.4% 100.0% 92.5% 336
2023 Q2 290 251 39 13.4% 100.0% 94.4% 334
2023 Q1 338 302 36 10.7% 83.3% 93.8% 312
2022 Q4 333 300 33 9.9% 60.0% 71.8% 352
2022 Q3 377 338 39 10.3% 66.7% 51.1% 352
2022 Q2 407 356 51 12.5% 0.0% 54.5% 399
2022 Q1 320 298 22 6.9% 28.6% 68.9% 368
2021 Q4 372 351 21 5.6% 33.3% 60.7% 404
2021 Q3 473 444 29 6.1% 100.0% 53.9% 408
2021 Q2 425 396 29 6.8% 60.0% 46.4% 553
2021 Q1 376 358 18 4.8% 100.0% 38.9% 461
2020 Q4 352 332 20 5.7% 75.0% 52.4% 429
2020 Q3 328 309 19 5.8% 100.0% 75.9% 400
2020 Q2 313 291 22 7.0% 50.0% 60.6% 289
2020 Q1 333 311 22 6.6% 100.0% 60.4% 404
2019 Q4 273 259 14 5.1% 71.4% 66.7% 315
2019 Q3 372 354 18 4.8% 75.0% 71.7% 331
2019 Q2 353 334 19 5.4% 40.0% 69.0% 403
2019 Q1 313 289 24 7.7% 80.0% 60.4% 386
2018 Q4 330 304 26 7.9% 66.7% 70.7% 375
2018 Q3 357 336 21 5.9% 57.1% 76.3% 355
2018 Q2 324 299 25 7.7% 66.7% 58.8% 367
2018 Q1 358 321 37 10.3% 46.2% 68.9% 337
2017 Q4 390 366 24 6.2% 40.0% 72.4% 415
2017 Q3 375 343 32 8.5% 45.5% 69.9% 382
2017 Q2 437 407 30 6.9% 35.7% 72.4% 429
2017 Q1 343 307 36 10.5% 50.0% 84.2% 408
2016 Q4 389 358 31 8.0% 70.0% 82.7% 420
2016 Q3 477 447 30 6.3% 75.0% 69.5% 470
2016 Q2 413 385 28 6.8% 62.5% 80.0% 494
2016 Q1 315 286 29 9.2% 60.0% 75.6% 399
2015 Q4 370 344 26 7.0% 72.7% 77.4% 355
2015 Q3 447 417 30 6.7% 45.0% 71.9% 434
2015 Q2 382 351 31 8.1% 80.0% 78.2% 375
2015 Q1 406 382 24 5.9% 83.3% 60.2% 444
2014 Q4 334 308 26 7.8% 75.0% 59.8% 419
2014 Q3 367 341 26 7.1% 75.0% 63.4% 439
2014 Q2 371 351 20 5.4% 100.0% 74.0% 465
2014 Q1 324 293 23 7.1% 66.7% 82.2% 418
2013 Q4 392 361 22 5.6% 71.4% 81.7% 386
2013 Q3 388 351 26 6.7% 57.1% 87.4% 446
2013 Q2 394 356 26 6.6% 55.6% 85.7% 480
2013 Q1 313 278 27 8.6% 44.4% 83.5% 386
2012 Q4 350 324 17 4.9% 80.0% 86.4% 408
2012 Q3 483 436 36 7.5% 40.0% 79.5% 412
2012 Q2 416 371 32 7.7% 66.7% 84.7% 502
2012 Q1 343 311 27 7.9% 12.5% 91.9% 489
2011 Q4 465 422 37 8.0% 60.0% 87.5% 399
2011 Q3 462 415 41 8.9% 50.0% 86.0% 584
2011 Q2 384 355 20 5.2% 50.0% 77.0% 438
2011 Q1 358 314 35 9.8% 66.7% 87.5% 443
2010 Q4 389 361 24 6.2% 60.0% 89.1% 408
2010 Q3 423 387 28 6.6% 33.3% 79.6% 474
2010 Q2 412 372 29 7.0% 62.5% 86.9% 431
2010 Q1 310 265 33 10.6% 55.6% 83.5% 425
2009 Q4 391 357 30 7.7% 44.4% 89.5% 365
2009 Q3 366 322 30 8.2% 50.0% 86.0% 453
2009 Q2 389 338 40 10.3% 28.6% 85.8% 397
2009 Q1 266 234 24 9.0% 33.3% 89.6% 363
2008 Q4 390 346 35 9.0% 80.0% 80.6% 325
2008 Q3 475 417 45 9.5% 45.5% 81.3% 467
2008 Q2 440 391 31 7.0% 63.6% 82.3% 526
2008 Q1 435 389 31 7.1% 62.5% 82.2% 414
2007 Q4 526 456 58 11.0% 83.3% 76.6% 496
2007 Q3 499 436 60 12.0% 66.7% 73.9% 557
2007 Q2 519 454 64 12.3% 55.6% 65.4% 576
2007 Q1 440 408 32 7.3% 55.6% 65.1% 553
2006 Q4 415 368 46 11.1% 85.7% 63.8% 526
2006 Q3 527 456 71 13.5% 58.3% 69.3% 501
2006 Q2 510 453 55 10.8% 64.3% 65.1% 570
2006 Q1 461 393 66 14.3% 60.0% 69.5% 558
2005 Q4 471 421 50 10.6% 66.7% 69.2% 565
2005 Q3 508 453 54 10.6% 54.5% 53.6% 546
2005 Q2 483 433 50 10.4% 76.5% 78.7% 611
2005 Q1 459 406 52 11.3% 68.8% 72.4% 473
2004 Q4 487 437 49 10.1% 62.5% 74.8% 544
2004 Q3 521 468 52 10.0% 75.0% 78.9% 634
2004 Q2 608 551 57 9.4% 86.7% 70.6% 636
2004 Q1 496 457 37 7.5% 66.7% 70.4% 516
2003 Q4 453 399 45 9.9% 80.0% 69.4% 549
2003 Q3 601 531 59 9.8% 50.0% 58.8% 520
2003 Q2 588 531 53 9.0% 62.5% 57.0% 587
2003 Q1 459 405 49 10.7% 40.0% 46.6% 602
2002 Q4 445 395 45 10.1% 33.3% 50.6% 484
2002 Q3 476 438 35 7.4% 33.3% 54.1% 481
2002 Q2 559 510 42 7.5% 60.0% 51.0% 505
2002 Q1 429 381 42 9.8% 0.0% 55.2% 569
2001 Q4 509 462 44 8.6% 75.0% 54.8% 494
2001 Q3 451 418 32 7.1% 66.7% 51.7% 451
2001 Q2 506 457 44 8.7% 40.0% 52.4% 512
2001 Q1 390 349 37 9.5% 42.9% 47.8% 504
2000 Q4 415 365 47 11.3% 25.0% 53.3% 371
2000 Q3 442 386 53 12.0% 50.0% 64.1% 484
2000 Q2 531 488 43 8.1% 40.0% 56.6% 502
2000 Q1 430 401 27 6.3% 80.0% 60.0% 545
1999 Q4 369 339 30 8.1% 50.0% 51.9% 400
1999 Q3 478 435 43 9.0% 80.0% 66.0% 504
1999 Q2 400 363 37 9.3% 66.7% 62.0% 473
1999 Q1 379 328 51 13.5% 0.0% 62.5% 464
1998 Q4 430 386 44 10.2% 66.7% 57.7% 350
1998 Q3 422 396 26 6.2% 40.0% 58.5% 464
1998 Q2 447 389 55 12.3% 77.8% 55.4% 492
1998 Q1 376 332 42 11.2% 62.5% 46.1% 436
1997 Q4 386 343 40 10.4% 100.0% 56.5% 409
1997 Q3 464 399 62 13.4% 100.0% 63.7% 489
1997 Q2 483 433 43 8.9% 66.7% 66.1% 505
1997 Q1 351 318 32 9.1% 50.0% 62.5% 411
1996 Q4 423 356 62 14.7% 60.0% 74.5% 415
1996 Q3 462 414 46 10.0% 66.7% 78.1% 481
1996 Q2 425 382 39 9.2% 66.7% 73.0% 449
1996 Q1 173 160 13 7.5% 100.0% 46.8% —
1995 Q4 190 168 22 11.6% 42.9% 44.3% —
1995 Q3 210 197 13 6.2% 0.0% 57.3% —
1995 Q2 275 250 25 9.1% 40.0% 57.8% —
1995 Q1 223 204 19 8.5% 60.0% 49.5% —
1994 Q4 225 209 16 7.1% 50.0% 57.6% —
1994 Q3 243 221 22 9.1% 42.9% 59.8% —
1994 Q2 262 237 25 9.5% 100.0% 54.1% —
1994 Q1 235 222 13 5.5% 40.0% 56.9% —
1993 Q4 273 260 13 4.8% 100.0% 65.1% —
1993 Q3 165 158 7 4.2% 0.0% 32.4% —
1993 Q2 188 171 17 9.0% 37.5% 64.5% —
1993 Q1 190 165 25 13.2% 22.2% 54.9% —
1992 Q4 240 218 22 9.2% 50.0% 34.9% —
1992 Q3 167 159 8 4.8% 0.0% 33.3% —
1992 Q2 159 136 23 14.5% — 18.4% —
1992 Q1 244 202 42 17.2% 40.0% 23.6% —
1991 Q4 248 220 28 11.3% 57.1% 24.5% —
1991 Q3 204 166 38 18.6% 100.0% 32.7% —
1991 Q2 274 240 34 12.4% 40.0% 55.3% —
1991 Q1 281 221 60 21.4% 71.4% 37.9% —
1990 Q4 248 213 35 14.1% 33.3% 36.4% —
1990 Q3 296 211 85 28.7% 20.0% 18.7% —
1990 Q2 251 206 45 17.9% 25.0% 46.6% —
1990 Q1 281 231 50 17.8% 21.4% 37.4% —
1989 Q4 264 193 71 26.9% 66.7% 45.5% —
1989 Q3 313 248 65 20.8% 55.6% 28.8% —
1989 Q2 403 338 65 16.1% 85.0% 47.6% —
1989 Q1 354 292 62 17.5% 55.6% 59.0% —
1988 Q4 411 323 88 21.4% 86.7% 62.7% —
1988 Q3 462 376 86 18.6% 84.0% 62.9% —
1988 Q2 328 276 52 15.9% 75.0% 68.4% —
1988 Q1 357 290 67 18.8% 66.7% 62.0% —
1987 Q4 273 244 29 10.6% 62.5% 66.1% —
1987 Q3 288 272 16 5.6% 50.0% 71.4% —
1987 Q2 243 210 33 13.6% 100.0% 72.6% —
1987 Q1 211 195 16 7.6% 83.3% 76.6% —
1986 Q4 255 228 27 10.6% 62.5% 66.4% —
1986 Q3 259 245 14 5.4% 50.0% 72.3% —
1986 Q2 238 205 33 13.9% 100.0% 72.1% —
1986 Q1 201 186 15 7.5% 83.3% 76.7% —
1985 Q4 226 201 25 11.1% 66.7% 61.8% —
1985 Q3 249 227 22 8.8% 71.4% 67.9% —
1985 Q2 272 242 30 11.0% 88.9% 71.3% —
1985 Q1 230 211 19 8.3% 83.3% 76.4% —
1984 Q4 227 206 21 9.3% 55.6% 78.8% —
1984 Q3 254 225 29 11.4% 57.1% 73.0% —
1984 Q2 253 225 28 11.1% 80.0% 75.0% —
1984 Q1 191 172 19 9.9% 87.5% 74.0% —
1983 Q4 200 177 23 11.5% 100.0% 83.2% —
1983 Q3 333 297 36 10.8% 100.0% 74.6% —
1983 Q2 251 231 20 8.0% 66.7% 72.9% —
1983 Q1 192 173 19 9.9% 100.0% 71.8% —
1982 Q4 234 203 31 13.2% 75.0% 86.1% —
1982 Q3 238 211 27 11.3% 100.0% 80.7% —
1982 Q2 252 225 27 10.7% 100.0% 85.5% —
1982 Q1 206 179 27 13.1% 85.7% 77.9% —
1981 Q4 224 197 27 12.1% 66.7% 81.7% —
1981 Q3 248 226 22 8.9% 71.4% 81.4% —
1981 Q2 366 311 55 15.0% 94.4% 78.1% —
1981 Q1 239 212 27 11.3% 77.8% 71.7% —
1980 Q4 282 228 54 19.1% 88.9% 75.2% —
1980 Q3 316 259 57 18.0% 68.4% 75.2% —
1980 Q2 362 321 41 11.3% 84.0% 73.1% —
1980 Q1 335 303 32 9.6% 68.4% 79.5% —
1979 Q4 349 299 50 14.3% 72.7% 76.3% —
1979 Q3 403 341 62 15.4% 72.7% 67.6% —
1979 Q2 336 295 41 12.2% 45.5% 68.8% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me