← All authorities

South Oxfordshire

South East · E07000179 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,465
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
6.2%
higher than 15% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
78.3%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
94.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.7%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
37.0%
98 allowed of 265 decided
Decisions overturned
1.1%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 9.8%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,475
in the window
Applications decided
1,465
in the window
Approval rate
93.8%
1,374 granted, 91 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 27 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
90.7%
rank 165 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 93 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major4866.7%100.0%
Minor31888.1%78.3%
Other1,09996.6%—
of which householder83497.8%94.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
02214422024 Q3: 395 received2024 Q3: 340 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 394 received2024 Q4: 356 decided2025 Q1: 442 received2025 Q1: 353 decided2025 Q2: 343 received2025 Q2: 368 decided2025 Q3: 398 received2025 Q3: 407 decided2025 Q4: 379 received2025 Q4: 394 decided2026 Q1: 360 received2026 Q1: 360 decided2026 Q2: 338 received2026 Q2: 304 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
171%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000179). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 304 292 12 3.9% 100.0% 94.7% 338
2026 Q1 360 333 27 7.5% — 85.2% 360
2025 Q4 394 366 28 7.1% 100.0% 65.9% 379
2025 Q3 407 383 24 5.9% 100.0% 78.6% 398
2025 Q2 368 351 17 4.6% 100.0% 82.9% 343
2025 Q1 353 337 16 4.5% 50.0% 96.3% 442
2024 Q4 356 336 20 5.6% 100.0% 91.4% 394
2024 Q3 340 314 26 7.6% 100.0% 97.2% 395
2024 Q2 384 357 27 7.0% 100.0% 90.6% 428
2024 Q1 444 421 23 5.2% 80.0% 83.7% 445
2023 Q4 440 397 43 9.8% 100.0% 82.1% 427
2023 Q3 428 415 13 3.0% 100.0% 86.1% 460
2023 Q2 422 396 26 6.2% 100.0% 84.0% 453
2023 Q1 452 408 44 9.7% 33.3% 79.7% 503
2022 Q4 490 452 38 7.8% 0.0% 84.5% 475
2022 Q3 487 460 27 5.5% 0.0% 60.4% 480
2022 Q2 530 504 26 4.9% 100.0% 70.0% 537
2022 Q1 510 487 23 4.5% 0.0% 67.8% 581
2021 Q4 478 454 24 5.0% 0.0% 65.6% 537
2021 Q3 437 422 15 3.4% 50.0% 57.4% 395
2021 Q2 576 558 18 3.1% 71.4% 57.6% 573
2021 Q1 517 497 20 3.9% 60.0% 58.0% 621
2020 Q4 558 525 33 5.9% 75.0% 61.3% 560
2020 Q3 471 444 27 5.7% 66.7% 62.2% 571
2020 Q2 402 385 17 4.2% 83.3% 76.6% 450
2020 Q1 450 429 21 4.7% 100.0% 84.9% 533
2019 Q4 503 475 28 5.6% 66.7% 69.7% 476
2019 Q3 501 470 31 6.2% 50.0% 58.1% 508
2019 Q2 501 468 33 6.6% 100.0% 76.1% 533
2019 Q1 516 489 27 5.2% 75.0% 74.6% 555
2018 Q4 515 483 32 6.2% 57.1% 57.6% 544
2018 Q3 554 524 30 5.4% 81.8% 64.0% 542
2018 Q2 527 497 30 5.7% 60.0% 74.0% 602
2018 Q1 501 458 43 8.6% 50.0% 76.0% 585
2017 Q4 493 465 28 5.7% 0.0% 86.2% 529
2017 Q3 588 557 31 5.3% 85.7% 76.1% 528
2017 Q2 578 538 40 6.9% 60.0% 83.8% 617
2017 Q1 512 467 45 8.8% 100.0% 89.4% 675
2016 Q4 525 486 39 7.4% 100.0% 77.9% 535
2016 Q3 545 523 22 4.0% 100.0% 84.9% 533
2016 Q2 511 486 25 4.9% 33.3% 83.3% 613
2016 Q1 587 554 33 5.6% 80.0% 88.8% 556
2015 Q4 477 461 16 3.4% 60.0% 88.8% 593
2015 Q3 586 547 39 6.7% 100.0% 82.9% 616
2015 Q2 628 594 34 5.4% 85.7% 84.6% 659
2015 Q1 422 396 26 6.2% 50.0% 70.6% 599
2014 Q4 509 476 33 6.5% 33.3% 77.9% 573
2014 Q3 572 542 30 5.2% 100.0% 73.7% 611
2014 Q2 527 513 14 2.7% 33.3% 71.4% 612
2014 Q1 491 437 21 4.3% 75.0% 57.5% 560
2013 Q4 501 437 26 5.2% 0.0% 67.5% 539
2013 Q3 612 562 20 3.3% 80.0% 79.4% 590
2013 Q2 493 452 21 4.3% 100.0% 83.7% 636
2013 Q1 445 413 17 3.8% 83.3% 77.2% 545
2012 Q4 531 484 21 4.0% 33.3% 67.2% 473
2012 Q3 543 477 37 6.8% 50.0% 63.5% 534
2012 Q2 581 510 31 5.3% 60.0% 56.6% 592
2012 Q1 482 410 48 10.0% 72.7% 73.8% 610
2011 Q4 557 484 50 9.0% 87.5% 76.6% 563
2011 Q3 557 495 36 6.5% 33.3% 81.0% 593
2011 Q2 521 444 52 10.0% 75.0% 80.8% 584
2011 Q1 490 422 48 9.8% 71.4% 79.5% 594
2010 Q4 515 438 54 10.5% 100.0% 77.0% 552
2010 Q3 617 523 52 8.4% 72.7% 79.8% 623
2010 Q2 628 530 66 10.5% 66.7% 83.5% 718
2010 Q1 453 394 45 9.9% 100.0% 78.5% 602
2009 Q4 509 431 48 9.4% 83.3% 78.9% 513
2009 Q3 463 396 49 10.6% 50.0% 77.8% 523
2009 Q2 452 393 44 9.7% 0.0% 80.0% 535
2009 Q1 389 337 43 11.1% 66.7% 82.0% 487
2008 Q4 509 437 57 11.2% 62.5% 73.0% 451
2008 Q3 632 542 75 11.9% 50.0% 75.9% 662
2008 Q2 603 509 83 13.8% 90.0% 69.7% 660
2008 Q1 594 463 113 19.0% 66.7% 78.2% 710
2007 Q4 604 508 80 13.2% 100.0% 78.0% 616
2007 Q3 685 547 119 17.4% 50.0% 72.8% 807
2007 Q2 612 527 72 11.8% 80.0% 78.4% 695
2007 Q1 542 454 71 13.1% 83.3% 70.9% 752
2006 Q4 524 445 66 12.6% 77.8% 65.4% 593
2006 Q3 662 576 77 11.6% 80.0% 75.0% 639
2006 Q2 671 586 70 10.4% 57.1% 78.7% 719
2006 Q1 448 374 54 12.1% 100.0% 67.7% 684
2005 Q4 516 442 63 12.2% 42.9% 71.3% 517
2005 Q3 590 496 83 14.1% 80.0% 77.8% 636
2005 Q2 641 560 68 10.6% 66.7% 82.8% 698
2005 Q1 575 496 70 12.2% 87.5% 65.3% 683
2004 Q4 616 501 96 15.6% 40.0% 71.0% 629
2004 Q3 678 577 86 12.7% 66.7% 68.6% 684
2004 Q2 729 626 81 11.1% 40.0% 57.5% 784
2004 Q1 576 464 96 16.7% 37.5% 53.3% 767
2003 Q4 605 488 86 14.2% 60.0% 52.1% 592
2003 Q3 628 520 96 15.3% 0.0% 42.7% 712
2003 Q2 703 583 108 15.4% 54.5% 57.6% 757
2003 Q1 584 495 83 14.2% 40.0% 53.5% 781
2002 Q4 712 604 75 10.5% 25.0% 43.9% 667
2002 Q3 675 601 62 9.2% 66.7% 38.5% 702
2002 Q2 721 617 95 13.2% 100.0% 42.0% 744
2002 Q1 553 469 77 13.9% 0.0% 47.7% 775
2001 Q4 639 523 109 17.1% 0.0% 56.6% 622
2001 Q3 681 570 102 15.0% 100.0% 50.4% 690
2001 Q2 806 680 114 14.1% 50.0% 61.9% 894
2001 Q1 655 540 101 15.4% 9.1% 56.1% 754
2000 Q4 571 499 70 12.3% 0.0% 59.5% 676
2000 Q3 692 595 79 11.4% 16.7% 56.6% 692
2000 Q2 648 541 96 14.8% 42.9% 63.0% 741
2000 Q1 550 473 65 11.8% 50.0% 56.9% 707
1999 Q4 615 506 98 15.9% 0.0% 45.6% 571
1999 Q3 681 555 119 17.5% 50.0% 51.6% 698
1999 Q2 649 531 114 17.6% 25.0% 56.0% 711
1999 Q1 575 473 91 15.8% 57.1% 72.7% 686
1998 Q4 568 458 100 17.6% 30.0% 60.3% 563
1998 Q3 636 526 88 13.8% 14.3% 48.1% 576
1998 Q2 635 541 83 13.1% 42.9% 50.4% 664
1998 Q1 566 459 93 16.4% 16.7% 32.2% 665
1997 Q4 614 527 79 12.9% 11.1% 45.7% 590
1997 Q3 562 486 66 11.7% 25.0% 41.3% 681
1997 Q2 634 553 69 10.9% 44.4% 43.1% 687
1997 Q1 460 396 58 12.6% 7.1% 47.9% 630
1996 Q4 473 395 67 14.2% 25.0% 36.8% 496
1996 Q3 564 491 65 11.5% 33.3% 52.2% 559
1996 Q2 559 465 83 14.8% 25.0% 43.3% 592
1996 Q1 208 191 17 8.2% 50.0% 60.3% —
1995 Q4 239 208 31 13.0% 44.4% 58.4% —
1995 Q3 250 225 25 10.0% 77.8% 75.9% —
1995 Q2 253 234 19 7.5% 77.8% 67.0% —
1995 Q1 244 221 23 9.4% 100.0% 62.2% —
1994 Q4 290 267 23 7.9% 25.0% 58.6% —
1994 Q3 276 259 17 6.2% 66.7% 55.8% —
1994 Q2 249 231 18 7.2% 75.0% 62.5% —
1994 Q1 248 224 24 9.7% 33.3% 58.8% —
1993 Q4 259 231 28 10.8% 66.7% 72.5% —
1993 Q3 276 247 29 10.5% 66.7% 74.2% —
1993 Q2 222 212 10 4.5% 25.0% 70.3% —
1993 Q1 227 210 17 7.5% 46.2% 53.6% —
1992 Q4 217 189 28 12.9% 100.0% 70.9% —
1992 Q3 282 246 36 12.8% 44.4% 78.6% —
1992 Q2 289 260 29 10.0% 75.0% 75.6% —
1992 Q1 259 226 33 12.7% 0.0% 61.8% —
1991 Q4 246 199 47 19.1% 33.3% 54.8% —
1991 Q3 302 253 49 16.2% 73.3% 70.3% —
1991 Q2 216 183 33 15.3% 100.0% 47.7% —
1991 Q1 235 191 44 18.7% 64.3% 55.2% —
1990 Q4 277 229 48 17.3% 53.8% 62.6% —
1990 Q3 375 317 58 15.5% 41.7% 54.2% —
1990 Q2 300 239 61 20.3% 46.7% 54.2% —
1990 Q1 283 207 76 26.9% 50.0% 37.5% —
1989 Q4 411 311 100 24.3% 38.5% 27.9% —
1989 Q3 386 306 80 20.7% 19.2% 12.5% —
1989 Q2 309 251 58 18.8% 13.3% 6.6% —
1989 Q1 371 289 82 22.1% 24.1% 8.0% —
1988 Q4 345 265 80 23.2% 57.9% 33.5% —
1988 Q3 401 336 65 16.2% 48.4% 40.9% —
1988 Q2 390 333 57 14.6% 86.7% 53.2% —
1988 Q1 383 316 67 17.5% 83.9% 58.0% —
1987 Q4 322 258 64 19.9% 60.0% 67.1% —
1987 Q3 381 331 50 13.1% 75.0% 74.7% —
1987 Q2 386 336 50 13.0% 71.4% 67.4% —
1987 Q1 278 239 39 14.0% 85.7% 65.3% —
1986 Q4 320 282 38 11.9% 75.0% 64.8% —
1986 Q3 354 302 52 14.7% 66.7% 52.8% —
1986 Q2 319 274 45 14.1% 66.7% 67.1% —
1986 Q1 239 209 30 12.6% 60.0% 65.8% —
1985 Q4 231 209 22 9.5% 100.0% 75.5% —
1985 Q3 319 282 37 11.6% 75.0% 64.4% —
1985 Q2 289 255 34 11.8% 100.0% 67.0% —
1985 Q1 221 201 20 9.0% — 73.9% —
1984 Q4 236 209 27 11.4% 80.0% 73.8% —
1984 Q3 233 212 21 9.0% 33.3% 70.1% —
1984 Q2 300 266 34 11.3% 62.5% 51.6% —
1984 Q1 279 250 29 10.4% 100.0% 58.6% —
1983 Q4 222 204 18 8.1% 50.0% 65.0% —
1983 Q3 293 261 32 10.9% 100.0% 77.5% —
1983 Q2 275 255 20 7.3% 100.0% 68.3% —
1983 Q1 243 220 23 9.5% 100.0% 55.7% —
1982 Q4 235 204 31 13.2% 100.0% 64.3% —
1982 Q3 259 238 21 8.1% 0.0% 62.5% —
1982 Q2 262 233 29 11.1% 80.0% 52.0% —
1982 Q1 165 147 18 10.9% 33.3% 58.3% —
1981 Q4 208 182 26 12.5% 0.0% 68.4% —
1981 Q3 219 193 26 11.9% 40.0% 57.1% —
1981 Q2 314 262 52 16.6% 71.4% 34.9% —
1981 Q1 293 252 41 14.0% 83.3% 70.1% —
1980 Q4 259 207 52 20.1% 33.3% 63.0% —
1980 Q3 265 219 46 17.4% 100.0% 56.1% —
1980 Q2 375 311 64 17.1% 50.0% 56.9% —
1980 Q1 287 242 45 15.7% 100.0% 60.4% —
1979 Q4 283 248 35 12.4% 83.3% 62.1% —
1979 Q3 344 307 37 10.8% — 50.4% —
1979 Q2 296 251 45 15.2% 66.7% 64.4% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me