← All authorities

Gedling

East Midlands · E07000173 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
376
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
6.6%
higher than 17% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
77.8%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
89.4%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
30.2%
39 allowed of 129 decided
Decisions overturned
1.3%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 18.8%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
443
in the window
Applications decided
376
in the window
Approval rate
93.4%
351 granted, 25 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 33 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
87.3%
rank 213 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 116 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major8100.0%100.0%
Minor8091.3%77.8%
Other28893.8%—
of which householder23093.9%89.4%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0711422024 Q3: 136 received2024 Q3: 123 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 135 received2024 Q4: 120 decided2025 Q1: 142 received2025 Q1: 118 decided2025 Q2: 112 received2025 Q2: 128 decided2025 Q3: 117 received2025 Q3: 107 decided2025 Q4: 83 received2025 Q4: 105 decided2026 Q1: 108 received2026 Q1: 75 decided2026 Q2: 135 received2026 Q2: 89 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
125%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000173). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 89 81 8 9.0% 100.0% 83.3% 135
2026 Q1 75 75 0 0.0% — 60.0% 108
2025 Q4 105 93 12 11.4% — 80.0% 83
2025 Q3 107 102 5 4.7% 100.0% 83.3% 117
2025 Q2 128 119 9 7.0% — 100.0% 112
2025 Q1 118 109 9 7.6% — 71.4% 142
2024 Q4 120 112 8 6.7% — 77.8% 135
2024 Q3 123 113 10 8.1% 100.0% 78.6% 136
2024 Q2 135 129 6 4.4% — 70.0% 133
2024 Q1 101 82 19 18.8% — 87.5% 130
2023 Q4 125 118 7 5.6% — 68.8% 118
2023 Q3 128 112 16 12.5% — 63.6% 135
2023 Q2 134 112 22 16.4% 100.0% 50.0% 127
2023 Q1 132 118 14 10.6% — 50.0% 157
2022 Q4 164 146 18 11.0% 100.0% 50.0% 128
2022 Q3 169 158 11 6.5% — 100.0% 167
2022 Q2 196 176 20 10.2% — 85.7% 208
2022 Q1 169 146 23 13.6% — 71.4% 226
2021 Q4 169 153 16 9.5% — 69.2% 178
2021 Q3 238 216 22 9.2% — 61.5% 191
2021 Q2 216 198 18 8.3% — 40.0% 233
2021 Q1 148 123 25 16.9% — 55.6% 219
2020 Q4 148 128 20 13.5% 50.0% 75.0% 199
2020 Q3 145 126 19 13.1% — 75.0% 204
2020 Q2 128 114 14 10.9% — 100.0% 158
2020 Q1 165 146 19 11.5% 100.0% 85.7% 160
2019 Q4 166 150 16 9.6% — 76.9% 178
2019 Q3 157 138 19 12.1% 100.0% 66.7% 174
2019 Q2 143 119 24 16.8% 100.0% 75.0% 180
2019 Q1 154 139 15 9.7% 0.0% 71.4% 190
2018 Q4 143 128 15 10.5% 75.0% 91.7% 151
2018 Q3 159 144 15 9.4% 100.0% 90.5% 165
2018 Q2 153 148 5 3.3% — 100.0% 177
2018 Q1 158 142 16 10.1% — 86.1% 184
2017 Q4 167 161 6 3.6% — 88.2% 160
2017 Q3 161 154 7 4.3% 100.0% 77.3% 177
2017 Q2 194 189 5 2.6% 100.0% 87.0% 177
2017 Q1 155 144 11 7.1% — 83.3% 201
2016 Q4 151 134 17 11.3% 100.0% 71.4% 151
2016 Q3 169 162 7 4.1% 100.0% 78.1% 160
2016 Q2 196 187 9 4.6% 100.0% 34.6% 183
2016 Q1 113 109 4 3.5% 100.0% 51.7% 184
2015 Q4 131 127 4 3.1% — 45.0% 133
2015 Q3 180 176 4 2.2% 100.0% 52.0% 164
2015 Q2 167 154 13 7.8% — 52.9% 189
2015 Q1 121 110 11 9.1% 33.3% 55.3% 142
2014 Q4 125 116 9 7.2% 0.0% 67.7% 149
2014 Q3 174 167 7 4.0% 83.3% 59.3% 155
2014 Q2 190 179 11 5.8% — 71.2% 195
2014 Q1 138 126 8 5.8% 60.0% 60.6% 178
2013 Q4 141 131 6 4.3% 60.0% 61.0% 160
2013 Q3 168 162 3 1.8% 33.3% 70.7% 149
2013 Q2 169 157 9 5.3% 62.5% 81.8% 183
2013 Q1 122 113 7 5.7% 0.0% 76.5% 146
2012 Q4 151 141 8 5.3% 50.0% 60.6% 135
2012 Q3 169 165 4 2.4% 66.7% 87.2% 151
2012 Q2 193 176 13 6.7% 75.0% 76.7% 199
2012 Q1 136 130 5 3.7% 100.0% 100.0% 190
2011 Q4 171 156 15 8.8% 57.1% 79.5% 151
2011 Q3 195 188 7 3.6% 60.0% 78.9% 174
2011 Q2 146 137 8 5.5% 100.0% 75.0% 185
2011 Q1 152 136 15 9.9% 66.7% 81.0% 172
2010 Q4 194 185 8 4.1% 100.0% 70.4% 142
2010 Q3 213 206 7 3.3% 42.9% 81.3% 229
2010 Q2 168 164 3 1.8% 100.0% 72.9% 193
2010 Q1 132 121 9 6.8% 100.0% 72.5% 179
2009 Q4 155 148 4 2.6% 100.0% 80.4% 166
2009 Q3 173 161 11 6.4% 33.3% 75.8% 171
2009 Q2 161 143 16 9.9% 75.0% 90.5% 177
2009 Q1 135 126 9 6.7% 0.0% 81.8% 162
2008 Q4 161 153 8 5.0% 25.0% 86.0% 147
2008 Q3 216 195 21 9.7% 83.3% 60.7% 174
2008 Q2 220 193 24 10.9% 85.7% 78.9% 239
2008 Q1 181 163 15 8.3% 66.7% 76.0% 241
2007 Q4 258 226 30 11.6% 83.3% 90.9% 210
2007 Q3 221 198 21 9.5% 83.3% 83.6% 269
2007 Q2 262 239 21 8.0% 87.5% 69.6% 269
2007 Q1 215 192 22 10.2% 80.0% 88.6% 236
2006 Q4 236 190 35 14.8% 69.2% 79.2% 248
2006 Q3 256 218 34 13.3% 92.9% 76.7% 231
2006 Q2 253 228 19 7.5% 75.0% 91.3% 269
2006 Q1 193 166 23 11.9% 100.0% 84.8% 260
2005 Q4 246 203 32 13.0% 77.8% 96.2% 228
2005 Q3 293 245 34 11.6% 100.0% 84.3% 272
2005 Q2 332 271 45 13.6% 87.5% 85.9% 317
2005 Q1 241 213 24 10.0% 100.0% 86.8% 314
2004 Q4 270 229 34 12.6% 71.4% 79.1% 261
2004 Q3 339 292 38 11.2% 87.5% 64.8% 270
2004 Q2 353 318 32 9.1% 100.0% 60.7% 342
2004 Q1 275 245 27 9.8% 83.3% 34.6% 322
2003 Q4 336 304 22 6.5% 60.0% 32.2% 280
2003 Q3 309 279 25 8.1% 66.7% 45.9% 328
2003 Q2 296 262 31 10.5% 33.3% 55.1% 343
2003 Q1 281 257 21 7.5% 33.3% 65.1% 334
2002 Q4 299 274 20 6.7% 33.3% 46.2% 272
2002 Q3 278 250 22 7.9% 33.3% 56.9% 315
2002 Q2 310 295 11 3.5% 0.0% 70.6% 300
2002 Q1 270 252 17 6.3% 14.3% 60.7% 308
2001 Q4 247 220 16 6.5% — 66.7% 277
2001 Q3 246 220 20 8.1% — 63.6% 259
2001 Q2 295 255 35 11.9% 50.0% 64.6% 263
2001 Q1 238 206 29 12.2% 50.0% 61.1% 303
2000 Q4 205 173 22 10.7% 66.7% 76.5% 202
2000 Q3 268 241 21 7.8% 25.0% 56.3% 239
2000 Q2 229 200 21 9.2% 60.0% 71.7% 264
2000 Q1 248 230 18 7.3% 87.5% 74.6% 275
1999 Q4 185 163 16 8.6% 50.0% 59.5% 191
1999 Q3 245 220 16 6.5% 0.0% 76.4% 226
1999 Q2 255 219 29 11.4% 66.7% 75.0% 221
1999 Q1 166 141 18 10.8% 50.0% 68.2% 234
1998 Q4 205 173 17 8.3% 100.0% 72.7% 195
1998 Q3 208 175 8 3.8% 75.0% 71.4% 235
1998 Q2 207 167 16 7.7% 71.4% 80.6% 217
1998 Q1 189 144 23 12.2% 50.0% 55.9% 202
1997 Q4 198 163 13 6.6% 100.0% 73.0% 193
1997 Q3 269 217 19 7.1% 75.0% 73.7% 233
1997 Q2 227 177 18 7.9% 75.0% 58.3% 273
1997 Q1 160 124 16 10.0% 83.3% 80.8% 186
1996 Q4 182 150 13 7.1% 33.3% 65.6% 172
1996 Q3 174 143 5 2.9% 50.0% 57.9% 193
1996 Q2 181 152 8 4.4% 50.0% 59.1% 201
1996 Q1 259 230 29 11.2% 80.0% 84.2% —
1995 Q4 282 244 38 13.5% 90.9% 86.4% —
1995 Q3 292 273 19 6.5% 72.7% 87.5% —
1995 Q2 280 253 27 9.6% 86.7% 88.0% —
1995 Q1 281 227 54 19.2% 68.4% 55.7% —
1994 Q4 254 215 39 15.4% 36.4% 60.4% —
1994 Q3 323 290 33 10.2% 61.5% 48.7% —
1994 Q2 277 258 19 6.9% 66.7% 51.4% —
1994 Q1 244 213 31 12.7% 25.0% 44.9% —
1993 Q4 232 189 43 18.5% 80.0% 52.8% —
1993 Q3 318 281 37 11.6% 54.5% 45.2% —
1993 Q2 338 292 46 13.6% 25.0% 48.9% —
1993 Q1 244 218 26 10.7% 62.5% 53.3% —
1992 Q4 283 249 34 12.0% 28.6% 40.0% —
1992 Q3 340 302 38 11.2% 100.0% 27.5% —
1992 Q2 259 228 31 12.0% 50.0% 40.0% —
1992 Q1 232 197 35 15.1% 66.7% 47.6% —
1991 Q4 302 269 33 10.9% 50.0% 58.3% —
1991 Q3 368 327 41 11.1% 44.4% 51.9% —
1991 Q2 278 236 42 15.1% 88.9% 43.1% —
1991 Q1 272 220 52 19.1% 75.0% 44.2% —
1990 Q4 273 233 40 14.7% 72.7% 44.4% —
1990 Q3 375 317 58 15.5% 75.0% 38.4% —
1990 Q2 381 331 50 13.1% 50.0% 38.2% —
1990 Q1 355 289 66 18.6% 47.6% 30.4% —
1989 Q4 364 315 49 13.5% 76.5% 27.8% —
1989 Q3 330 291 39 11.8% 54.5% 39.0% —
1989 Q2 355 314 41 11.5% 72.7% 47.6% —
1989 Q1 327 273 54 16.5% 73.7% 53.3% —
1988 Q4 342 297 45 13.2% 75.0% 43.4% —
1988 Q3 290 258 32 11.0% 66.7% 32.9% —
1988 Q2 305 263 42 13.8% 75.0% 52.3% —
1988 Q1 354 292 62 17.5% 66.7% 50.0% —
1987 Q4 340 284 56 16.5% 66.7% 46.2% —
1987 Q3 306 285 21 6.9% 40.0% 50.7% —
1987 Q2 312 292 20 6.4% 66.7% 66.2% —
1987 Q1 209 175 34 16.3% 83.3% 67.3% —
1986 Q4 166 149 17 10.2% 62.5% 78.7% —
1986 Q3 251 229 22 8.8% 55.6% 62.1% —
1986 Q2 245 223 22 9.0% 70.0% 64.9% —
1986 Q1 200 175 25 12.5% 90.0% 65.6% —
1985 Q4 180 151 29 16.1% 100.0% 65.4% —
1985 Q3 210 186 24 11.4% 40.0% 80.0% —
1985 Q2 228 199 29 12.7% 62.5% 66.1% —
1985 Q1 182 158 24 13.2% 100.0% 51.7% —
1984 Q4 190 162 28 14.7% 90.0% 60.4% —
1984 Q3 197 178 19 9.6% 60.0% 65.9% —
1984 Q2 227 205 22 9.7% 77.8% 77.0% —
1984 Q1 183 158 25 13.7% 50.0% 58.8% —
1983 Q4 180 162 18 10.0% 100.0% 53.2% —
1983 Q3 138 122 16 11.6% 85.7% 69.4% —
1983 Q2 220 200 20 9.1% 50.0% 57.9% —
1983 Q1 173 156 17 9.8% 62.5% 73.3% —
1982 Q4 189 163 26 13.8% 50.0% 83.0% —
1982 Q3 180 159 21 11.7% 83.3% 72.6% —
1982 Q2 219 197 22 10.0% 75.0% 64.4% —
1982 Q1 166 148 18 10.8% 22.2% 51.1% —
1981 Q4 213 191 22 10.3% 80.0% 64.3% —
1981 Q3 256 236 20 7.8% 71.4% 71.4% —
1981 Q2 333 292 41 12.3% 86.4% 65.6% —
1981 Q1 291 258 33 11.3% 100.0% 68.7% —
1980 Q4 333 293 40 12.0% 83.3% 67.9% —
1980 Q3 320 280 40 12.5% 87.5% 79.1% —
1980 Q2 360 324 36 10.0% 75.0% 55.4% —
1980 Q1 304 281 23 7.6% 66.7% 53.3% —
1979 Q4 335 303 32 9.6% 66.7% 52.9% —
1979 Q3 393 361 32 8.1% 77.8% 55.6% —
1979 Q2 319 299 20 6.3% 100.0% 71.6% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me