← All authorities

South Norfolk

East of England · E07000149 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,003
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
7.6%
higher than 24% of authorities
Majors in time
33.3%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
57.1%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
92.4%
no formal threshold
Delegated
95.3%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
27.2%
44 allowed of 162 decided
Decisions overturned
0.7%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 10.7%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
984
in the window
Applications decided
1,003
in the window
Approval rate
92.4%
927 granted, 76 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 45 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
81.8%
rank 255 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 135 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3892.1%33.3%
Minor30384.5%57.1%
Other66296.1%—
of which householder46995.5%92.4%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01472942024 Q3: 259 received2024 Q3: 245 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 276 received2024 Q4: 287 decided2025 Q1: 269 received2025 Q1: 248 decided2025 Q2: 258 received2025 Q2: 264 decided2025 Q3: 294 received2025 Q3: 290 decided2025 Q4: 231 received2025 Q4: 248 decided2026 Q1: 218 received2026 Q1: 211 decided2026 Q2: 241 received2026 Q2: 254 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
111%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000149). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 254 229 25 9.8% 66.7% 46.9% 241
2026 Q1 211 195 16 7.6% 0.0% 60.0% 218
2025 Q4 248 235 13 5.2% 0.0% 77.3% 231
2025 Q3 290 268 22 7.6% 0.0% 51.5% 294
2025 Q2 264 248 16 6.1% 100.0% 64.7% 258
2025 Q1 248 236 12 4.8% 50.0% 60.7% 269
2024 Q4 287 271 16 5.6% 100.0% 56.8% 276
2024 Q3 245 225 20 8.2% 50.0% 50.0% 259
2024 Q2 279 258 21 7.5% 100.0% 33.3% 259
2024 Q1 243 232 11 4.5% — 72.0% 259
2023 Q4 315 287 28 8.9% 0.0% 62.8% 271
2023 Q3 241 228 13 5.4% 100.0% 78.9% 314
2023 Q2 312 297 15 4.8% 100.0% 56.9% 270
2023 Q1 248 237 11 4.4% 50.0% 65.2% 310
2022 Q4 306 289 17 5.6% 100.0% 80.0% 301
2022 Q3 340 330 10 2.9% 50.0% 65.3% 359
2022 Q2 330 312 18 5.5% 66.7% 67.2% 347
2022 Q1 316 302 14 4.4% 100.0% 77.4% 377
2021 Q4 365 343 22 6.0% 60.0% 73.8% 352
2021 Q3 478 465 13 2.7% 20.0% 69.7% 418
2021 Q2 434 414 20 4.6% 50.0% 77.0% 450
2021 Q1 362 338 24 6.6% 0.0% 92.4% 487
2020 Q4 384 359 25 6.5% 100.0% 82.1% 365
2020 Q3 322 291 31 9.6% 75.0% 88.6% 381
2020 Q2 288 261 27 9.4% 100.0% 86.0% 293
2020 Q1 333 306 27 8.1% 100.0% 81.0% 347
2019 Q4 358 327 31 8.7% 100.0% 91.8% 369
2019 Q3 358 334 24 6.7% 100.0% 89.2% 382
2019 Q2 389 360 29 7.5% 100.0% 91.0% 375
2019 Q1 401 358 43 10.7% 100.0% 91.6% 425
2018 Q4 417 390 27 6.5% 80.0% 95.9% 436
2018 Q3 414 376 38 9.2% 100.0% 93.2% 417
2018 Q2 457 413 44 9.6% 100.0% 93.6% 456
2018 Q1 377 351 26 6.9% 66.7% 95.2% 454
2017 Q4 402 371 31 7.7% 100.0% 96.0% 402
2017 Q3 477 442 35 7.3% 100.0% 98.0% 410
2017 Q2 423 392 31 7.3% 100.0% 95.2% 492
2017 Q1 429 402 27 6.3% 100.0% 99.0% 498
2016 Q4 411 385 26 6.3% 100.0% 94.4% 429
2016 Q3 470 442 28 6.0% 100.0% 99.1% 451
2016 Q2 446 411 35 7.8% 87.5% 97.2% 522
2016 Q1 442 412 30 6.8% 100.0% 92.1% 431
2015 Q4 421 397 24 5.7% 80.0% 64.3% 407
2015 Q3 437 404 33 7.6% 100.0% 68.7% 421
2015 Q2 405 383 22 5.4% 83.3% 58.9% 460
2015 Q1 298 270 28 9.4% 100.0% 75.9% 395
2014 Q4 368 344 24 6.5% 87.5% 83.5% 355
2014 Q3 428 410 18 4.2% 100.0% 77.7% 386
2014 Q2 440 418 22 5.0% 90.0% 57.1% 429
2014 Q1 384 364 18 4.7% 80.0% 53.8% 422
2013 Q4 382 365 11 2.9% 88.9% 38.5% 347
2013 Q3 388 364 18 4.6% 40.0% 60.5% 433
2013 Q2 383 366 12 3.1% 40.0% 53.4% 419
2013 Q1 360 319 36 10.0% 20.0% 43.1% 377
2012 Q4 369 338 28 7.6% 37.5% 34.3% 360
2012 Q3 388 345 42 10.8% 50.0% 63.9% 418
2012 Q2 441 400 35 7.9% 42.9% 66.7% 480
2012 Q1 396 359 35 8.8% 33.3% 72.2% 520
2011 Q4 429 401 27 6.3% 33.3% 59.3% 395
2011 Q3 416 388 25 6.0% 40.0% 66.1% 433
2011 Q2 388 359 26 6.7% 50.0% 59.6% 423
2011 Q1 351 323 26 7.4% 42.9% 63.8% 446
2010 Q4 399 359 37 9.3% 25.0% 72.6% 456
2010 Q3 423 378 41 9.7% 62.5% 76.7% 451
2010 Q2 451 412 38 8.4% 42.9% 83.1% 504
2010 Q1 367 317 46 12.5% 70.0% 83.5% 425
2009 Q4 380 343 36 9.5% 63.6% 88.4% 437
2009 Q3 381 348 33 8.7% 71.4% 77.7% 393
2009 Q2 396 343 53 13.4% 66.7% 83.6% 422
2009 Q1 369 302 67 18.2% 78.6% 83.0% 431
2008 Q4 390 317 73 18.7% 70.6% 79.2% 485
2008 Q3 458 388 70 15.3% 76.5% 81.6% 473
2008 Q2 543 466 77 14.2% 80.0% 76.4% 533
2008 Q1 447 372 75 16.8% 92.3% 84.2% 579
2007 Q4 511 429 82 16.0% 100.0% 84.6% 533
2007 Q3 576 494 82 14.2% 60.0% 84.8% 577
2007 Q2 442 368 74 16.7% 80.0% 81.7% 617
2007 Q1 586 483 103 17.6% 44.4% 86.4% 572
2006 Q4 475 402 73 15.4% 85.7% 79.4% 512
2006 Q3 569 480 89 15.6% 88.2% 75.8% 576
2006 Q2 599 507 91 15.2% 75.0% 84.2% 620
2006 Q1 489 408 81 16.6% 56.3% 80.6% 668
2005 Q4 523 447 74 14.1% 93.8% 86.8% 572
2005 Q3 545 451 93 17.1% 60.0% 84.0% 549
2005 Q2 611 515 94 15.4% 66.7% 90.6% 622
2005 Q1 482 395 85 17.6% 70.0% 73.6% 553
2004 Q4 553 459 91 16.5% 68.8% 72.6% 596
2004 Q3 647 563 84 13.0% 80.0% 81.5% 627
2004 Q2 712 623 89 12.5% 66.7% 76.3% 716
2004 Q1 492 433 59 12.0% 57.1% 59.3% 672
2003 Q4 536 448 88 16.4% 38.5% 81.0% 612
2003 Q3 588 517 71 12.1% 44.4% 84.6% 639
2003 Q2 703 602 101 14.4% 40.0% 71.2% 615
2003 Q1 546 482 64 11.7% 43.8% 54.1% 644
2002 Q4 460 404 56 12.2% 64.3% 44.4% 494
2002 Q3 598 544 54 9.0% 60.0% 44.8% 549
2002 Q2 620 568 52 8.4% 71.4% 44.9% 650
2002 Q1 425 384 41 9.6% 57.1% 45.9% 600
2001 Q4 533 479 54 10.1% 14.3% 54.5% 486
2001 Q3 497 448 49 9.9% 28.6% 52.2% 549
2001 Q2 570 509 61 10.7% 54.5% 54.4% 561
2001 Q1 427 390 37 8.7% 54.5% 58.1% 527
2000 Q4 416 390 26 6.3% 42.9% 64.5% 428
2000 Q3 493 452 41 8.3% 25.0% 64.7% 515
2000 Q2 554 502 51 9.2% 50.0% 66.7% 521
2000 Q1 428 398 30 7.0% 57.1% 58.4% 522
1999 Q4 371 340 31 8.4% 71.4% 68.1% 387
1999 Q3 433 399 34 7.9% 37.5% 62.3% 447
1999 Q2 474 442 32 6.8% 44.4% 66.7% 488
1999 Q1 350 317 33 9.4% 66.7% 56.6% 441
1998 Q4 425 392 33 7.8% 44.4% 53.2% 409
1998 Q3 428 374 54 12.6% 60.0% 56.6% 442
1998 Q2 448 412 36 8.0% 44.4% 55.6% 472
1998 Q1 368 328 40 10.9% 50.0% 65.2% 475
1997 Q4 406 359 47 11.6% 71.4% 55.8% 376
1997 Q3 472 420 52 11.0% 61.5% 60.1% 434
1997 Q2 447 407 40 8.9% 58.6% 58.3% 497
1997 Q1 343 311 32 9.3% 72.7% 50.4% 413
1996 Q4 374 350 24 6.4% 58.8% 50.7% 365
1996 Q3 460 418 42 9.1% 75.0% 48.6% 416
1996 Q2 362 324 37 10.2% 80.0% 49.5% 487
1996 Q1 400 344 56 14.0% 75.0% 52.1% —
1995 Q4 217 187 30 13.8% 100.0% 76.3% —
1995 Q3 223 197 26 11.7% 71.4% 63.1% —
1995 Q2 235 205 30 12.8% 83.3% 66.4% —
1995 Q1 226 195 31 13.7% 42.9% 68.7% —
1994 Q4 221 189 32 14.5% 66.7% 70.8% —
1994 Q3 291 250 41 14.1% 90.9% 72.1% —
1994 Q2 303 264 39 12.9% 35.3% 69.2% —
1994 Q1 222 197 25 11.3% 71.4% 76.3% —
1993 Q4 270 223 47 17.4% 50.0% 70.3% —
1993 Q3 241 208 33 13.7% 80.0% 76.4% —
1993 Q2 277 239 38 13.7% 40.0% 68.6% —
1993 Q1 219 200 19 8.7% 80.0% 64.1% —
1992 Q4 234 204 30 12.8% 71.4% 69.3% —
1992 Q3 274 241 33 12.0% 71.4% 73.7% —
1992 Q2 260 215 45 17.3% 58.3% 65.5% —
1992 Q1 265 222 43 16.2% 83.3% 64.4% —
1991 Q4 295 257 38 12.9% 72.7% 68.1% —
1991 Q3 319 260 59 18.5% 88.2% 71.1% —
1991 Q2 326 286 40 12.3% 83.3% 59.7% —
1991 Q1 308 251 57 18.5% 54.5% 57.1% —
1990 Q4 331 255 76 23.0% 50.0% 54.6% —
1990 Q3 348 273 75 21.6% 63.6% 48.0% —
1990 Q2 349 291 58 16.6% 61.5% 41.8% —
1990 Q1 320 0 320 100.0% 62.5% 47.4% —
1989 Q4 319 243 76 23.8% 71.4% 57.2% —
1989 Q3 373 271 102 27.3% 78.9% 53.2% —
1989 Q2 346 274 72 20.8% 77.3% 42.6% —
1989 Q1 519 415 104 20.0% 77.3% 43.8% —
1988 Q4 130 91 39 30.0% 62.5% 63.2% —
1988 Q3 310 261 49 15.8% 83.3% 65.1% —
1988 Q2 344 296 48 14.0% 91.7% 55.1% —
1988 Q1 239 191 48 20.1% 75.0% 44.7% —
1987 Q4 260 210 50 19.2% 44.4% 39.7% —
1987 Q3 279 222 57 20.4% 77.3% 34.6% —
1987 Q2 244 203 41 16.8% 71.4% 50.0% —
1987 Q1 217 177 40 18.4% 81.8% 54.8% —
1986 Q4 308 213 95 30.8% 90.9% 28.6% —
1986 Q3 303 256 47 15.5% 58.3% 23.2% —
1986 Q2 280 229 51 18.2% 54.5% 23.2% —
1986 Q1 154 123 31 20.1% 77.8% 34.1% —
1985 Q4 263 225 38 14.4% 50.0% 51.9% —
1985 Q3 260 213 47 18.1% 60.0% 48.5% —
1985 Q2 261 211 50 19.2% 85.7% 53.5% —
1985 Q1 210 179 31 14.8% 57.1% 51.1% —
1984 Q4 212 173 39 18.4% 60.0% 57.5% —
1984 Q3 276 224 52 18.8% 100.0% 66.0% —
1984 Q2 290 234 56 19.3% 100.0% 40.3% —
1984 Q1 441 364 77 17.5% 92.9% 64.3% —
1983 Q4 335 274 61 18.2% 66.7% 53.6% —
1983 Q3 400 340 60 15.0% 100.0% 62.0% —
1983 Q2 394 336 58 14.7% 50.0% 47.9% —
1983 Q1 360 307 53 14.7% 100.0% 43.9% —
1982 Q4 461 390 71 15.4% — 63.3% —
1982 Q3 240 191 49 20.4% 100.0% 44.8% —
1982 Q2 223 190 33 14.8% 100.0% 48.9% —
1982 Q1 245 227 18 7.3% 85.7% 80.6% —
1981 Q4 193 168 25 13.0% 50.0% 69.4% —
1981 Q3 225 198 27 12.0% 0.0% 51.9% —
1981 Q2 338 254 84 24.9% 66.7% 55.7% —
1981 Q1 289 231 58 20.1% 100.0% 53.3% —
1980 Q4 231 189 42 18.2% 100.0% 71.9% —
1980 Q3 372 312 60 16.1% 0.0% 54.4% —
1980 Q2 463 419 44 9.5% 88.9% 67.0% —
1980 Q1 419 380 39 9.3% 83.3% 69.7% —
1979 Q4 457 418 39 8.5% 80.0% 71.8% —
1979 Q3 495 457 38 7.7% 90.0% 72.6% —
1979 Q2 458 419 39 8.5% 100.0% 70.5% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me