← All authorities

Norwich

East of England · E07000148 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
558
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
5.2%
higher than 8% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
84.7%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
93.5%
no formal threshold
Delegated
93.2%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
23.2%
16 allowed of 69 decided
Decisions overturned
0.5%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 14.0%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
553
in the window
Applications decided
558
in the window
Approval rate
94.8%
529 granted, 29 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 15 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
89.1%
rank 188 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 103 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major11100.0%100.0%
Minor16794.0%84.7%
Other38095.0%—
of which householder16797.6%93.5%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0821642024 Q3: 143 received2024 Q3: 142 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 133 received2024 Q4: 143 decided2025 Q1: 164 received2025 Q1: 128 decided2025 Q2: 143 received2025 Q2: 143 decided2025 Q3: 138 received2025 Q3: 126 decided2025 Q4: 134 received2025 Q4: 149 decided2026 Q1: 159 received2026 Q1: 120 decided2026 Q2: 122 received2026 Q2: 163 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
111%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000148). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 163 147 16 9.8% 100.0% 96.4% 122
2026 Q1 120 117 3 2.5% — 85.7% 159
2025 Q4 149 143 6 4.0% — 70.0% 134
2025 Q3 126 122 4 3.2% 100.0% 95.5% 138
2025 Q2 143 133 10 7.0% 0.0% 79.3% 143
2025 Q1 128 124 4 3.1% — 91.2% 164
2024 Q4 143 138 5 3.5% — 72.0% 133
2024 Q3 142 129 13 9.2% 100.0% 68.8% 143
2024 Q2 164 141 23 14.0% 50.0% 80.5% 173
2024 Q1 146 140 6 4.1% 100.0% 86.2% 175
2023 Q4 147 132 15 10.2% 100.0% 88.9% 167
2023 Q3 127 113 14 11.0% — 100.0% 164
2023 Q2 120 118 2 1.7% — 100.0% 141
2023 Q1 136 129 7 5.1% — 86.7% 133
2022 Q4 170 164 6 3.5% — 100.0% 155
2022 Q3 125 120 5 4.0% — 100.0% 149
2022 Q2 162 155 7 4.3% 100.0% 62.5% 165
2022 Q1 173 155 18 10.4% 50.0% 72.7% 201
2021 Q4 208 184 24 11.5% 100.0% 95.3% 217
2021 Q3 189 185 4 2.1% 100.0% 88.9% 177
2021 Q2 209 198 11 5.3% 100.0% 80.0% 227
2021 Q1 157 142 15 9.6% 100.0% 93.1% 202
2020 Q4 187 164 23 12.3% — 86.8% 203
2020 Q3 136 126 10 7.4% 100.0% 82.4% 175
2020 Q2 164 157 7 4.3% 100.0% 95.8% 153
2020 Q1 164 148 16 9.8% 100.0% 100.0% 178
2019 Q4 200 190 10 5.0% 100.0% 97.1% 190
2019 Q3 204 180 24 11.8% 100.0% 94.1% 200
2019 Q2 181 171 10 5.5% 100.0% 94.3% 216
2019 Q1 190 178 12 6.3% 100.0% 86.1% 215
2018 Q4 181 171 10 5.5% — 90.3% 191
2018 Q3 194 178 16 8.2% 66.7% 88.6% 203
2018 Q2 178 172 6 3.4% 100.0% 88.9% 225
2018 Q1 184 172 12 6.5% — 93.5% 199
2017 Q4 187 170 17 9.1% 100.0% 86.5% 179
2017 Q3 245 225 20 8.2% 75.0% 88.6% 216
2017 Q2 222 206 16 7.2% — 88.9% 235
2017 Q1 191 177 14 7.3% 100.0% 80.8% 255
2016 Q4 183 170 13 7.1% 66.7% 78.8% 178
2016 Q3 175 157 18 10.3% 100.0% 86.8% 180
2016 Q2 208 196 12 5.8% — 93.8% 221
2016 Q1 158 154 4 2.5% — 100.0% 217
2015 Q4 182 174 8 4.4% 100.0% 89.7% 191
2015 Q3 201 190 11 5.5% 100.0% 87.8% 186
2015 Q2 213 203 10 4.7% 100.0% 90.6% 211
2015 Q1 174 155 19 10.9% 71.4% 100.0% 224
2014 Q4 165 150 15 9.1% 100.0% 88.1% 181
2014 Q3 201 193 8 4.0% 100.0% 92.3% 199
2014 Q2 184 179 5 2.7% 100.0% 77.8% 214
2014 Q1 167 138 16 9.6% 100.0% 78.9% 196
2013 Q4 178 160 6 3.4% 100.0% 88.9% 188
2013 Q3 232 208 16 6.9% 68.4% 86.7% 194
2013 Q2 223 202 13 5.8% 50.0% 70.0% 224
2013 Q1 175 160 8 4.6% 7.1% 63.3% 205
2012 Q4 167 149 11 6.6% 14.3% 66.1% 170
2012 Q3 223 193 20 9.0% 50.0% 70.6% 195
2012 Q2 246 218 18 7.3% 77.8% 81.5% 274
2012 Q1 157 132 14 8.9% 30.0% 74.5% 225
2011 Q4 203 170 26 12.8% 71.4% 83.1% 180
2011 Q3 232 203 25 10.8% 20.0% 64.3% 244
2011 Q2 212 182 27 12.7% 75.0% 50.0% 181
2011 Q1 169 157 10 5.9% 44.4% 51.9% 256
2010 Q4 174 155 16 9.2% 88.9% 87.8% 197
2010 Q3 222 198 18 8.1% 100.0% 89.0% 222
2010 Q2 197 174 18 9.1% 72.7% 81.7% 214
2010 Q1 169 150 17 10.1% 85.7% 98.1% 196
2009 Q4 185 170 12 6.5% 70.0% 81.1% 188
2009 Q3 208 182 24 11.5% 90.0% 84.4% 215
2009 Q2 179 159 20 11.2% 53.8% 90.5% 185
2009 Q1 225 193 31 13.8% 16.7% 79.0% 222
2008 Q4 210 176 33 15.7% 60.0% 78.2% 199
2008 Q3 222 181 41 18.5% 27.3% 71.9% 235
2008 Q2 305 257 45 14.8% 60.0% 69.9% 303
2008 Q1 255 206 46 18.0% 38.9% 43.5% 233
2007 Q4 184 144 37 20.1% 12.5% 42.9% 223
2007 Q3 280 223 51 18.2% 36.4% 65.2% 277
2007 Q2 269 218 49 18.2% 45.5% 85.7% 325
2007 Q1 200 177 22 11.0% 37.5% 80.5% 267
2006 Q4 220 190 28 12.7% 75.0% 65.3% 225
2006 Q3 198 162 35 17.7% 22.2% 76.1% 268
2006 Q2 244 186 56 23.0% 66.7% 82.0% 242
2006 Q1 223 178 44 19.7% 37.5% 72.3% 238
2005 Q4 234 181 48 20.5% 57.1% 70.9% 227
2005 Q3 265 232 32 12.1% 0.0% 59.2% 268
2005 Q2 194 162 27 13.9% 14.3% 35.7% 239
2005 Q1 219 187 30 13.7% 50.0% 24.4% 197
2004 Q4 274 250 23 8.4% 68.8% 32.5% 231
2004 Q3 233 210 23 9.9% 6.7% 11.8% 275
2004 Q2 241 210 30 12.4% 35.7% 36.9% 303
2004 Q1 230 203 23 10.0% 33.3% 59.4% 275
2003 Q4 226 208 14 6.2% 52.6% 55.7% 218
2003 Q3 257 229 25 9.7% 33.3% 58.7% 255
2003 Q2 268 240 24 9.0% 23.1% 66.3% 263
2003 Q1 251 234 15 6.0% 69.6% 74.3% 309
2002 Q4 219 193 24 11.0% 37.5% 76.2% 253
2002 Q3 313 290 21 6.7% 46.2% 61.0% 274
2002 Q2 303 281 19 6.3% 55.6% 71.3% 325
2002 Q1 266 233 23 8.6% 33.3% 48.3% 282
2001 Q4 324 290 31 9.6% 25.0% 38.5% 261
2001 Q3 223 202 21 9.4% 33.3% 37.7% 261
2001 Q2 320 263 31 9.7% 33.3% 43.2% 283
2001 Q1 189 168 14 7.4% 0.0% 44.6% 263
2000 Q4 210 182 20 9.5% 60.0% 50.7% 216
2000 Q3 208 181 22 10.6% 100.0% 41.3% 235
2000 Q2 243 201 20 8.2% 50.0% 52.3% 235
2000 Q1 227 174 22 9.7% 0.0% 57.1% 279
1999 Q4 218 167 29 13.3% 81.8% 44.9% 221
1999 Q3 250 188 16 6.4% 42.9% 55.6% 259
1999 Q2 211 174 20 9.5% 20.0% 59.7% 244
1999 Q1 231 173 21 9.1% 33.3% 53.3% 262
1998 Q4 256 184 25 9.8% 0.0% 47.8% 221
1998 Q3 257 206 17 6.6% 14.3% 53.0% 273
1998 Q2 208 166 15 7.2% 20.0% 62.5% 245
1998 Q1 224 178 18 8.0% 66.7% 58.6% 247
1997 Q4 229 168 37 16.2% 57.9% 50.0% 230
1997 Q3 257 214 13 5.1% 0.0% 60.6% 239
1997 Q2 237 199 17 7.2% 50.0% 53.8% 265
1997 Q1 220 185 14 6.4% 0.0% 46.9% 226
1996 Q4 177 135 16 9.0% 25.0% 67.4% 228
1996 Q3 209 179 15 7.2% 0.0% 63.5% 233
1996 Q2 227 178 17 7.5% 16.7% 61.0% 252
1996 Q1 9 9 0 0.0% — 66.7% —
1995 Q4 8 8 0 0.0% — 83.3% —
1995 Q3 9 8 1 11.1% — 75.0% —
1995 Q2 9 9 0 0.0% — 100.0% —
1995 Q1 3 3 0 0.0% — 100.0% —
1994 Q4 9 8 1 11.1% — 50.0% —
1994 Q3 11 11 0 0.0% — 66.7% —
1994 Q2 13 11 2 15.4% — 16.7% —
1994 Q1 4 4 0 0.0% — 25.0% —
1993 Q4 2 2 0 0.0% — 50.0% —
1993 Q3 9 9 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1993 Q2 15 13 2 13.3% 0.0% 71.4% —
1993 Q1 10 6 4 40.0% — 14.3% —
1992 Q4 24 19 5 20.8% — 16.7% —
1992 Q3 2 2 0 0.0% — 100.0% —
1992 Q2 12 12 0 0.0% 50.0% 66.7% —
1992 Q1 2 2 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1991 Q4 1 1 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1991 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1991 Q2 3 3 0 0.0% — 50.0% —
1991 Q1 1 1 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1990 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1990 Q3 1 1 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1990 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1990 Q1 7 7 0 0.0% — 40.0% —
1989 Q4 6 6 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1989 Q3 10 10 0 0.0% — 50.0% —
1989 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1989 Q1 11 11 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1988 Q4 8 8 0 0.0% — 50.0% —
1988 Q3 7 7 0 0.0% — 66.7% —
1988 Q2 11 11 0 0.0% — 50.0% —
1988 Q1 13 13 0 0.0% — 25.0% —
1987 Q4 6 6 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1987 Q3 4 4 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1987 Q2 5 5 0 0.0% — 100.0% —
1987 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1986 Q4 5 4 1 20.0% — 66.7% —
1986 Q3 14 13 1 7.1% — 90.0% —
1986 Q2 10 8 2 20.0% 100.0% 0.0% —
1986 Q1 7 7 0 0.0% — 60.0% —
1985 Q4 3 3 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1985 Q3 1 1 0 0.0% — 0.0% —
1985 Q2 8 8 0 0.0% — 66.7% —
1985 Q1 16 13 3 18.8% 100.0% 85.7% —
1984 Q4 8 8 0 0.0% 100.0% 50.0% —
1984 Q3 2 2 0 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% —
1984 Q2 3 1 2 66.7% — 0.0% —
1984 Q1 5 5 0 0.0% 100.0% — —
1983 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1983 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1983 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1983 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1982 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1982 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1982 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1982 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1981 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1981 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1981 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1981 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1980 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1980 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1980 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —
1980 Q1 0 0 0 — — — —
1979 Q4 0 0 0 — — — —
1979 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
1979 Q2 0 0 0 — — — —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me