← All authorities

Breckland

East of England · E07000143 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
774
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
16.4%
higher than 77% of authorities
Majors in time
91.7%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
84.2%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
94.9%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.5%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
19.2%
41 allowed of 214 decided
Decisions overturned
0.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 22.3%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
837
in the window
Applications decided
774
in the window
Approval rate
83.6%
647 granted, 127 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 131 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
91.1%
rank 158 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 88 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3992.3%91.7%
Minor33267.5%84.2%
Other40396.0%—
of which householder32598.2%94.9%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01332662024 Q3: 170 received2024 Q3: 141 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 195 received2024 Q4: 111 decided2025 Q1: 266 received2025 Q1: 189 decided2025 Q2: 193 received2025 Q2: 224 decided2025 Q3: 221 received2025 Q3: 200 decided2025 Q4: 205 received2025 Q4: 186 decided2026 Q1: 224 received2026 Q1: 191 decided2026 Q2: 187 received2026 Q2: 197 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
144%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000143). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 197 165 32 16.2% 100.0% 79.5% 187
2026 Q1 191 170 21 11.0% — 78.8% 224
2025 Q4 186 152 34 18.3% 50.0% 86.1% 205
2025 Q3 200 160 40 20.0% 100.0% 91.1% 221
2025 Q2 224 191 33 14.7% 100.0% 79.6% 193
2025 Q1 189 168 21 11.1% 100.0% 85.7% 266
2024 Q4 111 92 19 17.1% — 46.4% 195
2024 Q3 141 132 9 6.4% 0.0% 47.8% 170
2024 Q2 220 191 29 13.2% 100.0% 100.0% 215
2024 Q1 215 189 26 12.1% 100.0% 86.4% 247
2023 Q4 233 181 52 22.3% 100.0% 93.3% 248
2023 Q3 262 228 34 13.0% 100.0% 96.3% 239
2023 Q2 263 221 42 16.0% 100.0% 91.5% 276
2023 Q1 290 239 51 17.6% 100.0% 85.0% 311
2022 Q4 301 260 41 13.6% 100.0% 84.0% 280
2022 Q3 282 255 27 9.6% 75.0% 85.0% 306
2022 Q2 241 213 28 11.6% 100.0% 92.3% 328
2022 Q1 294 267 27 9.2% 85.7% 94.4% 361
2021 Q4 300 263 37 12.3% 100.0% 95.9% 308
2021 Q3 378 351 27 7.1% 37.5% 89.7% 345
2021 Q2 379 348 31 8.2% 66.7% 93.1% 419
2021 Q1 385 348 37 9.6% 50.0% 89.8% 445
2020 Q4 324 301 23 7.1% 83.3% 98.8% 367
2020 Q3 364 327 37 10.2% 75.0% 92.0% 364
2020 Q2 226 196 30 13.3% 100.0% 90.9% 286
2020 Q1 333 290 43 12.9% 100.0% 97.2% 322
2019 Q4 349 301 48 13.8% 100.0% 98.1% 320
2019 Q3 362 324 38 10.5% 100.0% 93.8% 424
2019 Q2 353 310 43 12.2% 100.0% 90.9% 388
2019 Q1 342 300 42 12.3% 75.0% 90.8% 336
2018 Q4 333 302 31 9.3% 33.3% 78.7% 337
2018 Q3 363 326 37 10.2% 0.0% 87.5% 354
2018 Q2 309 289 20 6.5% 100.0% 91.2% 394
2018 Q1 296 264 32 10.8% 100.0% 98.5% 341
2017 Q4 308 269 39 12.7% 100.0% 95.6% 331
2017 Q3 331 288 43 13.0% 100.0% 93.1% 348
2017 Q2 350 313 37 10.6% 72.7% 91.5% 386
2017 Q1 348 274 74 21.3% 0.0% 89.1% 380
2016 Q4 304 251 53 17.4% 66.7% 84.1% 345
2016 Q3 328 281 47 14.3% 57.1% 82.6% 331
2016 Q2 349 310 39 11.2% 100.0% 81.8% 388
2016 Q1 332 302 30 9.0% 0.0% 85.5% 338
2015 Q4 290 259 31 10.7% 80.0% 86.7% 348
2015 Q3 331 291 40 12.1% 66.7% 71.9% 319
2015 Q2 282 254 28 9.9% 33.3% 71.9% 369
2015 Q1 341 305 36 10.6% 100.0% 93.4% 370
2014 Q4 271 246 25 9.2% 100.0% 96.3% 292
2014 Q3 286 262 24 8.4% 100.0% 90.2% 314
2014 Q2 315 280 35 11.1% 78.6% 91.7% 335
2014 Q1 267 235 22 8.2% 40.0% 80.2% 321
2013 Q4 300 237 48 16.0% 71.4% 84.3% 283
2013 Q3 294 253 24 8.2% 62.5% 77.9% 307
2013 Q2 346 299 34 9.8% 50.0% 57.9% 313
2013 Q1 268 226 35 13.1% 45.5% 53.5% 285
2012 Q4 276 233 39 14.1% 45.5% 76.1% 327
2012 Q3 300 261 29 9.7% 42.9% 76.6% 312
2012 Q2 335 287 38 11.3% 63.6% 82.2% 326
2012 Q1 308 250 45 14.6% 57.1% 81.8% 363
2011 Q4 332 284 40 12.0% 68.0% 84.2% 319
2011 Q3 364 300 53 14.6% 73.3% 88.1% 392
2011 Q2 318 264 43 13.5% 50.0% 88.2% 345
2011 Q1 265 227 33 12.5% 64.3% 80.4% 348
2010 Q4 333 271 53 15.9% 52.9% 85.1% 319
2010 Q3 360 307 47 13.1% 57.1% 90.9% 343
2010 Q2 339 297 33 9.7% 86.7% 90.8% 396
2010 Q1 226 194 27 11.9% 100.0% 84.8% 319
2009 Q4 285 235 44 15.4% 62.5% 88.3% 298
2009 Q3 249 221 27 10.8% 66.7% 92.5% 298
2009 Q2 266 235 31 11.7% 75.0% 81.9% 271
2009 Q1 236 192 44 18.6% 66.7% 91.0% 281
2008 Q4 348 296 50 14.4% 57.1% 86.1% 284
2008 Q3 407 361 44 10.8% 87.5% 87.2% 421
2008 Q2 472 405 62 13.1% 71.4% 81.3% 461
2008 Q1 422 364 57 13.5% 64.7% 86.2% 508
2007 Q4 429 356 64 14.9% 72.2% 87.1% 456
2007 Q3 490 410 74 15.1% 53.8% 68.5% 505
2007 Q2 457 396 56 12.3% 69.2% 80.0% 552
2007 Q1 392 338 51 13.0% 66.7% 77.8% 541
2006 Q4 414 354 58 14.0% 80.0% 81.9% 473
2006 Q3 478 415 61 12.8% 77.8% 70.1% 454
2006 Q2 390 347 40 10.3% 44.4% 73.2% 514
2006 Q1 401 361 39 9.7% 63.6% 71.7% 496
2005 Q4 365 323 42 11.5% 60.0% 76.7% 463
2005 Q3 461 393 62 13.4% 71.4% 71.1% 428
2005 Q2 524 470 52 9.9% 63.6% 70.6% 506
2005 Q1 402 355 45 11.2% 53.8% 55.6% 511
2004 Q4 434 395 39 9.0% 30.0% 70.5% 426
2004 Q3 578 537 39 6.7% 33.3% 70.0% 571
2004 Q2 511 460 50 9.8% 50.0% 70.9% 566
2004 Q1 453 430 21 4.6% 50.0% 64.3% 489
2003 Q4 406 383 23 5.7% 58.3% 69.4% 451
2003 Q3 500 467 30 6.0% 66.7% 58.4% 473
2003 Q2 506 473 30 5.9% 72.7% 62.6% 532
2003 Q1 431 399 32 7.4% 50.0% 57.2% 519
2002 Q4 407 376 31 7.6% 60.0% 61.8% 427
2002 Q3 477 450 27 5.7% 66.7% 48.8% 472
2002 Q2 518 501 17 3.3% 33.3% 56.5% 479
2002 Q1 330 301 29 8.8% 42.9% 53.8% 476
2001 Q4 340 316 24 7.1% 45.5% 58.1% 359
2001 Q3 459 421 38 8.3% 64.3% 50.9% 418
2001 Q2 349 326 21 6.0% 71.4% 47.8% 427
2001 Q1 284 263 20 7.0% 66.7% 47.2% 369
2000 Q4 327 299 27 8.3% 50.0% 53.4% 329
2000 Q3 403 373 30 7.4% 72.7% 55.6% 391
2000 Q2 426 401 24 5.6% 20.0% 65.9% 479
2000 Q1 348 330 18 5.2% 75.0% 55.3% 403
1999 Q4 349 317 32 9.2% 55.6% 57.2% 344
1999 Q3 362 340 22 6.1% 50.0% 60.1% 404
1999 Q2 408 375 33 8.1% 75.0% 50.3% 373
1999 Q1 340 298 16 4.7% 100.0% 51.9% 397
1998 Q4 442 333 36 8.1% 58.8% 48.6% 437
1998 Q3 384 306 29 7.6% 80.0% 44.2% 364
1998 Q2 385 307 23 6.0% 43.8% 42.6% 393
1998 Q1 302 228 22 7.3% 50.0% 40.2% 393
1997 Q4 305 239 8 2.6% 50.0% 53.9% 311
1997 Q3 398 316 26 6.5% 60.0% 45.8% 398
1997 Q2 360 296 17 4.7% 57.1% 59.3% 390
1997 Q1 261 181 24 9.2% 50.0% 44.6% 317
1996 Q4 305 224 23 7.5% 87.5% 61.0% 304
1996 Q3 344 265 31 9.0% 46.7% 53.1% 388
1996 Q2 349 281 22 6.3% 50.0% 55.3% 354
1996 Q1 245 217 28 11.4% 7.7% 60.2% —
1995 Q4 250 232 18 7.2% 46.2% 51.2% —
1995 Q3 282 261 21 7.4% 58.8% 44.1% —
1995 Q2 316 284 32 10.1% 60.0% 54.1% —
1995 Q1 236 216 20 8.5% 58.8% 60.0% —
1994 Q4 268 238 30 11.2% 56.3% 56.9% —
1994 Q3 289 263 26 9.0% 60.0% 52.8% —
1994 Q2 307 277 30 9.8% 54.5% 53.8% —
1994 Q1 252 228 24 9.5% 61.1% 58.6% —
1993 Q4 287 249 38 13.2% 50.0% 36.4% —
1993 Q3 288 260 28 9.7% 76.5% 52.3% —
1993 Q2 286 259 27 9.4% 50.0% 38.8% —
1993 Q1 262 229 33 12.6% 55.6% 47.6% —
1992 Q4 266 238 28 10.5% 70.6% 38.1% —
1992 Q3 283 251 32 11.3% 38.1% 32.3% —
1992 Q2 268 224 44 16.4% 61.9% 50.0% —
1992 Q1 303 251 52 17.2% 34.8% 42.2% —
1991 Q4 289 240 49 17.0% 57.9% 48.1% —
1991 Q3 301 240 61 20.3% 75.0% 43.6% —
1991 Q2 311 256 55 17.7% 50.0% 49.1% —
1991 Q1 357 292 65 18.2% 36.7% 48.6% —
1990 Q4 366 301 65 17.8% 50.0% 44.4% —
1990 Q3 337 273 64 19.0% 33.3% 41.0% —
1990 Q2 373 318 55 14.7% 50.0% 41.1% —
1990 Q1 428 351 77 18.0% 46.5% 50.5% —
1989 Q4 408 312 96 23.5% 38.5% 37.4% —
1989 Q3 399 305 94 23.6% 48.3% 29.7% —
1989 Q2 496 372 124 25.0% 46.3% 46.0% —
1989 Q1 519 393 126 24.3% 47.8% 35.6% —
1988 Q4 491 366 125 25.5% 50.0% 50.2% —
1988 Q3 558 439 119 21.3% 57.1% 53.4% —
1988 Q2 544 471 73 13.4% 55.2% 57.0% —
1988 Q1 505 427 78 15.4% 57.6% 47.4% —
1987 Q4 385 317 68 17.7% 47.1% 55.7% —
1987 Q3 535 450 85 15.9% 76.9% 50.5% —
1987 Q2 550 463 87 15.8% 27.3% 45.4% —
1987 Q1 602 511 91 15.1% 63.2% 27.3% —
1986 Q4 465 407 58 12.5% 0.0% 21.7% —
1986 Q3 544 465 79 14.5% 25.0% 22.9% —
1986 Q2 515 307 208 40.4% 0.0% 23.0% —
1986 Q1 437 379 58 13.3% 20.0% 21.8% —
1985 Q4 427 367 60 14.1% 37.5% 21.5% —
1985 Q3 501 435 66 13.2% 30.0% 31.1% —
1985 Q2 441 385 56 12.7% 33.3% 29.3% —
1985 Q1 418 356 62 14.8% 20.0% 34.9% —
1984 Q4 491 416 75 15.3% 16.7% 49.0% —
1984 Q3 577 489 88 15.3% 33.3% 42.5% —
1984 Q2 437 386 51 11.7% 55.6% 43.5% —
1984 Q1 509 434 75 14.7% 55.6% 46.3% —
1983 Q4 431 382 49 11.4% 66.7% 40.3% —
1983 Q3 482 426 56 11.6% 41.7% 47.4% —
1983 Q2 456 411 45 9.9% 20.0% 33.9% —
1983 Q1 494 429 65 13.2% 38.5% 27.1% —
1982 Q4 345 300 45 13.0% 70.0% 29.7% —
1982 Q3 468 410 58 12.4% 30.0% 35.9% —
1982 Q2 311 276 35 11.3% 55.6% 40.2% —
1982 Q1 413 361 52 12.6% 30.8% 50.0% —
1981 Q4 433 370 63 14.5% 50.0% 45.4% —
1981 Q3 432 371 61 14.1% 36.4% 31.0% —
1981 Q2 629 547 82 13.0% 37.5% 25.2% —
1981 Q1 448 387 61 13.6% 69.2% 32.5% —
1980 Q4 457 394 63 13.8% 55.6% 39.7% —
1980 Q3 532 460 72 13.5% 46.2% 43.1% —
1980 Q2 500 438 62 12.4% 53.8% 35.9% —
1980 Q1 407 348 59 14.5% 61.1% 12.9% —
1979 Q4 406 351 55 13.5% 54.5% 26.0% —
1979 Q3 610 548 62 10.2% 42.9% 32.4% —
1979 Q2 506 439 67 13.2% 50.0% 16.5% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me