← All authorities

North Kesteven

East Midlands · E07000139 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
616
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
2.9%
higher than 1% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
89.8%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
98.9%
no formal threshold
Delegated
99.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
18.2%
20 allowed of 110 decided
Decisions overturned
0.5%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 11.6%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
654
in the window
Applications decided
616
in the window
Approval rate
97.1%
598 granted, 18 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 3 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
96.4%
rank 64 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 32 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2996.6%100.0%
Minor15094.0%89.8%
Other43798.2%—
of which householder30699.3%98.9%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0921842024 Q3: 138 received2024 Q3: 138 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 155 received2024 Q4: 141 decided2025 Q1: 176 received2025 Q1: 135 decided2025 Q2: 171 received2025 Q2: 184 decided2025 Q3: 181 received2025 Q3: 160 decided2025 Q4: 137 received2025 Q4: 158 decided2026 Q1: 167 received2026 Q1: 129 decided2026 Q2: 169 received2026 Q2: 169 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
141%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000139). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 169 164 5 3.0% — 92.9% 169
2026 Q1 129 125 4 3.1% 100.0% 87.5% 167
2025 Q4 158 157 1 0.6% 100.0% 100.0% 137
2025 Q3 160 152 8 5.0% 100.0% 83.3% 181
2025 Q2 184 178 6 3.3% 100.0% 78.3% 171
2025 Q1 135 132 3 2.2% 100.0% 100.0% 176
2024 Q4 141 137 4 2.8% 100.0% 77.8% 155
2024 Q3 138 134 4 2.9% 100.0% 100.0% 138
2024 Q2 180 173 7 3.9% — 75.0% 162
2024 Q1 148 134 14 9.5% 100.0% 78.9% 192
2023 Q4 166 155 11 6.6% — 72.2% 159
2023 Q3 158 145 13 8.2% 0.0% 41.7% 182
2023 Q2 162 154 8 4.9% 75.0% 58.3% 186
2023 Q1 178 164 14 7.9% 50.0% 71.9% 180
2022 Q4 205 197 8 3.9% 100.0% 80.8% 197
2022 Q3 242 221 21 8.7% 100.0% 85.3% 218
2022 Q2 250 225 25 10.0% 100.0% 87.5% 263
2022 Q1 238 216 22 9.2% 75.0% 96.7% 271
2021 Q4 248 238 10 4.0% 100.0% 88.4% 260
2021 Q3 236 227 9 3.8% 100.0% 75.0% 250
2021 Q2 268 262 6 2.2% 100.0% 90.6% 266
2021 Q1 219 211 8 3.7% 100.0% 77.1% 279
2020 Q4 215 200 15 7.0% 100.0% 91.4% 248
2020 Q3 285 271 14 4.9% 100.0% 70.5% 237
2020 Q2 135 124 11 8.1% 100.0% 100.0% 229
2020 Q1 210 196 14 6.7% 87.5% 97.6% 216
2019 Q4 257 242 15 5.8% 100.0% 84.0% 243
2019 Q3 235 219 16 6.8% 80.0% 86.3% 250
2019 Q2 251 245 6 2.4% 66.7% 87.8% 269
2019 Q1 204 188 16 7.8% 71.4% 86.7% 254
2018 Q4 209 196 13 6.2% 80.0% 91.8% 213
2018 Q3 241 220 21 8.7% 20.0% 88.2% 234
2018 Q2 230 217 13 5.7% 100.0% 89.6% 252
2018 Q1 214 202 12 5.6% 100.0% 86.0% 213
2017 Q4 254 234 20 7.9% 50.0% 81.4% 251
2017 Q3 245 234 11 4.5% 100.0% 68.0% 268
2017 Q2 240 223 17 7.1% 100.0% 78.3% 243
2017 Q1 217 198 19 8.8% 100.0% 96.4% 98
2016 Q4 172 156 16 9.3% 83.3% 95.0% 214
2016 Q3 224 198 26 11.6% 75.0% 87.0% 233
2016 Q2 264 243 21 8.0% 100.0% 79.5% 242
2016 Q1 237 215 22 9.3% 100.0% 98.6% 264
2015 Q4 209 197 12 5.7% 100.0% 82.8% 219
2015 Q3 257 236 21 8.2% 33.3% 61.0% 214
2015 Q2 254 239 15 5.9% 80.0% 72.9% 275
2015 Q1 208 186 22 10.6% 63.6% 75.6% 240
2014 Q4 201 191 10 5.0% 71.4% 87.8% 228
2014 Q3 226 209 17 7.5% 50.0% 76.5% 252
2014 Q2 295 267 28 9.5% 66.7% 78.9% 257
2014 Q1 207 173 28 13.5% 77.8% 77.5% 253
2013 Q4 235 210 21 8.9% 88.9% 80.7% 250
2013 Q3 227 215 11 4.8% 60.0% 68.8% 201
2013 Q2 247 229 17 6.9% 57.1% 80.7% 260
2013 Q1 165 146 17 10.3% 81.8% 83.9% 213
2012 Q4 184 157 25 13.6% 100.0% 84.1% 191
2012 Q3 214 186 24 11.2% 75.0% 85.3% 192
2012 Q2 214 189 21 9.8% 61.5% 91.1% 244
2012 Q1 212 182 26 12.3% 71.4% 90.7% 209
2011 Q4 218 185 32 14.7% 84.6% 90.6% 237
2011 Q3 265 242 18 6.8% 83.3% 95.5% 265
2011 Q2 225 209 11 4.9% 85.7% 88.9% 242
2011 Q1 227 200 22 9.7% 92.9% 91.4% 258
2010 Q4 238 215 21 8.8% 83.3% 91.7% 241
2010 Q3 275 245 26 9.5% 75.0% 93.3% 280
2010 Q2 278 245 30 10.8% 86.7% 93.3% 277
2010 Q1 224 197 25 11.2% 100.0% 90.5% 281
2009 Q4 267 237 28 10.5% 85.7% 90.4% 250
2009 Q3 231 198 31 13.4% 100.0% 68.4% 258
2009 Q2 224 196 28 12.5% 100.0% 96.2% 254
2009 Q1 190 170 19 10.0% 100.0% 94.9% 227
2008 Q4 278 232 45 16.2% 66.7% 95.1% 231
2008 Q3 348 284 62 17.8% 76.9% 89.8% 327
2008 Q2 375 308 64 17.1% 81.3% 84.7% 342
2008 Q1 300 244 44 14.7% 84.6% 97.3% 397
2007 Q4 348 276 62 17.8% 88.9% 93.8% 340
2007 Q3 407 323 68 16.7% 85.0% 93.3% 381
2007 Q2 405 319 69 17.0% 94.1% 95.4% 439
2007 Q1 360 275 51 14.2% 92.3% 90.9% 417
2006 Q4 402 306 69 17.2% 94.4% 86.1% 395
2006 Q3 385 309 51 13.2% 83.3% 93.7% 411
2006 Q2 419 324 79 18.9% 75.0% 93.4% 419
2006 Q1 294 242 48 16.3% 68.4% 93.7% 388
2005 Q4 356 271 65 18.3% 90.0% 92.5% 340
2005 Q3 428 333 72 16.8% 80.0% 80.6% 362
2005 Q2 460 381 61 13.3% 88.9% 82.9% 447
2005 Q1 381 292 69 18.1% 50.0% 76.2% 493
2004 Q4 401 324 71 17.7% 42.9% 67.2% 410
2004 Q3 441 379 59 13.4% 33.3% 38.0% 403
2004 Q2 487 430 56 11.5% 62.5% 57.8% 649
2004 Q1 338 287 51 15.1% 50.0% 70.4% 250
2003 Q4 411 352 52 12.7% 53.3% 76.5% 340
2003 Q3 421 359 62 14.7% 53.8% 72.4% 453
2003 Q2 436 370 55 12.6% 57.1% 77.7% 449
2003 Q1 376 333 37 9.8% 42.9% 60.3% 426
2002 Q4 392 357 35 8.9% 46.2% 56.7% 396
2002 Q3 388 369 19 4.9% 60.0% 52.2% 412
2002 Q2 341 316 23 6.7% 20.0% 61.3% 386
2002 Q1 277 250 20 7.2% 50.0% 57.9% 429
2001 Q4 320 296 14 4.4% 37.5% 63.0% 315
2001 Q3 353 315 24 6.8% 64.3% 63.6% 365
2001 Q2 351 325 16 4.6% 50.0% 65.2% 395
2001 Q1 238 209 17 7.1% 41.2% 56.0% 343
2000 Q4 238 226 12 5.0% 25.0% 63.9% 234
2000 Q3 275 251 24 8.7% 33.3% 55.2% 328
2000 Q2 256 239 17 6.6% 46.2% 69.5% 375
2000 Q1 222 210 12 5.4% 53.8% 75.8% 350
1999 Q4 301 288 13 4.3% 61.1% 73.4% 264
1999 Q3 288 280 8 2.8% 68.8% 69.4% 305
1999 Q2 279 269 10 3.6% 50.0% 71.6% 280
1999 Q1 243 221 19 7.8% 53.3% 65.5% 307
1998 Q4 269 255 13 4.8% 25.0% 58.9% 250
1998 Q3 298 284 10 3.4% 35.3% 70.5% 288
1998 Q2 273 248 23 8.4% 33.3% 50.0% 318
1998 Q1 300 277 20 6.7% 25.0% 60.5% 299
1997 Q4 310 272 28 9.0% 68.8% 57.0% 254
1997 Q3 253 227 17 6.7% 70.0% 65.2% 281
1997 Q2 278 258 13 4.7% 41.7% 63.9% 327
1997 Q1 220 200 12 5.5% 50.0% 67.8% 261
1996 Q4 247 229 14 5.7% 52.9% 64.9% 234
1996 Q3 284 254 22 7.7% 52.9% 62.1% 285
1996 Q2 208 194 11 5.3% 50.0% 73.9% 290
1996 Q1 276 246 30 10.9% 25.0% 63.9% —
1995 Q4 258 231 27 10.5% 42.9% 47.7% —
1995 Q3 364 333 31 8.5% 40.0% 43.2% —
1995 Q2 253 229 24 9.5% 50.0% 33.3% —
1995 Q1 276 257 19 6.9% 50.0% 50.0% —
1994 Q4 279 253 26 9.3% 50.0% 50.7% —
1994 Q3 281 253 28 10.0% 63.6% 32.1% —
1994 Q2 326 284 42 12.9% 33.3% 32.1% —
1994 Q1 267 234 33 12.4% 80.0% 43.9% —
1993 Q4 270 235 35 13.0% 70.0% 52.6% —
1993 Q3 325 297 28 8.6% 42.9% 52.4% —
1993 Q2 301 283 18 6.0% 57.1% 60.6% —
1993 Q1 231 209 22 9.5% 50.0% 56.9% —
1992 Q4 248 223 25 10.1% 60.0% 45.5% —
1992 Q3 310 286 24 7.7% 63.6% 55.4% —
1992 Q2 301 277 24 8.0% 50.0% 60.3% —
1992 Q1 274 248 26 9.5% 50.0% 43.2% —
1991 Q4 291 268 23 7.9% 45.5% 59.5% —
1991 Q3 330 287 43 13.0% 20.0% 58.4% —
1991 Q2 332 283 49 14.8% 85.7% 47.0% —
1991 Q1 299 247 52 17.4% 40.0% 57.3% —
1990 Q4 328 269 59 18.0% 58.3% 57.1% —
1990 Q3 403 344 59 14.6% 50.0% 42.9% —
1990 Q2 426 369 57 13.4% 45.5% 41.2% —
1990 Q1 343 288 55 16.0% 31.3% 36.6% —
1989 Q4 281 244 37 13.2% 63.6% 37.0% —
1989 Q3 454 379 75 16.5% 30.0% 22.5% —
1989 Q2 409 354 55 13.4% 38.5% 20.0% —
1989 Q1 360 296 64 17.8% 45.0% 41.2% —
1988 Q4 377 326 51 13.5% 55.6% 44.2% —
1988 Q3 530 436 94 17.7% 61.1% 35.2% —
1988 Q2 494 421 73 14.8% 75.0% 51.8% —
1988 Q1 400 339 61 15.3% 85.7% 54.0% —
1987 Q4 295 248 47 15.9% 72.7% 57.9% —
1987 Q3 446 386 60 13.5% 88.2% 59.6% —
1987 Q2 441 383 58 13.2% 86.7% 63.2% —
1987 Q1 290 254 36 12.4% 50.0% 58.0% —
1986 Q4 307 264 43 14.0% 63.2% 62.1% —
1986 Q3 354 297 57 16.1% 69.2% 53.4% —
1986 Q2 292 255 37 12.7% 100.0% 60.9% —
1986 Q1 220 191 29 13.2% 83.3% 61.2% —
1985 Q4 222 192 30 13.5% 58.3% 75.0% —
1985 Q3 259 228 31 12.0% 60.0% 68.3% —
1985 Q2 322 269 53 16.5% 46.7% 61.8% —
1985 Q1 299 263 36 12.0% 63.0% 67.9% —
1984 Q4 247 217 30 12.1% 69.2% 68.3% —
1984 Q3 364 322 42 11.5% 64.7% 68.7% —
1984 Q2 319 269 50 15.7% 63.6% 72.1% —
1984 Q1 267 234 33 12.4% 77.8% 71.2% —
1983 Q4 154 129 25 16.2% 33.3% 51.0% —
1983 Q3 271 235 36 13.3% 83.3% 79.4% —
1983 Q2 338 314 24 7.1% 83.3% 68.3% —
1983 Q1 276 239 37 13.4% 100.0% 65.2% —
1982 Q4 209 191 18 8.6% 83.3% 65.2% —
1982 Q3 294 256 38 12.9% 100.0% 62.1% —
1982 Q2 250 217 33 13.2% 66.7% 66.1% —
1982 Q1 192 163 29 15.1% 75.0% 65.6% —
1981 Q4 219 188 31 14.2% 75.0% 75.8% —
1981 Q3 234 209 25 10.7% 66.7% 82.7% —
1981 Q2 328 287 41 12.5% 91.7% 80.4% —
1981 Q1 246 223 23 9.3% 83.3% 80.9% —
1980 Q4 226 198 28 12.4% 100.0% 83.2% —
1980 Q3 343 305 38 11.1% 84.2% 84.6% —
1980 Q2 343 298 45 13.1% 80.0% 76.6% —
1980 Q1 265 245 20 7.5% 87.5% 80.6% —
1979 Q4 296 267 29 9.8% 75.0% 90.2% —
1979 Q3 356 321 35 9.8% 92.9% 81.7% —
1979 Q2 340 294 46 13.5% 88.9% 73.5% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me