← All authorities

East Lindsey

East Midlands · E07000137 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
773
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
6.6%
higher than 17% of authorities
Majors in time
80.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
93.4%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
95.4%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.3%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
18.3%
22 allowed of 120 decided
Decisions overturned
0.4%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.9%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
833
in the window
Applications decided
773
in the window
Approval rate
93.4%
722 granted, 51 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 33 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
93.1%
rank 122 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 68 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major5994.9%80.0%
Minor28091.1%93.4%
Other43494.7%—
of which householder24494.7%95.4%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01202402024 Q3: 192 received2024 Q3: 184 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 216 received2024 Q4: 212 decided2025 Q1: 221 received2025 Q1: 174 decided2025 Q2: 226 received2025 Q2: 240 decided2025 Q3: 214 received2025 Q3: 221 decided2025 Q4: 221 received2025 Q4: 183 decided2026 Q1: 185 received2026 Q1: 173 decided2026 Q2: 213 received2026 Q2: 196 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
129%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000137). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 196 183 13 6.6% 75.0% 91.3% 213
2026 Q1 173 166 7 4.0% 75.0% 100.0% 185
2025 Q4 183 166 17 9.3% 75.0% 87.2% 221
2025 Q3 221 207 14 6.3% 100.0% 97.4% 214
2025 Q2 240 225 15 6.3% 88.9% 70.3% 226
2025 Q1 174 162 12 6.9% 100.0% 90.5% 221
2024 Q4 212 199 13 6.1% 100.0% 95.7% 216
2024 Q3 184 171 13 7.1% 100.0% 88.9% 192
2024 Q2 268 259 9 3.4% 100.0% 86.5% 200
2024 Q1 254 234 20 7.9% 60.0% 82.5% 276
2023 Q4 258 241 17 6.6% 57.1% 88.2% 254
2023 Q3 261 248 13 5.0% 25.0% 69.6% 270
2023 Q2 256 244 12 4.7% 40.0% 76.5% 286
2023 Q1 281 270 11 3.9% 90.0% 82.8% 276
2022 Q4 301 287 14 4.7% 25.0% 75.0% 331
2022 Q3 308 292 16 5.2% 44.4% 78.6% 271
2022 Q2 323 304 19 5.9% 57.1% 78.6% 341
2022 Q1 240 225 15 6.3% 90.0% 83.7% 346
2021 Q4 263 242 21 8.0% 100.0% 91.4% 298
2021 Q3 335 315 20 6.0% 100.0% 98.4% 305
2021 Q2 325 310 15 4.6% 100.0% 100.0% 354
2021 Q1 263 255 8 3.0% 100.0% 100.0% 342
2020 Q4 313 303 10 3.2% 100.0% 100.0% 317
2020 Q3 252 249 3 1.2% 100.0% 98.2% 327
2020 Q2 268 259 9 3.4% 100.0% 100.0% 257
2020 Q1 272 259 13 4.8% 100.0% 100.0% 300
2019 Q4 276 259 17 6.2% 100.0% 100.0% 301
2019 Q3 320 301 19 5.9% 100.0% 100.0% 306
2019 Q2 295 273 22 7.5% 100.0% 98.8% 300
2019 Q1 264 245 19 7.2% 100.0% 100.0% 302
2018 Q4 294 278 16 5.4% 100.0% 100.0% 298
2018 Q3 305 272 33 10.8% 100.0% 100.0% 315
2018 Q2 302 274 28 9.3% 100.0% 100.0% 329
2018 Q1 305 275 30 9.8% 100.0% 100.0% 318
2017 Q4 316 280 36 11.4% 100.0% 99.0% 338
2017 Q3 308 259 49 15.9% 100.0% 99.0% 332
2017 Q2 342 320 22 6.4% 100.0% 99.0% 330
2017 Q1 302 251 51 16.9% 100.0% 100.0% 364
2016 Q4 354 303 51 14.4% 100.0% 99.1% 341
2016 Q3 352 317 35 9.9% 100.0% 100.0% 359
2016 Q2 387 325 62 16.0% 92.3% 99.0% 383
2016 Q1 277 235 42 15.2% 100.0% 100.0% 373
2015 Q4 306 269 37 12.1% 100.0% 98.1% 325
2015 Q3 317 284 33 10.4% 100.0% 96.7% 309
2015 Q2 310 284 26 8.4% 100.0% 85.9% 303
2015 Q1 258 238 20 7.8% 100.0% 78.1% 330
2014 Q4 325 283 42 12.9% 68.4% 82.6% 295
2014 Q3 295 260 35 11.9% 72.7% 78.4% 332
2014 Q2 290 254 36 12.4% 42.9% 74.5% 314
2014 Q1 294 254 33 11.2% 50.0% 83.6% 335
2013 Q4 293 258 26 8.9% 83.3% 80.2% 330
2013 Q3 309 274 30 9.7% 66.7% 80.0% 316
2013 Q2 263 231 28 10.6% 54.5% 76.2% 305
2013 Q1 240 207 27 11.3% 66.7% 84.3% 308
2012 Q4 269 241 26 9.7% 71.4% 82.9% 280
2012 Q3 286 236 43 15.0% 58.3% 80.8% 291
2012 Q2 284 249 30 10.6% 50.0% 89.3% 277
2012 Q1 251 218 28 11.2% 42.9% 80.9% 297
2011 Q4 318 280 36 11.3% 62.5% 88.4% 332
2011 Q3 321 265 49 15.3% 75.0% 89.9% 360
2011 Q2 275 231 38 13.8% 45.5% 86.8% 295
2011 Q1 259 210 41 15.8% 69.2% 92.8% 309
2010 Q4 331 288 40 12.1% 75.0% 84.6% 284
2010 Q3 309 253 52 16.8% 73.3% 92.3% 346
2010 Q2 325 259 58 17.8% 90.9% 85.5% 346
2010 Q1 291 230 54 18.6% 72.7% 90.4% 337
2009 Q4 312 254 52 16.7% 88.9% 85.6% 323
2009 Q3 318 255 60 18.9% 53.8% 91.3% 343
2009 Q2 321 269 45 14.0% 44.4% 92.5% 347
2009 Q1 241 182 58 24.1% 85.7% 92.5% 327
2008 Q4 345 289 52 15.1% 76.9% 91.2% 294
2008 Q3 415 338 76 18.3% 74.1% 89.3% 382
2008 Q2 370 296 74 20.0% 75.0% 81.5% 448
2008 Q1 406 309 93 22.9% 63.6% 82.6% 406
2007 Q4 407 315 92 22.6% 81.8% 81.3% 439
2007 Q3 449 371 77 17.1% 66.7% 84.0% 476
2007 Q2 441 351 90 20.4% 76.9% 92.0% 467
2007 Q1 409 347 61 14.9% 84.6% 84.3% 504
2006 Q4 441 364 77 17.5% 84.2% 83.2% 446
2006 Q3 496 429 62 12.5% 65.0% 85.2% 473
2006 Q2 508 444 55 10.8% 47.4% 75.1% 520
2006 Q1 450 377 62 13.8% 70.0% 83.7% 543
2005 Q4 524 449 70 13.4% 53.6% 83.3% 503
2005 Q3 574 508 59 10.3% 61.9% 81.6% 535
2005 Q2 569 469 89 15.6% 75.0% 68.6% 590
2005 Q1 491 413 75 15.3% 64.3% 62.4% 536
2004 Q4 489 404 78 16.0% 36.4% 52.6% 507
2004 Q3 488 430 53 10.9% 50.0% 60.6% 531
2004 Q2 494 436 50 10.1% 77.3% 62.2% 529
2004 Q1 421 351 61 14.5% 40.0% 63.5% 505
2003 Q4 449 389 51 11.4% 63.6% 73.7% 471
2003 Q3 563 491 62 11.0% 76.2% 82.2% 551
2003 Q2 624 550 70 11.2% 67.9% 66.8% 620
2003 Q1 449 391 55 12.2% 59.3% 36.0% 493
2002 Q4 493 431 59 12.0% 11.1% 49.0% 460
2002 Q3 541 457 59 10.9% 27.3% 52.5% 545
2002 Q2 510 443 55 10.8% 50.0% 64.5% 517
2002 Q1 389 328 56 14.4% 41.7% 52.2% 480
2001 Q4 502 445 52 10.4% 30.8% 68.8% 420
2001 Q3 490 418 59 12.0% 16.7% 67.0% 527
2001 Q2 496 417 57 11.5% 100.0% 65.8% 493
2001 Q1 412 347 39 9.5% 8.3% 68.5% 497
2000 Q4 474 389 52 11.0% 36.4% 66.9% 442
2000 Q3 497 387 57 11.5% 60.0% 62.0% 471
2000 Q2 512 448 36 7.0% 63.6% 58.8% 528
2000 Q1 395 338 43 10.9% 40.0% 68.7% 504
1999 Q4 467 399 65 13.9% 50.0% 66.8% 422
1999 Q3 460 398 59 12.8% 53.8% 61.5% 457
1999 Q2 487 430 57 11.7% 76.9% 68.9% 544
1999 Q1 390 324 60 15.4% 20.0% 62.0% 412
1998 Q4 422 353 58 13.7% 46.7% 61.2% 414
1998 Q3 491 437 48 9.8% 55.6% 61.3% 475
1998 Q2 518 452 52 10.0% 54.2% 62.5% 513
1998 Q1 438 374 52 11.9% 54.3% 61.3% 526
1997 Q4 541 457 65 12.0% 66.7% 69.7% 480
1997 Q3 436 379 46 10.6% 72.2% 71.2% 515
1997 Q2 501 429 59 11.8% 50.0% 63.9% 519
1997 Q1 406 355 41 10.1% 41.7% 56.4% 471
1996 Q4 471 398 62 13.2% 78.9% 64.8% 453
1996 Q3 459 389 57 12.4% 70.0% 64.0% 461
1996 Q2 461 404 42 9.1% 40.0% 66.8% 517
1996 Q1 362 315 47 13.0% 50.0% 47.9% —
1995 Q4 339 283 56 16.5% 77.8% 48.8% —
1995 Q3 343 288 55 16.0% 37.5% 42.7% —
1995 Q2 409 351 58 14.2% 57.1% 44.0% —
1995 Q1 344 284 60 17.4% 66.7% 47.9% —
1994 Q4 401 311 90 22.4% 60.0% 50.5% —
1994 Q3 420 336 84 20.0% 71.4% 55.5% —
1994 Q2 393 328 65 16.5% 11.1% 56.8% —
1994 Q1 358 300 58 16.2% 33.3% 45.0% —
1993 Q4 382 309 73 19.1% 41.7% 49.0% —
1993 Q3 410 347 63 15.4% 75.0% 58.8% —
1993 Q2 378 329 49 13.0% 50.0% 63.2% —
1993 Q1 357 298 59 16.5% 33.3% 45.3% —
1992 Q4 376 317 59 15.7% 50.0% 51.6% —
1992 Q3 379 327 52 13.7% 50.0% 60.0% —
1992 Q2 353 290 63 17.8% 46.2% 63.0% —
1992 Q1 424 326 98 23.1% 53.8% 60.9% —
1991 Q4 441 334 107 24.3% 63.2% 52.1% —
1991 Q3 399 313 86 21.6% 44.4% 47.0% —
1991 Q2 447 367 80 17.9% 57.1% 59.8% —
1991 Q1 391 298 93 23.8% 60.0% 37.5% —
1990 Q4 423 300 123 29.1% 50.0% 51.3% —
1990 Q3 503 399 104 20.7% 83.3% 42.3% —
1990 Q2 477 371 106 22.2% 50.0% 46.6% —
1990 Q1 594 406 188 31.6% 75.0% 29.4% —
1989 Q4 500 387 113 22.6% 12.5% 26.1% —
1989 Q3 573 413 160 27.9% 50.0% 26.3% —
1989 Q2 508 382 126 24.8% 12.5% 36.2% —
1989 Q1 735 544 191 26.0% 20.0% 37.3% —
1988 Q4 521 399 122 23.4% 38.5% 29.3% —
1988 Q3 738 616 122 16.5% 40.0% 16.5% —
1988 Q2 501 411 90 18.0% 33.3% 19.4% —
1988 Q1 455 370 85 18.7% 28.6% 17.3% —
1987 Q4 446 361 85 19.1% 50.0% 28.8% —
1987 Q3 736 655 81 11.0% 72.7% 66.4% —
1987 Q2 633 567 66 10.4% 85.7% 64.0% —
1987 Q1 488 441 47 9.6% 72.0% 60.4% —
1986 Q4 496 434 62 12.5% 79.2% 80.5% —
1986 Q3 570 507 63 11.1% 83.3% 69.6% —
1986 Q2 552 464 88 15.9% 75.0% 72.8% —
1986 Q1 496 447 49 9.9% 80.8% 64.4% —
1985 Q4 505 437 68 13.5% 72.7% 71.2% —
1985 Q3 676 597 79 11.7% 82.4% 64.6% —
1985 Q2 566 491 75 13.3% 80.0% 57.7% —
1985 Q1 491 421 70 14.3% 74.2% 66.4% —
1984 Q4 485 427 58 12.0% 68.8% 70.3% —
1984 Q3 537 461 76 14.2% 86.4% 65.8% —
1984 Q2 610 533 77 12.6% 85.0% 62.6% —
1984 Q1 427 369 58 13.6% 73.7% 58.0% —
1983 Q4 364 308 56 15.4% 82.4% 75.0% —
1983 Q3 454 395 59 13.0% 89.5% 74.9% —
1983 Q2 541 468 73 13.5% 78.9% 53.3% —
1983 Q1 481 414 67 13.9% 54.5% 60.0% —
1982 Q4 387 325 62 16.0% 57.1% 58.5% —
1982 Q3 535 468 67 12.5% 75.0% 62.1% —
1982 Q2 531 432 99 18.6% 87.5% 62.5% —
1982 Q1 386 330 56 14.5% 78.6% 60.1% —
1981 Q4 443 371 72 16.3% 61.1% 67.2% —
1981 Q3 458 386 72 15.7% 73.7% 68.7% —
1981 Q2 722 604 118 16.3% 72.7% 54.0% —
1981 Q1 544 464 80 14.7% 71.9% 72.8% —
1980 Q4 606 482 124 20.5% 72.7% 68.9% —
1980 Q3 627 509 118 18.8% 82.6% 73.5% —
1980 Q2 822 683 139 16.9% 85.7% 75.9% —
1980 Q1 663 550 113 17.0% 71.4% 71.2% —
1979 Q4 617 507 110 17.8% 63.0% 75.5% —
1979 Q3 646 553 93 14.4% 85.7% 81.2% —
1979 Q2 626 522 104 16.6% 64.7% 80.3% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me