← All authorities

Boston

East Midlands · E07000136 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
302
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
8.6%
higher than 30% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
80.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
96.6%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
16.3%
7 allowed of 43 decided
Decisions overturned
0.4%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 17.1%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
305
in the window
Applications decided
302
in the window
Approval rate
91.4%
276 granted, 26 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 57 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
86.1%
rank 225 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 121 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2688.5%100.0%
Minor10089.0%80.0%
Other17693.2%—
of which householder8096.3%96.6%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0521032024 Q3: 77 received2024 Q3: 72 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 103 received2024 Q4: 93 decided2025 Q1: 98 received2025 Q1: 77 decided2025 Q2: 68 received2025 Q2: 84 decided2025 Q3: 61 received2025 Q3: 79 decided2025 Q4: 84 received2025 Q4: 68 decided2026 Q1: 83 received2026 Q1: 75 decided2026 Q2: 77 received2026 Q2: 80 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
127%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000136). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 80 75 5 6.3% 100.0% 75.0% 77
2026 Q1 75 67 8 10.7% — 45.5% 83
2025 Q4 68 64 4 5.9% 100.0% 100.0% 84
2025 Q3 79 70 9 11.4% 100.0% 94.1% 61
2025 Q2 84 77 7 8.3% 100.0% 75.0% 68
2025 Q1 77 69 8 10.4% 60.0% 70.0% 98
2024 Q4 93 90 3 3.2% 100.0% 100.0% 103
2024 Q3 72 69 3 4.2% 50.0% 100.0% 77
2024 Q2 88 83 5 5.7% 66.7% 100.0% 82
2024 Q1 75 66 9 12.0% 100.0% 88.9% 93
2023 Q4 66 63 3 4.5% 100.0% 91.7% 92
2023 Q3 69 64 5 7.2% 100.0% 83.3% 71
2023 Q2 80 74 6 7.5% 100.0% 64.3% 76
2023 Q1 88 84 4 4.5% 66.7% 75.0% 95
2022 Q4 93 89 4 4.3% 100.0% 78.6% 100
2022 Q3 94 89 5 5.3% — 100.0% 98
2022 Q2 96 95 1 1.0% 100.0% 69.2% 92
2022 Q1 74 67 7 9.5% 100.0% 75.0% 104
2021 Q4 86 76 10 11.6% 66.7% 83.3% 89
2021 Q3 126 119 7 5.6% 100.0% 96.3% 111
2021 Q2 111 101 10 9.0% — 88.9% 127
2021 Q1 90 81 9 10.0% 100.0% 94.4% 129
2020 Q4 104 94 10 9.6% 100.0% 91.3% 107
2020 Q3 71 64 7 9.9% 100.0% 90.9% 102
2020 Q2 82 68 14 17.1% 100.0% 77.8% 75
2020 Q1 87 79 8 9.2% — 85.7% 93
2019 Q4 111 101 10 9.0% 100.0% 53.3% 90
2019 Q3 113 103 10 8.8% 100.0% 72.2% 115
2019 Q2 80 78 2 2.5% 66.7% 89.5% 102
2019 Q1 93 84 9 9.7% 75.0% 81.3% 104
2018 Q4 94 81 13 13.8% 100.0% 77.8% 110
2018 Q3 116 101 15 12.9% 100.0% 75.0% 125
2018 Q2 104 92 12 11.5% 55.6% 50.0% 107
2018 Q1 111 103 8 7.2% 20.0% 48.4% 114
2017 Q4 81 74 7 8.6% 75.0% 73.9% 139
2017 Q3 106 100 6 5.7% 100.0% 88.9% 109
2017 Q2 72 67 5 6.9% 85.7% 75.9% 105
2017 Q1 101 92 9 8.9% 73.3% 76.3% 99
2016 Q4 105 95 10 9.5% 100.0% 68.6% 105
2016 Q3 86 80 6 7.0% 55.6% 45.7% 133
2016 Q2 104 91 13 12.5% 57.1% 65.8% 98
2016 Q1 101 91 10 9.9% 50.0% 70.6% 31
2015 Q4 107 99 8 7.5% 33.3% 81.3% 116
2015 Q3 87 82 5 5.7% 40.0% 62.5% 116
2015 Q2 111 105 6 5.4% 57.1% 54.8% 105
2015 Q1 65 59 6 9.2% 75.0% 67.9% 103
2014 Q4 85 76 9 10.6% 83.3% 58.3% 94
2014 Q3 92 84 8 8.7% 100.0% 72.4% 113
2014 Q2 90 86 4 4.4% 83.3% 65.5% 101
2014 Q1 100 90 9 9.0% 60.0% 80.0% 101
2013 Q4 90 86 3 3.3% 62.5% 67.9% 104
2013 Q3 91 85 6 6.6% 83.3% 84.8% 107
2013 Q2 103 94 7 6.8% 66.7% 78.1% 93
2013 Q1 96 85 9 9.4% 0.0% 79.4% 108
2012 Q4 83 76 5 6.0% 100.0% 70.0% 107
2012 Q3 76 71 2 2.6% 100.0% 65.2% 74
2012 Q2 88 79 5 5.7% 85.7% 57.1% 84
2012 Q1 98 93 4 4.1% 62.5% 66.7% 90
2011 Q4 113 103 9 8.0% 66.7% 75.8% 111
2011 Q3 112 101 11 9.8% 80.0% 77.1% 122
2011 Q2 98 85 10 10.2% 80.0% 64.4% 100
2011 Q1 113 103 7 6.2% 71.4% 75.0% 140
2010 Q4 84 76 6 7.1% 100.0% 78.6% 94
2010 Q3 123 109 14 11.4% 66.7% 67.3% 132
2010 Q2 105 95 8 7.6% 100.0% 63.3% 115
2010 Q1 70 64 4 5.7% 60.0% 76.9% 114
2009 Q4 80 75 5 6.3% 75.0% 75.0% 88
2009 Q3 110 93 16 14.5% 80.0% 56.3% 107
2009 Q2 87 80 6 6.9% 50.0% 65.5% 100
2009 Q1 93 81 11 11.8% 50.0% 65.8% 105
2008 Q4 130 115 14 10.8% 60.0% 69.8% 138
2008 Q3 159 133 25 15.7% 60.0% 76.2% 164
2008 Q2 183 153 29 15.8% 100.0% 91.6% 200
2008 Q1 127 104 21 16.5% 80.0% 89.1% 179
2007 Q4 146 128 17 11.6% 71.4% 84.2% 166
2007 Q3 161 132 29 18.0% 81.8% 81.3% 172
2007 Q2 168 145 22 13.1% 100.0% 67.2% 163
2007 Q1 133 108 21 15.8% 81.8% 71.2% 188
2006 Q4 181 153 25 13.8% 58.3% 74.6% 173
2006 Q3 182 167 11 6.0% 66.7% 80.3% 208
2006 Q2 186 170 13 7.0% 75.0% 94.7% 184
2006 Q1 182 146 28 15.4% 100.0% 93.8% 226
2005 Q4 184 155 25 13.6% 90.0% 92.9% 189
2005 Q3 165 143 21 12.7% 90.0% 93.0% 201
2005 Q2 180 145 33 18.3% 100.0% 95.7% 187
2005 Q1 199 163 34 17.1% 62.5% 90.4% 215
2004 Q4 250 212 37 14.8% 33.3% 57.4% 185
2004 Q3 285 252 29 10.2% 69.2% 49.1% 248
2004 Q2 199 180 17 8.5% 81.8% 42.6% 256
2004 Q1 236 198 37 15.7% 45.5% 25.2% 237
2003 Q4 165 145 20 12.1% 33.3% 35.4% 192
2003 Q3 164 142 22 13.4% 46.2% 58.0% 211
2003 Q2 263 240 22 8.4% 44.4% 38.7% 198
2003 Q1 127 113 14 11.0% 50.0% 19.0% 210
2002 Q4 144 128 15 10.4% 44.4% 9.8% 129
2002 Q3 190 160 29 15.3% 25.0% 22.4% 172
2002 Q2 148 138 10 6.8% 42.9% 14.3% 169
2002 Q1 111 102 9 8.1% 50.0% 34.2% 178
2001 Q4 161 153 8 5.0% 61.5% 63.1% 144
2001 Q3 144 133 10 6.9% 75.0% 71.7% 176
2001 Q2 160 146 14 8.8% 60.0% 67.3% 175
2001 Q1 133 124 7 5.3% 30.8% 75.0% 151
2000 Q4 147 141 6 4.1% 100.0% 94.4% 137
2000 Q3 165 155 10 6.1% 87.5% 65.5% 168
2000 Q2 145 138 6 4.1% 54.5% 53.1% 160
2000 Q1 135 127 7 5.2% 66.7% 46.7% 150
1999 Q4 114 108 5 4.4% 71.4% 53.2% 111
1999 Q3 154 147 7 4.5% 28.6% 56.3% 141
1999 Q2 159 153 6 3.8% 100.0% 48.5% 151
1999 Q1 137 127 9 6.6% 40.0% 58.6% 173
1998 Q4 151 138 13 8.6% 50.0% 47.2% 130
1998 Q3 151 141 9 6.0% 50.0% 44.8% 161
1998 Q2 180 167 10 5.6% 0.0% 19.0% 137
1998 Q1 114 105 9 7.9% 50.0% 13.5% 176
1997 Q4 115 105 9 7.8% 50.0% 27.5% 116
1997 Q3 144 127 13 9.0% 66.7% 45.2% 156
1997 Q2 180 169 10 5.6% 57.1% 42.9% 168
1997 Q1 127 116 10 7.9% 66.7% 59.2% 166
1996 Q4 140 121 16 11.4% 55.6% 58.8% 133
1996 Q3 154 144 7 4.5% 71.4% 64.5% 161
1996 Q2 133 117 15 11.3% 71.4% 60.0% 155
1996 Q1 136 123 13 9.6% 50.0% 69.7% —
1995 Q4 128 122 6 4.7% 83.3% 72.2% —
1995 Q3 190 180 10 5.3% 0.0% 64.5% —
1995 Q2 169 157 12 7.1% 75.0% 75.0% —
1995 Q1 155 139 16 10.3% 50.0% 81.8% —
1994 Q4 149 138 11 7.4% 77.8% 58.3% —
1994 Q3 180 168 12 6.7% 44.4% 61.3% —
1994 Q2 153 144 9 5.9% 90.9% 76.5% —
1994 Q1 137 128 9 6.6% 88.9% 60.3% —
1993 Q4 122 108 14 11.5% 100.0% 75.0% —
1993 Q3 172 159 13 7.6% 85.7% 72.1% —
1993 Q2 129 121 8 6.2% 100.0% 68.5% —
1993 Q1 153 136 17 11.1% 100.0% 72.5% —
1992 Q4 134 120 14 10.4% 100.0% 71.9% —
1992 Q3 132 123 9 6.8% 100.0% 72.7% —
1992 Q2 172 157 15 8.7% 90.9% 63.2% —
1992 Q1 233 213 20 8.6% 77.8% 64.6% —
1991 Q4 200 169 31 15.5% 64.3% 70.7% —
1991 Q3 161 145 16 9.9% 60.0% 86.0% —
1991 Q2 178 161 17 9.6% 88.2% 74.6% —
1991 Q1 156 132 24 15.4% 85.7% 71.1% —
1990 Q4 205 174 31 15.1% 100.0% 87.3% —
1990 Q3 199 158 41 20.6% 72.7% 82.6% —
1990 Q2 250 202 48 19.2% 76.2% 84.8% —
1990 Q1 226 202 24 10.6% 61.1% 83.0% —
1989 Q4 233 183 50 21.5% 100.0% 83.3% —
1989 Q3 211 167 44 20.9% 71.4% 74.7% —
1989 Q2 265 209 56 21.1% 88.9% 76.4% —
1989 Q1 291 228 63 21.6% 57.9% 57.4% —
1988 Q4 272 215 57 21.0% 50.0% 60.6% —
1988 Q3 291 230 61 21.0% 55.0% 41.0% —
1988 Q2 280 234 46 16.4% 81.8% 68.7% —
1988 Q1 317 266 51 16.1% 76.9% 73.1% —
1987 Q4 206 189 17 8.3% 71.4% 64.5% —
1987 Q3 461 343 118 25.6% 66.7% 16.1% —
1987 Q2 522 422 100 19.2% 77.8% 41.9% —
1987 Q1 379 295 84 22.2% 81.8% 58.9% —
1986 Q4 422 339 83 19.7% 87.1% 74.7% —
1986 Q3 467 372 95 20.3% 77.8% 66.5% —
1986 Q2 430 345 85 19.8% 100.0% 83.4% —
1986 Q1 359 288 71 19.8% 100.0% 89.2% —
1985 Q4 343 265 78 22.7% 84.6% 70.4% —
1985 Q3 408 304 104 25.5% 94.4% 69.8% —
1985 Q2 275 222 53 19.3% 100.0% 92.9% —
1985 Q1 484 391 93 19.2% 90.0% 70.7% —
1984 Q4 556 447 109 19.6% 72.7% 64.2% —
1984 Q3 500 437 63 12.6% 80.0% 87.7% —
1984 Q2 463 396 67 14.5% 100.0% 89.0% —
1984 Q1 467 395 72 15.4% 77.3% 86.5% —
1983 Q4 708 611 97 13.7% 84.4% 86.5% —
1983 Q3 462 391 71 15.4% 68.4% 74.6% —
1983 Q2 380 285 95 25.0% 75.0% 78.1% —
1983 Q1 343 275 68 19.8% 85.7% 85.0% —
1982 Q4 214 171 43 20.1% 100.0% 89.2% —
1982 Q3 253 202 51 20.2% 100.0% 89.0% —
1982 Q2 507 397 110 21.7% 50.0% 62.9% —
1982 Q1 350 260 90 25.7% 60.0% 41.7% —
1981 Q4 243 198 45 18.5% 33.3% 57.0% —
1981 Q3 331 252 79 23.9% 33.3% 30.3% —
1981 Q2 381 320 61 16.0% 57.1% 31.6% —
1981 Q1 420 345 75 17.9% 75.0% 68.6% —
1980 Q4 420 317 103 24.5% 16.7% 59.9% —
1980 Q3 330 260 70 21.2% 85.7% 44.4% —
1980 Q2 394 307 87 22.1% 58.8% 50.4% —
1980 Q1 482 359 123 25.5% 75.0% 62.2% —
1979 Q4 434 331 103 23.7% 81.3% 69.6% —
1979 Q3 448 314 134 29.9% 84.2% 55.9% —
1979 Q2 432 327 105 24.3% 88.9% 79.5% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me