← All authorities

Harborough

East Midlands · E07000131 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
774
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
11.1%
higher than 45% of authorities
Majors in time
44.4%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
40.9%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
73.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
94.4%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
29.8%
51 allowed of 171 decided
Decisions overturned
1.1%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 14.8%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
925
in the window
Applications decided
774
in the window
Approval rate
88.9%
688 granted, 86 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 81 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
57.6%
rank 303 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 160 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2777.8%44.4%
Minor19883.8%40.9%
Other54991.3%—
of which householder40292.3%73.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01262512024 Q3: 212 received2024 Q3: 181 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 209 received2024 Q4: 163 decided2025 Q1: 250 received2025 Q1: 177 decided2025 Q2: 237 received2025 Q2: 232 decided2025 Q3: 239 received2025 Q3: 200 decided2025 Q4: 214 received2025 Q4: 210 decided2026 Q1: 251 received2026 Q1: 172 decided2026 Q2: 221 received2026 Q2: 192 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
139%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000131). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 192 173 19 9.9% 42.9% 42.3% 221
2026 Q1 172 152 20 11.6% — 56.3% 251
2025 Q4 210 179 31 14.8% 100.0% 39.3% 214
2025 Q3 200 184 16 8.0% 0.0% 30.4% 239
2025 Q2 232 209 23 9.9% 50.0% 63.0% 237
2025 Q1 177 162 15 8.5% 50.0% 35.0% 250
2024 Q4 163 142 21 12.9% 100.0% 61.5% 209
2024 Q3 181 160 21 11.6% 50.0% 58.6% 212
2024 Q2 218 193 25 11.5% 100.0% 62.9% 220
2024 Q1 185 162 23 12.4% 100.0% 75.9% 240
2023 Q4 233 208 25 10.7% 37.5% 58.3% 214
2023 Q3 243 224 19 7.8% 66.7% 60.4% 245
2023 Q2 246 222 24 9.8% 37.5% 31.4% 279
2023 Q1 248 232 16 6.5% 25.0% 39.0% 279
2022 Q4 199 185 14 7.0% 33.3% 54.5% 271
2022 Q3 252 226 26 10.3% 16.7% 35.3% 258
2022 Q2 262 236 26 9.9% 16.7% 47.5% 292
2022 Q1 238 221 17 7.1% 75.0% 47.6% 307
2021 Q4 256 235 21 8.2% 0.0% 66.7% 309
2021 Q3 288 272 16 5.6% 40.0% 63.9% 319
2021 Q2 274 254 20 7.3% 57.1% 75.7% 358
2021 Q1 266 253 13 4.9% 60.0% 66.7% 364
2020 Q4 267 246 21 7.9% 50.0% 78.0% 310
2020 Q3 262 246 16 6.1% 66.7% 80.5% 292
2020 Q2 246 227 19 7.7% 42.9% 77.1% 280
2020 Q1 200 184 16 8.0% 42.9% 82.9% 293
2019 Q4 270 256 14 5.2% 100.0% 69.5% 271
2019 Q3 245 223 22 9.0% 100.0% 77.0% 280
2019 Q2 250 224 26 10.4% 100.0% 86.5% 317
2019 Q1 232 208 24 10.3% 100.0% 80.4% 296
2018 Q4 255 233 22 8.6% 83.3% 79.3% 285
2018 Q3 289 261 28 9.7% 80.0% 77.8% 279
2018 Q2 301 268 33 11.0% 90.0% 80.9% 355
2018 Q1 250 229 21 8.4% 100.0% 64.6% 376
2017 Q4 278 251 27 9.7% 75.0% 70.2% 295
2017 Q3 311 286 25 8.0% 83.3% 80.8% 303
2017 Q2 281 261 20 7.1% 100.0% 90.9% 358
2017 Q1 242 226 16 6.6% 77.8% 77.1% 289
2016 Q4 254 236 18 7.1% 66.7% 80.0% 319
2016 Q3 292 267 25 8.6% 60.0% 77.2% 304
2016 Q2 290 263 27 9.3% 81.8% 76.9% 331
2016 Q1 233 220 13 5.6% 66.7% 73.3% 351
2015 Q4 281 244 37 13.2% 66.7% 81.4% 280
2015 Q3 294 266 28 9.5% 87.5% 68.1% 351
2015 Q2 253 229 24 9.5% 100.0% 83.3% 342
2015 Q1 227 199 28 12.3% 87.5% 69.4% 263
2014 Q4 224 204 20 8.9% 66.7% 70.9% 244
2014 Q3 271 246 25 9.2% 85.7% 76.5% 276
2014 Q2 255 234 21 8.2% 66.7% 60.6% 262
2014 Q1 211 177 33 15.6% 80.0% 66.1% 277
2013 Q4 233 204 28 12.0% 93.3% 58.0% 260
2013 Q3 266 240 19 7.1% 92.3% 63.3% 263
2013 Q2 251 232 18 7.2% 66.7% 59.7% 310
2013 Q1 220 199 17 7.7% 72.7% 59.3% 240
2012 Q4 220 199 18 8.2% 76.9% 55.9% 253
2012 Q3 263 236 23 8.7% 42.9% 63.5% 258
2012 Q2 286 262 18 6.3% 88.9% 73.9% 310
2012 Q1 248 217 28 11.3% 63.6% 70.7% 313
2011 Q4 322 287 26 8.1% 53.3% 67.4% 300
2011 Q3 250 205 36 14.4% 80.0% 79.5% 343
2011 Q2 278 246 29 10.4% 90.9% 81.1% 284
2011 Q1 220 195 24 10.9% 50.0% 68.8% 274
2010 Q4 259 234 23 8.9% 77.8% 72.1% 269
2010 Q3 289 262 26 9.0% 71.4% 83.5% 295
2010 Q2 312 272 39 12.5% 92.3% 74.7% 323
2010 Q1 263 229 33 12.5% 75.0% 75.3% 311
2009 Q4 276 232 43 15.6% 100.0% 81.6% 261
2009 Q3 312 261 49 15.7% 50.0% 72.8% 339
2009 Q2 273 235 38 13.9% 66.7% 70.7% 312
2009 Q1 252 223 28 11.1% 100.0% 78.4% 303
2008 Q4 280 249 30 10.7% 70.0% 70.5% 293
2008 Q3 333 292 39 11.7% 85.7% 65.3% 329
2008 Q2 385 338 45 11.7% 53.8% 71.3% 404
2008 Q1 290 254 35 12.1% 81.8% 73.4% 358
2007 Q4 334 265 57 17.1% 100.0% 72.6% 384
2007 Q3 343 286 45 13.1% 50.0% 74.2% 351
2007 Q2 379 326 48 12.7% 70.0% 75.8% 402
2007 Q1 350 309 36 10.3% 57.1% 69.1% 416
2006 Q4 317 276 39 12.3% 58.3% 62.9% 358
2006 Q3 363 320 37 10.2% 88.9% 76.4% 386
2006 Q2 406 346 56 13.8% 84.6% 76.6% 416
2006 Q1 312 269 41 13.1% 69.2% 66.3% 406
2005 Q4 355 302 48 13.5% 31.3% 76.0% 328
2005 Q3 377 320 55 14.6% 25.0% 69.5% 393
2005 Q2 445 371 71 16.0% 47.6% 48.3% 401
2005 Q1 363 320 42 11.6% 53.8% 61.5% 463
2004 Q4 423 360 55 13.0% 37.5% 62.3% 435
2004 Q3 347 316 28 8.1% 45.5% 48.2% 404
2004 Q2 353 305 42 11.9% 50.0% 65.1% 415
2004 Q1 374 326 46 12.3% 71.4% 81.4% 452
2003 Q4 420 357 59 14.0% 64.3% 70.5% 403
2003 Q3 396 351 42 10.6% 55.6% 72.7% 396
2003 Q2 413 358 50 12.1% 37.5% 64.0% 457
2003 Q1 379 335 38 10.0% 42.9% 57.1% 421
2002 Q4 366 332 30 8.2% 80.0% 69.0% 345
2002 Q3 452 402 45 10.0% 80.0% 76.4% 450
2002 Q2 430 386 40 9.3% 25.0% 71.2% 404
2002 Q1 292 261 20 6.8% 60.0% 73.2% 427
2001 Q4 351 295 42 12.0% 71.4% 66.7% 338
2001 Q3 407 340 39 9.6% 50.0% 59.3% 381
2001 Q2 379 339 35 9.2% 100.0% 55.2% 399
2001 Q1 305 272 21 6.9% 40.0% 51.1% 355
2000 Q4 301 274 19 6.3% 40.0% 46.9% 315
2000 Q3 318 285 28 8.8% 40.0% 45.4% 315
2000 Q2 340 307 28 8.2% 50.0% 51.3% 355
2000 Q1 328 295 13 4.0% 60.0% 49.1% 316
1999 Q4 292 243 37 12.7% 16.7% 41.5% 327
1999 Q3 294 264 17 5.8% 85.7% 37.9% 317
1999 Q2 279 248 23 8.2% 25.0% 41.5% 297
1999 Q1 257 222 29 11.3% 60.0% 42.4% 286
1998 Q4 345 312 28 8.1% 54.5% 33.7% 274
1998 Q3 240 203 34 14.2% 14.3% 27.3% 311
1998 Q2 264 233 26 9.8% 25.0% 32.5% 311
1998 Q1 212 169 25 11.8% 42.9% 41.8% 299
1997 Q4 309 286 22 7.1% 38.5% 37.0% 250
1997 Q3 243 209 31 12.8% 33.3% 43.3% 289
1997 Q2 353 324 22 6.2% 60.0% 33.3% 310
1997 Q1 211 187 18 8.5% 37.5% 37.8% 285
1996 Q4 266 242 19 7.1% 14.3% 47.7% 249
1996 Q3 263 235 25 9.5% 75.0% 49.4% 294
1996 Q2 273 253 16 5.9% 85.7% 60.4% 294
1996 Q1 400 326 74 18.5% 33.3% 36.8% —
1995 Q4 398 313 85 21.4% 0.0% 37.8% —
1995 Q3 358 312 46 12.8% 25.0% 45.9% —
1995 Q2 367 316 51 13.9% 80.0% 31.6% —
1995 Q1 386 325 61 15.8% 25.0% 44.8% —
1994 Q4 411 357 54 13.1% 0.0% 52.5% —
1994 Q3 404 337 67 16.6% 25.0% 38.0% —
1994 Q2 381 309 72 18.9% 0.0% 37.2% —
1994 Q1 361 289 72 19.9% 33.3% 48.2% —
1993 Q4 321 243 78 24.3% 37.5% 50.7% —
1993 Q3 372 280 92 24.7% 62.5% 51.0% —
1993 Q2 305 247 58 19.0% 66.7% 50.7% —
1993 Q1 218 176 42 19.3% 22.2% 46.2% —
1992 Q4 272 216 56 20.6% 50.0% 51.4% —
1992 Q3 396 293 103 26.0% 75.0% 43.3% —
1992 Q2 257 196 61 23.7% 66.7% 45.9% —
1992 Q1 375 288 87 23.2% 44.4% 46.1% —
1991 Q4 424 325 99 23.3% 50.0% 37.2% —
1991 Q3 418 328 90 21.5% 16.7% 31.7% —
1991 Q2 478 355 123 25.7% 0.0% 21.8% —
1991 Q1 247 198 49 19.8% 0.0% 25.5% —
1990 Q4 491 392 99 20.2% 0.0% 33.9% —
1990 Q3 313 235 78 24.9% — 20.4% —
1990 Q2 373 287 86 23.1% 0.0% 26.4% —
1990 Q1 415 299 116 28.0% 50.0% 19.0% —
1989 Q4 429 333 96 22.4% 20.0% 14.1% —
1989 Q3 360 287 73 20.3% 72.7% 29.0% —
1989 Q2 362 276 86 23.8% 46.2% 47.7% —
1989 Q1 315 253 62 19.7% 66.7% 30.4% —
1988 Q4 617 473 144 23.3% — 37.2% —
1988 Q3 671 551 120 17.9% 28.6% 51.2% —
1988 Q2 821 746 75 9.1% 0.0% 38.4% —
1988 Q1 1,040 838 202 19.4% 25.0% 29.7% —
1987 Q4 564 433 131 23.2% — 37.2% —
1987 Q3 348 294 54 15.5% 50.0% 66.4% —
1987 Q2 371 339 32 8.6% 77.8% 68.4% —
1987 Q1 294 259 35 11.9% 80.0% 50.4% —
1986 Q4 308 264 44 14.3% 100.0% 61.4% —
1986 Q3 338 297 41 12.1% 63.6% 77.3% —
1986 Q2 291 264 27 9.3% 11.1% 72.3% —
1986 Q1 221 205 16 7.2% 100.0% 77.7% —
1985 Q4 240 215 25 10.4% 50.0% 73.2% —
1985 Q3 328 296 32 9.8% 72.7% 58.3% —
1985 Q2 240 216 24 10.0% 75.0% 72.5% —
1985 Q1 210 191 19 9.0% 75.0% 71.3% —
1984 Q4 248 225 23 9.3% 50.0% 71.6% —
1984 Q3 232 209 23 9.9% 77.8% 83.9% —
1984 Q2 288 264 24 8.3% 87.5% 78.0% —
1984 Q1 217 197 20 9.2% 75.0% 86.5% —
1983 Q4 231 211 20 8.7% 100.0% 80.6% —
1983 Q3 262 241 21 8.0% 100.0% 68.2% —
1983 Q2 271 254 17 6.3% 100.0% 63.9% —
1983 Q1 204 190 14 6.9% 20.0% 62.0% —
1982 Q4 253 230 23 9.1% 66.7% 55.7% —
1982 Q3 219 203 16 7.3% 100.0% 78.5% —
1982 Q2 279 248 31 11.1% 100.0% 58.1% —
1982 Q1 173 155 18 10.4% 100.0% 54.0% —
1981 Q4 185 166 19 10.3% 50.0% 49.3% —
1981 Q3 212 188 24 11.3% 50.0% 52.7% —
1981 Q2 414 338 76 18.4% 84.6% 36.8% —
1981 Q1 238 211 27 11.3% 100.0% 48.6% —
1980 Q4 272 226 46 16.9% 66.7% 41.3% —
1980 Q3 299 250 49 16.4% 100.0% 48.9% —
1980 Q2 356 307 49 13.8% 71.4% 57.7% —
1980 Q1 358 311 47 13.1% 90.9% 58.7% —
1979 Q4 383 336 47 12.3% 75.0% 61.2% —
1979 Q3 411 361 50 12.2% 90.0% 58.9% —
1979 Q2 362 324 38 10.5% 87.5% 61.0% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me