← All authorities

Lancaster

North West · E07000121 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
654
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
16.7%
higher than 78% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
97.9%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
99.0%
no formal threshold
Delegated
91.9%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
22.3%
45 allowed of 202 decided
Decisions overturned
1.0%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 24.7%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
674
in the window
Applications decided
654
in the window
Approval rate
83.3%
545 granted, 109 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 135 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
98.5%
rank 28 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 11 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3865.8%100.0%
Minor19276.0%97.9%
Other42488.2%—
of which householder27490.5%99.0%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01112212024 Q3: 200 received2024 Q3: 182 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 189 received2024 Q4: 195 decided2025 Q1: 221 received2025 Q1: 170 decided2025 Q2: 192 received2025 Q2: 219 decided2025 Q3: 187 received2025 Q3: 193 decided2025 Q4: 144 received2025 Q4: 146 decided2026 Q1: 195 received2026 Q1: 159 decided2026 Q2: 148 received2026 Q2: 156 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
48%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000121). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 156 132 24 15.4% — 100.0% 148
2026 Q1 159 130 29 18.2% 100.0% 95.8% 195
2025 Q4 146 123 23 15.8% 100.0% 95.2% 144
2025 Q3 193 160 33 17.1% 100.0% 100.0% 187
2025 Q2 219 182 37 16.9% 100.0% 73.7% 192
2025 Q1 170 144 26 15.3% 66.7% 88.2% 221
2024 Q4 195 169 26 13.3% 100.0% 94.3% 189
2024 Q3 182 155 27 14.8% 100.0% 91.7% 200
2024 Q2 231 200 31 13.4% 100.0% 95.0% 206
2024 Q1 219 182 37 16.9% 100.0% 81.6% 217
2023 Q4 186 140 46 24.7% 100.0% 86.1% 227
2023 Q3 197 173 24 12.2% 100.0% 90.9% 220
2023 Q2 211 184 27 12.8% — 75.0% 205
2023 Q1 235 202 33 14.0% 75.0% 86.1% 253
2022 Q4 200 173 27 13.5% 0.0% 86.2% 264
2022 Q3 196 168 28 14.3% 100.0% 88.6% 260
2022 Q2 223 184 39 17.5% 80.0% 80.5% 224
2022 Q1 219 181 38 17.4% 71.4% 77.4% 225
2021 Q4 324 251 73 22.5% 33.3% 54.5% 226
2021 Q3 230 202 28 12.2% 33.3% 14.3% 255
2021 Q2 203 180 23 11.3% 33.3% 27.3% 235
2021 Q1 205 185 20 9.8% 0.0% 20.0% 246
2020 Q4 171 146 25 14.6% 40.0% 35.7% 240
2020 Q3 179 149 30 16.8% 0.0% 60.0% 221
2020 Q2 162 133 29 17.9% 100.0% 75.0% 188
2020 Q1 189 161 28 14.8% 100.0% 90.9% 210
2019 Q4 209 164 45 21.5% 100.0% 96.8% 228
2019 Q3 234 201 33 14.1% 75.0% 97.8% 260
2019 Q2 242 216 26 10.7% 100.0% 100.0% 273
2019 Q1 226 195 31 13.7% 100.0% 97.2% 243
2018 Q4 224 192 32 14.3% 100.0% 98.2% 255
2018 Q3 207 188 19 9.2% 100.0% 100.0% 257
2018 Q2 238 216 22 9.2% 100.0% 100.0% 275
2018 Q1 195 183 12 6.2% 100.0% 100.0% 247
2017 Q4 208 183 25 12.0% 100.0% 100.0% 227
2017 Q3 238 215 23 9.7% 100.0% 100.0% 284
2017 Q2 272 243 29 10.7% 100.0% 100.0% 270
2017 Q1 222 197 25 11.3% 100.0% 98.2% 243
2016 Q4 231 200 31 13.4% 100.0% 96.0% 269
2016 Q3 247 217 30 12.1% 100.0% 87.5% 253
2016 Q2 227 201 26 11.5% 100.0% 76.1% 289
2016 Q1 252 222 30 11.9% 100.0% 77.6% 251
2015 Q4 242 218 24 9.9% 81.8% 55.4% 257
2015 Q3 273 252 21 7.7% 100.0% 32.7% 234
2015 Q2 227 208 19 8.4% 100.0% 42.3% 271
2015 Q1 194 174 20 10.3% 100.0% 48.9% 247
2014 Q4 216 199 17 7.9% 80.0% 38.0% 217
2014 Q3 263 243 20 7.6% 100.0% 68.7% 229
2014 Q2 238 212 26 10.9% 86.7% 57.6% 265
2014 Q1 203 169 27 13.3% 75.0% 68.9% 282
2013 Q4 222 201 18 8.1% 54.5% 55.0% 221
2013 Q3 236 201 31 13.1% 81.8% 70.1% 265
2013 Q2 257 222 32 12.5% 57.1% 76.9% 261
2013 Q1 201 175 22 10.9% 56.3% 55.6% 246
2012 Q4 218 194 21 9.6% 50.0% 64.6% 218
2012 Q3 252 227 19 7.5% 55.6% 54.5% 227
2012 Q2 217 182 28 12.9% 0.0% 40.7% 248
2012 Q1 200 168 22 11.0% 50.0% 59.3% 241
2011 Q4 230 198 23 10.0% 25.0% 55.6% 228
2011 Q3 203 167 30 14.8% 33.3% 46.8% 237
2011 Q2 214 193 17 7.9% 36.4% 54.9% 238
2011 Q1 281 246 29 10.3% 22.2% 45.1% 246
2010 Q4 194 167 26 13.4% 16.7% 50.8% 265
2010 Q3 239 207 27 11.3% 70.0% 56.9% 272
2010 Q2 234 203 26 11.1% 60.0% 60.0% 258
2010 Q1 228 192 30 13.2% 56.3% 70.9% 267
2009 Q4 252 223 21 8.3% 77.8% 62.1% 261
2009 Q3 271 224 42 15.5% 57.1% 77.8% 308
2009 Q2 217 196 21 9.7% 85.7% 75.0% 247
2009 Q1 207 179 23 11.1% 57.1% 87.5% 259
2008 Q4 251 212 35 13.9% 70.0% 77.8% 223
2008 Q3 295 266 27 9.2% 70.0% 79.4% 273
2008 Q2 321 281 37 11.5% 66.7% 74.8% 352
2008 Q1 314 275 34 10.8% 72.7% 79.7% 337
2007 Q4 342 296 43 12.6% 60.0% 81.0% 361
2007 Q3 404 345 58 14.4% 63.6% 86.9% 412
2007 Q2 375 312 58 15.5% 77.8% 85.9% 426
2007 Q1 332 281 45 13.6% 85.7% 83.1% 404
2006 Q4 329 274 48 14.6% 68.4% 81.0% 342
2006 Q3 356 295 53 14.9% 65.2% 79.3% 332
2006 Q2 394 338 50 12.7% 58.3% 64.4% 365
2006 Q1 321 292 28 8.7% 28.6% 76.4% 389
2005 Q4 323 278 41 12.7% 20.0% 73.1% 313
2005 Q3 333 295 37 11.1% 66.7% 67.2% 350
2005 Q2 403 339 60 14.9% 75.0% 87.9% 435
2005 Q1 291 258 31 10.7% 83.3% 86.1% 374
2004 Q4 347 294 49 14.1% 66.7% 91.9% 363
2004 Q3 430 356 71 16.5% 62.5% 85.3% 372
2004 Q2 432 363 63 14.6% 54.5% 76.5% 383
2004 Q1 315 282 32 10.2% 80.0% 57.1% 354
2003 Q4 328 282 41 12.5% 66.7% 63.9% 344
2003 Q3 407 342 64 15.7% 42.9% 61.1% 378
2003 Q2 332 298 33 9.9% 20.0% 53.7% 350
2003 Q1 315 279 34 10.8% 50.0% 45.5% 322
2002 Q4 331 294 36 10.9% 50.0% 62.1% 313
2002 Q3 342 312 27 7.9% 50.0% 49.5% 311
2002 Q2 336 306 29 8.6% 36.4% 63.2% 329
2002 Q1 320 286 32 10.0% 75.0% 59.1% 310
2001 Q4 299 268 29 9.7% 33.3% 55.7% 259
2001 Q3 237 215 21 8.9% 53.8% 42.6% 334
2001 Q2 205 184 18 8.8% 100.0% 57.4% 291
2001 Q1 253 224 25 9.9% 46.7% 62.3% 286
2000 Q4 249 218 26 10.4% 66.7% 68.4% 247
2000 Q3 265 237 26 9.8% 66.7% 54.8% 235
2000 Q2 331 302 26 7.9% 60.0% 71.3% 289
2000 Q1 282 260 15 5.3% 57.1% 68.2% 279
1999 Q4 273 240 31 11.4% 71.4% 59.5% 241
1999 Q3 275 236 34 12.4% 37.5% 61.3% 263
1999 Q2 298 274 22 7.4% 42.9% 51.1% 238
1999 Q1 239 214 23 9.6% 40.0% 53.0% 246
1998 Q4 230 198 30 13.0% 63.6% 43.8% 211
1998 Q3 279 253 25 9.0% 85.7% 50.6% 268
1998 Q2 273 251 20 7.3% 53.3% 60.0% 265
1998 Q1 286 260 25 8.7% 55.6% 70.3% 273
1997 Q4 305 265 39 12.8% 53.8% 54.1% 218
1997 Q3 312 284 25 8.0% 80.0% 60.8% 272
1997 Q2 304 262 34 11.2% 80.0% 57.6% 345
1997 Q1 265 228 31 11.7% 50.0% 49.5% 295
1996 Q4 249 220 24 9.6% 66.7% 65.7% 275
1996 Q3 312 268 36 11.5% 75.0% 60.4% 304
1996 Q2 266 233 29 10.9% 75.0% 67.1% 310
1996 Q1 245 216 29 11.8% 42.9% 57.0% —
1995 Q4 245 208 37 15.1% 50.0% 59.2% —
1995 Q3 302 259 43 14.2% 100.0% 51.0% —
1995 Q2 301 260 41 13.6% 66.7% 57.0% —
1995 Q1 311 276 35 11.3% 85.7% 53.1% —
1994 Q4 249 219 30 12.0% 50.0% 57.5% —
1994 Q3 234 200 34 14.5% 60.0% 61.8% —
1994 Q2 258 237 21 8.1% 100.0% 70.1% —
1994 Q1 256 224 32 12.5% 100.0% 53.1% —
1993 Q4 263 231 32 12.2% 57.1% 61.1% —
1993 Q3 246 223 23 9.3% 100.0% 73.8% —
1993 Q2 238 209 29 12.2% 100.0% 52.7% —
1993 Q1 237 208 29 12.2% 100.0% 51.3% —
1992 Q4 293 253 40 13.7% 72.7% 52.8% —
1992 Q3 270 240 30 11.1% 100.0% 53.7% —
1992 Q2 264 217 47 17.8% 100.0% 55.1% —
1992 Q1 324 277 47 14.5% 71.4% 35.3% —
1991 Q4 260 230 30 11.5% 71.4% 35.1% —
1991 Q3 210 169 41 19.5% 50.0% 37.0% —
1991 Q2 240 200 40 16.7% 50.0% 40.4% —
1991 Q1 233 183 50 21.5% 78.6% 31.9% —
1990 Q4 352 290 62 17.6% 66.7% 29.1% —
1990 Q3 312 276 36 11.5% 37.5% 23.3% —
1990 Q2 239 204 35 14.6% 37.5% 25.5% —
1990 Q1 280 246 34 12.1% 11.1% 21.6% —
1989 Q4 287 249 38 13.2% 50.0% 16.8% —
1989 Q3 209 181 28 13.4% 83.3% 28.7% —
1989 Q2 279 249 30 10.8% 20.0% 37.2% —
1989 Q1 234 206 28 12.0% 44.4% 35.3% —
1988 Q4 370 336 34 9.2% 80.0% 37.5% —
1988 Q3 228 149 79 34.6% 25.0% 25.7% —
1988 Q2 290 243 47 16.2% 42.9% 19.4% —
1988 Q1 342 329 13 3.8% 25.0% 37.1% —
1987 Q4 335 307 28 8.4% 80.0% 33.3% —
1987 Q3 311 296 15 4.8% 57.1% 32.0% —
1987 Q2 391 359 32 8.2% — 36.7% —
1987 Q1 299 274 25 8.4% 71.4% 38.5% —
1986 Q4 356 329 27 7.6% 66.7% 44.0% —
1986 Q3 389 340 49 12.6% 63.6% 50.2% —
1986 Q2 256 228 28 10.9% 33.3% 34.0% —
1986 Q1 346 318 28 8.1% 27.3% 42.2% —
1985 Q4 344 323 21 6.1% 50.0% 52.7% —
1985 Q3 404 381 23 5.7% 60.0% 49.6% —
1985 Q2 397 363 34 8.6% 27.8% 51.1% —
1985 Q1 387 360 27 7.0% 63.6% 40.2% —
1984 Q4 299 268 31 10.4% 15.4% 39.2% —
1984 Q3 389 355 34 8.7% 77.8% 52.8% —
1984 Q2 337 310 27 8.0% 44.4% 49.0% —
1984 Q1 543 491 52 9.6% 40.9% 38.2% —
1983 Q4 167 159 8 4.8% 100.0% 62.4% —
1983 Q3 310 283 27 8.7% 66.7% 49.4% —
1983 Q2 359 335 24 6.7% 75.0% 44.1% —
1983 Q1 294 275 19 6.5% 55.6% 47.3% —
1982 Q4 243 224 19 7.8% 75.0% 58.9% —
1982 Q3 306 278 28 9.2% 88.9% 74.2% —
1982 Q2 264 241 23 8.7% 100.0% 63.9% —
1982 Q1 264 239 25 9.5% 50.0% 63.8% —
1981 Q4 262 234 28 10.7% 71.4% 66.1% —
1981 Q3 331 300 31 9.4% 37.5% 56.8% —
1981 Q2 326 293 33 10.1% 25.0% 43.2% —
1981 Q1 405 370 35 8.6% 66.7% 42.7% —
1980 Q4 302 262 40 13.2% 60.0% 24.4% —
1980 Q3 280 257 23 8.2% 27.3% 13.5% —
1980 Q2 286 255 31 10.8% 0.0% 9.8% —
1980 Q1 336 296 40 11.9% 22.2% 11.8% —
1979 Q4 292 265 27 9.2% 20.0% 9.4% —
1979 Q3 245 219 26 10.6% 18.2% 4.5% —
1979 Q2 175 155 20 11.4% 28.6% 11.0% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me