← All authorities

Canterbury

South East · E07000106 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
879
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
5.3%
higher than 9% of authorities
Majors in time
25.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
50.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
69.8%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
28.1%
64 allowed of 228 decided
Decisions overturned
1.0%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.3%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,038
in the window
Applications decided
879
in the window
Approval rate
94.7%
832 granted, 47 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 17 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
61.9%
rank 297 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 157 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2391.3%25.0%
Minor13492.5%50.0%
Other72295.2%—
of which householder54496.9%69.8%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01653302024 Q3: 286 received2024 Q3: 330 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 288 received2024 Q4: 296 decided2025 Q1: 310 received2025 Q1: 273 decided2025 Q2: 264 received2025 Q2: 264 decided2025 Q3: 255 received2025 Q3: 233 decided2025 Q4: 258 received2025 Q4: 208 decided2026 Q1: 236 received2026 Q1: 220 decided2026 Q2: 289 received2026 Q2: 218 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
79%
Buffer

Delivery 75–84%: a 20% buffer is added to the authority's housing land supply requirement.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000106). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 218 203 15 6.9% 0.0% 35.7% 289
2026 Q1 220 215 5 2.3% 50.0% 60.0% 236
2025 Q4 208 197 11 5.3% — 45.5% 258
2025 Q3 233 217 16 6.9% 0.0% 63.6% 255
2025 Q2 264 251 13 4.9% 0.0% 53.8% 264
2025 Q1 273 248 25 9.2% 50.0% 80.0% 310
2024 Q4 296 275 21 7.1% — 72.2% 288
2024 Q3 330 303 27 8.2% — 41.4% 286
2024 Q2 206 188 18 8.7% 100.0% 19.0% 325
2024 Q1 155 148 7 4.5% — 37.5% 250
2023 Q4 235 198 37 15.7% — 50.0% 257
2023 Q3 307 277 30 9.8% 100.0% 65.2% 264
2023 Q2 320 282 38 11.9% 100.0% 73.5% 339
2023 Q1 286 267 19 6.6% — 75.7% 349
2022 Q4 305 278 27 8.9% 66.7% 66.7% 339
2022 Q3 367 332 35 9.5% 75.0% 62.5% 332
2022 Q2 321 300 21 6.5% 0.0% 65.4% 383
2022 Q1 337 305 32 9.5% 50.0% 70.5% 389
2021 Q4 408 362 46 11.3% 100.0% 75.0% 366
2021 Q3 408 391 17 4.2% 80.0% 69.4% 422
2021 Q2 346 331 15 4.3% — 84.6% 460
2021 Q1 387 357 30 7.8% 100.0% 76.9% 441
2020 Q4 316 282 34 10.8% — 87.2% 399
2020 Q3 312 283 29 9.3% 66.7% 68.1% 385
2020 Q2 268 247 21 7.8% — 88.9% 309
2020 Q1 356 315 41 11.5% 60.0% 81.7% 384
2019 Q4 345 312 33 9.6% 75.0% 91.9% 379
2019 Q3 441 398 43 9.8% 100.0% 96.3% 403
2019 Q2 389 354 35 9.0% 100.0% 84.6% 443
2019 Q1 332 301 31 9.3% 60.0% 92.5% 391
2018 Q4 394 346 48 12.2% 80.0% 75.4% 377
2018 Q3 366 332 34 9.3% 100.0% 80.3% 445
2018 Q2 386 326 60 15.5% 60.0% 89.7% 432
2018 Q1 385 339 46 11.9% 66.7% 76.8% 410
2017 Q4 380 333 47 12.4% 80.0% 82.5% 402
2017 Q3 454 393 61 13.4% 75.0% 84.7% 431
2017 Q2 492 430 62 12.6% 90.0% 81.0% 509
2017 Q1 434 371 63 14.5% 75.0% 71.4% 532
2016 Q4 472 395 77 16.3% 77.8% 64.2% 403
2016 Q3 390 346 44 11.3% 0.0% 72.0% 484
2016 Q2 428 365 63 14.7% 40.0% 62.5% 437
2016 Q1 381 345 36 9.4% 71.4% 57.0% 476
2015 Q4 401 357 44 11.0% 100.0% 65.6% 445
2015 Q3 393 348 45 11.5% 100.0% 74.7% 428
2015 Q2 404 356 48 11.9% 100.0% 73.2% 446
2015 Q1 386 336 50 13.0% 75.0% 80.8% 462
2014 Q4 387 328 59 15.2% 80.0% 91.6% 401
2014 Q3 358 323 35 9.8% 100.0% 92.2% 441
2014 Q2 366 322 44 12.0% 83.3% 94.4% 450
2014 Q1 350 290 47 13.4% 75.0% 53.8% 386
2013 Q4 328 281 37 11.3% 75.0% 57.9% 323
2013 Q3 363 313 30 8.3% 50.0% 50.0% 357
2013 Q2 335 297 22 6.6% 60.0% 57.1% 402
2013 Q1 281 244 26 9.3% 12.5% 62.9% 375
2012 Q4 335 280 47 14.0% 42.9% 75.0% 357
2012 Q3 386 345 34 8.8% 40.0% 76.5% 357
2012 Q2 404 367 29 7.2% 62.5% 59.7% 398
2012 Q1 256 225 22 8.6% 57.1% 67.8% 381
2011 Q4 317 281 29 9.1% 14.3% 71.3% 342
2011 Q3 395 351 39 9.9% 16.7% 47.3% 313
2011 Q2 303 265 32 10.6% 50.0% 63.5% 372
2011 Q1 292 251 32 11.0% 100.0% 63.9% 387
2010 Q4 368 324 38 10.3% 46.2% 62.8% 321
2010 Q3 396 336 52 13.1% 35.3% 63.0% 396
2010 Q2 359 312 41 11.4% 72.7% 65.4% 411
2010 Q1 309 268 33 10.7% 66.7% 68.9% 378
2009 Q4 368 308 53 14.4% 85.7% 65.3% 368
2009 Q3 302 251 49 16.2% 85.7% 80.5% 374
2009 Q2 324 269 52 16.0% 62.5% 71.7% 343
2009 Q1 310 250 52 16.8% 70.0% 73.3% 326
2008 Q4 385 331 49 12.7% 60.0% 75.5% 369
2008 Q3 396 326 66 16.7% 70.0% 66.7% 410
2008 Q2 455 370 80 17.6% 85.7% 72.6% 451
2008 Q1 436 335 84 19.3% 71.4% 73.4% 473
2007 Q4 440 326 107 24.3% 75.0% 73.4% 492
2007 Q3 564 436 111 19.7% 70.8% 77.8% 537
2007 Q2 459 388 65 14.2% 80.0% 64.7% 553
2007 Q1 470 364 84 17.9% 72.7% 79.0% 543
2006 Q4 431 348 77 17.9% 56.3% 72.1% 486
2006 Q3 491 408 76 15.5% 50.0% 76.2% 473
2006 Q2 463 388 62 13.4% 92.9% 66.2% 496
2006 Q1 429 346 72 16.8% 66.7% 78.8% 530
2005 Q4 431 350 59 13.7% 50.0% 68.3% 437
2005 Q3 531 445 76 14.3% 73.3% 73.0% 475
2005 Q2 500 442 50 10.0% 75.0% 70.2% 538
2005 Q1 416 337 63 15.1% 53.3% 69.6% 503
2004 Q4 507 428 60 11.8% 57.1% 73.0% 510
2004 Q3 508 410 86 16.9% 76.5% 70.1% 549
2004 Q2 511 453 48 9.4% 75.0% 78.5% 545
2004 Q1 480 421 52 10.8% 33.3% 66.7% 553
2003 Q4 455 385 59 13.0% 52.6% 63.1% 496
2003 Q3 559 466 77 13.8% 52.2% 63.2% 504
2003 Q2 496 421 64 12.9% 64.7% 61.8% 538
2003 Q1 400 336 58 14.5% 53.3% 69.3% 530
2002 Q4 439 383 46 10.5% 33.3% 68.3% 400
2002 Q3 432 378 44 10.2% 37.5% 55.7% 459
2002 Q2 490 413 71 14.5% 30.0% 53.2% 488
2002 Q1 393 344 38 9.7% 28.6% 62.7% 516
2001 Q4 379 317 50 13.2% 11.1% 58.1% 364
2001 Q3 408 361 42 10.3% 36.4% 49.1% 404
2001 Q2 447 397 41 9.2% 14.3% 53.8% 414
2001 Q1 336 289 36 10.7% 27.3% 53.2% 461
2000 Q4 374 329 38 10.2% 11.1% 51.8% 349
2000 Q3 411 373 30 7.3% 18.2% 59.6% 411
2000 Q2 395 344 37 9.4% 20.0% 44.8% 452
2000 Q1 361 317 38 10.5% 36.4% 42.3% 408
1999 Q4 313 286 24 7.7% 37.5% 47.9% 367
1999 Q3 325 281 39 12.0% 50.0% 60.4% 380
1999 Q2 415 365 42 10.1% 22.2% 55.7% 388
1999 Q1 319 271 46 14.4% 50.0% 46.0% 389
1998 Q4 338 295 41 12.1% 40.0% 60.4% 332
1998 Q3 401 353 43 10.7% 9.1% 48.8% 384
1998 Q2 372 322 46 12.4% 30.0% 47.2% 393
1998 Q1 302 258 42 13.9% 50.0% 55.7% 397
1997 Q4 406 349 50 12.3% 38.5% 55.7% 330
1997 Q3 387 336 49 12.7% 40.0% 68.5% 439
1997 Q2 404 366 35 8.7% 30.8% 45.7% 398
1997 Q1 409 285 41 10.0% 16.7% 59.8% 454
1996 Q4 382 261 58 15.2% 73.3% 53.8% 405
1996 Q3 498 363 51 10.2% 57.1% 70.5% 488
1996 Q2 426 311 42 9.9% 33.3% 67.9% 460
1996 Q1 366 320 46 12.6% 70.0% 67.0% —
1995 Q4 280 245 35 12.5% 44.4% 60.6% —
1995 Q3 337 298 39 11.6% 44.4% 59.3% —
1995 Q2 330 285 45 13.6% 40.0% 58.7% —
1995 Q1 335 291 44 13.1% 25.0% 59.4% —
1994 Q4 317 273 44 13.9% 40.0% 56.5% —
1994 Q3 326 281 45 13.8% 16.7% 66.3% —
1994 Q2 340 294 46 13.5% 50.0% 77.1% —
1994 Q1 336 275 61 18.2% 78.6% 59.0% —
1993 Q4 301 260 41 13.6% 100.0% 58.4% —
1993 Q3 384 298 86 22.4% 75.0% 64.7% —
1993 Q2 346 305 41 11.8% 60.0% 60.6% —
1993 Q1 309 252 57 18.4% 25.0% 52.2% —
1992 Q4 326 267 59 18.1% 60.0% 52.4% —
1992 Q3 314 275 39 12.4% 60.0% 47.4% —
1992 Q2 317 272 45 14.2% 41.7% 57.0% —
1992 Q1 259 212 47 18.1% 42.9% 50.0% —
1991 Q4 292 235 57 19.5% 30.8% 55.8% —
1991 Q3 412 345 67 16.3% 62.5% 54.2% —
1991 Q2 413 338 75 18.2% 36.8% 48.7% —
1991 Q1 320 259 61 19.1% 81.0% 66.7% —
1990 Q4 366 291 75 20.5% 31.3% 46.0% —
1990 Q3 391 308 83 21.2% 58.3% 51.0% —
1990 Q2 447 334 113 25.3% 25.0% 45.2% —
1990 Q1 367 263 104 28.3% 53.8% 46.6% —
1989 Q4 434 324 110 25.3% 54.5% 52.0% —
1989 Q3 441 320 121 27.4% 60.0% 49.6% —
1989 Q2 606 420 186 30.7% 77.1% 53.2% —
1989 Q1 497 345 152 30.6% 58.3% 47.9% —
1988 Q4 510 379 131 25.7% 50.0% 47.8% —
1988 Q3 515 403 112 21.7% 73.3% 43.8% —
1988 Q2 659 522 137 20.8% 30.4% 55.2% —
1988 Q1 435 331 104 23.9% 50.0% 49.7% —
1987 Q4 486 384 102 21.0% 30.0% 37.5% —
1987 Q3 315 257 58 18.4% 50.0% 22.2% —
1987 Q2 324 287 37 11.4% 50.0% 43.0% —
1987 Q1 300 254 46 15.3% 0.0% 34.2% —
1986 Q4 387 340 47 12.1% 100.0% 38.5% —
1986 Q3 363 319 44 12.1% 100.0% 42.4% —
1986 Q2 307 271 36 11.7% — 43.5% —
1986 Q1 350 309 41 11.7% 33.3% 38.7% —
1985 Q4 397 332 65 16.4% 60.0% 32.0% —
1985 Q3 320 288 32 10.0% 100.0% 33.1% —
1985 Q2 294 248 46 15.6% 100.0% 41.4% —
1985 Q1 222 196 26 11.7% — 38.6% —
1984 Q4 293 261 32 10.9% 100.0% 59.0% —
1984 Q3 300 265 35 11.7% 75.0% 60.2% —
1984 Q2 372 339 33 8.9% 100.0% 68.7% —
1984 Q1 313 280 33 10.5% 75.0% 59.3% —
1983 Q4 315 270 45 14.3% 75.0% 75.4% —
1983 Q3 368 330 38 10.3% 42.9% 80.2% —
1983 Q2 252 232 20 7.9% 83.3% 76.3% —
1983 Q1 378 329 49 13.0% 100.0% 73.8% —
1982 Q4 311 271 40 12.9% 100.0% 88.6% —
1982 Q3 285 246 39 13.7% 57.1% 79.2% —
1982 Q2 236 208 28 11.9% 66.7% 78.9% —
1982 Q1 355 316 39 11.0% 100.0% 71.7% —
1981 Q4 276 242 34 12.3% 62.5% 83.2% —
1981 Q3 300 263 37 12.3% 60.0% 70.1% —
1981 Q2 366 306 60 16.4% 100.0% 86.0% —
1981 Q1 457 385 72 15.8% 66.7% 61.0% —
1980 Q4 365 302 63 17.3% 60.0% 66.9% —
1980 Q3 392 311 81 20.7% 75.0% 57.7% —
1980 Q2 300 242 58 19.3% 42.9% 52.9% —
1980 Q1 494 394 100 20.2% 50.0% 54.2% —
1979 Q4 392 298 94 24.0% 60.0% 51.0% —
1979 Q3 453 384 69 15.2% 60.0% 58.3% —
1979 Q2 415 353 62 14.9% 100.0% 64.0% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me