← All authorities

Cotswold

South West · E07000079 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,285
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
10.2%
higher than 40% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
80.6%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
91.8%
no formal threshold
Delegated
98.2%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
25.8%
57 allowed of 221 decided
Decisions overturned
0.7%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 13.9%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,491
in the window
Applications decided
1,285
in the window
Approval rate
89.8%
1,154 granted, 131 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 70 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
88.2%
rank 198 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 108 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3588.6%100.0%
Minor28082.9%80.6%
Other97091.9%—
of which householder61192.1%91.8%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01963912024 Q3: 385 received2024 Q3: 391 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 367 received2024 Q4: 337 decided2025 Q1: 347 received2025 Q1: 354 decided2025 Q2: 340 received2025 Q2: 338 decided2025 Q3: 373 received2025 Q3: 309 decided2025 Q4: 377 received2025 Q4: 286 decided2026 Q1: 378 received2026 Q1: 319 decided2026 Q2: 363 received2026 Q2: 371 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
68%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000079). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 371 347 24 6.5% — 75.9% 363
2026 Q1 319 292 27 8.5% 100.0% 81.8% 378
2025 Q4 286 249 37 12.9% 100.0% 79.2% 377
2025 Q3 309 266 43 13.9% 100.0% 84.8% 373
2025 Q2 338 307 31 9.2% 100.0% 88.6% 340
2025 Q1 354 324 30 8.5% 100.0% 79.1% 347
2024 Q4 337 306 31 9.2% 100.0% 91.7% 367
2024 Q3 391 350 41 10.5% 75.0% 86.0% 385
2024 Q2 368 335 33 9.0% 100.0% 91.4% 372
2024 Q1 361 331 30 8.3% 100.0% 82.5% 414
2023 Q4 358 325 33 9.2% 100.0% 94.6% 364
2023 Q3 396 361 35 8.8% 100.0% 89.2% 356
2023 Q2 349 325 24 6.9% 100.0% 90.0% 388
2023 Q1 380 357 23 6.1% 100.0% 65.9% 395
2022 Q4 420 402 18 4.3% 85.7% 79.3% 424
2022 Q3 419 399 20 4.8% 100.0% 75.0% 415
2022 Q2 418 405 13 3.1% 100.0% 66.7% 458
2022 Q1 418 402 16 3.8% 100.0% 51.0% 469
2021 Q4 526 500 26 4.9% 50.0% 62.7% 485
2021 Q3 448 430 18 4.0% 75.0% 52.5% 502
2021 Q2 476 461 15 3.2% 50.0% 58.2% 568
2021 Q1 373 364 9 2.4% 75.0% 71.8% 509
2020 Q4 378 352 26 6.9% 100.0% 80.0% 478
2020 Q3 329 303 26 7.9% 100.0% 84.1% 423
2020 Q2 364 332 32 8.8% 100.0% 90.0% 389
2020 Q1 387 361 26 6.7% 75.0% 80.0% 401
2019 Q4 424 401 23 5.4% 100.0% 88.5% 384
2019 Q3 396 377 19 4.8% 100.0% 88.2% 411
2019 Q2 402 385 17 4.2% — 87.1% 401
2019 Q1 421 385 36 8.6% 50.0% 87.9% 369
2018 Q4 393 369 24 6.1% 33.3% 88.6% 402
2018 Q3 435 403 32 7.4% 100.0% 72.5% 390
2018 Q2 467 426 41 8.8% 71.4% 76.3% 416
2018 Q1 422 397 25 5.9% 60.0% 67.6% 444
2017 Q4 374 348 26 7.0% 85.7% 76.0% 384
2017 Q3 454 428 26 5.7% 100.0% 71.0% 382
2017 Q2 499 468 31 6.2% 100.0% 78.6% 487
2017 Q1 459 435 24 5.2% 75.0% 63.8% 402
2016 Q4 480 448 32 6.7% 0.0% 77.9% 421
2016 Q3 438 415 23 5.3% 100.0% 75.0% 466
2016 Q2 522 494 28 5.4% 75.0% 82.9% 494
2016 Q1 472 445 27 5.7% 100.0% 68.7% 442
2015 Q4 403 375 28 6.9% 100.0% 55.7% 368
2015 Q3 448 426 22 4.9% 100.0% 53.3% 371
2015 Q2 461 441 20 4.3% 50.0% 46.8% 383
2015 Q1 363 343 20 5.5% 75.0% 66.7% 389
2014 Q4 483 456 27 5.6% 100.0% 52.1% 375
2014 Q3 412 387 25 6.1% 100.0% 38.9% 487
2014 Q2 428 404 24 5.6% 83.3% 58.8% 444
2014 Q1 344 318 12 3.5% 100.0% 56.3% 372
2013 Q4 398 363 25 6.3% 100.0% 63.2% 385
2013 Q3 452 413 24 5.3% 66.7% 64.6% 395
2013 Q2 460 429 22 4.8% 14.3% 66.1% 509
2013 Q1 446 397 27 6.1% 14.3% 63.2% 464
2012 Q4 415 373 32 7.7% 50.0% 62.0% 436
2012 Q3 456 432 17 3.7% 42.9% 59.0% 428
2012 Q2 366 331 24 6.6% 50.0% 64.0% 406
2012 Q1 470 437 25 5.3% 40.0% 42.1% 419
2011 Q4 456 421 28 6.1% 14.3% 37.5% 379
2011 Q3 408 381 16 3.9% 62.5% 51.2% 420
2011 Q2 375 342 21 5.6% 42.9% 60.3% 440
2011 Q1 415 381 20 4.8% 44.4% 57.3% 396
2010 Q4 412 382 18 4.4% 50.0% 68.8% 426
2010 Q3 431 398 29 6.7% 53.8% 69.2% 410
2010 Q2 407 367 34 8.4% 50.0% 61.8% 423
2010 Q1 369 340 24 6.5% 55.6% 51.9% 436
2009 Q4 376 350 21 5.6% 0.0% 78.3% 405
2009 Q3 465 439 22 4.7% 50.0% 78.0% 456
2009 Q2 446 415 24 5.4% 38.5% 71.2% 452
2009 Q1 418 371 34 8.1% 40.0% 63.8% 398
2008 Q4 423 389 26 6.1% 22.2% 60.6% 465
2008 Q3 519 467 32 6.2% 100.0% 72.7% 538
2008 Q2 548 499 43 7.8% 50.0% 60.9% 705
2008 Q1 519 451 37 7.1% 50.0% 62.0% 597
2007 Q4 512 406 38 7.4% 40.0% 53.8% 579
2007 Q3 540 467 46 8.5% 37.5% 65.2% 587
2007 Q2 488 443 36 7.4% 66.7% 65.9% 594
2007 Q1 478 410 58 12.1% 91.7% 79.1% 585
2006 Q4 519 452 57 11.0% 66.7% 70.0% 576
2006 Q3 596 512 62 10.4% 50.0% 62.6% 610
2006 Q2 597 509 68 11.4% 62.5% 79.1% 683
2006 Q1 518 442 68 13.1% 60.0% 59.3% 638
2005 Q4 560 479 70 12.5% 44.4% 71.4% 641
2005 Q3 647 579 58 9.0% 70.0% 67.3% 704
2005 Q2 663 576 71 10.7% 78.6% 77.4% 740
2005 Q1 533 451 66 12.4% 60.0% 68.9% 666
2004 Q4 638 563 61 9.6% 41.7% 62.2% 610
2004 Q3 666 608 48 7.2% 54.5% 67.2% 753
2004 Q2 710 645 52 7.3% 37.5% 66.7% 737
2004 Q1 595 533 47 7.9% 40.0% 70.6% 740
2003 Q4 607 521 65 10.7% 27.3% 61.7% 701
2003 Q3 642 566 58 9.0% 38.5% 64.0% 649
2003 Q2 673 604 53 7.9% 50.0% 65.5% 761
2003 Q1 609 544 49 8.0% 37.5% 59.2% 677
2002 Q4 605 524 62 10.2% 50.0% 64.0% 659
2002 Q3 603 522 53 8.8% 60.0% 64.3% 692
2002 Q2 697 618 59 8.5% 20.0% 69.0% 677
2002 Q1 528 434 70 13.3% 25.0% 51.7% 656
2001 Q4 648 563 61 9.4% 33.3% 56.0% 572
2001 Q3 657 589 39 5.9% 53.8% 39.8% 668
2001 Q2 697 576 37 5.3% 62.5% 38.1% 651
2001 Q1 480 373 47 9.8% 37.5% 37.7% 768
2000 Q4 573 449 57 9.9% 33.3% 50.0% 535
2000 Q3 634 523 50 7.9% 33.3% 65.0% 642
2000 Q2 648 537 35 5.4% 0.0% 45.4% 638
2000 Q1 530 435 41 7.7% 62.5% 39.5% 673
1999 Q4 527 430 43 8.2% 37.5% 42.7% 480
1999 Q3 574 476 34 5.9% 14.3% 49.4% 606
1999 Q2 560 457 35 6.3% 50.0% 52.0% 605
1999 Q1 485 387 35 7.2% 66.7% 45.8% 617
1998 Q4 512 422 31 6.1% 50.0% 64.9% 514
1998 Q3 514 415 41 8.0% 33.3% 62.5% 552
1998 Q2 621 489 42 6.8% 39.1% 62.2% 566
1998 Q1 474 388 24 5.1% 69.2% 52.3% 591
1997 Q4 525 415 40 7.6% 50.0% 66.2% 517
1997 Q3 555 445 39 7.0% 80.0% 49.4% 567
1997 Q2 610 459 46 7.5% 25.0% 62.1% 650
1997 Q1 518 398 41 7.9% 42.9% 46.3% 592
1996 Q4 454 352 47 10.4% 100.0% 57.7% 529
1996 Q3 548 437 24 4.4% — 56.4% 523
1996 Q2 646 486 47 7.3% 83.3% 51.2% 661
1996 Q1 80 80 0 0.0% 66.7% 63.3% —
1995 Q4 74 74 0 0.0% 57.1% 73.9% —
1995 Q3 76 75 1 1.3% 50.0% 50.0% —
1995 Q2 44 42 2 4.5% 0.0% 75.0% —
1995 Q1 86 83 3 3.5% 80.0% 69.4% —
1994 Q4 66 65 1 1.5% 55.6% 60.0% —
1994 Q3 85 84 1 1.2% 100.0% 64.7% —
1994 Q2 84 82 2 2.4% 33.3% 57.6% —
1994 Q1 75 73 2 2.7% 100.0% 38.5% —
1993 Q4 86 86 0 0.0% 83.3% 54.8% —
1993 Q3 71 71 0 0.0% 100.0% 90.0% —
1993 Q2 76 75 1 1.3% 22.2% 50.0% —
1993 Q1 73 72 1 1.4% 28.6% 70.8% —
1992 Q4 66 65 1 1.5% 66.7% 60.0% —
1992 Q3 69 66 3 4.3% 0.0% 55.6% —
1992 Q2 59 59 0 0.0% 42.9% 50.0% —
1992 Q1 66 63 3 4.5% 42.9% 33.3% —
1991 Q4 45 45 0 0.0% 100.0% 52.9% —
1991 Q3 67 63 4 6.0% 0.0% 65.0% —
1991 Q2 107 105 2 1.9% 100.0% 26.7% —
1991 Q1 52 49 3 5.8% 54.5% 0.0% —
1990 Q4 71 65 6 8.5% 0.0% 38.1% —
1990 Q3 89 86 3 3.4% 40.0% 38.1% —
1990 Q2 110 105 5 4.5% 27.8% 23.3% —
1990 Q1 75 70 5 6.7% 50.0% 40.0% —
1989 Q4 79 74 5 6.3% 66.7% 14.3% —
1989 Q3 83 80 3 3.6% 0.0% 5.9% —
1989 Q2 125 122 3 2.4% 57.1% 33.3% —
1989 Q1 110 104 6 5.5% 66.7% 42.9% —
1988 Q4 95 93 2 2.1% 57.1% 65.2% —
1988 Q3 143 142 1 0.7% 71.4% 34.6% —
1988 Q2 95 93 2 2.1% 50.0% 55.6% —
1988 Q1 93 92 1 1.1% 50.0% 47.8% —
1987 Q4 101 96 5 5.0% 42.9% 62.5% —
1987 Q3 542 448 94 17.3% 36.4% 33.5% —
1987 Q2 547 465 82 15.0% 94.1% 40.9% —
1987 Q1 472 396 76 16.1% 62.5% 63.1% —
1986 Q4 451 377 74 16.4% 73.3% 60.8% —
1986 Q3 525 432 93 17.7% 75.0% 47.3% —
1986 Q2 454 366 88 19.4% 90.0% 71.4% —
1986 Q1 400 328 72 18.0% 87.5% 71.3% —
1985 Q4 404 328 76 18.8% 100.0% 73.7% —
1985 Q3 381 308 73 19.2% 88.9% 61.2% —
1985 Q2 383 323 60 15.7% 50.0% 75.0% —
1985 Q1 362 301 61 16.9% 57.1% 66.2% —
1984 Q4 379 301 78 20.6% 90.0% 53.5% —
1984 Q3 365 298 67 18.4% 88.9% 69.6% —
1984 Q2 405 342 63 15.6% 70.0% 68.1% —
1984 Q1 354 296 58 16.4% 77.8% 76.0% —
1983 Q4 362 306 56 15.5% 100.0% 77.6% —
1983 Q3 433 376 57 13.2% 77.8% 70.0% —
1983 Q2 405 335 70 17.3% 66.7% 58.0% —
1983 Q1 331 265 66 19.9% 33.3% 71.9% —
1982 Q4 226 185 41 18.1% 77.8% 85.4% —
1982 Q3 400 331 69 17.3% 100.0% 73.5% —
1982 Q2 393 333 60 15.3% 71.4% 81.3% —
1982 Q1 322 285 37 11.5% 60.0% 77.3% —
1981 Q4 317 251 66 20.8% 80.0% 75.2% —
1981 Q3 386 324 62 16.1% 44.4% 71.5% —
1981 Q2 554 442 112 20.2% 78.6% 52.3% —
1981 Q1 450 350 100 22.2% 75.0% 68.5% —
1980 Q4 411 324 87 21.2% 75.0% 73.4% —
1980 Q3 488 380 108 22.1% 92.9% 70.1% —
1980 Q2 454 342 112 24.7% 100.0% 69.4% —
1980 Q1 430 335 95 22.1% 91.7% 63.9% —
1979 Q4 321 249 72 22.4% 62.5% 55.1% —
1979 Q3 457 361 96 21.0% 60.0% 54.3% —
1979 Q2 427 345 82 19.2% 75.0% 53.9% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me