← All authorities

Cheltenham

South West · E07000078 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
906
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
3.4%
higher than 3% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
95.1%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
96.9%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.9%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
25.4%
30 allowed of 118 decided
Decisions overturned
0.5%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 8.3%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
990
in the window
Applications decided
906
in the window
Approval rate
96.6%
875 granted, 31 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 6 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
94.2%
rank 106 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 60 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major1687.5%100.0%
Minor14194.3%95.1%
Other74997.2%—
of which householder54697.1%96.9%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01533062024 Q3: 244 received2024 Q3: 241 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 306 received2024 Q4: 266 decided2025 Q1: 303 received2025 Q1: 286 decided2025 Q2: 226 received2025 Q2: 260 decided2025 Q3: 254 received2025 Q3: 247 decided2025 Q4: 237 received2025 Q4: 228 decided2026 Q1: 276 received2026 Q1: 192 decided2026 Q2: 223 received2026 Q2: 239 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
56%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000078). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 239 232 7 2.9% 100.0% 91.7% 223
2026 Q1 192 187 5 2.6% 100.0% 93.8% 276
2025 Q4 228 223 5 2.2% — 94.7% 237
2025 Q3 247 233 14 5.7% — 100.0% 254
2025 Q2 260 254 6 2.3% 100.0% 92.6% 226
2025 Q1 286 275 11 3.8% — 88.9% 303
2024 Q4 266 251 15 5.6% 75.0% 85.7% 306
2024 Q3 241 225 16 6.6% — 92.3% 244
2024 Q2 242 222 20 8.3% 75.0% 87.5% 276
2024 Q1 238 222 16 6.7% — 90.0% 282
2023 Q4 266 250 16 6.0% 66.7% 88.0% 243
2023 Q3 278 265 13 4.7% 100.0% 88.9% 291
2023 Q2 263 256 7 2.7% 100.0% 82.1% 297
2023 Q1 262 250 12 4.6% 100.0% 81.8% 294
2022 Q4 266 249 17 6.4% 100.0% 96.4% 246
2022 Q3 297 279 18 6.1% 100.0% 86.7% 310
2022 Q2 336 311 25 7.4% 100.0% 93.1% 331
2022 Q1 313 298 15 4.8% 0.0% 78.3% 351
2021 Q4 358 340 18 5.0% 100.0% 91.7% 389
2021 Q3 366 358 8 2.2% 100.0% 93.3% 336
2021 Q2 432 418 14 3.2% — 92.5% 467
2021 Q1 357 348 9 2.5% 100.0% 91.2% 428
2020 Q4 342 330 12 3.5% 100.0% 93.8% 356
2020 Q3 292 275 17 5.8% 100.0% 96.4% 343
2020 Q2 287 277 10 3.5% 100.0% 97.0% 272
2020 Q1 295 291 4 1.4% 100.0% 94.7% 317
2019 Q4 318 309 9 2.8% 100.0% 92.1% 328
2019 Q3 332 326 6 1.8% 100.0% 97.9% 316
2019 Q2 382 360 22 5.8% 100.0% 95.6% 379
2019 Q1 285 270 15 5.3% 100.0% 80.6% 330
2018 Q4 310 294 16 5.2% 100.0% 94.9% 351
2018 Q3 325 308 17 5.2% 40.0% 86.4% 325
2018 Q2 348 330 18 5.2% 100.0% 77.6% 331
2018 Q1 319 303 16 5.0% 50.0% 71.4% 331
2017 Q4 346 336 10 2.9% 66.7% 77.1% 366
2017 Q3 365 352 13 3.6% 100.0% 76.6% 355
2017 Q2 369 355 14 3.8% 83.3% 75.0% 377
2017 Q1 316 300 16 5.1% 100.0% 77.6% 405
2016 Q4 315 297 18 5.7% 100.0% 79.6% 304
2016 Q3 340 317 23 6.8% 100.0% 69.2% 366
2016 Q2 378 359 19 5.0% — 88.0% 409
2016 Q1 311 298 13 4.2% 100.0% 85.2% 329
2015 Q4 299 278 21 7.0% 100.0% 70.9% 307
2015 Q3 295 275 20 6.8% 75.0% 41.2% 328
2015 Q2 329 313 16 4.9% 100.0% 65.5% 358
2015 Q1 281 276 5 1.8% 50.0% 55.8% 379
2014 Q4 278 251 27 9.7% 62.5% 58.9% 322
2014 Q3 336 313 23 6.8% 75.0% 62.3% 369
2014 Q2 282 264 18 6.4% 62.5% 56.8% 405
2014 Q1 284 235 25 8.8% 27.3% 50.0% 303
2013 Q4 286 261 14 4.9% 66.7% 59.5% 317
2013 Q3 335 294 15 4.5% 55.6% 65.6% 348
2013 Q2 287 252 9 3.1% 20.0% 56.8% 343
2013 Q1 234 195 13 5.6% 100.0% 66.7% 275
2012 Q4 310 271 11 3.5% 0.0% 60.0% 318
2012 Q3 292 255 24 8.2% 50.0% 40.8% 312
2012 Q2 281 242 15 5.3% 50.0% 57.6% 322
2012 Q1 241 207 12 5.0% 75.0% 61.4% 311
2011 Q4 300 241 11 3.7% 52.6% 58.2% 267
2011 Q3 296 236 18 6.1% 72.7% 63.3% 329
2011 Q2 279 237 15 5.4% 70.0% 59.6% 300
2011 Q1 255 224 31 12.2% 50.0% 84.0% 329
2010 Q4 278 226 17 6.1% 66.7% 84.6% 281
2010 Q3 337 265 28 8.3% 66.7% 61.4% 350
2010 Q2 314 249 28 8.9% 85.7% 85.7% 371
2010 Q1 248 211 17 6.9% 85.7% 84.6% 334
2009 Q4 254 191 28 11.0% 57.1% 89.5% 292
2009 Q3 312 250 29 9.3% 77.8% 90.2% 313
2009 Q2 276 224 23 8.3% 92.9% 77.3% 315
2009 Q1 205 159 25 12.2% 100.0% 80.8% 305
2008 Q4 241 178 34 14.1% 71.4% 88.0% 259
2008 Q3 353 273 55 15.6% 94.7% 92.2% 326
2008 Q2 329 239 47 14.3% 93.3% 94.4% 381
2008 Q1 320 256 35 10.9% 100.0% 80.0% 373
2007 Q4 283 210 40 14.1% 77.8% 96.2% 324
2007 Q3 340 274 32 9.4% 100.0% 89.4% 339
2007 Q2 370 289 39 10.5% 100.0% 92.1% 378
2007 Q1 335 256 28 8.4% 92.9% 96.2% 435
2006 Q4 363 293 35 9.6% 100.0% 92.2% 338
2006 Q3 439 349 48 10.9% 83.3% 88.1% 473
2006 Q2 386 292 53 13.7% 83.3% 91.5% 424
2006 Q1 326 252 44 13.5% 89.5% 82.7% 426
2005 Q4 371 264 48 12.9% 88.2% 81.0% 389
2005 Q3 399 279 73 18.3% 100.0% 75.0% 399
2005 Q2 418 333 67 16.0% 83.3% 94.6% 455
2005 Q1 369 290 71 19.2% 85.0% 78.3% 416
2004 Q4 386 323 52 13.5% 71.4% 77.3% 409
2004 Q3 512 390 109 21.3% 70.6% 84.5% 481
2004 Q2 477 381 75 15.7% 60.0% 83.8% 555
2004 Q1 356 269 76 21.3% 50.0% 63.3% 477
2003 Q4 454 360 79 17.4% 22.2% 70.3% 391
2003 Q3 385 321 46 11.9% 62.5% 52.6% 403
2003 Q2 405 304 77 19.0% 42.9% 61.4% 442
2003 Q1 403 318 69 17.1% 30.0% 58.5% 409
2002 Q4 416 305 86 20.7% 36.4% 34.4% 390
2002 Q3 322 254 42 13.0% 50.0% 50.0% 415
2002 Q2 403 297 79 19.6% 20.0% 66.7% 430
2002 Q1 261 212 27 10.3% 50.0% 47.6% 396
2001 Q4 328 255 52 15.9% 50.0% 50.0% 348
2001 Q3 294 236 33 11.2% 40.0% 49.0% 344
2001 Q2 362 281 50 13.8% 28.6% 53.8% 361
2001 Q1 341 277 41 12.0% 30.8% 60.0% 386
2000 Q4 355 280 53 14.9% 60.0% 56.3% 358
2000 Q3 305 250 45 14.8% 25.0% 48.2% 347
2000 Q2 364 300 53 14.6% 62.5% 52.4% 380
2000 Q1 264 233 29 11.0% 66.7% 45.5% 483
1999 Q4 344 291 39 11.3% 25.0% 55.6% 359
1999 Q3 273 238 29 10.6% 33.3% 50.9% 293
1999 Q2 349 309 38 10.9% 92.3% 63.1% 347
1999 Q1 271 233 38 14.0% 25.0% 59.3% 324
1998 Q4 346 288 50 14.5% 38.5% 56.3% 269
1998 Q3 247 216 28 11.3% 83.3% 54.1% 342
1998 Q2 318 274 40 12.6% 66.7% 66.7% 329
1998 Q1 275 243 32 11.6% 100.0% 54.3% 297
1997 Q4 218 197 20 9.2% 66.7% 70.0% 254
1997 Q3 255 233 22 8.6% 100.0% 45.3% 267
1997 Q2 304 271 31 10.2% 73.3% 56.3% 298
1997 Q1 248 219 28 11.3% 57.1% 58.2% 251
1996 Q4 256 224 30 11.7% 77.8% 70.4% 255
1996 Q3 230 202 27 11.7% 100.0% 42.9% 256
1996 Q2 310 270 40 12.9% 63.6% 71.8% 307
1996 Q1 248 214 34 13.7% 75.0% 74.6% —
1995 Q4 221 198 23 10.4% 57.1% 70.2% —
1995 Q3 303 269 34 11.2% 68.8% 70.8% —
1995 Q2 264 234 30 11.4% 80.0% 78.5% —
1995 Q1 230 195 35 15.2% 75.0% 48.0% —
1994 Q4 248 220 28 11.3% 76.5% 46.3% —
1994 Q3 289 250 39 13.5% 75.0% 54.5% —
1994 Q2 280 238 42 15.0% 93.3% 55.7% —
1994 Q1 285 239 46 16.1% 73.3% 61.3% —
1993 Q4 272 220 52 19.1% 79.2% 58.2% —
1993 Q3 287 247 40 13.9% 75.0% 67.7% —
1993 Q2 343 290 53 15.5% 72.7% 61.6% —
1993 Q1 255 207 48 18.8% 42.9% 56.2% —
1992 Q4 258 204 54 20.9% 66.7% 75.0% —
1992 Q3 297 263 34 11.4% 81.3% 64.5% —
1992 Q2 310 241 69 22.3% 64.7% 83.1% —
1992 Q1 238 194 44 18.5% 84.6% 77.3% —
1991 Q4 311 249 62 19.9% 78.6% 88.2% —
1991 Q3 300 231 69 23.0% 66.7% 82.1% —
1991 Q2 367 311 56 15.3% 100.0% 80.0% —
1991 Q1 281 229 52 18.5% 100.0% 84.2% —
1990 Q4 274 201 73 26.6% 91.7% 87.5% —
1990 Q3 279 223 56 20.1% 100.0% 79.3% —
1990 Q2 363 268 95 26.2% 100.0% 76.6% —
1990 Q1 366 294 72 19.7% 93.8% 66.7% —
1989 Q4 323 245 78 24.1% 100.0% 78.6% —
1989 Q3 335 257 78 23.3% 83.3% 67.0% —
1989 Q2 430 340 90 20.9% 82.4% 77.2% —
1989 Q1 431 336 95 22.0% 93.3% 77.9% —
1988 Q4 378 315 63 16.7% 54.5% 89.0% —
1988 Q3 425 341 84 19.8% 90.5% 68.9% —
1988 Q2 398 322 76 19.1% 90.0% 84.9% —
1988 Q1 425 357 68 16.0% 75.0% 77.5% —
1987 Q4 335 266 69 20.6% 100.0% 87.3% —
1987 Q3 498 440 58 11.6% 70.0% 44.2% —
1987 Q2 422 342 80 19.0% 30.0% 51.0% —
1987 Q1 443 365 78 17.6% 66.7% 59.8% —
1986 Q4 405 343 62 15.3% 50.0% 54.8% —
1986 Q3 428 366 62 14.5% 8.3% 53.5% —
1986 Q2 395 347 48 12.2% 62.5% 43.4% —
1986 Q1 326 234 92 28.2% 80.0% 59.1% —
1985 Q4 330 191 139 42.1% 50.0% 50.7% —
1985 Q3 317 292 25 7.9% 62.5% 55.4% —
1985 Q2 365 332 33 9.0% 100.0% 55.3% —
1985 Q1 264 235 29 11.0% 50.0% 53.5% —
1984 Q4 265 225 40 15.1% 66.7% 58.8% —
1984 Q3 295 263 32 10.8% 71.4% 50.5% —
1984 Q2 378 334 44 11.6% 76.9% 65.4% —
1984 Q1 304 264 40 13.2% 50.0% 52.3% —
1983 Q4 279 238 41 14.7% 25.0% 61.5% —
1983 Q3 317 281 36 11.4% 42.9% 46.8% —
1983 Q2 307 278 29 9.4% 55.6% 61.7% —
1983 Q1 299 275 24 8.0% 71.4% 63.6% —
1982 Q4 296 264 32 10.8% 66.7% 67.0% —
1982 Q3 408 363 45 11.0% 72.7% 61.6% —
1982 Q2 290 251 39 13.4% 75.0% 68.0% —
1982 Q1 209 189 20 9.6% 60.0% 66.7% —
1981 Q4 260 232 28 10.8% 70.6% 63.6% —
1981 Q3 302 272 30 9.9% 35.7% 62.0% —
1981 Q2 452 390 62 13.7% 77.3% 48.4% —
1981 Q1 329 293 36 10.9% 81.8% 52.9% —
1980 Q4 331 270 61 18.4% 60.0% 62.1% —
1980 Q3 344 298 46 13.4% 27.3% 50.0% —
1980 Q2 426 374 52 12.2% 80.0% 51.1% —
1980 Q1 299 253 46 15.4% 69.2% 46.2% —
1979 Q4 319 282 37 11.6% 42.9% 53.0% —
1979 Q3 390 336 54 13.8% 76.9% 50.4% —
1979 Q2 494 441 53 10.7% 55.6% 38.1% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me