← All authorities

Wealden

South East · E07000065 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,283
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
15.4%
higher than 70% of authorities
Majors in time
95.7%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
94.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
99.1%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
30.8%
164 allowed of 532 decided
Decisions overturned
1.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 17.0%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,376
in the window
Applications decided
1,283
in the window
Approval rate
84.6%
1,085 granted, 198 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 120 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
97.5%
rank 51 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 23 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major5580.0%95.7%
Minor34979.4%94.0%
Other87986.9%—
of which householder66189.7%99.1%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
02244472024 Q3: 381 received2024 Q3: 386 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 378 received2024 Q4: 364 decided2025 Q1: 447 received2025 Q1: 336 decided2025 Q2: 367 received2025 Q2: 428 decided2025 Q3: 334 received2025 Q3: 294 decided2025 Q4: 363 received2025 Q4: 343 decided2026 Q1: 340 received2026 Q1: 296 decided2026 Q2: 339 received2026 Q2: 350 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
89%
Action plan

Delivery 85–94%: the authority must publish an action plan. No presumption or buffer consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000065). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 350 300 50 14.3% 100.0% 92.3% 339
2026 Q1 296 250 46 15.5% 100.0% 97.0% 340
2025 Q4 343 289 54 15.7% 100.0% 94.2% 363
2025 Q3 294 246 48 16.3% 80.0% 93.2% 334
2025 Q2 428 356 72 16.8% 100.0% 88.1% 367
2025 Q1 336 292 44 13.1% 83.3% 97.3% 447
2024 Q4 364 307 57 15.7% 66.7% 93.8% 378
2024 Q3 386 329 57 14.8% 100.0% 88.9% 381
2024 Q2 430 357 73 17.0% 50.0% 77.2% 407
2024 Q1 384 338 46 12.0% 100.0% 82.8% 456
2023 Q4 365 311 54 14.8% — 85.4% 425
2023 Q3 464 403 61 13.1% 100.0% 90.5% 435
2023 Q2 418 352 66 15.8% 100.0% 92.2% 471
2023 Q1 489 409 80 16.4% 100.0% 78.1% 484
2022 Q4 428 365 63 14.7% 66.7% 70.4% 474
2022 Q3 524 469 55 10.5% 50.0% 65.8% 588
2022 Q2 453 396 57 12.6% 50.0% 63.4% 450
2022 Q1 454 383 71 15.6% 100.0% 53.2% 488
2021 Q4 611 509 102 16.7% 75.0% 66.2% 516
2021 Q3 614 546 68 11.1% 100.0% 67.2% 637
2021 Q2 541 471 70 12.9% 57.1% 51.0% 636
2021 Q1 469 427 42 9.0% 50.0% 52.3% 596
2020 Q4 506 449 57 11.3% 57.1% 50.0% 468
2020 Q3 519 484 35 6.7% — 39.5% 535
2020 Q2 220 190 30 13.6% 33.3% 16.7% 428
2020 Q1 482 455 27 5.6% 100.0% 75.5% 510
2019 Q4 423 382 41 9.7% 100.0% 78.6% 430
2019 Q3 463 414 49 10.6% 87.5% 81.5% 521
2019 Q2 526 477 49 9.3% 83.3% 73.1% 542
2019 Q1 439 386 53 12.1% 87.5% 63.9% 541
2018 Q4 478 423 55 11.5% 100.0% 70.0% 519
2018 Q3 437 381 56 12.8% 80.0% 68.1% 547
2018 Q2 520 481 39 7.5% 88.9% 70.6% 524
2018 Q1 477 432 45 9.4% 100.0% 73.8% 532
2017 Q4 519 475 44 8.5% 100.0% 69.3% 545
2017 Q3 521 479 42 8.1% 100.0% 78.2% 580
2017 Q2 507 475 32 6.3% 75.0% 68.5% 579
2017 Q1 452 395 57 12.6% 100.0% 78.8% 559
2016 Q4 566 519 47 8.3% 90.9% 74.8% 533
2016 Q3 646 594 52 8.0% 100.0% 71.7% 631
2016 Q2 577 534 43 7.5% 100.0% 76.0% 684
2016 Q1 509 470 39 7.7% 80.0% 78.9% 611
2015 Q4 513 484 29 5.7% 93.3% 77.5% 544
2015 Q3 527 478 49 9.3% 88.9% 74.8% 526
2015 Q2 492 453 39 7.9% 100.0% 82.7% 546
2015 Q1 436 401 35 8.0% 100.0% 82.9% 605
2014 Q4 457 412 45 9.8% 87.5% 81.7% 516
2014 Q3 506 478 28 5.5% 77.8% 78.6% 523
2014 Q2 537 505 32 6.0% 100.0% 85.0% 547
2014 Q1 470 384 41 8.7% 88.9% 86.4% 602
2013 Q4 593 488 46 7.8% 82.4% 88.0% 525
2013 Q3 565 443 45 8.0% 57.1% 86.1% 601
2013 Q2 577 456 56 9.7% 100.0% 83.2% 617
2013 Q1 478 386 39 8.2% 80.0% 86.1% 601
2012 Q4 554 441 62 11.2% 80.0% 87.8% 526
2012 Q3 550 402 90 16.4% 91.7% 80.7% 557
2012 Q2 612 467 91 14.9% 80.0% 81.2% 623
2012 Q1 556 440 66 11.9% 66.7% 81.9% 698
2011 Q4 642 489 94 14.6% 64.3% 88.6% 631
2011 Q3 657 500 109 16.6% 57.1% 88.2% 662
2011 Q2 650 519 82 12.6% 40.0% 85.2% 715
2011 Q1 534 427 54 10.1% 55.6% 73.9% 650
2010 Q4 658 527 73 11.1% 84.6% 82.5% 657
2010 Q3 648 510 73 11.3% 91.7% 80.9% 667
2010 Q2 675 537 59 8.7% 90.0% 91.4% 723
2010 Q1 569 439 79 13.9% 66.7% 88.2% 722
2009 Q4 515 412 62 12.0% 76.9% 88.4% 561
2009 Q3 574 445 65 11.3% 100.0% 92.3% 606
2009 Q2 650 428 85 13.1% 66.7% 86.9% 617
2009 Q1 570 387 84 14.7% 91.7% 86.7% 775
2008 Q4 584 451 93 15.9% 90.9% 89.1% 586
2008 Q3 802 647 120 15.0% 100.0% 89.4% 774
2008 Q2 790 600 152 19.2% 100.0% 80.0% 813
2008 Q1 671 501 127 18.9% 87.5% 90.6% 842
2007 Q4 827 589 141 17.0% 75.0% 89.4% 826
2007 Q3 964 667 134 13.9% 92.9% 88.3% 937
2007 Q2 840 654 134 16.0% 76.9% 86.3% 944
2007 Q1 698 502 106 15.2% 77.8% 83.8% 906
2006 Q4 731 535 120 16.4% 80.0% 82.0% 797
2006 Q3 825 604 168 20.4% 100.0% 80.6% 785
2006 Q2 809 603 135 16.7% 70.0% 84.8% 939
2006 Q1 736 537 135 18.3% 72.7% 84.7% 916
2005 Q4 832 595 179 21.5% 83.3% 79.7% 800
2005 Q3 900 665 174 19.3% 63.6% 75.5% 826
2005 Q2 862 628 157 18.2% 83.3% 57.8% 892
2005 Q1 786 580 141 17.9% 55.6% 49.7% 890
2004 Q4 680 524 135 19.9% 66.7% 47.7% 794
2004 Q3 817 681 120 14.7% 66.7% 62.8% 802
2004 Q2 818 667 136 16.6% 18.2% 56.9% 865
2004 Q1 707 597 102 14.4% 50.0% 25.0% 820
2003 Q4 720 583 115 16.0% 16.7% 31.7% 697
2003 Q3 770 667 88 11.4% 33.3% 40.1% 716
2003 Q2 758 636 103 13.6% 20.0% 42.9% 832
2003 Q1 573 480 75 13.1% 83.3% 47.8% 735
2002 Q4 616 528 75 12.2% 62.5% 49.6% 638
2002 Q3 720 635 66 9.2% 88.9% 50.9% 764
2002 Q2 712 629 73 10.3% 30.0% 49.7% 697
2002 Q1 580 492 78 13.4% 83.3% 56.7% 768
2001 Q4 688 597 79 11.5% 50.0% 53.3% 621
2001 Q3 745 678 54 7.2% 71.4% 42.0% 662
2001 Q2 783 722 46 5.9% 50.0% 43.4% 792
2001 Q1 568 498 59 10.4% 44.4% 51.2% 763
2000 Q4 553 501 47 8.5% 33.3% 51.0% 611
2000 Q3 654 582 62 9.5% 27.3% 46.8% 629
2000 Q2 694 632 54 7.8% 70.0% 48.6% 732
2000 Q1 578 505 54 9.3% 75.0% 48.9% 706
1999 Q4 554 487 54 9.7% 71.4% 56.7% 607
1999 Q3 699 624 63 9.0% 50.0% 49.1% 637
1999 Q2 610 547 52 8.5% 37.5% 52.7% 652
1999 Q1 555 467 79 14.2% 50.0% 48.5% 674
1998 Q4 585 519 52 8.9% 50.0% 49.4% 622
1998 Q3 714 630 71 9.9% 53.8% 54.8% 595
1998 Q2 632 573 50 7.9% 33.3% 54.0% 685
1998 Q1 492 452 31 6.3% 20.0% 59.4% 673
1997 Q4 606 526 67 11.1% 33.3% 46.2% 577
1997 Q3 650 573 47 7.2% 38.5% 41.8% 689
1997 Q2 544 473 59 10.8% 16.7% 51.3% 633
1997 Q1 497 426 67 13.5% 73.3% 50.3% 556
1996 Q4 491 418 62 12.6% 66.7% 45.9% 556
1996 Q3 581 493 85 14.6% 33.3% 46.5% 583
1996 Q2 594 512 73 12.3% 50.0% 47.6% 582
1996 Q1 366 303 63 17.2% 66.7% 59.5% —
1995 Q4 342 297 45 13.2% 66.7% 60.8% —
1995 Q3 385 331 54 14.0% 40.0% 65.3% —
1995 Q2 442 381 61 13.8% 71.4% 66.7% —
1995 Q1 370 313 57 15.4% 75.0% 63.8% —
1994 Q4 343 305 38 11.1% 33.3% 64.6% —
1994 Q3 397 349 48 12.1% 45.5% 56.1% —
1994 Q2 442 387 55 12.4% 100.0% 59.4% —
1994 Q1 385 331 54 14.0% 25.0% 65.5% —
1993 Q4 359 324 35 9.7% 75.0% 58.6% —
1993 Q3 411 344 67 16.3% 66.7% 60.2% —
1993 Q2 419 375 44 10.5% 50.0% 58.6% —
1993 Q1 357 311 46 12.9% 20.0% 67.3% —
1992 Q4 350 297 53 15.1% 60.0% 43.4% —
1992 Q3 426 345 81 19.0% 20.0% 53.0% —
1992 Q2 454 382 72 15.9% 37.5% 34.5% —
1992 Q1 346 270 76 22.0% 50.0% 49.5% —
1991 Q4 363 293 70 19.3% 20.0% 55.7% —
1991 Q3 451 380 71 15.7% 25.0% 45.4% —
1991 Q2 478 386 92 19.2% 11.1% 34.6% —
1991 Q1 453 364 89 19.6% 20.0% 21.0% —
1990 Q4 440 345 95 21.6% 14.3% 22.1% —
1990 Q3 563 453 110 19.5% 50.0% 26.7% —
1990 Q2 480 402 78 16.3% 25.0% 23.2% —
1990 Q1 461 372 89 19.3% 50.0% 20.5% —
1989 Q4 500 410 90 18.0% 44.4% 31.9% —
1989 Q3 629 488 141 22.4% 20.0% 18.4% —
1989 Q2 576 456 120 20.8% 20.0% 16.0% —
1989 Q1 543 420 123 22.7% 0.0% 15.5% —
1988 Q4 597 458 139 23.3% 11.1% 20.6% —
1988 Q3 653 519 134 20.5% 33.3% 17.4% —
1988 Q2 594 504 90 15.2% 57.1% 22.1% —
1988 Q1 563 454 109 19.4% 100.0% 15.1% —
1987 Q4 475 380 95 20.0% 42.1% 13.5% —
1987 Q3 553 459 94 17.0% 33.3% 27.9% —
1987 Q2 573 483 90 15.7% 75.0% 35.9% —
1987 Q1 477 392 85 17.8% 27.3% 21.0% —
1986 Q4 458 366 92 20.1% 53.8% 18.9% —
1986 Q3 533 450 83 15.6% 33.3% 29.7% —
1986 Q2 517 430 87 16.8% 7.7% 41.9% —
1986 Q1 388 317 71 18.3% 55.6% 48.0% —
1985 Q4 405 328 77 19.0% 46.2% 47.2% —
1985 Q3 454 385 69 15.2% 55.6% 44.0% —
1985 Q2 543 434 109 20.1% 20.0% 44.8% —
1985 Q1 412 339 73 17.7% 42.9% 40.6% —
1984 Q4 362 299 63 17.4% 75.0% 52.3% —
1984 Q3 452 377 75 16.6% 57.1% 52.3% —
1984 Q2 462 400 62 13.4% 40.0% 52.5% —
1984 Q1 391 333 58 14.8% 60.0% 48.0% —
1983 Q4 419 370 49 11.7% 50.0% 58.5% —
1983 Q3 452 380 72 15.9% 85.7% 54.1% —
1983 Q2 495 424 71 14.3% 58.3% 55.1% —
1983 Q1 376 327 49 13.0% 70.0% 62.5% —
1982 Q4 326 275 51 15.6% 40.0% 64.1% —
1982 Q3 471 386 85 18.0% 53.8% 53.8% —
1982 Q2 393 323 70 17.8% 66.7% 57.7% —
1982 Q1 389 334 55 14.1% 40.0% 47.1% —
1981 Q4 349 283 66 18.9% 68.8% 60.0% —
1981 Q3 445 368 77 17.3% 30.0% 31.5% —
1981 Q2 542 403 139 25.6% 64.7% 21.9% —
1981 Q1 444 361 83 18.7% 70.0% 38.5% —
1980 Q4 323 250 73 22.6% 44.4% 42.4% —
1980 Q3 551 436 115 20.9% 70.8% 52.0% —
1980 Q2 541 449 92 17.0% 60.0% 39.6% —
1980 Q1 552 439 113 20.5% 66.7% 41.6% —
1979 Q4 602 486 116 19.3% 66.7% 35.8% —
1979 Q3 595 502 93 15.6% 76.9% 47.3% —
1979 Q2 645 554 91 14.1% 42.9% 44.1% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me