← All authorities

South Hams

South West · E07000044 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
976
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
8.0%
higher than 25% of authorities
Majors in time
66.7%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
94.6%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
96.9%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.9%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
36.4%
114 allowed of 313 decided
Decisions overturned
1.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.8%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,033
in the window
Applications decided
976
in the window
Approval rate
92.0%
898 granted, 78 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 48 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
95.9%
rank 76 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 43 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2580.0%66.7%
Minor31988.1%94.6%
Other63294.5%—
of which householder45693.9%96.9%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01553092024 Q3: 303 received2024 Q3: 308 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 301 received2024 Q4: 246 decided2025 Q1: 309 received2025 Q1: 268 decided2025 Q2: 308 received2025 Q2: 276 decided2025 Q3: 263 received2025 Q3: 275 decided2025 Q4: 281 received2025 Q4: 231 decided2026 Q1: 244 received2026 Q1: 236 decided2026 Q2: 245 received2026 Q2: 234 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
87%
Action plan

Delivery 85–94%: the authority must publish an action plan. No presumption or buffer consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000044). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 234 222 12 5.1% — 97.4% 245
2026 Q1 236 222 14 5.9% — 97.1% 244
2025 Q4 231 207 24 10.4% 50.0% 95.7% 281
2025 Q3 275 247 28 10.2% 100.0% 89.8% 263
2025 Q2 276 241 35 12.7% 100.0% 91.1% 308
2025 Q1 268 237 31 11.6% 75.0% 87.2% 309
2024 Q4 246 230 16 6.5% — 95.9% 301
2024 Q3 308 286 22 7.1% — 91.4% 303
2024 Q2 301 268 33 11.0% 100.0% 93.2% 372
2024 Q1 286 251 35 12.2% 75.0% 86.5% 371
2023 Q4 306 280 26 8.5% 100.0% 93.3% 321
2023 Q3 286 251 35 12.2% 75.0% 86.5% 355
2023 Q2 317 278 39 12.3% 100.0% 86.0% 407
2023 Q1 359 306 53 14.8% 50.0% 87.0% 322
2022 Q4 312 272 40 12.8% 0.0% 86.5% 394
2022 Q3 333 301 32 9.6% 40.0% 87.9% 402
2022 Q2 327 272 55 16.8% 100.0% 80.3% 369
2022 Q1 346 307 39 11.3% 66.7% 72.6% 357
2021 Q4 341 309 32 9.4% 0.0% 45.6% 415
2021 Q3 350 322 28 8.0% 0.0% 45.8% 399
2021 Q2 355 332 23 6.5% 100.0% 68.3% 489
2021 Q1 308 286 22 7.1% 50.0% 83.8% 429
2020 Q4 333 305 28 8.4% 50.0% 91.1% 394
2020 Q3 362 320 42 11.6% — 81.5% 361
2020 Q2 314 294 20 6.4% 75.0% 72.2% 361
2020 Q1 348 308 40 11.5% 66.7% 79.4% 365
2019 Q4 302 267 35 11.6% 50.0% 67.8% 391
2019 Q3 384 335 49 12.8% — 82.5% 338
2019 Q2 372 344 28 7.5% 0.0% 86.4% 416
2019 Q1 343 313 30 8.7% 80.0% 73.3% 504
2018 Q4 356 334 22 6.2% 0.0% 73.8% 415
2018 Q3 325 306 19 5.8% 0.0% 82.5% 392
2018 Q2 375 348 27 7.2% 100.0% 74.0% 398
2018 Q1 337 316 21 6.2% 100.0% 76.1% 404
2017 Q4 351 335 16 4.6% 0.0% 86.1% 392
2017 Q3 371 343 28 7.5% — 86.5% 409
2017 Q2 340 317 23 6.8% 50.0% 80.3% 417
2017 Q1 346 318 28 8.1% — 79.7% 415
2016 Q4 339 324 15 4.4% 100.0% 76.1% 359
2016 Q3 363 347 16 4.4% 100.0% 74.1% 375
2016 Q2 353 334 19 5.4% 100.0% 73.7% 403
2016 Q1 337 315 22 6.5% 100.0% 91.7% 421
2015 Q4 501 481 20 4.0% 33.3% 46.8% 460
2015 Q3 395 377 18 4.6% 50.0% 26.2% 438
2015 Q2 336 327 9 2.7% 50.0% 44.7% 427
2015 Q1 378 358 20 5.3% 100.0% 43.8% 382
2014 Q4 369 353 16 4.3% 100.0% 50.0% 428
2014 Q3 382 374 8 2.1% 50.0% 48.6% 383
2014 Q2 316 299 17 5.4% 66.7% 58.4% 444
2014 Q1 338 303 23 6.8% 100.0% 46.5% 384
2013 Q4 370 329 19 5.1% 100.0% 63.3% 430
2013 Q3 367 336 19 5.2% 83.3% 55.7% 409
2013 Q2 415 378 19 4.6% 100.0% 53.3% 408
2013 Q1 357 320 16 4.5% 44.4% 54.0% 426
2012 Q4 426 373 32 7.5% 11.1% 45.4% 383
2012 Q3 423 393 18 4.3% 40.0% 35.2% 445
2012 Q2 326 291 13 4.0% 25.0% 35.9% 454
2012 Q1 375 329 21 5.6% 0.0% 38.5% 398
2011 Q4 395 357 21 5.3% 100.0% 53.3% 461
2011 Q3 624 479 104 16.7% 50.0% 67.9% 511
2011 Q2 403 341 38 9.4% 33.3% 64.5% 469
2011 Q1 388 340 29 7.5% 50.0% 65.8% 489
2010 Q4 402 350 35 8.7% 50.0% 67.5% 410
2010 Q3 450 409 27 6.0% 100.0% 39.5% 459
2010 Q2 418 383 23 5.5% 20.0% 21.6% 487
2010 Q1 329 286 36 10.9% 25.0% 34.3% 467
2009 Q4 355 327 21 5.9% 60.0% 52.1% 457
2009 Q3 359 314 39 10.9% 25.0% 60.6% 446
2009 Q2 410 365 41 10.0% 57.1% 69.2% 455
2009 Q1 377 320 51 13.5% 75.0% 71.6% 484
2008 Q4 430 384 44 10.2% 66.7% 64.2% 543
2008 Q3 449 403 44 9.8% 28.6% 65.0% 530
2008 Q2 507 435 62 12.2% 83.3% 69.9% 626
2008 Q1 457 395 59 12.9% 87.5% 67.6% 642
2007 Q4 475 399 70 14.7% 66.7% 69.9% 557
2007 Q3 563 503 56 9.9% 100.0% 73.6% 632
2007 Q2 600 540 53 8.8% 66.7% 57.1% 668
2007 Q1 520 457 50 9.6% 71.4% 63.3% 707
2006 Q4 433 406 26 6.0% 55.6% 67.3% 582
2006 Q3 541 488 49 9.1% 75.0% 69.3% 531
2006 Q2 502 451 42 8.4% 100.0% 75.4% 619
2006 Q1 469 424 41 8.7% 50.0% 65.6% 643
2005 Q4 487 437 44 9.0% 80.0% 72.4% 542
2005 Q3 499 447 44 8.8% 66.7% 78.8% 556
2005 Q2 567 492 71 12.5% 66.7% 74.6% 610
2005 Q1 479 419 52 10.9% 50.0% 69.1% 578
2004 Q4 521 477 42 8.1% 25.0% 78.7% 582
2004 Q3 545 478 60 11.0% 54.5% 80.9% 583
2004 Q2 632 568 61 9.7% 66.7% 73.9% 610
2004 Q1 513 463 46 9.0% 22.2% 62.0% 633
2003 Q4 506 460 45 8.9% 50.0% 55.6% 564
2003 Q3 580 539 36 6.2% 40.0% 61.6% 553
2003 Q2 561 498 57 10.2% 57.1% 55.1% 635
2003 Q1 473 418 53 11.2% 0.0% 53.3% 668
2002 Q4 531 474 56 10.5% 25.0% 54.9% 528
2002 Q3 552 489 57 10.3% 75.0% 61.4% 623
2002 Q2 517 459 57 11.0% 16.7% 68.5% 602
2002 Q1 452 372 76 16.8% 33.3% 64.0% 586
2001 Q4 494 423 71 14.4% 40.0% 70.5% 491
2001 Q3 501 458 36 7.2% 40.0% 67.4% 527
2001 Q2 445 403 41 9.2% 85.7% 59.1% 532
2001 Q1 427 386 37 8.7% 20.0% 64.1% 525
2000 Q4 424 370 51 12.0% 25.0% 67.6% 455
2000 Q3 454 409 41 9.0% 66.7% 74.5% 511
2000 Q2 520 449 69 13.3% 100.0% 74.7% 481
2000 Q1 425 362 56 13.2% 83.3% 72.6% 512
1999 Q4 388 341 40 10.3% 44.4% 71.9% 478
1999 Q3 469 392 71 15.1% 57.1% 70.1% 502
1999 Q2 476 421 55 11.6% 88.9% 83.4% 484
1999 Q1 436 388 43 9.9% 80.0% 88.6% 565
1998 Q4 371 332 28 7.5% 60.0% 88.8% 452
1998 Q3 459 411 45 9.8% 100.0% 90.1% 473
1998 Q2 484 431 49 10.1% 62.5% 90.2% 487
1998 Q1 412 359 45 10.9% 85.7% 88.3% 486
1997 Q4 394 337 50 12.7% 85.7% 92.4% 425
1997 Q3 531 493 29 5.5% 88.9% 91.0% 545
1997 Q2 532 477 48 9.0% 100.0% 91.5% 583
1997 Q1 471 423 43 9.1% 77.8% 87.4% 505
1996 Q4 467 400 62 13.3% 83.3% 91.6% 486
1996 Q3 418 375 37 8.9% 69.2% 91.6% 508
1996 Q2 563 495 60 10.7% 100.0% 91.4% 507
1996 Q1 129 120 9 7.0% 83.3% 61.9% —
1995 Q4 212 205 7 3.3% 90.9% 55.0% —
1995 Q3 235 223 12 5.1% 63.6% 60.0% —
1995 Q2 227 218 9 4.0% 50.0% 63.1% —
1995 Q1 203 186 17 8.4% 81.8% 62.2% —
1994 Q4 225 206 19 8.4% 90.9% 61.1% —
1994 Q3 291 276 15 5.2% 84.6% 61.0% —
1994 Q2 249 222 27 10.8% 83.3% 62.6% —
1994 Q1 216 194 22 10.2% 90.0% 74.2% —
1993 Q4 275 261 14 5.1% 92.9% 68.8% —
1993 Q3 309 283 26 8.4% 86.7% 64.3% —
1993 Q2 248 229 19 7.7% 80.0% 65.4% —
1993 Q1 205 170 35 17.1% 87.5% 72.0% —
1992 Q4 270 244 26 9.6% 63.6% 54.7% —
1992 Q3 259 231 28 10.8% 40.0% 56.7% —
1992 Q2 292 261 31 10.6% 66.7% 70.2% —
1992 Q1 238 205 33 13.9% 66.7% 57.0% —
1991 Q4 270 233 37 13.7% 71.4% 58.0% —
1991 Q3 314 287 27 8.6% 41.7% 64.0% —
1991 Q2 275 253 22 8.0% 58.3% 65.5% —
1991 Q1 257 235 22 8.6% 63.6% 66.3% —
1990 Q4 278 246 32 11.5% 43.8% 51.4% —
1990 Q3 344 303 41 11.9% 65.0% 42.1% —
1990 Q2 310 276 34 11.0% 81.3% 49.6% —
1990 Q1 248 220 28 11.3% 71.4% 55.3% —
1989 Q4 338 293 45 13.3% 71.4% 35.4% —
1989 Q3 363 280 83 22.9% 64.7% 21.5% —
1989 Q2 352 321 31 8.8% 60.0% 48.0% —
1989 Q1 262 222 40 15.3% 72.7% 47.1% —
1988 Q4 284 242 42 14.8% 83.3% 53.2% —
1988 Q3 287 264 23 8.0% 90.0% 52.2% —
1988 Q2 238 221 17 7.1% 60.0% 65.9% —
1988 Q1 211 189 22 10.4% 50.0% 58.9% —
1987 Q4 208 183 25 12.0% 66.7% 63.6% —
1987 Q3 270 240 30 11.1% 61.5% 57.9% —
1987 Q2 209 189 20 9.6% 42.9% 55.8% —
1987 Q1 204 175 29 14.2% 72.7% 42.0% —
1986 Q4 223 202 21 9.4% 100.0% 43.4% —
1986 Q3 218 201 17 7.8% 0.0% 54.5% —
1986 Q2 214 195 19 8.9% 100.0% 50.6% —
1986 Q1 176 157 19 10.8% 50.0% 50.7% —
1985 Q4 219 199 20 9.1% 40.0% 47.1% —
1985 Q3 231 211 20 8.7% 66.7% 59.0% —
1985 Q2 226 198 28 12.4% 100.0% 43.2% —
1985 Q1 197 163 34 17.3% 71.4% 52.7% —
1984 Q4 177 151 26 14.7% 100.0% 78.3% —
1984 Q3 218 207 11 5.0% 77.8% 58.8% —
1984 Q2 261 241 20 7.7% 50.0% 55.4% —
1984 Q1 177 164 13 7.3% 87.5% 60.9% —
1983 Q4 223 202 21 9.4% 87.5% 69.9% —
1983 Q3 264 250 14 5.3% 100.0% 68.9% —
1983 Q2 231 219 12 5.2% 75.0% 61.4% —
1983 Q1 218 203 15 6.9% 55.6% 83.3% —
1982 Q4 243 208 35 14.4% 90.0% 58.5% —
1982 Q3 240 220 20 8.3% 60.0% 60.3% —
1982 Q2 233 217 16 6.9% 100.0% 61.5% —
1982 Q1 170 161 9 5.3% 100.0% 59.6% —
1981 Q4 194 168 26 13.4% 50.0% 49.4% —
1981 Q3 192 175 17 8.9% 83.3% 53.3% —
1981 Q2 380 328 52 13.7% 75.0% 48.7% —
1981 Q1 310 280 30 9.7% 75.0% 62.7% —
1980 Q4 283 237 46 16.3% 87.5% 63.3% —
1980 Q3 293 259 34 11.6% 70.0% 48.5% —
1980 Q2 364 338 26 7.1% 62.5% 37.6% —
1980 Q1 293 268 25 8.5% 50.0% 23.5% —
1979 Q4 345 296 49 14.2% 86.7% 24.4% —
1979 Q3 351 327 24 6.8% 28.6% 28.2% —
1979 Q2 307 272 35 11.4% 42.9% 8.6% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me