← All authorities

Fenland

East of England · E07000010 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
588
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
13.9%
higher than 64% of authorities
Majors in time
90.9%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
90.6%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
96.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
86.2%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
36.1%
31 allowed of 86 decided
Decisions overturned
0.9%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 26.2%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
630
in the window
Applications decided
588
in the window
Approval rate
86.1%
506 granted, 82 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 111 of 164 district councils (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 11.4%
Decided within time
91.9%
rank 145 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 82 of 164 district councils · peer median 91.9%

Peer ranks compare only district councils with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major5082.0%90.9%
Minor30980.9%90.6%
Other22993.9%—
of which householder15893.7%96.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0901802024 Q3: 128 received2024 Q3: 129 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 142 received2024 Q4: 125 decided2025 Q1: 151 received2025 Q1: 154 decided2025 Q2: 151 received2025 Q2: 174 decided2025 Q3: 124 received2025 Q3: 135 decided2025 Q4: 180 received2025 Q4: 136 decided2026 Q1: 169 received2026 Q1: 159 decided2026 Q2: 157 received2026 Q2: 158 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
117%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E07000010). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 158 138 20 12.7% 100.0% 86.7% 157
2026 Q1 159 138 21 13.2% 100.0% 91.8% 169
2025 Q4 136 117 19 14.0% 80.0% 92.9% 180
2025 Q3 135 113 22 16.3% 100.0% 91.9% 124
2025 Q2 174 157 17 9.8% 100.0% 94.3% 151
2025 Q1 154 134 20 13.0% 100.0% 87.5% 151
2024 Q4 125 106 19 15.2% 100.0% 61.9% 142
2024 Q3 129 119 10 7.8% — 76.5% 128
2024 Q2 125 113 12 9.6% 100.0% 83.3% 130
2024 Q1 142 124 18 12.7% — 80.0% 138
2023 Q4 154 134 20 13.0% — 54.5% 165
2023 Q3 185 163 22 11.9% 100.0% 44.0% 141
2023 Q2 164 132 32 19.5% 50.0% 31.8% 182
2023 Q1 162 145 17 10.5% 50.0% 38.2% 169
2022 Q4 176 139 37 21.0% 0.0% 46.5% 177
2022 Q3 205 186 19 9.3% 50.0% 40.0% 202
2022 Q2 182 168 14 7.7% 57.1% 46.5% 220
2022 Q1 205 184 21 10.2% 33.3% 50.0% 212
2021 Q4 157 147 10 6.4% 100.0% 79.3% 229
2021 Q3 194 168 26 13.4% 100.0% 56.5% 199
2021 Q2 194 180 14 7.2% 100.0% 73.2% 203
2021 Q1 198 181 17 8.6% 100.0% 80.9% 219
2020 Q4 161 153 8 5.0% 100.0% 93.9% 232
2020 Q3 165 147 18 10.9% 100.0% 91.9% 184
2020 Q2 168 143 25 14.9% 100.0% 96.2% 159
2020 Q1 170 150 20 11.8% 100.0% 96.1% 171
2019 Q4 189 161 28 14.8% 100.0% 98.5% 207
2019 Q3 209 166 43 20.6% 100.0% 94.2% 181
2019 Q2 165 134 31 18.8% 100.0% 95.5% 216
2019 Q1 192 165 27 14.1% 100.0% 98.2% 183
2018 Q4 183 152 31 16.9% 100.0% 98.1% 195
2018 Q3 196 156 40 20.4% 100.0% 89.1% 183
2018 Q2 215 173 42 19.5% 100.0% 94.8% 205
2018 Q1 229 169 60 26.2% 100.0% 87.8% 236
2017 Q4 219 178 41 18.7% 80.0% 94.2% 237
2017 Q3 206 162 44 21.4% — 96.6% 228
2017 Q2 201 170 31 15.4% 100.0% 97.9% 201
2017 Q1 185 168 17 9.2% — 91.5% 213
2016 Q4 196 167 29 14.8% 100.0% 95.2% 221
2016 Q3 240 202 38 15.8% 100.0% 86.4% 241
2016 Q2 159 138 21 13.2% 50.0% 83.9% 234
2016 Q1 158 137 21 13.3% 100.0% 92.2% 172
2015 Q4 222 186 36 16.2% 80.0% 83.6% 192
2015 Q3 223 190 33 14.8% 100.0% 68.1% 245
2015 Q2 149 126 23 15.4% 75.0% 88.7% 241
2015 Q1 170 148 22 12.9% 100.0% 95.7% 191
2014 Q4 175 145 30 17.1% 80.0% 93.2% 186
2014 Q3 199 184 15 7.5% 83.3% 86.4% 202
2014 Q2 177 162 15 8.5% 60.0% 57.0% 193
2014 Q1 169 140 29 17.2% 40.0% 69.3% 207
2013 Q4 191 159 30 15.7% 66.7% 59.6% 174
2013 Q3 202 170 28 13.9% 12.5% 51.3% 202
2013 Q2 168 130 36 21.4% 37.5% 52.7% 227
2013 Q1 145 123 19 13.1% 0.0% 64.2% 174
2012 Q4 203 165 35 17.2% 50.0% 67.6% 209
2012 Q3 193 159 31 16.1% 50.0% 61.5% 218
2012 Q2 197 171 25 12.7% 50.0% 75.5% 202
2012 Q1 155 125 28 18.1% 66.7% 71.6% 220
2011 Q4 196 162 33 16.8% 84.6% 55.3% 179
2011 Q3 190 159 27 14.2% 81.8% 62.2% 214
2011 Q2 163 148 14 8.6% 75.0% 73.8% 213
2011 Q1 180 149 30 16.7% 100.0% 75.0% 214
2010 Q4 186 165 21 11.3% 37.5% 72.8% 182
2010 Q3 207 179 26 12.6% 50.0% 74.0% 204
2010 Q2 180 162 17 9.4% 71.4% 83.5% 199
2010 Q1 177 159 15 8.5% 70.0% 76.1% 202
2009 Q4 179 162 15 8.4% 75.0% 83.5% 186
2009 Q3 179 156 21 11.7% 57.1% 66.7% 168
2009 Q2 162 143 18 11.1% 57.1% 74.1% 169
2009 Q1 184 157 25 13.6% 77.8% 76.6% 220
2008 Q4 229 189 37 16.2% 33.3% 77.7% 193
2008 Q3 283 249 34 12.0% 52.9% 79.8% 292
2008 Q2 250 194 53 21.2% 64.3% 67.6% 223
2008 Q1 271 214 53 19.6% 80.0% 83.6% 318
2007 Q4 302 238 61 20.2% 64.3% 84.8% 293
2007 Q3 291 219 66 22.7% 81.0% 84.8% 344
2007 Q2 293 239 50 17.1% 45.5% 79.7% 318
2007 Q1 319 248 70 21.9% 82.4% 92.2% 323
2006 Q4 303 237 64 21.1% 70.0% 84.2% 316
2006 Q3 332 233 96 28.9% 57.9% 75.0% 286
2006 Q2 376 278 95 25.3% 58.3% 75.2% 396
2006 Q1 294 213 79 26.9% 70.6% 63.7% 373
2005 Q4 314 232 72 22.9% 81.3% 63.4% 321
2005 Q3 343 269 68 19.8% 28.6% 70.1% 378
2005 Q2 337 271 63 18.7% 57.9% 63.2% 341
2005 Q1 322 261 58 18.0% 38.9% 65.6% 363
2004 Q4 356 287 66 18.5% 63.2% 75.0% 381
2004 Q3 379 307 68 17.9% 56.3% 77.4% 407
2004 Q2 428 347 74 17.3% 28.6% 69.4% 412
2004 Q1 311 254 43 13.8% 44.4% 65.2% 381
2003 Q4 319 249 56 17.6% 18.2% 62.3% 341
2003 Q3 389 311 71 18.3% 0.0% 55.7% 335
2003 Q2 395 336 54 13.7% 26.7% 53.3% 417
2003 Q1 328 258 60 18.3% 38.5% 46.7% 403
2002 Q4 331 275 51 15.4% 23.1% 51.9% 326
2002 Q3 365 315 46 12.6% 10.0% 41.3% 364
2002 Q2 326 282 42 12.9% 42.9% 55.9% 361
2002 Q1 326 284 38 11.7% 30.8% 53.5% 362
2001 Q4 267 229 29 10.9% 22.2% 57.4% 289
2001 Q3 315 277 29 9.2% 29.4% 50.4% 304
2001 Q2 274 234 29 10.6% 28.6% 50.0% 280
2001 Q1 257 229 18 7.0% 17.6% 41.2% 302
2000 Q4 254 220 22 8.7% 0.0% 36.1% 251
2000 Q3 249 218 22 8.8% 40.0% 48.4% 301
2000 Q2 288 251 28 9.7% 33.3% 51.4% 294
2000 Q1 233 208 16 6.9% 42.9% 27.4% 258
1999 Q4 242 211 15 6.2% 28.6% 43.4% 253
1999 Q3 262 228 14 5.3% 60.0% 41.4% 266
1999 Q2 219 182 19 8.7% 72.7% 41.5% 265
1999 Q1 232 192 18 7.8% 37.5% 50.6% 235
1998 Q4 224 180 25 11.2% 12.5% 47.1% 239
1998 Q3 263 212 21 8.0% 57.1% 46.6% 247
1998 Q2 216 185 18 8.3% 33.3% 56.8% 254
1998 Q1 198 167 21 10.6% 31.6% 43.6% 242
1997 Q4 235 177 32 13.6% 35.7% 51.0% 216
1997 Q3 267 210 27 10.1% 44.4% 42.7% 258
1997 Q2 244 196 27 11.1% 25.0% 41.7% 266
1997 Q1 190 162 17 8.9% 0.0% 29.5% 250
1996 Q4 198 162 19 9.6% 20.0% 48.9% 199
1996 Q3 197 164 21 10.7% 42.9% 63.9% 235
1996 Q2 237 196 28 11.8% 47.4% 62.5% 226
1996 Q1 186 159 27 14.5% 50.0% 63.6% —
1995 Q4 207 181 26 12.6% 20.0% 63.2% —
1995 Q3 270 228 42 15.6% 80.0% 65.4% —
1995 Q2 275 236 39 14.2% 28.6% 54.5% —
1995 Q1 213 184 29 13.6% 66.7% 65.7% —
1994 Q4 233 205 28 12.0% 0.0% 69.7% —
1994 Q3 278 243 35 12.6% 20.0% 69.7% —
1994 Q2 221 183 38 17.2% 66.7% 68.2% —
1994 Q1 208 174 34 16.3% 25.0% 62.0% —
1993 Q4 241 207 34 14.1% 33.3% 77.3% —
1993 Q3 296 233 63 21.3% 25.0% 76.5% —
1993 Q2 285 234 51 17.9% 75.0% 65.9% —
1993 Q1 193 147 46 23.8% 25.0% 56.5% —
1992 Q4 226 185 41 18.1% 60.0% 65.1% —
1992 Q3 240 195 45 18.8% 50.0% 71.2% —
1992 Q2 290 233 57 19.7% 34.8% 67.9% —
1992 Q1 276 212 64 23.2% 55.0% 77.5% —
1991 Q4 255 206 49 19.2% 76.9% 66.2% —
1991 Q3 322 254 68 21.1% 92.3% 75.8% —
1991 Q2 291 189 102 35.1% 60.0% 65.1% —
1991 Q1 269 207 62 23.0% 25.0% 35.6% —
1990 Q4 266 203 63 23.7% 33.3% 46.3% —
1990 Q3 305 231 74 24.3% 9.1% 36.7% —
1990 Q2 373 265 108 29.0% 16.7% 19.3% —
1990 Q1 340 233 107 31.5% 20.0% 16.5% —
1989 Q4 290 246 44 15.2% 23.1% 6.6% —
1989 Q3 269 218 51 19.0% 6.7% 2.5% —
1989 Q2 259 201 58 22.4% 31.6% 5.1% —
1989 Q1 262 210 52 19.8% 18.2% 14.7% —
1988 Q4 294 246 48 16.3% 12.5% 29.7% —
1988 Q3 357 290 67 18.8% 33.3% 24.5% —
1988 Q2 387 336 51 13.2% 16.7% 36.2% —
1988 Q1 240 192 48 20.0% 50.0% 47.0% —
1987 Q4 299 249 50 16.7% 33.3% 51.5% —
1987 Q3 330 281 49 14.8% 33.3% 33.1% —
1987 Q2 296 260 36 12.2% 62.5% 20.0% —
1987 Q1 245 213 32 13.1% 50.0% 28.0% —
1986 Q4 215 194 21 9.8% 71.4% 55.3% —
1986 Q3 281 248 33 11.7% 87.5% 57.6% —
1986 Q2 255 224 31 12.2% 73.3% 57.0% —
1986 Q1 239 211 28 11.7% 88.9% 58.1% —
1985 Q4 292 253 39 13.4% 50.0% 53.7% —
1985 Q3 272 247 25 9.2% 80.0% 55.0% —
1985 Q2 317 275 42 13.2% 70.0% 60.7% —
1985 Q1 253 224 29 11.5% 62.5% 53.6% —
1984 Q4 224 205 19 8.5% 25.0% 62.4% —
1984 Q3 290 270 20 6.9% 83.3% 62.0% —
1984 Q2 271 245 26 9.6% 100.0% 70.5% —
1984 Q1 252 231 21 8.3% 84.6% 73.5% —
1983 Q4 278 248 30 10.8% 83.3% 62.1% —
1983 Q3 231 213 18 7.8% 100.0% 70.0% —
1983 Q2 274 248 26 9.5% 80.0% 74.3% —
1983 Q1 207 186 21 10.1% 60.0% 76.5% —
1982 Q4 210 182 28 13.3% 50.0% 72.0% —
1982 Q3 239 218 21 8.8% 100.0% 80.8% —
1982 Q2 265 243 22 8.3% 50.0% 75.5% —
1982 Q1 200 180 20 10.0% 75.0% 65.1% —
1981 Q4 207 184 23 11.1% 83.3% 82.2% —
1981 Q3 207 182 25 12.1% 63.6% 76.6% —
1981 Q2 300 263 37 12.3% 85.7% 61.1% —
1981 Q1 231 205 26 11.3% 50.0% 70.9% —
1980 Q4 255 217 38 14.9% 63.6% 72.0% —
1980 Q3 309 271 38 12.3% 83.3% 69.3% —
1980 Q2 330 287 43 13.0% 83.3% 71.6% —
1980 Q1 313 258 55 17.6% 100.0% 62.6% —
1979 Q4 361 307 54 15.0% 93.8% 60.2% —
1979 Q3 294 244 50 17.0% 73.3% 62.6% —
1979 Q2 280 240 40 14.3% 86.7% 56.9% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me