← All authorities

West Berkshire

South East · E06000037 · 113 quarters held (1998 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,037
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
10.0%
higher than 39% of authorities
Majors in time
58.8%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
79.7%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
92.8%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.9%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
37.0%
101 allowed of 273 decided
Decisions overturned
1.5%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 30.9%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,234
in the window
Applications decided
1,037
in the window
Approval rate
90.0%
933 granted, 104 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 29 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
89.4%
rank 187 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 35 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major5589.1%58.8%
Minor20777.8%79.7%
Other77593.3%—
of which householder58293.5%92.8%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01863722024 Q3: 293 received2024 Q3: 313 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 328 received2024 Q4: 293 decided2025 Q1: 284 received2025 Q1: 314 decided2025 Q2: 313 received2025 Q2: 281 decided2025 Q3: 372 received2025 Q3: 294 decided2025 Q4: 278 received2025 Q4: 252 decided2026 Q1: 304 received2026 Q1: 218 decided2026 Q2: 280 received2026 Q2: 273 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
114%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000037). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1998 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (113 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1998 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (113 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 273 244 29 10.6% 100.0% 66.7% 280
2026 Q1 218 189 29 13.3% 33.3% 88.2% 304
2025 Q4 252 231 21 8.3% 100.0% 80.0% 278
2025 Q3 294 269 25 8.5% 66.7% 88.9% 372
2025 Q2 281 248 33 11.7% — 88.2% 313
2025 Q1 314 283 31 9.9% 100.0% 88.2% 284
2024 Q4 293 260 33 11.3% 100.0% 71.4% 328
2024 Q3 313 289 24 7.7% 66.7% 78.9% 293
2024 Q2 226 188 38 16.8% 100.0% 75.0% 266
2024 Q1 311 281 30 9.6% 100.0% 93.3% 274
2023 Q4 284 258 26 9.2% 62.5% 53.8% 291
2023 Q3 282 254 28 9.9% 100.0% 53.8% 349
2023 Q2 293 261 32 10.9% 100.0% 69.2% 367
2023 Q1 267 234 33 12.4% 83.3% 62.5% 361
2022 Q4 321 265 56 17.4% 54.5% 78.6% 356
2022 Q3 402 340 62 15.4% 41.7% 70.0% 414
2022 Q2 352 290 62 17.6% 83.3% 87.5% 406
2022 Q1 341 305 36 10.6% 75.0% 89.5% 445
2021 Q4 409 370 39 9.5% 80.0% 93.3% 415
2021 Q3 442 399 43 9.7% 87.5% 83.3% 438
2021 Q2 401 374 27 6.7% 100.0% 100.0% 512
2021 Q1 358 330 28 7.8% 83.3% 91.7% 432
2020 Q4 397 364 33 8.3% 70.0% 100.0% 432
2020 Q3 347 317 30 8.6% 85.7% 96.8% 443
2020 Q2 364 319 45 12.4% 100.0% 84.6% 359
2020 Q1 337 289 48 14.2% 100.0% 95.5% 424
2019 Q4 368 331 37 10.1% 100.0% 92.2% 409
2019 Q3 451 407 44 9.8% 100.0% 93.8% 417
2019 Q2 426 386 40 9.4% 70.0% 88.9% 464
2019 Q1 401 353 48 12.0% 100.0% 98.0% 498
2018 Q4 467 411 56 12.0% 71.4% 72.1% 474
2018 Q3 397 364 33 8.3% 90.0% 58.8% 460
2018 Q2 402 359 43 10.7% 66.7% 66.7% 429
2018 Q1 339 306 33 9.7% 88.9% 71.4% 614
2017 Q4 567 392 175 30.9% 81.3% 88.6% 713
2017 Q3 540 482 58 10.7% 68.4% 81.4% 642
2017 Q2 462 430 32 6.9% 90.9% 69.1% 509
2017 Q1 395 356 39 9.9% 77.8% 84.5% 504
2016 Q4 419 378 41 9.8% 100.0% 83.1% 448
2016 Q3 481 429 52 10.8% 73.7% 81.5% 597
2016 Q2 520 459 61 11.7% 75.0% 67.8% 721
2016 Q1 409 370 39 9.5% 70.0% 72.1% 683
2015 Q4 439 390 49 11.2% 90.0% 77.3% 425
2015 Q3 457 411 46 10.1% 72.7% 73.1% 678
2015 Q2 464 415 49 10.6% 87.5% 75.8% 687
2015 Q1 473 402 71 15.0% 72.2% 71.0% 775
2014 Q4 446 403 43 9.6% 64.7% 65.3% 681
2014 Q3 439 386 53 12.1% 86.7% 75.9% 729
2014 Q2 463 416 47 10.2% 62.5% 75.0% 465
2014 Q1 393 321 42 10.7% 84.6% 64.0% 588
2013 Q4 433 358 41 9.5% 75.0% 65.4% 569
2013 Q3 514 440 37 7.2% 78.6% 63.0% 603
2013 Q2 439 374 39 8.9% 55.6% 77.1% 621
2013 Q1 355 293 33 9.3% 90.0% 75.9% 532
2012 Q4 461 388 45 9.8% 73.3% 73.9% 530
2012 Q3 508 431 53 10.4% 76.9% 71.8% 564
2012 Q2 563 479 39 6.9% 78.6% 81.5% 646
2012 Q1 533 424 74 13.9% 31.3% 34.1% 752
2011 Q4 674 547 66 9.8% 15.8% 13.0% 795
2011 Q3 497 417 32 6.4% 50.0% 1.1% 525
2011 Q2 325 267 32 9.8% 33.3% 1.5% 572
2011 Q1 409 321 48 11.7% 17.4% 6.4% 420
2010 Q4 482 384 68 14.1% 26.7% 17.9% 525
2010 Q3 524 426 69 13.2% 78.9% 61.8% 585
2010 Q2 523 452 38 7.3% 75.0% 82.0% 569
2010 Q1 407 341 40 9.8% 84.6% 86.4% 569
2009 Q4 448 365 40 8.9% 100.0% 88.3% 464
2009 Q3 466 383 58 12.4% 85.7% 88.8% 495
2009 Q2 399 336 41 10.3% 69.2% 81.4% 486
2009 Q1 342 281 45 13.2% 87.5% 71.4% 439
2008 Q4 498 430 61 12.2% 90.0% 78.5% 515
2008 Q3 543 484 48 8.8% 77.8% 83.8% 593
2008 Q2 573 489 82 14.3% 88.5% 82.4% 634
2008 Q1 541 451 83 15.3% 82.5% 80.1% 599
2007 Q4 570 487 77 13.5% 76.5% 88.0% 586
2007 Q3 610 538 66 10.8% 80.0% 89.5% 680
2007 Q2 576 495 78 13.5% 64.3% 85.7% 670
2007 Q1 552 494 57 10.3% 75.0% 90.5% 716
2006 Q4 589 491 95 16.1% 78.3% 84.7% 661
2006 Q3 633 542 88 13.9% 94.4% 80.9% 683
2006 Q2 643 512 126 19.6% 94.7% 86.2% 729
2006 Q1 577 492 80 13.9% 82.6% 80.1% 787
2005 Q4 606 525 72 11.9% 81.8% 89.0% 684
2005 Q3 647 535 102 15.8% 83.3% 86.4% 728
2005 Q2 641 531 99 15.4% 81.8% 82.0% 694
2005 Q1 690 581 93 13.5% 69.4% 67.0% 733
2004 Q4 638 522 91 14.3% 57.7% 68.6% 709
2004 Q3 711 595 97 13.6% 22.2% 73.1% 753
2004 Q2 773 671 95 12.3% 40.5% 61.3% 804
2004 Q1 627 535 65 10.4% 38.9% 59.6% 659
2003 Q4 534 451 57 10.7% 22.2% 50.0% 665
2003 Q3 751 609 81 10.8% 26.9% 50.7% 653
2003 Q2 759 605 79 10.4% 35.0% 50.4% 707
2003 Q1 546 473 70 12.8% 27.8% 40.4% 683
2002 Q4 563 470 89 15.8% 25.0% 47.2% 626
2002 Q3 688 618 67 9.7% 8.3% 33.7% 633
2002 Q2 604 512 82 13.6% 50.0% 38.6% 687
2002 Q1 597 512 82 13.7% 25.9% 33.6% 690
2001 Q4 632 539 86 13.6% 24.0% 39.4% 623
2001 Q3 558 477 66 11.8% 25.0% 52.9% 587
2001 Q2 618 534 69 11.2% 35.7% 52.0% 589
2001 Q1 467 396 70 15.0% 28.6% 12.6% 661
2000 Q4 533 470 61 11.4% 9.1% 8.9% 530
2000 Q3 520 467 52 10.0% 7.1% 15.5% 636
2000 Q2 556 514 42 7.6% 0.0% 32.2% 753
2000 Q1 613 564 48 7.8% 35.7% 27.3% 573
1999 Q4 549 495 48 8.7% 25.0% 19.0% 604
1999 Q3 546 492 53 9.7% 17.6% 14.0% 618
1999 Q2 484 431 49 10.1% 35.3% 23.5% 568
1999 Q1 397 346 50 12.6% 20.0% 37.9% 604
1998 Q4 471 422 49 10.4% 40.0% 45.4% 470
1998 Q3 593 514 66 11.1% 21.4% 44.6% 601
1998 Q2 476 396 74 15.5% 50.0% 38.8% 571

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me