← All authorities

Medway

South East · E06000035 · 113 quarters held (1998 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
918
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
8.1%
higher than 26% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
92.6%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
99.6%
no formal threshold
Delegated
95.6%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
33.7%
88 allowed of 261 decided
Decisions overturned
1.4%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.0%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
996
in the window
Applications decided
918
in the window
Approval rate
91.9%
844 granted, 74 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 18 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
97.2%
rank 55 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 14 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3688.9%100.0%
Minor22685.0%92.6%
Other65694.5%—
of which householder50696.8%99.6%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01633252024 Q3: 256 received2024 Q3: 256 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 248 received2024 Q4: 246 decided2025 Q1: 325 received2025 Q1: 214 decided2025 Q2: 268 received2025 Q2: 320 decided2025 Q3: 238 received2025 Q3: 245 decided2025 Q4: 247 received2025 Q4: 246 decided2026 Q1: 265 received2026 Q1: 188 decided2026 Q2: 246 received2026 Q2: 239 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
60%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000035). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1998 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (113 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1998 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (113 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 239 221 18 7.5% 100.0% 100.0% 246
2026 Q1 188 171 17 9.0% 100.0% 94.9% 265
2025 Q4 246 222 24 9.8% 100.0% 84.1% 247
2025 Q3 245 230 15 6.1% 100.0% 94.7% 238
2025 Q2 320 288 32 10.0% 100.0% 100.0% 268
2025 Q1 214 199 15 7.0% 100.0% 94.1% 325
2024 Q4 246 222 24 9.8% 100.0% 84.4% 248
2024 Q3 256 232 24 9.4% 100.0% 94.4% 256
2024 Q2 266 247 19 7.1% 100.0% 97.3% 265
2024 Q1 245 209 36 14.7% 100.0% 88.2% 283
2023 Q4 246 218 28 11.4% 100.0% 93.0% 273
2023 Q3 282 259 23 8.2% 100.0% 87.2% 296
2023 Q2 263 221 42 16.0% 75.0% 72.3% 329
2023 Q1 263 221 42 16.0% 75.0% 72.3% 329
2022 Q4 284 254 30 10.6% 60.0% 82.4% 290
2022 Q3 282 259 23 8.2% 100.0% 87.2% 298
2022 Q2 390 367 23 5.9% 100.0% 85.5% 321
2022 Q1 282 259 23 8.2% 100.0% 89.2% 393
2021 Q4 386 345 41 10.6% 100.0% 97.7% 368
2021 Q3 440 390 50 11.4% 100.0% 49.1% 417
2021 Q2 406 369 37 9.1% 66.7% 91.9% 413
2021 Q1 385 337 48 12.5% 100.0% 94.6% 428
2020 Q4 355 310 45 12.7% 85.7% 88.1% 401
2020 Q3 342 291 51 14.9% 85.7% 90.0% 398
2020 Q2 316 281 35 11.1% 83.3% 89.8% 294
2020 Q1 297 260 37 12.5% 100.0% 89.1% 355
2019 Q4 367 313 54 14.7% 100.0% 92.4% 352
2019 Q3 370 330 40 10.8% 85.7% 92.7% 364
2019 Q2 374 331 43 11.5% 100.0% 100.0% 392
2019 Q1 264 224 40 15.2% 66.7% 97.6% 367
2018 Q4 357 328 29 8.1% 62.5% 83.0% 347
2018 Q3 365 333 32 8.8% 71.4% 88.1% 363
2018 Q2 372 323 49 13.2% 80.0% 76.2% 389
2018 Q1 348 304 44 12.6% 100.0% 98.0% 398
2017 Q4 375 329 46 12.3% 50.0% 87.5% 380
2017 Q3 357 313 44 12.3% 75.0% 94.3% 397
2017 Q2 411 371 40 9.7% 100.0% 96.4% 403
2017 Q1 343 313 30 8.7% 85.7% 95.3% 408
2016 Q4 355 330 25 7.0% 83.3% 92.9% 358
2016 Q3 347 310 37 10.7% 66.7% 93.3% 385
2016 Q2 408 380 28 6.9% 91.7% 88.5% 403
2016 Q1 309 288 21 6.8% 66.7% 80.4% 409
2015 Q4 293 262 31 10.6% 100.0% 79.5% 330
2015 Q3 339 301 38 11.2% 85.7% 92.2% 317
2015 Q2 381 346 35 9.2% 92.3% 85.5% 391
2015 Q1 311 281 30 9.6% 75.0% 87.7% 380
2014 Q4 344 302 42 12.2% 100.0% 83.7% 341
2014 Q3 366 331 35 9.6% 40.0% 73.8% 365
2014 Q2 320 295 25 7.8% 70.6% 82.3% 385
2014 Q1 371 276 47 12.7% 100.0% 79.5% 395
2013 Q4 379 284 43 11.3% 100.0% 74.7% 388
2013 Q3 388 278 45 11.6% 58.8% 79.8% 418
2013 Q2 391 286 55 14.1% 54.5% 78.8% 436
2013 Q1 322 237 52 16.1% 57.1% 75.8% 386
2012 Q4 418 299 72 17.2% 54.5% 88.0% 377
2012 Q3 370 247 64 17.3% 75.0% 75.3% 406
2012 Q2 412 297 78 18.9% 68.8% 75.5% 393
2012 Q1 350 241 52 14.9% 62.5% 81.1% 474
2011 Q4 350 227 74 21.1% 69.2% 77.4% 362
2011 Q3 362 274 61 16.9% 33.3% 83.0% 364
2011 Q2 438 281 96 21.9% 100.0% 80.6% 414
2011 Q1 353 260 52 14.7% 61.1% 78.1% 424
2010 Q4 384 272 68 17.7% 86.7% 81.6% 404
2010 Q3 489 345 81 16.6% 77.8% 81.7% 430
2010 Q2 414 304 70 16.9% 20.0% 74.6% 472
2010 Q1 377 271 70 18.6% 65.0% 77.9% 409
2009 Q4 367 255 70 19.1% 66.7% 79.3% 398
2009 Q3 425 312 76 17.9% 65.2% 80.2% 433
2009 Q2 333 238 62 18.6% 66.7% 83.5% 420
2009 Q1 336 242 63 18.8% 65.0% 81.4% 358
2008 Q4 380 267 85 22.4% 61.1% 74.8% 442
2008 Q3 491 373 72 14.7% 61.9% 75.2% 483
2008 Q2 536 358 125 23.3% 86.2% 71.6% 471
2008 Q1 486 345 91 18.7% 75.0% 79.8% 616
2007 Q4 588 405 124 21.1% 75.0% 81.1% 604
2007 Q3 537 352 115 21.4% 60.0% 75.6% 642
2007 Q2 544 393 93 17.1% 27.8% 70.8% 611
2007 Q1 440 294 92 20.9% 64.3% 76.8% 570
2006 Q4 494 354 95 19.2% 72.2% 66.9% 470
2006 Q3 589 430 86 14.6% 61.9% 71.4% 577
2006 Q2 531 376 92 17.3% 69.0% 76.2% 683
2006 Q1 514 378 81 15.8% 55.0% 67.3% 553
2005 Q4 578 394 104 18.0% 61.9% 69.4% 562
2005 Q3 0 0 0 — — — —
2005 Q2 582 450 76 13.1% 60.0% 67.4% 583
2005 Q1 538 404 54 10.0% 75.0% 68.4% 638
2004 Q4 607 441 84 13.8% 44.4% 68.5% 608
2004 Q3 773 575 89 11.5% 60.7% 64.3% 748
2004 Q2 707 595 80 11.3% 61.1% 65.3% 763
2004 Q1 604 487 96 15.9% 47.4% 62.8% 695
2003 Q4 605 481 100 16.5% 52.6% 65.0% 629
2003 Q3 678 529 114 16.8% 61.1% 64.2% 677
2003 Q2 719 599 88 12.2% 8.3% 60.4% 683
2003 Q1 615 508 73 11.9% 30.0% 39.3% 670
2002 Q4 540 462 56 10.4% 14.3% 45.1% 582
2002 Q3 609 505 70 11.5% 20.0% 26.4% 609
2002 Q2 684 562 78 11.4% 0.0% 36.4% 640
2002 Q1 475 382 59 12.4% 25.0% 35.5% 664
2001 Q4 477 408 34 7.1% 15.4% 19.4% 456
2001 Q3 516 451 41 7.9% 30.8% 35.4% 551
2001 Q2 571 505 36 6.3% 44.4% 37.0% 577
2001 Q1 371 295 40 10.8% 30.0% 44.0% 503
2000 Q4 451 373 39 8.6% 10.0% 42.2% 433
2000 Q3 428 368 29 6.8% 23.1% 30.4% 412
2000 Q2 397 347 27 6.8% 33.3% 43.3% 440
2000 Q1 350 284 30 8.6% 66.7% 57.1% 437
1999 Q4 374 300 37 9.9% 38.5% 47.6% 378
1999 Q3 465 393 30 6.5% 21.4% 57.1% 442
1999 Q2 392 357 27 6.9% 77.8% 32.1% 0
1999 Q1 317 271 29 9.1% 16.7% 54.2% 420
1998 Q4 370 324 37 10.0% 61.5% 38.0% 334
1998 Q3 408 352 39 9.6% 58.3% 38.1% 395
1998 Q2 364 331 26 7.1% 77.8% 32.9% 404

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me