← All authorities

Plymouth

South West · E06000026 · 133 quarters held (1993 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
672
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
5.4%
higher than 11% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
98.9%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
98.8%
no formal threshold
Delegated
98.1%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
18.7%
28 allowed of 150 decided
Decisions overturned
0.6%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 19.6%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
758
in the window
Applications decided
672
in the window
Approval rate
94.6%
636 granted, 36 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 6 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
99.1%
rank 19 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 6 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2796.3%100.0%
Minor16291.4%98.9%
Other48395.7%—
of which householder33595.8%98.8%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01112212024 Q3: 179 received2024 Q3: 177 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 169 received2024 Q4: 187 decided2025 Q1: 221 received2025 Q1: 161 decided2025 Q2: 155 received2025 Q2: 189 decided2025 Q3: 154 received2025 Q3: 162 decided2025 Q4: 187 received2025 Q4: 165 decided2026 Q1: 196 received2026 Q1: 164 decided2026 Q2: 221 received2026 Q2: 181 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
87%
Action plan

Delivery 85–94%: the authority must publish an action plan. No presumption or buffer consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000026). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1993 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (133 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1993 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (133 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 181 174 7 3.9% 100.0% 100.0% 221
2026 Q1 164 153 11 6.7% 100.0% 100.0% 196
2025 Q4 165 155 10 6.1% 100.0% 100.0% 187
2025 Q3 162 154 8 4.9% 100.0% 92.3% 154
2025 Q2 189 168 21 11.1% 100.0% 100.0% 155
2025 Q1 161 151 10 6.2% 100.0% 97.1% 221
2024 Q4 187 180 7 3.7% 100.0% 100.0% 169
2024 Q3 177 166 11 6.2% 100.0% 100.0% 179
2024 Q2 168 159 9 5.4% 100.0% 91.7% 194
2024 Q1 188 175 13 6.9% 100.0% 96.2% 170
2023 Q4 182 171 11 6.0% 100.0% 95.8% 212
2023 Q3 188 175 13 6.9% 100.0% 91.9% 176
2023 Q2 235 222 13 5.5% 100.0% 94.1% 215
2023 Q1 219 205 14 6.4% 100.0% 96.2% 282
2022 Q4 229 203 26 11.4% 100.0% 92.1% 214
2022 Q3 298 272 26 8.7% 100.0% 93.8% 253
2022 Q2 285 229 56 19.6% 100.0% 100.0% 306
2022 Q1 238 218 20 8.4% 100.0% 90.3% 295
2021 Q4 239 221 18 7.5% 100.0% 92.9% 243
2021 Q3 330 305 25 7.6% 100.0% 93.8% 306
2021 Q2 308 286 22 7.1% 100.0% 76.2% 334
2021 Q1 243 229 14 5.8% 100.0% 95.0% 309
2020 Q4 273 250 23 8.4% 100.0% 93.8% 265
2020 Q3 231 216 15 6.5% 100.0% 97.6% 276
2020 Q2 186 173 13 7.0% 100.0% 100.0% 197
2020 Q1 214 197 17 7.9% 100.0% 97.9% 261
2019 Q4 238 217 21 8.8% 100.0% 97.6% 245
2019 Q3 243 226 17 7.0% 66.7% 91.7% 253
2019 Q2 261 244 17 6.5% 100.0% 97.4% 284
2019 Q1 183 173 10 5.5% 66.7% 90.3% 239
2018 Q4 284 269 15 5.3% 100.0% 95.2% 226
2018 Q3 264 246 18 6.8% 100.0% 95.7% 256
2018 Q2 264 251 13 4.9% 100.0% 97.6% 286
2018 Q1 211 190 21 10.0% 100.0% 88.2% 254
2017 Q4 208 196 12 5.8% 100.0% 92.9% 248
2017 Q3 274 250 24 8.8% 100.0% 87.7% 286
2017 Q2 324 297 27 8.3% 100.0% 92.3% 301
2017 Q1 239 228 11 4.6% 100.0% 74.5% 292
2016 Q4 281 265 16 5.7% 100.0% 95.4% 259
2016 Q3 261 250 11 4.2% — 98.4% 547
2016 Q2 298 278 20 6.7% 100.0% 95.8% 553
2016 Q1 236 220 16 6.8% 83.3% 100.0% 504
2015 Q4 238 216 22 9.2% 100.0% 90.9% 479
2015 Q3 293 273 20 6.8% 100.0% 87.5% 288
2015 Q2 260 247 13 5.0% 83.3% 92.6% 272
2015 Q1 212 204 8 3.8% 90.0% 92.7% 264
2014 Q4 307 284 23 7.5% 100.0% 90.7% 273
2014 Q3 239 229 10 4.2% 87.5% 91.4% 313
2014 Q2 225 213 12 5.3% 83.3% 84.5% 259
2014 Q1 284 253 18 6.3% 91.7% 93.6% 311
2013 Q4 269 230 26 9.7% 83.3% 86.7% 258
2013 Q3 287 245 26 9.1% 86.7% 94.3% 310
2013 Q2 327 284 30 9.2% 83.3% 80.3% 314
2013 Q1 289 246 29 10.0% 75.0% 88.9% 310
2012 Q4 263 211 40 15.2% 57.1% 82.1% 288
2012 Q3 301 244 33 11.0% 80.0% 88.8% 257
2012 Q2 318 263 36 11.3% 82.6% 91.7% 309
2012 Q1 300 249 35 11.7% 77.8% 89.1% 330
2011 Q4 303 245 39 12.9% 93.3% 84.4% 301
2011 Q3 362 290 48 13.3% 90.3% 77.7% 363
2011 Q2 301 235 43 14.3% 65.0% 90.1% 343
2011 Q1 298 241 40 13.4% 75.0% 91.0% 348
2010 Q4 308 253 40 13.0% 81.0% 76.9% 256
2010 Q3 429 308 82 19.1% 72.2% 75.7% 403
2010 Q2 345 248 67 19.4% 79.3% 85.4% 313
2010 Q1 355 260 70 19.7% 70.4% 70.9% 308
2009 Q4 328 237 68 20.7% 73.5% 74.1% 343
2009 Q3 297 216 60 20.2% 42.9% 83.8% 333
2009 Q2 243 193 36 14.8% 47.4% 85.0% 311
2009 Q1 299 214 64 21.4% 40.0% 37.8% 236
2008 Q4 338 255 61 18.0% 45.5% 46.8% 314
2008 Q3 403 307 81 20.1% 60.7% 63.2% 377
2008 Q2 424 319 79 18.6% 66.7% 62.5% 456
2008 Q1 399 298 72 18.0% 68.6% 71.8% 435
2007 Q4 444 353 68 15.3% 75.0% 76.6% 427
2007 Q3 144 113 24 16.7% 90.9% 90.2% 177
2007 Q2 512 400 79 15.4% 66.7% 79.4% 448
2007 Q1 355 272 64 18.0% 80.6% 70.4% 445
2006 Q4 410 318 63 15.4% 88.0% 78.6% 413
2006 Q3 523 414 75 14.3% 85.7% 71.2% 468
2006 Q2 499 412 59 11.8% 56.5% 75.0% 521
2006 Q1 430 351 54 12.6% 13.9% 80.5% 499
2005 Q4 513 398 84 16.4% 52.9% 79.1% 439
2005 Q3 580 441 84 14.5% 38.5% 79.5% 574
2005 Q2 485 364 98 20.2% 42.9% 87.2% 574
2005 Q1 493 372 108 21.9% 22.7% 83.7% 537
2004 Q4 558 432 100 17.9% 26.3% 82.3% 543
2004 Q3 613 436 157 25.6% 60.9% 83.0% 598
2004 Q2 547 406 125 22.9% 23.5% 69.8% 597
2004 Q1 475 359 101 21.3% 46.7% 51.1% 535
2003 Q4 626 471 131 20.9% 29.4% 44.2% 510
2003 Q3 468 368 88 18.8% 20.0% 34.7% 555
2003 Q2 518 416 88 17.0% 33.3% 42.7% 553
2003 Q1 457 353 81 17.7% 22.2% 23.2% 493
2002 Q4 417 331 72 17.3% 37.5% 38.2% 467
2002 Q3 466 363 86 18.5% 8.3% 47.9% 491
2002 Q2 438 374 47 10.7% 22.2% 21.7% 495
2002 Q1 336 274 38 11.3% 20.0% 42.9% 469
2001 Q4 366 296 54 14.8% 50.0% 60.6% 387
2001 Q3 450 389 48 10.7% 6.7% 59.4% 448
2001 Q2 344 293 51 14.8% 70.0% 67.5% 460
2001 Q1 288 235 41 14.2% 44.4% 66.3% 393
2000 Q4 433 354 65 15.0% 28.6% 54.8% 342
2000 Q3 343 294 41 12.0% 33.3% 42.9% 401
2000 Q2 348 286 50 14.4% 20.0% 53.5% 369
2000 Q1 413 365 29 7.0% 18.2% 31.9% 347
1999 Q4 356 280 39 11.0% 50.0% 61.7% 479
1999 Q3 376 294 58 15.4% 26.7% 59.1% 382
1999 Q2 345 258 41 11.9% 44.4% 62.9% 434
1999 Q1 319 230 68 21.3% 16.7% 69.7% 400
1998 Q4 366 295 47 12.8% 52.9% 59.4% 354
1998 Q3 329 264 40 12.2% 55.6% 57.6% 356
1998 Q2 396 267 60 15.2% 22.2% 50.6% 411
1998 Q1 341 246 42 12.3% 0.0% 47.4% 368
1997 Q4 378 315 37 9.8% 40.0% 55.2% 319
1997 Q3 397 311 78 19.6% 33.3% 64.9% 432
1997 Q2 418 291 125 29.9% 40.0% 84.1% 424
1997 Q1 304 253 50 16.4% 16.7% 70.1% 416
1996 Q4 287 229 55 19.2% 75.0% 73.1% 305
1996 Q3 361 314 46 12.7% 33.3% 77.2% 334
1996 Q2 391 341 50 12.8% 57.1% 73.3% 443
1996 Q1 214 193 21 9.8% 60.0% 55.4% —
1995 Q4 264 234 30 11.4% 38.5% 59.8% —
1995 Q3 285 258 27 9.5% 11.1% 46.6% —
1995 Q2 277 253 24 8.7% 45.5% 57.0% —
1995 Q1 239 219 20 8.4% 44.4% 46.6% —
1994 Q4 265 255 10 3.8% 54.2% 62.6% —
1994 Q3 251 229 22 8.8% 50.0% 52.4% —
1994 Q2 288 264 24 8.3% 50.0% 53.8% —
1994 Q1 273 250 23 8.4% 70.6% 44.6% —
1993 Q4 206 186 20 9.7% 64.3% 63.8% —
1993 Q3 290 263 27 9.3% 77.8% 62.9% —
1993 Q2 262 237 25 9.5% 33.3% 47.9% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me