← All authorities

Telford and Wrekin

West Midlands · E06000020 · 113 quarters held (1998 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
559
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
8.8%
higher than 32% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
100.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
99.6%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.9%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
37.8%
45 allowed of 119 decided
Decisions overturned
1.2%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 15.5%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
703
in the window
Applications decided
559
in the window
Approval rate
91.2%
510 granted, 49 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 22 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
99.8%
rank 7 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 2 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major20100.0%100.0%
Minor14889.2%100.0%
Other39191.6%—
of which householder27492.0%99.6%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01022032024 Q3: 187 received2024 Q3: 162 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 188 received2024 Q4: 171 decided2025 Q1: 189 received2025 Q1: 146 decided2025 Q2: 149 received2025 Q2: 164 decided2025 Q3: 163 received2025 Q3: 140 decided2025 Q4: 161 received2025 Q4: 143 decided2026 Q1: 176 received2026 Q1: 124 decided2026 Q2: 203 received2026 Q2: 152 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
309%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000020). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1998 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (113 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1998 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (113 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 152 142 10 6.6% 100.0% 100.0% 203
2026 Q1 124 112 12 9.7% — 100.0% 176
2025 Q4 143 131 12 8.4% 100.0% 100.0% 161
2025 Q3 140 125 15 10.7% 100.0% 100.0% 163
2025 Q2 164 149 15 9.1% 100.0% 100.0% 149
2025 Q1 146 130 16 11.0% 100.0% 100.0% 189
2024 Q4 171 145 26 15.2% 100.0% 100.0% 188
2024 Q3 162 142 20 12.3% 100.0% 100.0% 187
2024 Q2 189 174 15 7.9% 100.0% 100.0% 202
2024 Q1 210 191 19 9.0% 100.0% 97.7% 196
2023 Q4 205 189 16 7.8% 100.0% 100.0% 168
2023 Q3 220 214 6 2.7% 100.0% 100.0% 221
2023 Q2 152 143 9 5.9% 100.0% 93.8% 193
2023 Q1 160 150 10 6.3% 100.0% 100.0% 191
2022 Q4 196 182 14 7.1% 100.0% 95.5% 201
2022 Q3 184 173 11 6.0% 100.0% 94.1% 196
2022 Q2 230 216 14 6.1% 100.0% 100.0% 222
2022 Q1 218 210 8 3.7% 100.0% 96.3% 248
2021 Q4 226 212 14 6.2% 83.3% 96.6% 231
2021 Q3 237 223 14 5.9% 100.0% 92.0% 244
2021 Q2 243 233 10 4.1% 100.0% 100.0% 289
2021 Q1 209 187 22 10.5% 100.0% 100.0% 263
2020 Q4 208 197 11 5.3% 75.0% 100.0% 235
2020 Q3 209 196 13 6.2% 66.7% 95.8% 225
2020 Q2 176 158 18 10.2% 100.0% 96.8% 194
2020 Q1 187 158 29 15.5% 100.0% 89.3% 242
2019 Q4 203 189 14 6.9% 100.0% 96.7% 231
2019 Q3 220 198 22 10.0% 100.0% 97.2% 212
2019 Q2 182 160 22 12.1% 100.0% 93.8% 210
2019 Q1 217 196 21 9.7% 100.0% 93.5% 222
2018 Q4 192 176 16 8.3% 100.0% 86.2% 208
2018 Q3 206 190 16 7.8% 75.0% 71.9% 235
2018 Q2 217 190 27 12.4% 50.0% 69.2% 215
2018 Q1 210 197 13 6.2% 87.5% 82.0% 228
2017 Q4 197 187 10 5.1% 75.0% 94.3% 217
2017 Q3 170 153 17 10.0% 80.0% 90.5% 181
2017 Q2 220 200 20 9.1% 75.0% 90.5% 208
2017 Q1 215 201 14 6.5% 66.7% 91.8% 235
2016 Q4 214 204 10 4.7% 100.0% 94.3% 237
2016 Q3 252 243 9 3.6% 100.0% 92.9% 284
2016 Q2 235 219 16 6.8% 100.0% 92.7% 252
2016 Q1 235 214 21 8.9% 100.0% 97.8% 247
2015 Q4 219 207 12 5.5% 0.0% 71.7% 204
2015 Q3 229 206 23 10.0% 80.0% 76.6% 254
2015 Q2 205 173 32 15.6% 77.8% 76.5% 251
2015 Q1 225 205 20 8.9% 81.8% 81.3% 213
2014 Q4 215 199 16 7.4% 71.4% 70.4% 261
2014 Q3 260 247 13 5.0% 85.7% 78.3% 243
2014 Q2 225 209 16 7.1% 64.7% 67.5% 271
2014 Q1 183 174 6 3.3% 66.7% 70.8% 239
2013 Q4 208 198 9 4.3% 95.2% 86.7% 229
2013 Q3 264 254 8 3.0% 73.7% 68.4% 249
2013 Q2 188 177 10 5.3% 37.5% 58.1% 221
2013 Q1 233 219 10 4.3% 63.2% 57.8% 220
2012 Q4 224 205 17 7.6% 41.2% 46.3% 219
2012 Q3 230 207 18 7.8% 54.5% 48.1% 249
2012 Q2 205 192 12 5.9% 60.0% 50.0% 241
2012 Q1 196 169 27 13.8% 78.6% 53.2% 235
2011 Q4 240 213 25 10.4% 50.0% 73.1% 239
2011 Q3 255 220 32 12.5% 37.5% 51.9% 252
2011 Q2 253 226 26 10.3% 54.5% 48.5% 291
2011 Q1 208 192 14 6.7% 64.3% 40.3% 218
2010 Q4 218 198 18 8.3% 77.8% 38.7% 249
2010 Q3 215 201 14 6.5% 66.7% 51.3% 207
2010 Q2 235 223 12 5.1% 78.6% 61.3% 251
2010 Q1 166 146 19 11.4% 60.0% 83.6% 201
2009 Q4 229 206 23 10.0% 40.0% 88.2% 253
2009 Q3 227 200 27 11.9% 40.0% 83.1% 261
2009 Q2 231 213 15 6.5% 85.7% 83.5% 230
2009 Q1 194 162 29 14.9% 80.0% 84.8% 265
2008 Q4 286 230 53 18.5% 86.7% 84.6% 229
2008 Q3 317 271 42 13.2% 53.8% 83.1% 335
2008 Q2 349 280 67 19.2% 92.9% 81.7% 344
2008 Q1 312 248 62 19.9% 70.6% 82.6% 385
2007 Q4 391 330 59 15.1% 83.3% 85.2% 375
2007 Q3 396 331 62 15.7% 65.4% 81.0% 418
2007 Q2 372 308 62 16.7% 81.3% 89.7% 438
2007 Q1 307 236 68 22.1% 70.8% 88.2% 399
2006 Q4 364 300 62 17.0% 50.0% 69.8% 311
2006 Q3 366 311 51 13.9% 77.8% 70.1% 356
2006 Q2 335 268 64 19.1% 71.4% 77.6% 387
2006 Q1 335 267 64 19.1% 66.7% 59.8% 365
2005 Q4 318 257 59 18.6% 58.3% 71.6% 330
2005 Q3 304 246 54 17.8% 83.3% 77.2% 369
2005 Q2 353 287 59 16.7% 92.9% 80.9% 369
2005 Q1 347 292 48 13.8% 31.3% 71.7% 349
2004 Q4 326 271 47 14.4% 60.0% 68.2% 357
2004 Q3 347 308 31 8.9% 71.4% 72.8% 377
2004 Q2 343 292 45 13.1% 60.0% 67.9% 376
2004 Q1 297 259 36 12.1% 0.0% 57.4% 370
2003 Q4 321 261 22 6.9% 50.0% 59.1% 303
2003 Q3 366 331 34 9.3% 28.6% 54.9% 370
2003 Q2 324 301 19 5.9% 83.3% 59.3% 393
2003 Q1 263 239 22 8.4% 55.6% 58.6% 363
2002 Q4 319 290 26 8.2% 20.0% 46.7% 277
2002 Q3 340 305 33 9.7% 30.0% 48.6% 328
2002 Q2 336 307 23 6.8% 50.0% 67.3% 386
2002 Q1 212 194 12 5.7% 50.0% 67.9% 329
2001 Q4 221 197 12 5.4% 28.6% 72.4% 232
2001 Q3 293 264 20 6.8% 42.9% 64.7% 290
2001 Q2 254 226 16 6.3% 0.0% 64.1% 270
2001 Q1 227 199 17 7.5% 41.7% 65.0% 259
2000 Q4 254 204 33 13.0% 66.7% 64.6% 235
2000 Q3 244 217 16 6.6% 28.6% 73.0% 264
2000 Q2 256 227 21 8.2% 40.0% 63.6% 272
2000 Q1 220 205 8 3.6% 16.7% 49.4% 232
1999 Q4 258 233 18 7.0% 40.0% 49.4% 236
1999 Q3 287 253 20 7.0% 60.0% 50.0% 280
1999 Q2 231 211 11 4.8% 16.7% 57.3% 253
1999 Q1 228 202 19 8.3% 25.0% 51.1% 259
1998 Q4 249 211 28 11.2% 50.0% 54.9% 203
1998 Q3 258 234 18 7.0% 22.2% 60.9% 291
1998 Q2 247 219 17 6.9% 42.9% 48.1% 254

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me