← All authorities

Derby

East Midlands · E06000015 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
938
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
11.5%
higher than 48% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
84.2%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
91.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.9%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
32.1%
43 allowed of 134 decided
Decisions overturned
0.7%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.0%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
910
in the window
Applications decided
938
in the window
Approval rate
88.5%
830 granted, 108 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 35 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
87.9%
rank 204 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 39 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3697.2%100.0%
Minor21489.3%84.2%
Other68887.8%—
of which householder49988.2%91.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01422842024 Q3: 273 received2024 Q3: 248 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 230 received2024 Q4: 270 decided2025 Q1: 284 received2025 Q1: 189 decided2025 Q2: 279 received2025 Q2: 254 decided2025 Q3: 197 received2025 Q3: 260 decided2025 Q4: 233 received2025 Q4: 234 decided2026 Q1: 247 received2026 Q1: 196 decided2026 Q2: 233 received2026 Q2: 248 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
71%
Presumption

Delivery below 75%: the NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development applies to housing applications here. A material point for any housing proposal.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000015). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 248 212 36 14.5% — 75.0% 233
2026 Q1 196 176 20 10.2% — 90.9% 247
2025 Q4 234 204 30 12.8% — 81.8% 233
2025 Q3 260 238 22 8.5% 100.0% 89.5% 197
2025 Q2 254 239 15 5.9% 100.0% 75.0% 279
2025 Q1 189 172 17 9.0% 66.7% 90.0% 284
2024 Q4 270 240 30 11.1% 100.0% 81.3% 230
2024 Q3 248 228 20 8.1% — 90.6% 273
2024 Q2 241 210 31 12.9% 100.0% 92.9% 209
2024 Q1 251 226 25 10.0% 66.7% 90.5% 260
2023 Q4 284 253 31 10.9% 100.0% 100.0% 241
2023 Q3 261 223 38 14.6% 100.0% 100.0% 278
2023 Q2 275 231 44 16.0% 100.0% 64.7% 278
2023 Q1 268 246 22 8.2% 100.0% 57.1% 285
2022 Q4 295 261 34 11.5% 50.0% 36.0% 265
2022 Q3 327 295 32 9.8% 100.0% 67.6% 323
2022 Q2 320 299 21 6.6% 100.0% 80.6% 361
2022 Q1 307 288 19 6.2% 85.7% 65.2% 342
2021 Q4 362 316 46 12.7% 66.7% 42.9% 342
2021 Q3 332 323 9 2.7% 100.0% 56.5% 337
2021 Q2 348 326 22 6.3% 50.0% 42.9% 372
2021 Q1 277 261 16 5.8% 100.0% 58.3% 353
2020 Q4 292 274 18 6.2% 50.0% 80.0% 312
2020 Q3 247 230 17 6.9% 66.7% 62.5% 304
2020 Q2 207 192 15 7.2% 100.0% 78.6% 198
2020 Q1 246 223 23 9.3% 100.0% 70.4% 300
2019 Q4 315 292 23 7.3% 100.0% 72.1% 241
2019 Q3 301 276 25 8.3% 100.0% 70.6% 305
2019 Q2 358 336 22 6.1% 100.0% 78.0% 329
2019 Q1 272 256 16 5.9% 100.0% 75.0% 355
2018 Q4 286 274 12 4.2% 75.0% 84.8% 257
2018 Q3 323 292 31 9.6% 50.0% 97.1% 309
2018 Q2 329 304 25 7.6% 100.0% 85.0% 347
2018 Q1 303 283 20 6.6% 100.0% 92.3% 310
2017 Q4 249 226 23 9.2% 100.0% 88.0% 285
2017 Q3 260 247 13 5.0% — 90.5% 266
2017 Q2 256 234 22 8.6% 100.0% 92.3% 295
2017 Q1 273 240 33 12.1% 100.0% 100.0% 295
2016 Q4 262 238 24 9.2% 100.0% 100.0% 285
2016 Q3 329 311 18 5.5% 88.9% 93.7% 300
2016 Q2 314 294 20 6.4% 100.0% 97.2% 320
2016 Q1 260 249 11 4.2% 100.0% 68.2% 289
2015 Q4 247 227 20 8.1% 100.0% 60.6% 240
2015 Q3 323 307 16 5.0% 83.3% 60.7% 268
2015 Q2 271 252 19 7.0% 66.7% 51.1% 313
2015 Q1 257 244 13 5.1% 80.0% 51.9% 305
2014 Q4 318 298 20 6.3% 100.0% 60.4% 286
2014 Q3 323 301 22 6.8% 100.0% 46.4% 346
2014 Q2 398 363 35 8.8% 50.0% 43.6% 302
2014 Q1 230 204 21 9.1% 100.0% 36.7% 342
2013 Q4 281 251 22 7.8% 60.0% 62.9% 286
2013 Q3 292 252 24 8.2% 55.6% 47.2% 306
2013 Q2 274 239 20 7.3% 60.0% 40.6% 323
2013 Q1 240 213 20 8.3% 44.4% 34.7% 284
2012 Q4 287 249 27 9.4% 41.7% 65.5% 306
2012 Q3 386 344 32 8.3% 12.5% 51.5% 306
2012 Q2 325 287 25 7.7% 57.1% 51.2% 357
2012 Q1 285 243 33 11.6% 22.2% 55.8% 317
2011 Q4 318 263 41 12.9% 41.7% 78.4% 298
2011 Q3 333 261 56 16.8% 77.8% 70.3% 342
2011 Q2 314 253 51 16.2% 37.5% 68.0% 354
2011 Q1 272 223 43 15.8% 41.7% 74.6% 309
2010 Q4 260 213 28 10.8% 70.0% 77.2% 297
2010 Q3 379 300 68 17.9% 41.7% 80.0% 320
2010 Q2 353 300 41 11.6% 60.0% 75.3% 359
2010 Q1 241 201 33 13.7% 60.0% 46.2% 352
2009 Q4 347 291 54 15.6% 87.5% 65.6% 315
2009 Q3 321 284 36 11.2% 60.0% 66.7% 346
2009 Q2 235 184 40 17.0% 66.7% 77.5% 338
2009 Q1 343 295 43 12.5% 61.5% 65.3% 310
2008 Q4 342 296 44 12.9% 42.9% 64.5% 319
2008 Q3 430 376 53 12.3% 38.9% 59.8% 388
2008 Q2 469 416 51 10.9% 45.5% 40.3% 413
2008 Q1 323 270 49 15.2% 58.3% 53.8% 448
2007 Q4 443 354 85 19.2% 60.0% 64.1% 434
2007 Q3 538 420 114 21.2% 69.0% 83.1% 517
2007 Q2 466 386 73 15.7% 66.7% 70.2% 539
2007 Q1 496 421 63 12.7% 66.7% 74.1% 575
2006 Q4 447 380 53 11.9% 72.7% 63.3% 426
2006 Q3 437 368 59 13.5% 62.5% 69.1% 438
2006 Q2 448 390 54 12.1% 75.0% 66.1% 496
2006 Q1 411 338 61 14.8% 63.6% 67.6% 519
2005 Q4 441 379 50 11.3% 61.5% 67.6% 382
2005 Q3 451 397 43 9.5% 71.4% 80.9% 487
2005 Q2 549 468 76 13.8% 66.7% 74.0% 519
2005 Q1 453 387 62 13.7% 56.5% 65.6% 526
2004 Q4 519 440 70 13.5% 47.6% 42.7% 464
2004 Q3 529 442 80 15.1% 54.5% 64.7% 548
2004 Q2 546 489 52 9.5% 13.6% 65.9% 571
2004 Q1 466 427 39 8.4% 21.7% 65.2% 584
2003 Q4 452 419 33 7.3% 53.8% 75.7% 445
2003 Q3 555 507 48 8.6% 33.3% 74.7% 543
2003 Q2 602 546 56 9.3% 53.8% 57.5% 574
2003 Q1 426 396 30 7.0% 25.0% 39.8% 528
2002 Q4 415 383 32 7.7% 33.3% 47.6% 440
2002 Q3 406 365 41 10.1% 66.7% 59.8% 492
2002 Q2 381 357 23 6.0% 18.2% 52.9% 415
2002 Q1 340 313 27 7.9% 33.3% 54.2% 426
2001 Q4 346 322 24 6.9% 53.3% 60.2% 332
2001 Q3 396 372 24 6.1% 50.0% 57.3% 360
2001 Q2 366 336 30 8.2% 40.0% 43.9% 368
2001 Q1 470 430 40 8.5% 53.8% 38.5% 397
2000 Q4 363 326 37 10.2% 75.0% 62.8% 486
2000 Q3 374 337 36 9.6% 40.0% 63.0% 407
2000 Q2 310 284 26 8.4% 63.6% 59.7% 380
2000 Q1 326 307 17 5.2% 72.7% 50.4% 313
1999 Q4 306 281 25 8.2% 40.0% 53.2% 270
1999 Q3 399 370 29 7.3% 57.1% 64.0% 432
1999 Q2 316 289 27 8.5% 60.0% 53.5% 353
1999 Q1 350 325 25 7.1% 46.7% 70.4% 370
1998 Q4 304 285 19 6.3% 66.7% 66.7% 335
1998 Q3 345 321 24 7.0% 66.7% 72.6% 371
1998 Q2 365 337 28 7.7% 50.0% 72.8% 369
1998 Q1 327 295 32 9.8% 78.6% 74.3% 356
1997 Q4 332 307 25 7.5% 55.6% 67.7% 319
1997 Q3 400 356 44 11.0% 80.0% 70.4% 362
1997 Q2 408 354 54 13.2% 55.6% 58.8% 404
1997 Q1 306 269 37 12.1% 83.3% 63.7% 360
1996 Q4 337 306 30 8.9% 100.0% 62.6% 332
1996 Q3 317 285 32 10.1% 25.0% 67.7% 392
1996 Q2 314 284 29 9.2% 87.5% 68.8% 313
1996 Q1 231 211 20 8.7% 55.6% 61.5% —
1995 Q4 239 225 14 5.9% 33.3% 61.1% —
1995 Q3 289 259 30 10.4% 58.3% 54.7% —
1995 Q2 317 285 32 10.1% 77.8% 65.9% —
1995 Q1 276 245 31 11.2% 46.7% 69.3% —
1994 Q4 276 245 31 11.2% 72.7% 71.8% —
1994 Q3 258 233 25 9.7% 72.7% 65.7% —
1994 Q2 322 291 31 9.6% 88.2% 66.1% —
1994 Q1 255 236 19 7.5% 80.0% 73.3% —
1993 Q4 269 245 24 8.9% 80.0% 79.8% —
1993 Q3 286 264 22 7.7% 72.2% 58.2% —
1993 Q2 294 270 24 8.2% 84.6% 70.8% —
1993 Q1 258 234 24 9.3% 85.7% 72.6% —
1992 Q4 236 209 27 11.4% 87.5% 74.2% —
1992 Q3 273 236 37 13.6% 90.0% 72.2% —
1992 Q2 318 274 44 13.8% 100.0% 61.1% —
1992 Q1 221 182 39 17.6% 80.0% 65.5% —
1991 Q4 359 288 71 19.8% 54.5% 61.9% —
1991 Q3 297 252 45 15.2% 66.7% 64.1% —
1991 Q2 256 214 42 16.4% 77.8% 65.7% —
1991 Q1 273 200 73 26.7% 80.0% 59.1% —
1990 Q4 328 236 92 28.0% 44.4% 54.9% —
1990 Q3 325 240 85 26.2% 60.0% 63.6% —
1990 Q2 334 266 68 20.4% 73.3% 50.7% —
1990 Q1 369 290 79 21.4% 60.0% 50.9% —
1989 Q4 400 300 100 25.0% 53.6% 39.4% —
1989 Q3 322 260 62 19.3% 37.5% 17.7% —
1989 Q2 346 297 49 14.2% 92.9% 74.6% —
1989 Q1 497 393 104 20.9% 69.2% 82.1% —
1988 Q4 312 251 61 19.6% 90.9% 69.8% —
1988 Q3 438 321 117 26.7% 95.0% 68.0% —
1988 Q2 310 266 44 14.2% 91.7% 74.2% —
1988 Q1 434 345 89 20.5% 63.6% 81.6% —
1987 Q4 253 203 50 19.8% 88.9% 66.7% —
1987 Q3 341 315 26 7.6% 73.7% 55.5% —
1987 Q2 432 378 54 12.5% 72.7% 48.5% —
1987 Q1 276 254 22 8.0% 81.8% 39.4% —
1986 Q4 315 285 30 9.5% 84.0% 65.0% —
1986 Q3 337 300 37 11.0% 93.8% 63.3% —
1986 Q2 300 277 23 7.7% 88.2% 72.7% —
1986 Q1 240 217 23 9.6% 71.4% 69.8% —
1985 Q4 273 239 34 12.5% 84.6% 78.0% —
1985 Q3 320 286 34 10.6% 84.2% 70.0% —
1985 Q2 335 298 37 11.0% 92.9% 67.9% —
1985 Q1 280 252 28 10.0% 70.0% 75.0% —
1984 Q4 269 234 35 13.0% 92.9% 85.1% —
1984 Q3 314 266 48 15.3% 64.0% 72.4% —
1984 Q2 337 299 38 11.3% 78.6% 72.6% —
1984 Q1 309 283 26 8.4% 84.6% 72.4% —
1983 Q4 315 282 33 10.5% 69.2% 74.4% —
1983 Q3 355 327 28 7.9% 87.5% 49.0% —
1983 Q2 278 236 42 15.1% 77.8% 65.3% —
1983 Q1 277 246 31 11.2% 86.7% 59.2% —
1982 Q4 291 251 40 13.7% 93.3% 68.6% —
1982 Q3 316 273 43 13.6% 85.7% 55.9% —
1982 Q2 335 288 47 14.0% 73.3% 61.0% —
1982 Q1 260 221 39 15.0% 65.0% 52.3% —
1981 Q4 294 256 38 12.9% 57.1% 64.0% —
1981 Q3 319 287 32 10.0% 28.6% 41.2% —
1981 Q2 415 371 44 10.6% 76.0% 35.1% —
1981 Q1 405 361 44 10.9% 87.0% 50.4% —
1980 Q4 434 379 55 12.7% 70.0% 59.2% —
1980 Q3 467 426 41 8.8% 76.2% 50.5% —
1980 Q2 540 485 55 10.2% 75.0% 50.0% —
1980 Q1 442 394 48 10.9% 72.2% 55.0% —
1979 Q4 439 401 38 8.7% 80.0% 56.2% —
1979 Q3 467 425 42 9.0% 86.7% 48.6% —
1979 Q2 410 373 37 9.0% 61.1% 53.4% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me