← All authorities

York

Yorkshire and the Humber · E06000014 · 189 quarters held (1979 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,198
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
16.9%
higher than 80% of authorities
Majors in time
87.5%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
75.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
96.0%
no formal threshold
Delegated
98.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
27.4%
80 allowed of 292 decided
Decisions overturned
1.1%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 21.3%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,590
in the window
Applications decided
1,198
in the window
Approval rate
83.1%
995 granted, 203 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 53 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
89.1%
rank 188 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 36 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3582.9%87.5%
Minor28380.2%75.0%
Other88084.0%—
of which householder55387.0%96.0%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
02244482024 Q3: 366 received2024 Q3: 355 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 381 received2024 Q4: 310 decided2025 Q1: 439 received2025 Q1: 306 decided2025 Q2: 448 received2025 Q2: 374 decided2025 Q3: 390 received2025 Q3: 322 decided2025 Q4: 414 received2025 Q4: 268 decided2026 Q1: 405 received2026 Q1: 314 decided2026 Q2: 381 received2026 Q2: 294 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
87%
Action plan

Delivery 85–94%: the authority must publish an action plan. No presumption or buffer consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000014). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1979 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (189 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 294 242 52 17.7% — 76.7% 381
2026 Q1 314 247 67 21.3% 66.7% 75.8% 405
2025 Q4 268 230 38 14.2% 100.0% 87.1% 414
2025 Q3 322 276 46 14.3% 100.0% 61.8% 390
2025 Q2 374 301 73 19.5% — 69.2% 448
2025 Q1 306 251 55 18.0% 50.0% 70.6% 439
2024 Q4 310 273 37 11.9% 100.0% 46.7% 381
2024 Q3 355 311 44 12.4% 100.0% 62.1% 366
2024 Q2 339 302 37 10.9% — 60.0% 429
2024 Q1 302 253 49 16.2% 100.0% 33.3% 349
2023 Q4 304 262 42 13.8% 100.0% 41.2% 364
2023 Q3 350 296 54 15.4% 100.0% 60.6% 364
2023 Q2 330 301 29 8.8% 50.0% 56.7% 435
2023 Q1 363 320 43 11.8% 66.7% 58.3% 435
2022 Q4 377 333 44 11.7% 50.0% 70.6% 393
2022 Q3 411 341 70 17.0% 100.0% 68.1% 465
2022 Q2 377 355 22 5.8% 100.0% 78.3% 448
2022 Q1 338 302 36 10.7% 100.0% 72.7% 456
2021 Q4 391 362 29 7.4% 100.0% 88.0% 385
2021 Q3 461 428 33 7.2% 100.0% 90.6% 442
2021 Q2 429 407 22 5.1% — 83.9% 527
2021 Q1 367 345 22 6.0% 100.0% 88.9% 514
2020 Q4 392 362 30 7.7% 100.0% 95.5% 443
2020 Q3 354 321 33 9.3% 100.0% 90.3% 459
2020 Q2 323 298 25 7.7% 100.0% 92.1% 359
2020 Q1 384 349 35 9.1% 100.0% 75.8% 421
2019 Q4 410 374 36 8.8% 100.0% 66.7% 433
2019 Q3 419 382 37 8.8% 100.0% 76.5% 467
2019 Q2 398 359 39 9.8% 100.0% 87.9% 459
2019 Q1 390 348 42 10.8% 100.0% 78.9% 467
2018 Q4 419 378 41 9.8% 66.7% 79.4% 450
2018 Q3 412 365 47 11.4% 50.0% 73.7% 515
2018 Q2 464 413 51 11.0% 100.0% 77.4% 516
2018 Q1 371 343 28 7.5% 100.0% 83.3% 500
2017 Q4 432 383 49 11.3% 80.0% 71.1% 472
2017 Q3 492 446 46 9.3% 100.0% 67.9% 486
2017 Q2 428 397 31 7.2% 100.0% 82.7% 567
2017 Q1 370 329 41 11.1% 100.0% 89.8% 494
2016 Q4 364 333 31 8.5% 75.0% 76.5% 453
2016 Q3 438 394 44 10.0% 100.0% 84.8% 432
2016 Q2 463 427 36 7.8% 83.3% 86.9% 539
2016 Q1 418 389 29 6.9% 100.0% 77.4% 500
2015 Q4 424 390 34 8.0% 80.0% 77.9% 453
2015 Q3 429 405 24 5.6% 66.7% 77.8% 483
2015 Q2 399 378 21 5.3% 57.1% 65.2% 486
2015 Q1 361 339 22 6.1% 100.0% 73.4% 467
2014 Q4 362 337 25 6.9% 100.0% 79.7% 428
2014 Q3 423 393 30 7.1% 100.0% 71.1% 438
2014 Q2 460 421 39 8.5% 62.5% 76.3% 507
2014 Q1 363 325 29 8.0% 46.2% 73.3% 457
2013 Q4 444 404 30 6.8% 90.9% 79.1% 460
2013 Q3 476 441 27 5.7% 81.3% 79.6% 515
2013 Q2 489 437 40 8.2% 75.0% 72.7% 545
2013 Q1 343 312 24 7.0% 50.0% 72.9% 422
2012 Q4 386 354 21 5.4% 77.8% 71.0% 419
2012 Q3 479 421 54 11.3% 83.3% 72.0% 429
2012 Q2 442 377 61 13.8% 62.5% 63.7% 503
2012 Q1 391 336 51 13.0% 72.7% 71.3% 433
2011 Q4 375 291 82 21.9% 83.3% 78.9% 426
2011 Q3 478 414 59 12.3% 81.8% 78.6% 433
2011 Q2 420 365 54 12.9% 66.7% 67.3% 473
2011 Q1 342 293 45 13.2% 84.6% 77.3% 434
2010 Q4 382 322 54 14.1% 70.0% 79.8% 408
2010 Q3 461 394 63 13.7% 73.3% 74.0% 429
2010 Q2 414 372 39 9.4% 72.7% 83.3% 488
2010 Q1 363 302 56 15.4% 100.0% 88.4% 415
2009 Q4 407 337 65 16.0% 66.7% 77.1% 427
2009 Q3 412 351 60 14.6% 91.7% 82.2% 417
2009 Q2 379 327 49 12.9% 50.0% 82.4% 438
2009 Q1 374 318 52 13.9% 70.0% 78.2% 413
2008 Q4 455 387 65 14.3% 75.0% 70.8% 397
2008 Q3 458 387 69 15.1% 76.9% 74.3% 544
2008 Q2 512 422 88 17.2% 82.4% 72.1% 522
2008 Q1 454 377 74 16.3% 88.9% 67.9% 562
2007 Q4 597 492 103 17.3% 75.0% 77.6% 555
2007 Q3 678 568 107 15.8% 61.9% 78.3% 673
2007 Q2 630 529 94 14.9% 77.8% 77.5% 736
2007 Q1 541 440 95 17.6% 93.8% 80.2% 632
2006 Q4 547 449 95 17.4% 75.0% 78.1% 588
2006 Q3 634 517 110 17.4% 80.0% 59.2% 546
2006 Q2 591 491 97 16.4% 92.3% 76.3% 678
2006 Q1 521 425 89 17.1% 75.0% 75.6% 654
2005 Q4 478 387 83 17.4% 81.3% 59.5% 511
2005 Q3 588 510 72 12.2% 45.5% 70.6% 580
2005 Q2 657 545 110 16.7% 52.9% 64.1% 650
2005 Q1 521 439 74 14.2% 36.8% 62.9% 634
2004 Q4 632 534 90 14.2% 53.3% 69.1% 610
2004 Q3 689 565 118 17.1% 36.8% 61.6% 677
2004 Q2 785 701 81 10.3% 25.0% 50.6% 768
2004 Q1 492 427 59 12.0% 30.0% 37.8% 679
2003 Q4 563 474 83 14.7% 14.3% 48.6% 570
2003 Q3 643 572 67 10.4% 26.1% 37.6% 576
2003 Q2 573 536 33 5.8% 31.6% 35.0% 608
2003 Q1 551 517 30 5.4% 23.5% 38.6% 670
2002 Q4 554 506 45 8.1% 22.2% 39.1% 553
2002 Q3 575 525 44 7.7% 10.0% 34.8% 596
2002 Q2 584 544 38 6.5% 15.8% 43.2% 610
2002 Q1 470 441 19 4.0% 18.2% 38.8% 606
2001 Q4 480 451 21 4.4% 28.6% 40.7% 494
2001 Q3 557 509 37 6.6% 7.7% 50.0% 561
2001 Q2 506 469 31 6.1% 16.7% 51.9% 602
2001 Q1 404 370 31 7.7% 31.8% 46.0% 530
2000 Q4 399 350 41 10.3% 33.3% 44.9% 450
2000 Q3 455 415 33 7.3% 18.8% 47.7% 474
2000 Q2 451 403 42 9.3% 50.0% 48.2% 487
2000 Q1 434 390 39 9.0% 42.9% 59.3% 516
1999 Q4 435 390 42 9.7% 36.4% 59.3% 511
1999 Q3 467 420 41 8.8% 23.1% 54.2% 471
1999 Q2 488 453 34 7.0% 31.3% 54.1% 503
1999 Q1 377 332 39 10.3% 15.4% 54.4% 490
1998 Q4 455 407 41 9.0% 61.1% 48.1% 394
1998 Q3 434 386 39 9.0% 33.3% 33.8% 524
1998 Q2 414 363 33 8.0% 50.0% 49.0% 470
1998 Q1 371 304 38 10.2% 33.3% 50.0% 465
1997 Q4 367 314 45 12.3% 30.8% 28.0% 412
1997 Q3 471 424 38 8.1% 30.0% 16.1% 424
1997 Q2 318 280 25 7.9% 50.0% 17.4% 503
1997 Q1 326 292 26 8.0% 74.2% 29.1% 448
1996 Q4 522 444 66 12.6% 73.5% 37.9% 329
1996 Q3 400 343 47 11.8% 63.9% 31.9% 442
1996 Q2 245 223 13 5.3% 60.0% 34.4% 528
1996 Q1 202 177 25 12.4% 83.3% 60.0% —
1995 Q4 182 161 21 11.5% 57.1% 65.4% —
1995 Q3 469 418 51 10.9% 62.5% 73.2% —
1995 Q2 248 222 26 10.5% 62.5% 67.6% —
1995 Q1 190 163 27 14.2% 70.0% 80.4% —
1994 Q4 213 172 41 19.2% 77.8% 74.5% —
1994 Q3 293 263 30 10.2% 80.0% 68.6% —
1994 Q2 241 215 26 10.8% 100.0% 79.0% —
1994 Q1 198 170 28 14.1% 75.0% 60.0% —
1993 Q4 212 197 15 7.1% 0.0% 62.0% —
1993 Q3 226 196 30 13.3% 100.0% 56.4% —
1993 Q2 189 170 19 10.1% 100.0% 72.7% —
1993 Q1 221 198 23 10.4% 60.0% 54.8% —
1992 Q4 204 179 25 12.3% 16.7% 69.5% —
1992 Q3 239 199 40 16.7% 50.0% 84.1% —
1992 Q2 240 216 24 10.0% 100.0% 82.0% —
1992 Q1 227 189 38 16.7% 50.0% 77.3% —
1991 Q4 239 201 38 15.9% 100.0% 65.4% —
1991 Q3 206 172 34 16.5% 0.0% 58.1% —
1991 Q2 262 223 39 14.9% 50.0% 84.4% —
1991 Q1 247 183 64 25.9% 88.2% 72.1% —
1990 Q4 238 169 69 29.0% 50.0% 63.4% —
1990 Q3 203 148 55 27.1% 87.5% 69.5% —
1990 Q2 261 200 61 23.4% 0.0% 73.2% —
1990 Q1 245 176 69 28.2% 100.0% 65.9% —
1989 Q4 299 242 57 19.1% 75.0% 60.8% —
1989 Q3 286 223 63 22.0% 33.3% 45.4% —
1989 Q2 314 248 66 21.0% 50.0% 48.5% —
1989 Q1 282 234 48 17.0% 75.0% 18.3% —
1988 Q4 230 153 77 33.5% 55.6% 15.4% —
1988 Q3 226 196 30 13.3% 0.0% 59.2% —
1988 Q2 303 258 45 14.9% 40.0% 61.7% —
1988 Q1 269 192 77 28.6% 33.3% 53.3% —
1987 Q4 232 173 59 25.4% 66.7% 55.1% —
1987 Q3 263 212 51 19.4% 100.0% 42.3% —
1987 Q2 263 211 52 19.8% 80.0% 52.1% —
1987 Q1 200 168 32 16.0% 40.0% 58.1% —
1986 Q4 248 207 41 16.5% 75.0% 62.2% —
1986 Q3 302 255 47 15.6% 70.0% 49.5% —
1986 Q2 175 152 23 13.1% 25.0% 64.4% —
1986 Q1 165 143 22 13.3% 20.0% 78.8% —
1985 Q4 212 198 14 6.6% 60.0% 90.3% —
1985 Q3 271 237 34 12.5% 100.0% 91.0% —
1985 Q2 200 172 28 14.0% 100.0% 89.5% —
1985 Q1 198 168 30 15.2% 75.0% 85.3% —
1984 Q4 198 177 21 10.6% 100.0% 83.0% —
1984 Q3 219 197 22 10.0% 66.7% 85.0% —
1984 Q2 243 220 23 9.5% 100.0% 86.8% —
1984 Q1 180 160 20 11.1% 100.0% 82.9% —
1983 Q4 208 198 10 4.8% 50.0% 81.7% —
1983 Q3 227 198 29 12.8% 100.0% 86.1% —
1983 Q2 235 214 21 8.9% 70.0% 87.7% —
1983 Q1 151 133 18 11.9% 100.0% 81.5% —
1982 Q4 196 178 18 9.2% 100.0% 82.3% —
1982 Q3 205 181 24 11.7% 83.3% 82.1% —
1982 Q2 224 199 25 11.2% — 79.3% —
1982 Q1 170 153 17 10.0% 100.0% 80.3% —
1981 Q4 175 149 26 14.9% 100.0% 81.9% —
1981 Q3 232 197 35 15.1% 33.3% 88.8% —
1981 Q2 305 254 51 16.7% 100.0% 76.2% —
1981 Q1 211 181 30 14.2% 66.7% 79.1% —
1980 Q4 259 216 43 16.6% 16.7% 79.3% —
1980 Q3 226 201 25 11.1% 100.0% 81.3% —
1980 Q2 294 257 37 12.6% 75.0% 80.2% —
1980 Q1 252 217 35 13.9% 100.0% 79.3% —
1979 Q4 269 229 40 14.9% 66.7% 79.6% —
1979 Q3 235 194 41 17.4% 66.7% 67.6% —
1979 Q2 280 238 42 15.0% 100.0% 80.0% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me