← All authorities

North Lincolnshire

Yorkshire and the Humber · E06000013 · 121 quarters held (1996 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
681
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
11.2%
higher than 46% of authorities
Majors in time
90.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
90.0%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
96.1%
no formal threshold
Delegated
90.5%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
34.6%
74 allowed of 214 decided
Decisions overturned
1.6%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 16.4%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
838
in the window
Applications decided
681
in the window
Approval rate
88.8%
605 granted, 76 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 33 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
93.5%
rank 119 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 24 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major4082.5%90.0%
Minor23583.0%90.0%
Other40692.9%—
of which householder31593.3%96.1%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
01112212024 Q3: 163 received2024 Q3: 177 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 158 received2024 Q4: 186 decided2025 Q1: 217 received2025 Q1: 180 decided2025 Q2: 215 received2025 Q2: 208 decided2025 Q3: 203 received2025 Q3: 170 decided2025 Q4: 220 received2025 Q4: 162 decided2026 Q1: 221 received2026 Q1: 165 decided2026 Q2: 194 received2026 Q2: 184 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
137%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000013). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1996 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (121 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1996 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (121 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 184 175 9 4.9% 75.0% 85.0% 194
2026 Q1 165 144 21 12.7% 100.0% 87.0% 221
2025 Q4 162 143 19 11.7% 100.0% 91.7% 220
2025 Q3 170 143 27 15.9% 100.0% 95.7% 203
2025 Q2 208 179 29 13.9% 100.0% 82.4% 215
2025 Q1 180 154 26 14.4% 100.0% 84.0% 217
2024 Q4 186 162 24 12.9% 100.0% 84.0% 158
2024 Q3 177 159 18 10.2% 50.0% 70.0% 163
2024 Q2 248 216 32 12.9% 100.0% 69.8% 182
2024 Q1 195 163 32 16.4% 0.0% 66.7% 237
2023 Q4 237 208 29 12.2% 100.0% 70.3% 234
2023 Q3 185 169 16 8.6% — 42.9% 233
2023 Q2 225 201 24 10.7% — 35.0% 203
2023 Q1 194 173 21 10.8% 100.0% 88.0% 214
2022 Q4 194 170 24 12.4% 80.0% 76.9% 229
2022 Q3 253 234 19 7.5% — 88.1% 241
2022 Q2 279 248 31 11.1% 85.7% 84.6% 296
2022 Q1 214 186 28 13.1% 66.7% 80.0% 266
2021 Q4 294 265 29 9.9% 33.3% 66.1% 226
2021 Q3 306 279 27 8.8% 37.5% 65.7% 292
2021 Q2 305 282 23 7.5% 100.0% 83.3% 315
2021 Q1 249 225 24 9.6% 100.0% 87.5% 335
2020 Q4 241 217 24 10.0% 75.0% 91.1% 260
2020 Q3 247 222 25 10.1% 50.0% 81.1% 254
2020 Q2 246 219 27 11.0% 50.0% 86.5% 214
2020 Q1 240 206 34 14.2% 57.1% 69.1% 277
2019 Q4 211 177 34 16.1% 71.4% 96.8% 246
2019 Q3 239 218 21 8.8% 40.0% 89.5% 249
2019 Q2 262 238 24 9.2% 100.0% 93.8% 261
2019 Q1 237 221 16 6.8% 66.7% 92.9% 265
2018 Q4 287 258 29 10.1% 50.0% 79.4% 248
2018 Q3 247 226 21 8.5% 100.0% 81.1% 289
2018 Q2 234 220 14 6.0% 81.8% 91.1% 279
2018 Q1 257 242 15 5.8% 100.0% 79.7% 244
2017 Q4 241 212 29 12.0% 100.0% 84.7% 259
2017 Q3 256 235 21 8.2% 66.7% 81.1% 256
2017 Q2 255 237 18 7.1% 50.0% 87.8% 274
2017 Q1 246 220 26 10.6% 90.9% 94.7% 282
2016 Q4 227 209 18 7.9% 100.0% 88.9% 265
2016 Q3 281 257 24 8.5% 100.0% 90.0% 250
2016 Q2 278 253 25 9.0% 100.0% 78.9% 281
2016 Q1 208 190 18 8.7% 66.7% 72.7% 261
2015 Q4 268 241 27 10.1% 73.7% 56.5% 236
2015 Q3 314 290 24 7.6% 60.0% 57.3% 280
2015 Q2 303 284 19 6.3% 87.5% 62.0% 326
2015 Q1 241 212 29 12.0% 64.3% 44.2% 294
2014 Q4 246 212 34 13.8% 66.7% 37.4% 235
2014 Q3 257 233 24 9.3% 46.2% 24.7% 245
2014 Q2 201 179 22 10.9% 40.0% 45.7% 284
2014 Q1 227 203 20 8.8% 87.5% 64.3% 277
2013 Q4 313 286 24 7.7% 100.0% 76.4% 274
2013 Q3 280 261 16 5.7% 78.6% 67.0% 386
2013 Q2 316 295 19 6.0% 100.0% 72.4% 307
2013 Q1 262 240 20 7.6% 60.0% 75.2% 298
2012 Q4 205 186 18 8.8% 44.4% 79.8% 262
2012 Q3 286 255 29 10.1% 75.0% 70.7% 278
2012 Q2 323 289 32 9.9% 69.2% 78.8% 314
2012 Q1 291 255 36 12.4% 60.0% 85.0% 338
2011 Q4 323 288 33 10.2% 72.7% 82.6% 332
2011 Q3 315 284 26 8.3% 58.3% 76.9% 344
2011 Q2 309 269 38 12.3% 78.6% 89.6% 349
2011 Q1 319 294 23 7.2% 80.0% 79.6% 329
2010 Q4 322 290 30 9.3% 78.9% 72.4% 330
2010 Q3 297 261 28 9.4% 69.2% 77.9% 341
2010 Q2 305 273 29 9.5% 73.3% 81.3% 330
2010 Q1 264 229 29 11.0% 50.0% 84.2% 295
2009 Q4 257 219 37 14.4% 42.9% 74.2% 290
2009 Q3 369 304 57 15.4% 40.0% 87.2% 342
2009 Q2 356 311 42 11.8% 70.0% 84.6% 362
2009 Q1 248 199 46 18.5% 50.0% 69.6% 312
2008 Q4 375 302 67 17.9% 68.8% 78.7% 325
2008 Q3 381 304 77 20.2% 60.0% 82.8% 395
2008 Q2 446 377 67 15.0% 85.2% 78.1% 431
2008 Q1 357 295 58 16.2% 83.3% 79.1% 454
2007 Q4 456 390 65 14.3% 76.5% 86.9% 399
2007 Q3 428 354 70 16.4% 41.7% 78.7% 483
2007 Q2 453 386 65 14.3% 63.2% 76.8% 480
2007 Q1 414 339 75 18.1% 75.0% 79.0% 500
2006 Q4 385 324 61 15.8% 33.3% 73.5% 382
2006 Q3 414 355 59 14.3% 64.7% 75.9% 407
2006 Q2 500 432 67 13.4% 50.0% 74.9% 482
2006 Q1 376 333 39 10.4% 50.0% 85.9% 473
2005 Q4 421 348 73 17.3% 61.5% 72.4% 403
2005 Q3 471 388 80 17.0% 76.5% 71.3% 458
2005 Q2 501 420 80 16.0% 31.3% 70.0% 498
2005 Q1 481 393 84 17.5% 66.7% 74.6% 505
2004 Q4 516 423 91 17.6% 53.8% 60.8% 471
2004 Q3 548 444 104 19.0% 60.0% 59.8% 568
2004 Q2 585 502 83 14.2% 60.0% 60.3% 598
2004 Q1 452 382 70 15.5% 54.5% 29.8% 495
2003 Q4 477 387 90 18.9% 54.5% 31.8% 445
2003 Q3 394 347 47 11.9% 36.4% 40.9% 456
2003 Q2 433 400 31 7.2% 35.7% 39.7% 448
2003 Q1 388 344 44 11.3% 23.1% 42.7% 417
2002 Q4 405 374 31 7.7% 46.2% 41.3% 409
2002 Q3 427 400 27 6.3% 50.0% 47.4% 484
2002 Q2 392 366 26 6.6% 64.7% 59.1% 447
2002 Q1 319 292 27 8.5% 47.1% 56.8% 386
2001 Q4 354 326 26 7.3% 90.0% 64.6% 350
2001 Q3 343 321 21 6.1% 60.0% 59.8% 389
2001 Q2 340 311 23 6.8% 75.0% 57.8% 335
2001 Q1 286 264 22 7.7% 57.1% 55.0% 364
2000 Q4 326 290 30 9.2% 33.3% 59.9% 274
2000 Q3 378 351 22 5.8% 52.4% 52.6% 335
2000 Q2 289 266 21 7.3% 88.9% 50.8% 375
2000 Q1 301 268 30 10.0% 46.2% 58.6% 360
1999 Q4 335 312 20 6.0% 43.8% 57.0% 255
1999 Q3 349 320 26 7.4% 52.9% 38.1% 350
1999 Q2 314 288 23 7.3% 54.5% 41.7% 345
1999 Q1 279 260 17 6.1% 50.0% 29.8% 326
1998 Q4 281 271 10 3.6% 37.5% 46.4% 269
1998 Q3 353 331 20 5.7% 57.1% 46.4% 345
1998 Q2 329 312 17 5.2% 52.6% 50.9% 369
1998 Q1 319 291 25 7.8% 75.0% 57.6% 358
1997 Q4 320 301 18 5.6% 54.5% 68.8% 297
1997 Q3 347 326 21 6.1% 64.3% 58.3% 367
1997 Q2 327 305 20 6.1% 66.7% 71.8% 377
1997 Q1 264 234 27 10.2% 70.0% 52.8% 303
1996 Q4 322 290 30 9.3% 68.2% 65.9% 307
1996 Q3 303 273 23 7.6% 60.0% 62.4% 284
1996 Q2 315 288 23 7.3% 76.9% 59.3% 372

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me